Supreme Court issues notice on PIL seeking display of detailed info about sellers, service providers
A Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyaya seeking a declaration that every consumer has right to know not only about the quality, quantity, potency, purity, standard, manufacturing as well as expiry date and certification of goods and products, but also about the details of the distributer, dealer, trader, seller and shop owner to seek redressal against unfair trade practices, restrictive trade practices and unscrupulous exploitation.
The plea also sought a direction that every distributor, dealer, trader, seller and shop owner display full details of registration or license, including name, address, number of employees and phone number at the entry gate in bold letters on a display board visible to an ordinary person.
It said that the 'Right to Know' about sellers and service providers is secured under the Consumer Protection Act, read with Article 19 of the Constitution.
'Therefore, every consumer has the right to access details of product, service, as well as distributor, dealer, trader, seller and shop owner before making a purchase,' stated the plea.
It added that 'Right to Know' is crucial for consumers to make informed choices and to protect themselves from unfair and restrictive trade practices and unscrupulous exploitation. As per the petition, 'Right to Know' helps consumers avoid falling prey to fraudulent or deceptive distributors, dealers, traders, sellers and shop owners, who might misrepresent products/services or disappear after sale, purchase and money transaction.
The petitioner claimed that while travelling to Haridwar, he found many motels, restaurants and eateries on the Delhi-Haridwar highway, which were not displaying their registration, owner's name, address and contact number, and this is happening pan India.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Nashik civic body gets state's nod for 227cr sewage project
Nashik: The civic body received state govt's nod to begin works for a Rs227 crore sewage project at a state-level meeting in Mumbai on Monday. The state-level technical committee gave its approval to the sewage project of Nashik Municipal Corporation (NMC) under which sewerage lines with a total length of 80km are to be laid down in different parts of the city. The project will be funded under central govt's Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) scheme. While state govt will provide 25% of the total funds, Centre too will contribute 25%. NMC will spend the remaining 50% of the project cost on its own. Superintending Engineer (Water & Sewage Management) of NMC Ravindra Dharanakar said: "Now we will prepare the tender document for the project, which will be sent again to state govt for approval. After this, we will float the tender for the project. This will take around a couple of months." The sewerage lines are to be laid in all six divisions of NMC. Some of the existing old sewerage lines will be replaced with new ones.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Secretly recorded conversations may be evidence, but erode spousal trust
In a landmark judgment in a divorce case (Vibhor Garg vs Neha), the Supreme Court has accepted the admissibility of secretly recorded conversations between a married couple as reliable evidence. Vibhor Garg had filed a divorce petition under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in a family court at Bathinda in Punjab on the grounds of mental cruelty by his wife, Neha. The petitioner adduced conversations between him and his wife recorded by him over a period of time without her consent and knowledge to buttress his allegations of mental cruelty. The evidence was admitted by the family court. However, on appeal against its decision, the Punjab & Haryana High Court took an opposing view, holding the secretly recorded calls violative of the fundamental right to privacy as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution. Justice Lisa Gill held that the conversations were in clear breach of the privacy rights, and set aside the decision of the family court. Aggrieved by this decision, the petitioner approached the Supreme Court, which on July 14 ruled in favour of the husband by accepting the recorded conversations, though they were made without the consent and knowledge of the spouse. Complete lack of trust The Supreme Court Bench, comprising Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma, used the recorded conversations to conclude that the marriage in question had reached a point of a broken relationship, where one spouse was actively snooping on the other, denoting a complete lack of trust between them, the very bedrock of a marriage. In essence, the Supreme Court admitted the recorded conversations to decide on the broken marriage rather than as an absolute question of privacy laws. The court also relied on the exception provided in Section 122 of the Indian Evidence Act, which permits the disclosure of recorded marital communications in suits between married persons or proceedings in which one married person is prosecuted for any crime committed against the other. The Bench observed: 'We do not think there is any breach of privacy in this case. Section 122 of the Evidence Act does not recognise any such right. On the other hand, it carves out an exception to the right to privacy between spouses and therefore cannot be applied horizontally at all.' The Family Courts Act, 1984 grants a family court discretion to admit evidence, including reports, statements, documents, information, or other matters, that, in its opinion, will assist in effectively handling a dispute, even if that evidence might not meet the admissibility benchmark under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. This provision allows the family courts to consider a broader range of evidence, including recorded conversations, in deciding matrimonial disputes. The court recognised that instances of mental suffering were very private and recorded conversations assisted the family court in deciding the matter appropriately. It reaffirmed its commitment to a fair trial, an inalienable right provided by Article 21 of the Constitution. Important form of evidence Call recordings have become an important form of evidence in legal proceedings. The Information Technology Act, 2000 and the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 are the primary laws related to electronic records and the admissibility of these records. The admissibility of call recordings in Indian courts has been a matter of debate and controversy for several years. The K.S. Puttaswamy judgment (2017) established privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. However, the Supreme Court, in this case, has interpreted the right to privacy in the specific context of matrimonial discord, the exception provided in the Evidence Act, and the admissibility of relevant evidence in a family court proceeding to decide a case. The judgment reaffirms the admissibility of secretly recorded conversations, based on the precedent set in R.M. Malkani vs State of Maharashtra. The admissibility of recorded electronic evidence was also examined in S. Pratap Singh vs State of Punjab, in which the Supreme Court accepted an unauthorisedly obtained tape-recorded conversation between two parties. The court evaluated the evidentiary value of the tape-recorded conversation and accepted it as evidence only because it was essential to resolving the case. Some believe the judgment will promote spousal surveillance and abuse of privacy laws to be used against an unsuspecting partner in future. Research established that women are generally at the receiving end in a family or a live-in relationship. The male counterpart enjoys greater coercive control. Admission of recorded conversations between spouses will create a greater atmosphere of suspicion, a trust deficit, and an abuse of privacy laws. The admissibility of call recordings in Indian courts depends on several factors, including the authenticity, accuracy, and reliability of the recordings, the relevance and probative value of the recordings to the issue at hand, and the circumstances under which the recordings were made. As technology continues to evolve, the admissibility of electronic evidence, including call recordings, will likely remain a subject of judicial scrutiny and interpretation. The admissibility of electronic evidence, such as recorded telephone or mobile conversations and video clips, often raises concerns regarding the right to privacy. While electronic evidence is accepted in a court of law, it is not generally legal for individuals to record conversations without authorisation due to the violation of the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution. However, in Vibhor Garg vs Neha, the Supreme Court has emphasised that the use of recorded conversations as evidence is admissible only in cases involving matrimonial or family discord. Only time will tell if the courts in India will be liberal in accepting such evidence in other cases also. (The writer is a former Director-General of Police, Himachal Pradesh; view are personal)
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bullet train project to be completed by Dec 2029, govt tells LS
New Delhi: The Centre on Wednesday said the entire Ahmedabad-Mumbai bullet train project is likely to be completed by Dec 2029, with the section falling in Gujarat to be completed by Dec 2027. This comes months after Maharashtra chief minister Devendra Fadnavis announced that he expected the entire bullet train corridor to be operational by 2028. Interestingly, while the Centre has maintained that the timeline for the country's first high-speed train project has been pushed back due to delay in land acquisition and forest clearance for the Maharashtra section, there is delay in work on the Gujarat portion as well. In a written reply to a question in Lok Sabha, the railway ministry submitted that the Vapi-Sabarmati section in Gujarat is "planned to be completed by Dec, 2027" and the entire Maharashtra to Sabarmati section "is expected to be completed by Dec, 2029". The foundation stone for the project was laid in Sep 2017. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai It added that since the project is very complex and technology-intensive, "Exact timelines for the completion of the project can be reasonably ascertained after the completion of all associated works of civil structures, track, electrical, signaling and telecommunication and supply of trainsets". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Time is running out! Green Card Registration americ24 Undo The 508-km corridor with 12 stations is being executed with technical and financial assistance from the Japanese govt. Though the project cost has increased significantly due to the delay, the ministry told the lower House that the total estimated cost is around Rs 1.1 lakh crore. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) is funding 81% of the project cost and the balance 19% is being funded through equity contribution from railways (50%) and the two states of Maharashtra and Gujarat (50%). Till June end, around Rs 78,839 crore had been spent on the project. The National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd (NHRSCL) is yet to bid out two of the 28 tender packages. The ministry said that 392 km of pier construction, 329 km of girder casting and 308 km of girder launching have been completed so far. Work on the undersea tunnel (21 km) has also started.
