Europe's defense puts a fresh twist on steel, growth engine of old
THE HAGUE, Netherlands — For generations, the blast furnaces of the Ruhr Valley, Silesia and Lorraine have formed the backbone of European heavy industry. Now, an uncertain geopolitical environment has thrust them back into the center of attention, with the European Union vowing to revitalize the continent's metals sector.
The pitch: Europe wants to redouble its efforts to make steel 'green' – producing the key ingredients for tanks, shells and ships in an environmentally conscious way.
The European Steel and Metals Action Plan, released on March 19, represents Brussels' most comprehensive strategy yet to shore up an industry facing multiple existential threats: Chinese overcapacity, crippling energy costs, and the looming shadow of new American tariffs — all while fostering its transformation to climate neutrality.
The steel industry is one of the largest producers of greenhouse gases globally, responsible for roughly a tenth of total CO2 emissions. This is because it takes immense amounts of heat and, by extension, energy to melt the metal in blast furnaces.
But with European rearmament en vogue and free international trade out of fashion, the continent is set to experience a boom in demand for steel as a key ingredient in its buildup of its armed forces.
The plan's linking of industrial policy to defense readiness represents a significant shift in how Brussels frames its economic priorities. Commission officials explicitly linked the question of steel production to defense readiness amid rising tensions with Russia and uncertainty about long-term American security guarantees.
The European Commission, headed by Ursula von der Leyen, serves as the executive branch of the European Union. It was the commission that floated the ambitious plan to rearm Europe, which promises to see Europe mobilize close to a trillion dollars for its defense sector in the next five years. Just days after that plan was announced, the EU followed up with its ambitious metals plan.
The EU, at its core, was built on steel, growing out of the European Coal and Steel Community that established in the aftermath of World War 2. And indeed, domestic production still covers 90% of the continent's current consumption, the European Commission said. The situation is 'more worrying,' in the EU's words, for aluminum and nickel, where domestic production covers only 46% and 25% of Europe's demand, respectively.
'All these metals are essential for defense,' the EU's paper reads. It goes on to list out the requirements for specific armaments: 'A main battle tank contains 50 to 60 tonnes of high-quality steel; a self-propelled artillery system up to 100 tonnes; a fighter aircraft 3 tonnes of aluminium.'
Europe's metals industry has been squeezed from multiple directions. Energy costs following Russia's invasion of Ukraine have skyrocketed, with European producers paying up to five times more for gas and three times more for electricity than their American counterparts, the European Commission conceded in its report. Meanwhile, imports from Asia have nearly tripled over the past decade, with every third ton of steel in the EU now coming from elsewhere.
'The foreign trade policy proposals are a step in the right direction,' said Kerstin Maria Rippel, CEO of Germany's Steel Industry Association. She said that it 'is only logical in view of the increasing import pressure and the consequences of the confrontational U.S. trade policy.'
The EU's six-pillar action plan hopes to alleviate some of the other ailments, too, by addressing energy costs, carbon leakage prevention, industrial capacity protection, metal recycling, job protection, and providing investment support in addition to protectionism.
Most notably, it includes a plan for a €100 billion ($108 billion) Industrial Decarbonisation Bank and a €1 billion pilot auction in 2025 aimed at electrification and low-carbon steel production.
It places 'green steel' firmly at the heart of the European metals strategy. Using electrical furnaces and hydrogen, the emissions from the steel industry can be cut by as much as 95%. When burning hydrogen instead of coal or gas – the byproduct produced is water steam – rather than CO2.
European steel producers have generally welcomed the plan. It demonstrates 'understanding of the urgency surrounding the situation and a readiness to address key structural challenges,' praised Aditya Mittal, the CEO of ArcelorMittal, Europe's largest steel producer. And the European Steel Association's president, Henrik Adam, echoed the sentiment, saying that 'the European Commission is sending a clear message: a strong European Union needs a strong European steel industry.'
However, both executives stressed that energy costs remain 'the elephant in the room,' with Adam noting they are 'dragging down entire European industrial value chains.'
Electricity costs, for instance, stubbornly hover at double or four times the price of other steelmaking locations. With the transition to electric arc furnaces, electricity consumption is expected to roughly double, industry associations say, further magnifying a cost disadvantage.
Nonetheless, electricity and producing renewable hydrogen may be a more suitable way forward for Europe than relying on old methods. Gas is used during pig iron production in blast furnaces, which account for about 60% of EU steel production but has been a sticking point since Russia's invasion of Ukraine. During the 2022 energy crisis, energy costs reached 80% of total production costs for European steel producers.
While fossil fuel deposits cannot be conjured from thin air, renewable energy is seen by some as the solution to the continent's energy woes, with solar, hydro and wind power available in ample quantities and ready for additional exploitation.
The third age of nuclear, still in its infancy, may play a role, too. Poland, for example, is progressing in its plans to build the country's first nuclear power plant, with a final contract to be concluded this year. Nuclear power, while not strictly renewable, does not emit any harmful gases because no fuel is burnt. The electricity from these environmentally conscious sources can then be used to either power electric arc furnaces directly, or to split water to produce 'green hydrogen,' the theory goes.
Russia's invasion of its smaller neighbor Ukraine has brought to the fore the importance of energy resilience for the European Union. The European Defence Fund – an EU mechanism to support research and development with military applications – specifically designed this field as a 'priority area' for defense investment in its 2025 work program.
The Union has called climate change 'a priority for the EU's security and defense policies' for years. It goes well beyond simply weaning the bloc off of foreign sources of gas. EU bodies warn that rising temperatures will have knock-on effects on security as societies struggle to adapt to a growing water scarcity and lower agricultural output.
The European Union's diplomatic branch, the External Action Service, believes that 'this will increasingly undermine peace and security, especially in fragile countries.' The EU estimates that 5.5% of global CO2 emissions may stem from the defense industry.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Americans say Trump ‘has gone too far' with immigrant roundups and sending Marines and National Guard to LA
A new survey — conducted after President Donald Trump deployed National Guard and Marine troops to Los Angeles to quell protests against ramped-up immigration enforcement — reveals more Americans do not approve of either move. The Reuters/Ipsos poll surveyed 1,136 American adults on Wednesday and Thursday of this week. And while it found broad support for increasing the pace of deportations for people not in the United States legally, when respondents were asked whether Trump has gone too far with recent efforts to carry out mass arrests of migrants in urban centers, 49 percent agreed that the recent arrests have gone too far, while 40 percent said they had not. Americans surveyed also had a largely negative view of how Trump has responded to the protests with sending in military troops to Los Angeles, the nation's second-largest city, since the stepped-up Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids began last week. The poll showed that 50 percent of American adults do not approve of the administration's response compared with just 35 percent saying they approved. Similarly, 49 percent of respondents said Trump should not push for arrests of local officials who push back against federal immigration enforcement, while 35 percent said the administration should arrest defiant officials. At the same time, the survey revealed that Americans have a dim view of the protests that have spread from Los Angeles to other major cities in response to the anti-immigrant raids, with some degenerating into violence that has seen people injured and property damaged, When asked if the protests have gone too far, 46 percent said yes, compared with just 38 percent who said the protests have not gone too far and 16 percent who offered no opinion either way. But Americans also supported Trump's use of the military to bring order to violent protests by a margin of 48 percent agreeing to 41 percent disagreeing, with 11 percent saying they were unsure. The survey results come just as the first 200 U.S. Marines out of a battalion of 700 arrived in Los Angeles, joining National Guard troops already deployed to the city by the Trump administration. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has sued the administration to block Trump's use of the National Guard, and on Thursday a federal judge in San Francisco ruled that the president had broken the law by bypassing Newsom when calling the guard into federal service. But that ruling is on hold after an appeals court ruled that Donald Trump can retain temporary control of the Guard pending a more comprehensive hearing on the matter this Tuesday. The late-night decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals came swiftly after U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ruled that Trump's action was 'illegal' and violated the Tenth Amendment, stating that the president must return control of 4,000 troops to Newsom. Additional protests against the ongoing workplace raids have occurred across the nation and are expected to continue through the weekend as part of the 'No Kings' movement, coinciding with the president's birthday parade in Washington, D.C., which celebrates the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nucor Corporation (NUE)'s Former CEO Told Me About Steel Dumping, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published a list of . In this article, we are going to take a look at where Nucor Corporation (NYSE:NUE) stands against other stocks that Jim Cramer discussed. Nucor Corporation (NYSE:NUE) is another frequent steel stock discussed by Jim Cramer. It is the biggest steel company in America and the shares are up by 6.7% year-to-date. While Nucor Corporation (NYSE:NUE)'s shares sank by 16% in April after the Liberation Day tariff announcements, they jumped by 10% in June. The stock rose after the firm's domestic exposure as a sizable player in the steel industry aided it after President Trump announced 50% steel tariffs and implemented the new tariffs on June 4th. Cramer's previous remarks about Nucor Corporation (NYSE:NUE) have asserted that the firm has suffered due to cheap Chinese steel flooding the US market. This time around, he reasserted the claim: "Well I think that I wanted it [CLF] to win because I have been very suspicious of Nippon Steel which has had a history I believe of dumping in our country. And that is I'm getting that Dan DiMicco, the former CEO of Nucor who has continually told me the kind of dumping that we've seen around the world." In his previous comments about Nucor Corporation (NYSE:NUE), Cramer commented: 'I think Navarro would have said, look, we have got to stop whatever China is doing. We have to put a tariff on China. But we also have to stop steel coming from Mexico in particular because they're sneaking their, the Chinese are sneaking their steel in. That's what it's about. That's why Nucor goes higher. Yeah. Buy some Nucor. Overall, NUE ranks 6th on our list of stocks that Jim Cramer discussed. While we acknowledge the potential of NUE as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at . Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF): 'I Wanted It To Win,' Says Jim Cramer
We recently published a list of . In this article, we are going to take a look at where Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF) stands against other stocks that Jim Cramer discussed. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF) has featured several times on Cramer's morning show in 2025. Most of these appearances have surrounded Japan's Nippon Steel's purchase of US Steel. The deal has created quite a bit of controversy, particularly surrounding the ownership of American firms in key industries in foreign hands. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF) has ardently opposed the deal, and Cramer has speculated that the firm might end up buying US Steel instead. His previous remarks about the firm have remained appreciative of the firm's CEO and asserted that the firm has been hurt by cheap Chinese steel flooding the US market. His recent comments about Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF) surrounded the US Steel deal after co-host David Faber pointed out that the deal was going to close and Nippon was going to own US Steel: "Well I think that I wanted it [CLF] to win because I have been very suspicious of Nippon Steel which has had a history I believe of dumping in our country. And that is I'm getting that Dan DiMicco, the former CEO of Nucor who has continually told me the kind of dumping that we've seen around the world. In his previous remarks, Cramer commented on some problems: 'I think the problem [with] Cleveland- it's two problems, one is the balance sheet's not that good, and two, there's got to be demand. If the auto companies are really cutting back – and I think you're gonna have to after the initial spur – that is going to make it so that the the numbers have to go lower. If the numbers go lower, Cleveland Cliffs and the stock's going to go to 65.' Overall, CLF ranks 7th on our list of stocks that Jim Cramer discussed. While we acknowledge the potential of CLF as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at . Related Content NYSE Sign in to access your portfolio