logo
Republicans offer defense spending tips after punting on a budget

Republicans offer defense spending tips after punting on a budget

Yahoo20-03-2025

The Republican leaders of the House and Senate appropriations committees have sent the Pentagon detailed plans for how they think it should spend fiscal 2025 funding, following the passage of a six-month stopgap spending bill that largely freezes funding at prior-year levels.
The 181-page document, obtained by Defense News, includes the standard funding tables attached to lawmakers' annual defense spending legislation, which call for cuts to major service-led efforts like the Air Force's drone wingmen program, Army missile procurement and the Space Force's missile warning and tracking satellite architecture.
But the FY25 appropriations process has not been standard. The full-year continuing resolution passed by Congress may lower defense spending, but it also grants the Defense Department far more authority to decide how to spend its budget.
Because Congress failed to pass a full FY25 appropriations bill, the plans now sent to the Pentagon are not legally binding, instead serving merely as spending recommendations, according to Todd Harrison, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
'Congress ceded a significant degree of authority to the executive branch in the FY25 defense budget, and they can't get that back by issuing a letter that basically says, 'This is what we intended,'' Harrison told Defense News. 'Good luck getting DoD to adhere to this.'
Congressional appropriators recommend a $1.2 billion cut from the Army's FY25 request for operations and maintenance FY25, but add an additional $501 million to the service's personnel account to cover pay raises for junior enlisted service members, according to the document.
Additional funding — to the tune of $265 million — would bolster Army procurement. Another $248.7 million would be added to RDT&E accounts.
While missiles have flowed from the U.S. to Ukraine and the Army has led the way in replacing and replenishing those munitions, lawmakers are recommending a cut of $247 million in missile procurement.
The Army's future missile defense radar — the Lower-Tier Air and Missile Defense Sensor, or LTAMDS, is recommended for a $129 million cut. The most capable variant of the Army's Patriot missile would also be cut by $58 million due to a delivery backlog. The delayed Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon program would be cut by $75 million.
Yet Congress is recommending a $100 million increase for the legacy Army Tactical Missile System, or ATACMS, beyond just the $3.3 million the Army asked for in its FY25 budget as it works to phase the missile out and field the longer-range Precision Strike Missile. Congress proposes a $25 million cut for PrSM procurement and another $10 million for the Army's pursuit of a second variant.
Certain vehicles buys would also take a hit if the Army took the congressional recommendations. Lawmakers recommend slashing Armored Multipurpose Vehicle procurement by $134 million. The document contains an increase for the Paladin Integrated Management System by $158 million at a time when the service is looking at exactly how it might modernize its howitzer fleet.
Congress also suggests a major funding boost of $248 million for a modular artillery production facility and another $41 million for Army ammunition plant modernization.
Army aviation procurement would be increased as well, to include $240 million for National Guard-bound Gray Eagle unmanned aircraft systems and another $60 million for National Guard UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters.
Lawmakers recommend an injection of cash into Humvee modernization for both the active ($90 million) and reserve forces ($50 million) as well as additional $120 million for the Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles, or FMTV. Congressional appropriators would also add $167 more in funding for the Family of Heavy Tactical Vehicles, or FHTV.
In RDT&E funding, lawmakers cut more than $140 million deemed to be associated with climate change initiatives, including $29.5 million from the Next-Generation Combat Vehicle program and $7.4 million from a 'soldier lethality technology' line. They also recommended cuts to all hybrid electric vehicle prototyping efforts in the force.
Lawmakers proposed additional funding in technology development areas affiliated with lethality enhancements.
The document recommends a nearly $3.2 billion spending reduction from the Air Force's original 2025 budget request.
That includes cuts of $2.3 billion from research and development funding, $1.4 billion from operations and maintenance. $130 million from personnel, and nearly $115 million from missile procurement. Aircraft procurement would receive almost $64 million more than originally requested, and 'other' procurement programs would see a plus-up of about $679 million.
Lawmakers proposed a $325 million cut to the Next Generation Air Dominance program, which they didn't justify but simply called a 'classified adjustment.' This would bring funding for NGAD — the Air Force's effort to build a sixth-generation crewed fighter that would fly alongside autonomous drone wingmen and other systems — down to $2.4 billion in FY25.
The document also breaks the high-priority drone wingman program known as Collaborative Combat Aircraft into its own line item, but also proposes trimming more than $70 million. CCAs would have nearly $487 million in funding this year if the document's funding levels were enacted.
Travis Sharp, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments who studies the defense budget, noted that CCA is one of the programs Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has indicated as a priority for funding.
'This seems to be a case where mostly everyone agrees that CCA is a promising capability, but they don't agree with what [that] means in spending terms,' Sharp told Defense News in an email.
Funding for the Air Force's advanced engine development programs would get another $100 million. This would be apart from the program to build cutting-edge adaptive engines for NGAD — known as next-generation adaptive propulsion, or NGAP — which would retain the original 2025 budget request's proposed funding of $562 million.
The E-7 airborne battle management program would get an overall bump up of $189 million over the 2025 budget request. This is the Air Force's program to acquire a fleet of up to 26 of the Boeing-made aircraft, sometimes referred to as the Wedgetail, to replace the aging E-3 Sentry airborne warning and control system, or AWACS, planes.
Lawmakers want to strike $50 million in funding proposed in the 2025 budget proposal — called an 'unjustified request' — for prototyping the Hypersonic Attack Cruise Missile, or HACM. This would leave HACM with nearly $467 million in funding.
Lawmakers would also provide the services money to buy six more F-35 Joint Strike Fighters than originally requested. The Air Force would get another $196 million to buy two more F-35As, and the Navy would receive another $524 million to buy four more carrier-based F-35Cs
The F-35 program would also get a $10 million bump to improve its power thermal management system. The F-35′s Continuous Capability Development and Delivery, or C2D2, approach to developing, testing and delivering incremental improvements to the fighter will receive more than $1.1 billion in 2025.
And the document recommends providing another $200 million for the HH-60W Jolly Green II combat rescue helicopter program to buy two more aircraft than requested.
The Space Force's fiscal 2025 funding would drop $700 million under this proposal — a seemingly small decrease presented as the service pushes for its nearly $30 billion budget to triple amid growing threats in orbit.
The reductions include $222 million from the service's operations and maintenance request, $147 million from research and development and an increase of about $1.4 million to its personnel account.
As the Trump administration crafts a plan to develop a homeland missile defense shield composed of advanced space sensors — a project known as 'Golden Dome' — lawmakers are proposing cuts to the space-based missile warning and tracking systems that would likely make up the foundation of that system.
The proposal includes a $283 million reduction to that layered architecture, including $33 million from the Space Development Agency's low-Earth orbit satellite constellation. Another $180 million could come from the spacecraft the service is developing to monitor missile threats from geostationary orbit and $170 million from its medium Earth orbit layer.
Lawmakers also recommend cutting $246 million from the Space Force's classified procurement account and adding $351 million to its classified development account. While details on those funding lines are largely veiled, a large portion is used to develop counter space weapons and defensive systems.
The document lays out some potential additions for the Space Force, including $30 million for a Resilient Global Positioning System program that's being designed to augment the current GPS fleet. The proposal would also create a new funding line for commercial services, appropriating $40 million in FY25. Lawmakers also suggest an $80 million add to fund additional satellite payload processing capabilities at the Space Force's overtaxed launch ranges.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Whole Hog Politics: Trump enlists the military for politics
Whole Hog Politics: Trump enlists the military for politics

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Whole Hog Politics: Trump enlists the military for politics

On the menu: Going nuclear; Fore!; Newsom uses Trump to get back in Dems' good graces; Moonbeam to moderate?; Masked bandit America's largest military base has had four names in the past five years. In 2023, the Biden administration rechristened the base in North Carolina as Fort Liberty, replacing the name given to it in 1918 by resentful Southerners in the Army who honored Confederate Gen. Braxton Bragg. In early 2025, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that it would be Fort Bragg again, but with a twist. It would be for Roland Bragg, a hero paratrooper from Maine who served in World War II, rather than the bumbling Confederate general. Then this week, President Trump undid the twist and made it plain that the base, and all the others named for Confederates that had been changed by Trump's predecessor, were going back to their original namesakes. And he did it as part of what could only be described as political speech at Fort Bragg to an audience of soldiers who were screened for their political allegiances and responded with wild cheers for Trump's attacks on his political rivals. It all put me in mind of the Immovable Ladder of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. Acclaimed since at least the fourth century as the site of the tomb of Jesus of Nazareth, the church building has been under the joint governance of Greek, Coptic, Ethiopian and Syriac Orthodox sects, the Armenian Apostolic church and the Roman Catholics since the days of the Ottomans. Outside a window on the second story of the church, there is a rough, wooden ladder that has been there since at least 1721. No one knows when or why the ladder was placed there, but they do know that under the uneasy power-sharing arrangement between the sects, no one has the unilateral authority to move it, nor can anyone obtain the unanimous consent necessary to do so licitly. So fearful are the custodians of the church that any violations of the truce will end in rupture or even violence, that they do nothing. And so, the ladder has sat in the dry desert air for longer than the United States has been a nation. Now, you can't run a nation like a pilgrimage church, and certainly not a nation's military. A lot more than ladders have to get moved to keep the planet's apex power in position. But the ladder does, ahem, lead up to a valuable way of thinking about how to treat even minor issues when tensions and stakes are high. When things can be left alone, it is often wise to leave them be. The re-Confederate-ing of the military bases in the South is a small thing on its own, but so was their vestigial connection to the Confederacy in the first place. Other than Fort Robert E. Lee in Virginia, none of the other namesakes had lingered on in popular memory, except for perhaps Bragg's fellow bungler, George Pickett, most famous for a failed infantry charge. Joe Biden could have left those ladders leaning, but wanted to make a point. Now Trump has made the counterpoint, and we might expect that the next Democratic president may want to make the counter-counterpoint. None of that will make the American military better, but it will make it more political, and that's very bad news. Americans have long been suspicious about the idea of having a large standing army. One of the reasons it took us so long to get into the fray in World War II was that public sentiment demanded a nearly complete demobilization after World War I. For most of American history, the idea that there would be more than a million active-duty troops stationed inside the borders of the United States would have been a very unappealing one. Standing armies are expensive and, as the history of the world shows with crushing frequency, dangerous to the liberty of citizens. And yet, America's military is massively popular. An impressive 79 percent of U.S. adults said in a recent poll that they have confidence in the military to act in the public's best interests. Compare that with just 22 percent for the federal government as a whole, 47 percent for the Supreme Court, 26 percent for the presidency and 9 percent for Congress. It might be said that our military is the only federal institution that is actually succeeding these days, but certainly it is the only part of it that is broadly popular, enjoying strong public support regardless of which party is in power at any given time. That is because in the era of large standing armies since the start of the Cold War and especially since the institution of the all-volunteer force after the Vietnam War, our civilian and military leaders have worked very hard to keep politics out of the military. Even as the greedy goblins of partisanship ripped the wiring out of every other institution that worked, the military has stood apart. Lots of bad things happen in countries when the military is the only stable part of the government, but our highly professional, scrupulously restrained, civilian-controlled military has done an exceptionally good job of staying out of domestic politics. But now, domestic politics has stopped returning the favor. Trump's decision to host a massive military demonstration in the streets of Washington on Saturday would have been a dubious choice under any circumstances. The occasion is the Army's 250th birthday, which also happens to fall on the president's 79th birthday. Trump will review a force of 6,600 troops and 150 vehicles including Abrams tanks, Paladins and Strykers, as well as Black Hawk, Apache and Chinook helicopters overhead as they pass in front of the White House. It's something Trump wanted in his first term, but was refused by military leaders who said it would be too expensive and send the wrong message about the military's relationship to the government. Rolling tanks through the capital city just isn't something Americans typically do, until now. Also in the category of Trump this week realizing unachieved goals from his first term is his mobilization of the military to suppress riots. In the summer of 2020, Trump was stymied in his efforts to use military force to smash the riots that followed in the wake of the George Floyd protests. The protesters in Los Angeles, and the copycats that one assumes will follow at other protests against federal deportation raids, have given Trump the chance to finish another unrealized goal of his first term. You may think what Trump is doing with the protesters and rioters is correct, and it may even end up being considered legal, but the timing sure does stink. Does anyone imagine that, rightly or wrongly, the bipartisan esteem for the military won't take a hit in all this? Setting up clashes between the Marines and Americans at the same time as the president held a political rally for himself at an Army base and just ahead of a massive military parade down Constitution Avenue doesn't exactly reinforce the idea of an apolitical military. Indeed, one of the best reasons to not politicize the military is so that when a commander in chief has to use our forces in controversial ways, it can be free of any taint. If you want to be able to send the Marines to Compton, you'd better pass on the political spectacles. Biden's name games with the bases or the use of the military to advance domestic political issues certainly didn't help. He moved the ladder, and now Trump is picking it up and smashing it through a window. If our political leaders keep at this, we will end up with what Americans for so long feared: a partisan military. No good can ever come of that. Holy croakano! We welcome your feedback, so please email us with your tips, corrections, reactions, amplifications, etc. at WHOLEHOGPOLITICS@ . If you'd like to be considered for publication, please include your real name and hometown. If you don't want your comments to be made public, please specify. NUTRITIONAL INFORMATION Trump Job Performance Average Approval: 42% Average Disapproval: 53.6% Net Score: -11.6 points Change from one week ago: -1.7 points Change from one month ago: -0.4 points [Average includes: Gallup: 43% approve – 53% disapprove; Ipsos/Reuters: 42% approve – 52% disapprove; Marquette: 46% approve – 54% disapprove; ARG: 41% approve – 55% disapprove; Quinnipiac University: 38% approve – 54% disapprove] Americans going nuclear Do you favor or oppose more nuclear power plants to generate electricity? Now Favor: 59%Oppose: 39% Spring of 2021 Favor: 50% Oppose: 47% Spring of 2016 Favor: 43% Oppose: 54% [Pew Research Center surveys] ON THE SIDE: LAYING OUT OF SAM SNEAD'S BUNKER As the most venerable of all American golf tournaments gets underway, writer Brody Miller goes digging for a central piece of lore. The Athletic: 'There's a story about Oakmont Country Club the members love to tell. And they're right to tell it. Because it's the perfect story about the hardest golf course in America, the place just outside of Pittsburgh that is hosting the U.S. Open this week. It's the perfect story about the Fownes family, the father and son who built this course and believed so deeply in the sanctity of par that the famous W.C. Fownes' line goes: 'A shot poorly played should be a shot irrevocably lost.' And this story? The people of Oakmont always believed it to be factual. Until very recently. 'Well …' Oakmont historian David Moore says with a chuckle. 'There's a little debate about that right now.' It goes like this …' PRIME CUTS In Trump showdown, Newsom gets chance to dispel notions of appeasement: NBC News: 'The battle between the president and the governor of the country's largest state instantly turned [Gavin Newsom] into the face of resistance to President Donald Trump's expansive interpretation of the authorities of his office and mass-deportation campaign. Newsom, who is a potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, has been taking heavy criticism from within his own party over his efforts — in part through his new podcast — to cast himself in the role of conciliator. … On Monday, California sued Trump for using emergency powers to deploy National Guard troops to the Los Angeles area over the weekend. Trump, citing a statute that allows the president to activate the guard to repel a foreign invasion or quell a rebellion, accused Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of failing to protect federal agents and property from demonstrators.' Cuomo nabs Bloomberg backing with less than two weeks to go: New York Times: 'Former Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg on Tuesday announced that he was backing former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo in the New York City mayor's race, giving Mr. Cuomo an endorsement coveted by many of the Democratic candidates in the race. Mr. Bloomberg has a long record of helping Democratic candidates. … But he has mostly avoided endorsing mayoral candidates at the primary level in New York City, making his backing of Mr. Cuomo more notable. … The endorsement may also persuade some undecided voters who have criticisms of Mr. Cuomo's handling of the pandemic or who may have misgivings over his sexual harassment scandal, which led to his resignation as governor of New York in 2021. … Mr. Cuomo has led in polls ahead of the June 24 Democratic primary. But he has faced a surprisingly strong challenge from Zohran Mamdani, a state lawmaker from Queens and a democratic socialist. The endorsement comes two days before the second and final candidate debate on Thursday. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez endorsed Mr. Mamdani last week, and polls show the race narrowing.' Voters don't find beauty in Trump's big bill: The Hill: 'More than half of voters oppose the domestic policy bill that President Trump has pushed Republicans in Congress to pass by July 4, according to a poll released Wednesday. Quinnipiac University's national survey found less than a third of registered voters surveyed support Trump's agenda-setting One Big Beautiful Bill Act, while 53 percent oppose the legislation.' New Jersey gubernatorial race set for Ciattarelli and Sherrill: Associated Press: 'Republican Jack Ciattarelli, who had President Donald Trump's endorsement, and Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill won their primary elections in New Jersey's race for governor, setting the stage for a November election, poised to be fought in part over affordability and the president's policies… New Jersey has been reliably Democratic in Senate and presidential contests for decades. But the odd-year races for governor have tended to swing back and forth, and each of the last three GOP governors has won a second term.' SHORT ORDER Daughter of longtime Maine Rep. Chellie Pingree (D) joins crowded Democratic gubernatorial primary—WMTW After Tennessee Rep. Mark Green (R) announces plan to quit, a crowded field forms—Tennessee Lookout Youngkin sets Sept. 9 special election to fill Connolly's seat in Congress—Virginia Mercury Iowa state Sen. Zach Wahls (D) announces challenge to Republican Sen. Joni Ernst—The Hill TABLE TALK 'Gonna be a rumble out on the promenade.' 'The voters know who I am.' — Atlantic City, N.J., Mayor Marty Small Sr. explaining his primary victory in his reelection campaign, despite facing multiple criminal indictments along with his wife, Atlantic City School District Superintendent La'Quetta Small. Mayor Small has been in office since 2019, when his predecessor resigned after pleading guilty to wire fraud. MAILBAG 'Democrats should run the closest carbon copy of former California Gov. Jerry Brown that they can find: if not the 87-year-old man himself. Jerry transformed himself from Governor Moonbeam to a wise, fiscally responsible leader. After seven years in office, Brown turned a $27 million deficit into a $13.8 billion rainy day fund, which [Gov. Gavin Newsom] has quickly blown through, bringing us to a $12 billion deficit. As an American and conservative Republican, I would have no problem voting for a Jerry act-alike.' — Peter S. Krimmell, Glendora, Calif. Mr. Krimmell, I think that is very much what your current governor has in mind! National Republicans scoff and sneer at Newsom's recent reinvention as a foe of the excesses of wokeness and socialism, but he seems very much to have in mind a Brown-like reinvention. It certainly doesn't match with his record, especially on the fiscal matter to which you refer, but he would hardly be the first politician to undergo an ideological overhaul before seeking public office. Newsom's may be jarring to Republicans, but if he could somehow get through a progressive-leaning Democratic primary electorate (a big if), it might be hard to convince persuadable voters that he, a career-long flip-flopper, was actually a true believer in anything. Newsom's career prior to 2018 as member of the board of supervisors and then mayor in San Francisco or as Brown's lieutenant governor all point to a kind of squishy, corporatist, Clintonite Democrat. It seems much more believable that he was faking his radicalism in service of his ambitions within a radicalizing state party than that he had simply been suppressing his inner extremist for the previous 20 years. If the current and no doubt extended showdown with the Trump administration gives Newsom sufficient standing with the left, he might find it possible to shift his policy positions back to the center without disqualifying himself entirely with the Democrats' activist base. Donald Trump's rapid public ideological positioning from moderate Democrat to Reform Party to conservative Republican to pure populism suggests that many voters care little about consistency if they have a strong emotional attachment to the candidate. The more likely outcome is that Newsom will trip on his shoelaces amid all that fancy footwork, but stranger things have happened. All best, c 'I don't always agree with your conclusions but very much appreciate your view of both sides of an issue. Do you ever do personal appearances and public presentations? Also, what is 'Holy Croakano.'' — J. Stan Carpenter, Concord, N.C. Mr. Carpenter, I do get around a good bit for speeches and talks at colleges, etc. I don't know of anything near you or in the Charlotte area anytime soon, but keep a lookout. The more important question, though, is about croakano! I don't have a sufficient etymology for the word — pronounced kind of like volcano: cro-kuh-no. It is an excited utterance or interjection: a mild oath used in place of a more vulgar or blasphemous word. It came to me as a county colloquialism used by my father and, at least, his father before him in Cumberland County, Ill. Did they even have it when my branch of the Stirewalts left North Carolina in the 1820s? Who knows? There was a popular Canadian board game from the 19th century called crokinole, the name for which is thought to be from the French word croquignole, for a small biscuit. How that would have made itself into croakano and gotten to the crossroads town of Timothy, Ill., circa 1900 I couldn't guess, or it may be a false lead altogether. But as always, I invite you and all our readers to share the regional or family linguistic gems that you treasure with us so we can try to keep them alive. Yours in word nerddom, c You should email us! Write to WHOLEHOGPOLITICS@ with your tips, kudos, criticisms, insights, rediscovered words, wonderful names, recipes, and, always, good jokes. Please include your real name—at least first and last—and hometown. Make sure to let us know in the email if you want to keep your submission private. My colleague, the daring Meera Sehgal, and I will look for your emails and then share the most interesting ones and my responses here. Clickety clack! FOR DESSERT Dr. Doolittle, Kentucky style WHAS: 'A man from Murray, Kentucky, was arrested last week after police say he released a raccoon inside a business. This comes just months after the same man was arrested for attempting to evade police officers on a mule. On June 6, 2025, Murray Police Department responded to a call that a person had intentionally released a raccoon into an open business, and that he had fled the scene. Soon after, officers initiated a traffic stop on Jonathan Mason, 40. According to police, he refused to roll down his windows or exit his vehicle. Officers physically removed Mason from the vehicle. Investigators learned the raccoon that was released into the business bit a person, and that Mason was previously warned that he was not allowed on the property of the business.' Chris Stirewalt is the politics editor for The Hill and NewsNation, the host of The Hill Sunday on NewsNation and The CW, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and the author of books on politics and the media. MeeraSehgalcontributed to this report. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Rain or shine? Trump offers update on weather's impact on military parade
Rain or shine? Trump offers update on weather's impact on military parade

USA Today

time25 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Rain or shine? Trump offers update on weather's impact on military parade

Rain or shine? Trump offers update on weather's impact on military parade The National Weather Service forecast for Washington D.C. on June 14 has a 50% chance of rain, with thunderstorms possible Show Caption Hide Caption Army Golden Knights parachute team practices for military parade The Army's Golden Knights parachute team has been preparing for months to perform at the 250th anniversary military parade. WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said this weekend's military parade in the nation's capital is a rain or shine event as forecasts show the potential for bad weather on parade day. "I hope the weather's okay, but actually if it's not, that brings you good luck, and that's okay, too," Trump said June 12 in discussing the parade during the congressional picnic at the White House. "It doesn't matter. It doesn't affect the tanks at all, it doesn't affect the soldiers. They're used to it. They're tough. Smart." Earlier in the day, White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said there will be a military celebration "no matter what." 'Any changes to the Army Birthday Parade will be announced by the Department of Defense or America 250 Commission. No matter what, a historic celebration of our military servicemembers will take place!' Kelly said. The National Weather Service forecast for Washington D.C. on June 14 has a 50% chance of rain. The forecast says it will be mostly cloudy with a high of 83. Thunderstorms are possible. Trump is planning a large military parade through the streets of Washington D.C. June 14 on the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary. It's also his 79th birthday. The second-term president described it as a "grand parade" in his picnic remarks, adding: "I don't think we've ever seen the likes of what you're going to see." The parade is drawing comparisons to authoritarian regimes, with Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California, calling it a "dictator-style military parade." Protesters are staging "No Kings" demonstrations across the country against Trump on the day of the parade. "President Trump wants tanks in the street and a made-for-TV display of dominance for his birthday. A spectacle meant to look like strength," a statement on the "No Kings" website reads. "But real power isn't staged in Washington. It rises up everywhere else." The Army's initial estimate for the parade covered a range from $25 million to $45 million. But the estimate has been refined as the event nears and includes damage to streets and infrastructure anticipated from heavy armored vehicles, according to a Defense official who was not authorized to speak publicly. The $40 million in taxpayer dollars will fund a parade featuring Abrams tanks, vintage World War II warplanes and thousands of soldiers marching in period uniforms to mark the nation's battles from the Revolutionary War to the present. A reviewing stand is being erected for Trump south of the White House. The Army has also shipped tanks from Texas by railroad to Washington for the parade, and soldiers from other posts around the country. They are being housed downtown in government buildings transformed into makeshift barracks with thousands of cots. Contributing: Tom Vanden Brook, Joey Garrison

Live updates: Trump advises Iran to make a deal hours after Israeli attack
Live updates: Trump advises Iran to make a deal hours after Israeli attack

The Hill

time29 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Live updates: Trump advises Iran to make a deal hours after Israeli attack

Hours after Israel landed significant missile strikes against Iran, President Trump chided Tehran for not making a nuclear deal through several rounds of talks, but held out hope it still could do so. 'I told them what to do, but they just couldn't get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!' Trump wrote Friday morning on Truth Social. Iran on Friday said it was pulling out of talks, with the next round originally set for Sunday. Those weeks of talks, however, appear to have given cover to Israel to prepare its attack. The president is set to meet with his National Security Council on Friday morning. In federal court in Tennessee, Kilmar Abrego Garcia will be arraigned on federal trafficking charges. The mistakenly deported man will face a judge a week after being returned to the U.S. from a Salvadoran prison. Washington is also in the final stages of preparation for its massive parade marking the Army's 250th birthday on Saturday, which is also Trump's 79th birthday. Nationwide protests in cities beyond D.C. are expected, part of the 'No Kings' movement. Other stories to watch: Follow along today for the latest on these stories and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store