logo
NC House passes $500M in Helene aid, $100 boost to weekly unemployment checks

NC House passes $500M in Helene aid, $100 boost to weekly unemployment checks

Yahoo26-02-2025
North Carolina Rep. Dudley Greene (R-Avery) urges the House to support a bill sending $500 million in aid to western North Carolina after Hurricane Helene on Feb. 25, 2025. (Photo: Galen Bacharier/NC Newsline)
The North Carolina House approved a pair of key bills Tuesday, passing the next round of Hurricane Helene relief and an increase in the state's weekly unemployment payouts.
Both measures received bipartisan support; the Helene aid bill now heads to the Senate, where leaders have been quiet about their exact plans. The unemployment bill requires one more vote to pass the House.
House Bill 47, state lawmakers' third round of aid for western North Carolina, sends $500 million in new spending to the mountains. It passed the House unanimously.
The relief bill includes $150 million for a new homebuilding program, $150 million for agricultural relief and $100 million to repair private roads and bridges in the region.
Efforts by the legislature to get new money flowing have taken on a new sense of urgency with questions plentiful and mounting at the federal level, months after the storm. Officials had already expected months-long delays on money to rebuild homes. And reported White House cuts to key offices could further complicate another bundle of money arriving on time.
Rep. Dudley Greene (R-Avery), one of the lead sponsors of the bill, said it would address 'immediate needs' in the mountains.
'We all hope that that money will start flowing soon,' said Greene. 'But I fully expect that this won't be the last that will be needed. In this or future sessions.'
The bill marks the General Assembly's largest investment in Helene relief since mid-October, when it approved a $600 million aid bill. And it brings the state's total spending on Helene to about $1.1 billion.
Gov. Josh Stein and his fellow Democrats have continued to urge, without success, higher levels of spending in the latest round of aid. Stein requested $1 billion earlier this month, including money for a small business grant program and for schools to fund summer classes.
'We are five months out from this storm,' said Rep. Lindsey Prather (D-Buncombe). 'We've got to move quicker, and we've got to spend more. We have a rainy day fund for a reason. Let's use it.'
House Speaker Destin Hall (R-Caldwell) told reporters Tuesday that the current approach to sending aid allowed for further transparency on how the money has spent. Republicans remain wary of disaster relief after one of the offices leading recovery efforts in eastern North Carolina in response to past hurricanes ran up a major deficit.
'Instead of just passing one bill and sending all of that money to the governor in one go, we're going to have oversight of it over time,' Hall said.
It remains to be seen whether the Senate will make major changes to the aid bill. Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger (R-Rockingham) said earlier this month that the chamber could either take up the House bill or begin moving its own.
The House also gave initial approval to a bill boosting the state's weekly unemployment payouts by $100 on Tuesday.
House Bill 48 would raise North Carolina's maximum weekly payment from the current $350 to $450. It earned initial approval in the House on a 115-1 vote.
The bill would mark the first increase in unemployment benefits since they were slashed almost a decade ago. Facing with repaying a federal loan from in the aftermath of the Great Recession, lawmakers in 2013 dramatically cut the total length of unemployment eligibility and capped the weekly payment at $350. Since then, North Carolina's unemployment benefits have been among the least generous in the country.
When first introduced, the bill increased the weekly payment to $400. A Democratic-led push to boost it further, to $450, found bipartisan support during the committee process.
The increase, if it becomes law, would spend around $584 million from the state's unemployment fund over the next five years, according to legislative staff's analysis. But the staff still expects the fund to 'continue to increase,' even with increased benefits.
After Hurricane Helene, former Gov. Roy Cooper issued an executive order increasing the maximum weekly unemployment check to $600. That order expires March 1.
The bill both ratifies that executive order while also declaring that the governor did not have the authority to issue it in the first place. Democrats have expressed concerns that the language could stop governors from moving to respond to future disasters effectively.
Rep. Deb Butler (D-New Hanover), the sole 'no' vote, said the bill was 'just another step in a rather calculated effort to undermine the balance of power in this state.'
'Let's allow our governor to use his best judgement during emergencies,' Butler said.
House Republicans have signaled that their party colleagues in the Senate may be less enthusiastic about the $450 figure. Berger told reporters earlier this month that 'we probably need to raise' the payment — but declined to commit to a specific amount.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump caught Democrats in a trap — torn by their Medicaid lies
Trump caught Democrats in a trap — torn by their Medicaid lies

New York Post

time4 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump caught Democrats in a trap — torn by their Medicaid lies

This week, President Donald Trump officially launched his push to remove illegal aliens from state Medicaid rolls by cross-checking them against federal databases, a move that's sure to send Democrats running to the courts yet again. But when it comes to illegal immigrants and welfare, Democrats have a serious problem — and it's not just their continuing slide in favorability. It's that they just can't make up their minds about whether or not those here illegally are receiving federal Medicaid dollars at all. Advertisement When Congress was debating Trump's One Big, Beautiful Bill Act, one of the left's oft-repeated refrains was that there was no need to ban illegal aliens from Medicaid's rolls — because giving them its benefits was already against the law. They conveniently forgot to mention the 12 states that explicitly expanded non-emergency Medicaid coverage to illegal immigrants, and the other gaping loopholes being exploited nationwide. But in June, Trump made a move that forced Democrats drop the act and show their hand: His Health and Human Services Department began sharing Medicaid data from four states and Washington, DC, with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Advertisement Cue the outrage. Within days California Attorney General Rob Bonta, New York AG Letitia James and 19 other blue states filed suit in federal court to block the data-sharing — and gave up the game in the process. Democrats love to lie in the court of public opinion — but in a courtroom, you've got to tell the truth. And by suing to stop Team Trump, they practically confessed: Illegal aliens are on Medicaid, and blue states are desperate to keep it that way. Advertisement Since then HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (or CMS) Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz have doubled down, expanding their partnership with ICE to include nationwide Medicaid data. To help their effort, Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-Tex.) demanded that Gov. Kathy Hochul cough up the data on Medicaid-receiving illegal immigrants in the Empire State, citing her legal obligations to regularly report enrollment and eligibility data to the federal government. The Democrats' lawsuits continue their track record of fighting beyond the limits of their power to protect illegal aliens — in this case by keeping their Medicaid data 'safe' — while endangering law-abiding Americans. Their claims that no illegal aliens take advantage of Medicaid benefits also fly in the face of Medicaid's own records. Advertisement Between 2021 and 2023, taxpayers spent at least $16 billion on emergency services for illegal immigrants, CMS has reported, with federal taxpayers covering more than 70% of those costs. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters When you add in the billions likely spent on non-emergency services in direct circumvention of federal law, the total figure of Medicaid resources going to illegal aliens is incalculable — an enormous transfer of wealth from Americans to non-citizens who shouldn't be here at all. Welfare benefits like Medicaid have been some of the strongest magnets spurring mass migration into this country and encouraging people to illegally stay. Halting those perks, as Trump and Republicans in Congress are rightly doing, will do much to turn the magnet off. Stealing from Medicaid is especially grievous because the program is intended to help America's most vulnerable, including low-income children and people with disabilities. When illegal aliens or other ineligible people take Medicaid, they not only suck up taxpayer resources, they reroute precious resources from legitimate Medicaid recipients who already have to compete for a limited pool of providers. It's downright despicable — yet Democrats in Congress and in at least 20 blue states seem more than happy to run interference to ensure that it continues. Advertisement Some Democrats are begging for their party to moderate after November's resounding defeat. Some — like New York City primary voters — are sprinting further to the left. If they want to appeal to the majority of voters in the coming midterms, though, they need to get their Medicaid stories straight. Advertisement More important, they need to get their priorities straight. Instead of robbing from taxpayers to give to law-breakers, Democrats should protect Medicaid for the Americans who truly need it. They could do that by following the lead of Republicans like Gov. Jeff Landry of Louisiana, who just signed a law referring illegal aliens fraudulently receiving welfare to ICE so they can be deported. If Democrats can't make up their minds about illegal aliens and welfare, the American people will make up their minds about the Democrats — and keep rejecting them at the ballot box. Hayden Dublois is the Data and Analytics Director for the Foundation for Government Accountability.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signs redistricting measure in response to new Texas House map
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signs redistricting measure in response to new Texas House map

New York Post

time4 minutes ago

  • New York Post

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signs redistricting measure in response to new Texas House map

California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom signed off Thursday evening on a redistricting plan aimed at countering Texas Republicans' planned implementation of new congressional maps for the Lone Star State. Newsom enacted the so-called 'Election Rigging Response Act,' setting a Nov. 4 special election asking whether Golden State voters approve of new House districts designed by legislators. The Democrat-controlled state Senate passed the special election measure in a 30-8 vote, shortly after the Dem-held state Assembly approved it in a 57-20 vote. Advertisement If the new map is approved by voters — and if it survives near-certain legal challenges — Democrats could win up to five additional House seats in next year's midterm elections, canceling out the five seats Republicans in Texas are expected to gain as a result of their redistricting push. Newsom announced that California would forge ahead with redistricting at a rally-like press conference in Los Angeles last week. AFP via Getty Images 'The president and the Texas Republicans are rigging the election … it is our duty to fight fire with fire,' state Sen. Jerry McNerney (D-East Bay) said during debate on the measure. Advertisement McNerney argued that 'California voters should have the right to decide if the state should respond to the president's effort to rig the election.' Since the measure seeks to override the Golden State's voter-approved, nonpartisan redistricting commission, a special election is necessary to redraw the existing congressional map. State Democrats maintain that the mid-decade redistricting measure is a one-off, needed to directly respond to Texas Republicans, but some in the legislature expressed fear that California would never return to its original system. President Trump strongly backed Texas' effort to redraw congressional maps in the Lone Star State. REUTERS Advertisement 'With the reported involvement of the [Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee] in this action – that has been developed behind the scenes – one has to be awfully suspicious of significant changes to this process,' argued Republican state Sen. Roger Niello (R-Sacramento County). 'Indeed, the intent or the power to continue on our previous track after 2030 is of great concern to me and I think should be of great concern to everybody who votes in favor of this,' he added. Former President Barack Obama weighed in on California's redistricting earlier this week at a DCCC fundraiser, arguing that Newsom's plan 'was a smart, measured approach' to counter Texas' move.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store