logo
UK Government promises Edinburgh festivals new investment

UK Government promises Edinburgh festivals new investment

He pledged that the Government would work to ensure the city's festivals - which date back to the aftermath of the Second World War - remain at the 'pinnacle' of the global culture scene in the face of growing competition.
Read more:
He said it was essential for the UK and Scottish governments to work together to tackle concerns over the cost of accommodation for performers and public transport provision during the festivals.
Mr Murray said the Government wanted to build on initiatives like an official partnership recently been formed with the Royal Edinburgh Military Tattoo to help promote Scotland around the world.
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray at the Filmhouse cinema in Edinburgh, which the UK Government has helped refurbish and restore ahead of its reopening this month. (Image: Ian Georgeson) He stressed the importance of investing in the city's cultural infrastructure, including venues like the Filmhouse cinema, which will reopen next week.
The Government has provided the bulk of the funding for a £2m revamp of the Filmhouse, the historic home of the Edinburgh International Film Festival.
Edinburgh's festivals have been running since 1947.Both were forced to shut down suddenly in October 2022 after the financial collapse of their operator.
The Government has also committed £2m to an ongoing restoration of the King's Theatre, one of the Edinburgh International Festival's key venues, which will reopen next year.
The cast of Pentheselia, which was staged at last year's Edinburgh International Festival. (Image: Newsquest)
A further £10m has been pledged for a project that will create Edinburgh's first new purpose-built concert hall for a century, which will also host festival performances from 2029.
Other major infrastructure projects expected to require funding in the next few years include a refurbishment of Leith Theatre, which was last open permanently in the early 1980s, and an overhaul of the Ross Bandstand, which opened in West Princes Street Gardens in 1935.
The work nearing completion at the Filmhouse, which screened its first films in 1979, involves the refurbishment of its café-bar, box office and foyer spaces, while its screening rooms will reopen with a reduced capacity, but with more leg room and more comfortable seats.
The Government has provided £1.5m for the project, which was instigated by a group of former Filmhouse employees.
A crowdfunding campaign they launched in September 2023 has raised more than £330,000 to date after it was backed by stars including Jack Lowden, Brian Cox, Alan Cumming, Emma Thompson, Dougray Scott, Kate Dickie and Timothy Spall.
Speaking during a visit to the Filmhouse, which is due to reopen on June 27, Mr Murray said: 'The Filmhouse is a cultural institution, not just for Edinburgh but for the whole of Scotland.
'It has been refurbished after group of film-lovers who had been involved in the Filmhouse came together after it closed to say: 'We are not going to let this go.'
'Their dreams have come alive and it will reopen for film lovers from all over the world.
'I think the UK has a real role to play in cultural institutions like this.
'They are not just about arts and culture, they are about economic development, jobs, education, skills.
'When you talk to people who have been involved in the Filmhouse project, they've been ushers, they've sold popcorn and they've worked in the box office.
'This is about our cultural heritage. It is really important for both the UK and Scottish governments to invest in these institutions like the Filmhouse and the King's Theatre.
'There is a whole list of things in Edinburgh and right across Scotland of things that have to be done.
'When the doors open at the Filmhouse, people will realise that it is is the kind of thing we have to be putting funding into.'
The UK Government has not traditionally supported Edinburgh's festivals, with their public funding coming from the Scottish Government, its agencies Creative Scotland and EventScotland, and Edinburgh City Council.
However there was a significant breakthrough two years ago when the then Conservative Government agreed to provide £8.6m for the Edinburgh International Festival and the Fringe.
Around £1m has been invested in a "Keep It Fringe Fund," which is supporting 180 artists and companies from across the UK to bring work to the festival this summer, while £6m is ringfenced for a new headquarters for the Fringe Society, the arts charity which oversees the event.
It was announced in April that the Scotland Office had formed an official partnership with the Tattoo, which will celebrate its 75th anniversary this year. Announced during the Tartan Week celebrations in New York, the deal will see the Tattoo represented in key 'Brand Scotland' trade missions around the world.
The UK Government is now part of a new 'Festivals City Leadership Group,' which was instigated by the city council to help shape the future of Edinburgh's major cultural events over the next five years.
Mr Murray pointed out that Edinburgh's festivals had faced competition from festivals within the UK, including in Brighton and Manchester, and as far afield as Australia.
He added: 'We are world leaders in festivals in culture in Scotland. Everybody across the world knows that. But we are not alone in having festivals. They have been replicated across the UK and overseas.
'What we are doing in Edinburgh is very much unique and world-leading. But it is going to take a lot of effort to keep them there, so have to work with the festivals to make sure they stay right at the pinnacle of the international cultural scene.
'They are not just Edinburgh's festivals. They are international festivals which happen to be in Edinburgh and we are very lucky to have them here.
'I want to work with the festivals make to sure they don't just stay as they are, but that they can flourish and develop.'
Mr Murray, who has been an Edinburgh MP since 2010, suggested the Government wanted to recognise and capitalise on the full range of benefits delivered from Edinburgh's festivals, which were valued at £407m to the economy in 2023.
He told The Herald: 'Our cultural organisations are really good door-openers for all sorts of things to do with trade and diplomacy, and to bring people here to enjoy themselves, and to invest, live and work here.
'The festivals are cultural institutions that we should nurture.
'We need to bring new money into them, but there are a whole host of structural things around the festivals that need to be dealt with, for example the cost of accommodation for people coming here, transport and connectivity, and pushing the festivals out of the centre of Edinburgh into more of our communities.
'We are working with them to make sure that we can put in place not just funding, but also the regulatory environment to make sure they can thrive.
"It is about both governments working together. We should be working together to make sure we get maximum back for the taxpayer buck when when it is going into these kind of cultural institutions.'
Mr Murray said he fully supported calls for Edinburgh's festivals to secure a share of the city's new tourist tax, which will be applied to all bookings in the made for next summer on or after October 1 this year.
He added: "The visitor levy is about having visitors contributing a bit into the city in order for the city to give a bit back. That should be going into culture, public realm and connectivity.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Welsh transport secretary reviews Raglan A40 junction
Welsh transport secretary reviews Raglan A40 junction

South Wales Argus

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Argus

Welsh transport secretary reviews Raglan A40 junction

Welsh Government cabinet secretary for transport and north Wales, Ken Skates, visited Monmouthshire to review the A40 junction at Raglan, following repeated calls for action from residents and politicians. The visit included a site inspection and a formal meeting with stakeholders in Raglan. South Wales East MS Laura Anne Jones described the meeting as 'really useful and productive,' and said: "It seems we can achieve some improvements over the next year – 'quick wins' – that will, until a more permanent solution is found, be of some comfort to the Raglan and surrounding areas community." Peter Fox, MS for Monmouth, said: "I am very happy to see the cabinet secretary here in my constituency, to listen to our concerns and to see the problem first hand." Monmouthshire County Council said it welcomed the recent introduction of a 50mph speed limit, but believes further short-term measures are needed to improve safety. The council said: "While we are pleased to see our request for the 50mph on this stretch introduced, we believe implementing additional short-term measures could further support safety. "However, while average speeds have been reduced, compliance is not universal, and the South Wales Trunk Roads Agency has agreed to look at additional measures in the short term. "Monmouthshire County Council will continue to explore what measures within our control can also be implemented." The council said it remains 'committed' to working with partners including the Welsh Government on the situation.

Ignore 'hysteria' around Loch Lomond Flamingo Land, says developer
Ignore 'hysteria' around Loch Lomond Flamingo Land, says developer

Glasgow Times

timean hour ago

  • Glasgow Times

Ignore 'hysteria' around Loch Lomond Flamingo Land, says developer

Lomond Banks – owned by theme park operator Flamingo Land – has proposed to build more than 100 lodges, two hotels, a water park, monorail and parking spaces for more than 300 cars at the site, on the southern shores of the loch at Balloch, West Dunbartonshire. Last week, the Scottish Government took the decision to call in the application, which had been given the green light by a Government reporter despite heavy backlash from campaigners. The reporter elected to approve the application, subject to 49 conditions, despite the unanimous rejection of the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park authority and objections from the Woodland Trust, the National Trust for Scotland and the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (Sepa). Minister Ivan McKee had previously ruled out an intervention on the issue but, last week, said the decision was of 'national significance'. The decision came 24 hours before a motion tabled by Labour deputy leader Dame Jackie Baillie was due for a vote, with the motion passing unanimously. On Monday, Lomond Banks development director Jim Paterson said the firm was 'extremely disappointed' MSPs had voted last week to force the application to be called. 'We have engaged with the planning process in good faith, following every regulation and expectation set by the National Park and Scotland's new national planning framework,' he said. 'The land in question has been allocated for sustainable tourism development for decades, a fact acknowledged by the DPEA (Planning and Environmental Appeals Division) reporter. 'To have this long-established planning context disregarded at the 11th hour raises serious questions not only about the integrity and consistency of the Scottish planning system, but also about Scotland as an investment destination.' The director went on to urge ministers to back the proposals. 'We now call on all ministers, especially the planning minister, to uphold the integrity of the planning system,' he said. 'This process must remain impartial and evidence-led, not subjected to political opportunism or pressure campaigns built on misinformation. 'The rules must apply fairly and equally to all, or public trust in the system will be irreparably damaged. 'We urge the Scottish Government to see through the hysteria and consider not just the facts of this proposal, but the precedent it sets for all future investment in Scotland.' Paterson accused opponents of the development – spearheaded by Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer – of a 'sensationalist and misleading campaign' full of 'mistruths and inaccuracies'. Contrary to the 150,000 people who signed a petition to halt the plans, and the 50,000 who wrote to the Scottish Government to intervene, Paterson claimed the project has 'strong local support'. 'Anyone genuinely interested in the views of the Scottish people need only look at the widespread positive engagement on social media and elsewhere, reflecting a clear desire for sustainable, year-round economic activity and job creation,' he said. According to a study commissioned by Lomond Banks, 200 jobs would be created in the area, 80 full-time and 120 part-time or seasonal, though the study suggested a net of just 61 jobs would result from the £43.5 million development. Paterson also took issue with the description of Flamingo Land as a 'Yorkshire company'. 'Flamingo Land is a Scottish-registered business, incorporated in 1973, and all taxable profits are retained within Scotland,' he said. The company is registered at an address in Uddingston, South Lanarkshire, but its key site is in Yorkshire, with all three of the firm's active directors on Companies House being based south of the border. Greer accused the developer of being 'desperate', adding that the company 'have treated the people of Balloch with complete contempt' and claiming multiple surveys have shown local opposition to the plans. 'Flamingo Land would rather throw accusations around than address the many, many ways in which their mega-resort would be a disaster for the National Park,' he said. 'The evidence all points one way – the Scottish Government must reject this application and save Loch Lomond.'

Poll suggests support for better end-of-life care over assisted dying Bill
Poll suggests support for better end-of-life care over assisted dying Bill

South Wales Argus

time2 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

Poll suggests support for better end-of-life care over assisted dying Bill

The polling, commissioned by a group opposed to assisted dying being legalised, 'blows apart the arguments that the public are desperate' for a change in the law, a campaigner claimed. Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater said last week that MPs should not have to choose between supporting assisted dying or palliative care as it is not an 'either/or' conversation for dying people. She said palliative care and assisted dying 'can and do work side by side to give terminally-ill patients the care and choice they deserve in their final days', and urged MPs to support 'all options available to terminally ill people'. An amendment to the Bill, requiring the Health Secretary to publish an assessment of the availability, quality and distribution of palliative and end-of-life care one year after the Bill passing into law, could be voted on on Friday. Friday is also set to be the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill's third reading stage, which is likely to see the overall Bill voted on for the first time since November's historic yes vote, when a majority of 55 supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales. The latest polling, commissioned by Care Not Killing and carried out by British Polling Council member Whitestone, saw 2,089 UK adults surveyed online between May 30 and June 1. Respondents, who are said to have been weighted to be a representative sample, were told of concerns raised by the Royal Colleges of Physicians and Psychiatrists and the Association for Palliative Medicine about the Bill in its current form as well as opposition from disability campaigners. Campaigners gathered in Parliament Square earlier this month (James Manning/PA) In this context, they were asked about replacing the Bill with a plan to improve and invest in palliative care – to which 69% agreed, and about a Royal Commission being set up to consider and make recommendations for a holistic end-of-life and palliative care service – with which 61% agreed. Almost two thirds (65%) said the Government's priority should be sorting out palliative and social care before changing the law – down very slightly from 66% last year. Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of Care Not Killing, said: 'This major new poll blows apart the arguments that the public are desperate for a so-called assisted dying law. 'The public want the Government and MPs to focus on fixing the NHS and palliative care which they know are broken. After all one in four Brits who would benefit from palliative care aren't currently receiving it, while in many places services are piecemeal, part-time or facing cuts.' Former prime minister Gordon Brown (Lucy North/PA) It comes as former prime minister Gordon Brown repeated his opposition to assisted dying. Writing in the Guardian, he said: 'It has become clear that whatever views people hold on the principle, passing the terminally ill adults (end of life) bill into law would privilege the legal right to assisted dying without guaranteeing anything approaching an equivalent right to high-quality palliative care for those close to death.' He said MP's personal preferences 'cannot be separated off from the duties they have as members of a community to ensure that the way we treat the dying reflects the values of a decent, compassionate country'. He added: 'That should mean upholding the role of the medical professions as care-givers, and exclusively care-givers; avoiding the possibility of private profiteering by legal-medical consortiums which might well commercialise assisted dying as a lucrative business; safeguarding vulnerable people about whose fate the royal medical colleges have all expressed concern; preventing unacceptable coercive pressures that can be brought to bear on disabled people, and those who are incapacitated or mentally stressed; and thus showing that as a society we value life above death.' Dozens of Labour MPs called for Friday's overall vote to be delayed, asking for more time to scrutinise a Bill they brand as 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'. Writing to Commons leader Lucy Powell, they said: 'We implore you as the Leader of the House to allocate more Parliamentary time to the scrutiny of this Bill, the valid concerns that members have about its implementation, and the consequences it could have on vulnerable populations.' A Government spokesperson said: 'This Bill has been brought as a Private Members' Bill. The amount of time for debate is therefore a matter for the House.' Labour MP Kim Leadbeater is the sponsor of the Bill (Jordan Pettitt/PA) The Bill's sponsor, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, has repeatedly stated that her proposed legislation has been strengthened since it was first introduced last year, insisting it is subject to robust safeguards. Medical staff are among some of the MPs who back the Bill. As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer voted in favour of the Bill last year, but said the Government remains neutral on the issue. Both Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood voted against.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store