'Mark your own homework': Healthy Homes checks under fire
Like drivers issuing their own warrants of fitness - that's how building experts and renter advocates describe the new Healthy Homes Standards.
Since July 1, all rental properties across the motu have been required to comply with the new standards, which set minimum requirements for heating, insulation, ventilation, moisture ingress and drainage.
But who gets to say whether a property is up to scratch? Well, with no certification required in order to complete an assessment, the role could technically be filled by anyone.
This has prompted calls for an independent certification system.
Ideally, under the new standards, damp and draughty rentals should now be a thing of the past.
But the New Zealand Institute of Building Inspectors isn't convinced.
Chief executive Graeme Blissett, said the standards contain several loopholes. Not least, that anyone can label themselves a healthy homes assessor.
"It's a huge problem, because there's no one looking at what they're actually inspecting and writing reports on is actually correct.
"There are no guarantees because no one's double-checking what they're doing, and I believe that if you're charging $150, $200 to do a healthy homes inspection on a house, you're not doing it correctly."
It doesn't take long to find companies offering Healthy Homes assessments - a business was found online, offering to carry out a certification for around $200.
But Blissett fears that without certification, many of these businesses will prioritise "quantity over quality".
He said he's seen several certificates that ticked off each of the standards, despite the properties falling short.
"The tenants [are] usually up to speed with these sorts of regulations and rules, so if the landlords do it on their own property and they get it incorrect, and the tenant finds out about it or talks to someone, and they've got a little bit of knowledge on it. There is a chance for them to be taken [to] the Tenancy Tribunal.
"I believe there's fines of like $5000 or something like that for non-compliance."
Renters United President, Zac Thomas, said the Healthy Homes Standards are a positive step towards a warmer and drier housing stock.
But he's also concerned about the assessment process.
"There is a mark your own homework situation where landlords don't even need to use an independent assessor in the first place. They can say that they are healthy homes compliant, that's the first thing.
"But then the second thing is they can get this assessment from an agency that in many cases won't actually be complying or assessing to the standards as they should be."
Thomas said that if the checks were completed by qualified assessors, it would give peace of mind to both landlords and tenants.
"A renter might go, 'hey, please show me your healthy homes compliance.' They might be worried that the house is not compliant, and the landlord will probably show this, and then they might go, 'Oh well, I guess I have nothing to complain about'.
"In reality, if there was a consistent standard, tenants would have the confidence to say, 'Okay, like this does meet standard, therefore I don't need to worry about going to the Tenancy Tribunal."
University of Otago Professor, Lucy Telfer Barnard, said that as winter rolls around, if houses aren't up to standard, it's the tenants who face the consequences.
"The tenants may not necessarily initially know that's why they're feeling unwell, but then if they do start to wonder, there's whole process that they can then have to go through to get those standards met.
"To have that after the fact when they've moved in, in good faith, thinking that the property meets the standards, really isn't fair and puts a whole burden onto people."
Landlords who fail to meet the Healthy Homes standards can face fines of up to $7200. Owners of six or more rentals that do not comply could be hit with $50,000 fines.
A statement from the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development said they don't assess how landlords achieve compliance, and there is no licensing requirement to undertake Healthy Homes Standards assessments. Moving to this sort of "WOF" scheme would be a big undertaking with significant costs and impacts.
It said landlords need to satisfy themselves that the person they hire is suitably experienced and can undertake the required inspection or work to an acceptable standard.
If a tenant thinks the property they are renting is not up to standard, they can make a complaint on the Tenancy Services website or apply for a work order from the Tenancy Tribunal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
Mackenzie District Mayor Anne Munro steps down as cancer worsens
Mackenzie District Mayor Anne Munro. Photo: RNZ / Nathan Mckinnon Mackenzie District Mayor Anne Munro is stepping aside due to her cancer diagnosis. Munro shared the news last year and testing have confirmed the cancer is metastatic. She said while treatment was ongoing, her prognosis remained uncertain. More to come...
NZ Herald
16 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Kāeo's decade-long boil-water notice raises health concerns
Valentine said the colour of the water had improved in recent years, but it was still no good for drinking. In July 2015, Northland's Medical Officer of Health issued a boil-water notice because of levels of E. coli bacteria found in the water. That notice had never been lifted. Kāeo Water supplies just under 30 customers – a mix of homes, businesses and public facilities such as the toilets and community hall – on State Highway 10, the town's main street. Rather than face the cost of constantly boiling water, the Valentines have rigged up a tank for catching rainwater and every day they use it to fill up bottles for drinking water. Valentine said she had organised public meetings and lobbied the council in the past, but little had changed. 'The water needs to be drinkable out of the tap, for the kids that go to the community hall, and the people coming through town. They don't know that it's not drinkable. The businesses in town, a lot of them have installed their own rainwater tanks because they just can't rely on the water.' Kāeo chef Anna Valentine says her children have never known what it's like to drink out of a tap. Photo / RNZ Until the year 2000 Kāeo's water supply was owned by the Far North District Council. The council sold it to Doubtless Bay Water, which quit in 2008, saying it was not economically viable. It was then taken on by Wai Care Environmental Consultants. Kāeo Water operator Bryce Aldridge said it was difficult keeping up with ever-changing drinking water standards, especially for a small scheme like Kāeo's. 'And the Government's not assisting with the upgrading that's needed to meet those standards, because of the size of plant that we are.' Aldridge said he had never put up the price of water, and only a small minority complained about the quality. 'It's actually only one client … I have spoken to the other clients, and this is their fear [if the system is upgraded]: the water price going up, and the battle of having to put fluoride in our water, so a boil water notice actually protects us there.' The Ministry of Health has recently ordered the Far North District Council to add fluoride to its Kerikeri and Kaitāia town water supplies, but a spokesperson told RNZ the ministry did not order fluoridation of privately-owned water supplies. Aldridge said the discolouration was caused by iron and manganese naturally present in the source water from the Waikara Stream. Removing iron and manganese completely was difficult and required multiple treatment stages. He said the next step for the water scheme would be to move the plant to a new location, and introduce UV treatment. He told RNZ he had secured a new location just last week, but that had yet to be confirmed. Kāeo's private water treatment plant, on School Gully Road, draws from the Waikara Stream. Photo / RNZ Aldridge said he welcomed media scrutiny because it had caught the attention of Taumata Arowai, the national water authority, and had bumped Kāeo's water supply up its priority list. Taumata Arowai head of operations Steve Taylor said even a small private drinking water supply such as Kāeo's had to meet the requirements of the Water Services Act 2021 and other rules. The authority had sent a letter outlining its expectations in March, but a meeting scheduled that month had been cancelled by the supplier. Expectations included boil-water notice communication with consumers, and providing a confirmed, funded plan for achieving compliance with legal requirements. Taylor said those expectations had not yet been met. The authority had set a new date of July 23 for meeting the supplier and inspecting the plant. Taylor said boil water notices were only meant to be a temporary solution, because over time people could forget and risked drinking contaminated water. The authority could take action if it believed a supplier was not responding adequately to concerns about unsafe drinking water or failed persistently to comply with legal requirements. That could include requiring the local authority, in this case the Far North District Council, to take over the supply. All Kāeo Water's customers are based on the Far North town's main street. Photo / RNZ Te Rūnanga o Whaingaroa pou arahi, or cultural manager, Raniera Kaio said the scheme had suffered from buck-passing between the council and the operator as to who was responsible. He believed the only way to fix it was by the council, the operator and iwi working together. 'My personal opinion, indeed my professional opinion, is that the operator lacks the resources to fix it. Lacks the resources to fix it alone. It has to be a collaborative solution.' Kaio said the water plant had been inundated in the 2007 floods and never fully recovered. The boil-water notice also had a financial effect on the rūnanga, which spent $300-$400 a month on bottled water for staff and manuhiri [visitors]. He said Kāeo's water woes were emblematic of the neglect suffered by many rural, Māori-majority towns. The effects went well beyond the cost and inconvenience of having to boil water or buy it by the bottle. 'It's about the dignity of Kāeo, the mana of Kāeo. And whānau in Kāeo have lived with daily anxiety around whether their water is safe to drink, that really affects not only your health, your hauora [wellbeing], but it sort of affects your own self-worth and your identity as being from Kāeo.' However, Kaio said he was buoyed by news that Taumata Arowai was about to meet the operator, and hopeful a solution could be found. Meanwhile, Anna Valentine just hoped one day soon her children would be able to drink water out of the tap. 'I mean, we live in New Zealand, but it feels like we're in a bit of a third world country up here in Kāeo, having to go out every day and fill our plastic bottles from a water container that we collect off the roof. It's just crazy, actually.' Kāeo's boil-water notice is not the longest-running one in the country. A 2024 Drinking Water Regulation Report stated 74 long-term 'consumer advisories' – which include boil-water notices – were in place at the end of last year, and 20 council supplies serving a total of 7000 people had advisories in place for three or more years. 'The persistence of long-term consumer advisories represents a significant regulatory and public health challenge,' the report stated.
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Wine brand ahead with Irish cancer warning
|By Guyon Espiner of RNZ One of New Zealand's most celebrated wine brands is putting cancer warning labels on wines exported to Ireland - nearly a year ahead of a law making the labels compulsory from May 2026. Villa Maria wines sold in Ireland feature a label on the bottle warning drinkers ''there is a direct link between alcohol and fatal cancers'' and also that ''drinking alcohol causes liver disease''. Alcohol harm reduction advocates say the labels should also be on alcohol sold in New Zealand rather than leaving drinkers in the dark about the cancer risk. Simon Limmer, chief executive of Indevin which owns the Villa Maria brand, said cancer warnings were on all Villa Maria wines produced for the Irish market from the 2024 vintage onwards and had been appearing on shelves over the last six months. The wine travelled long distances and could spend weeks in shipping containers and distribution before reaching retail shelves so acting early would avoid disruption for retail partners and consumers. "Consumers will likely take note of the new labels in Ireland as it's a significant change across all alcoholic products but it's too soon to understand the ongoing impact on purchasing decisions." Photos of Villa Maria wines featuring the warning labels were sent to advocacy groups in New Zealand by Alcohol Action Ireland, as it rallies support to stave off an alcohol industry lobbying effort to stall the labels. Sheila Gilheany, chief executive of Alcohol Action Ireland, wrote to alcohol harm reduction groups in New Zealand warning of a "severe threat to Ireland's alcohol health information labelling regulations". Gilheany told RNZ that Ireland's alcohol industry had opposed the cancer warning labels and was now using fears about trade tariffs to call for a delay. Irish media now expect the government to defer the introduction of cancer warning labels until 2029. Gilheany welcomed Villa Maria's acceptance of Ireland's labelling law and said winemakers from Australia and Spain had also been early adopters. "They are assuming that the government is not going to turn its back on its own law. Why should it? But at the same time, we can see the pressure that the various sectors of the industry are placing on the government here in Ireland and seeking to have it postponed." Ireland had about 1000 alcohol-related cancers every year and one in eight breast cancer cases were linked to alcohol but awareness of those risks was low, she said. Governments had to "face down the lobbying" both locally and internationally, Gilheany said. "We know that when Ireland goes ahead with this measure, particularly around the cancer warnings, it is likely that other nations will follow suit." Global push for warning labels Dozens of health groups recently wrote to British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer urging him to follow Ireland's lead. The letter was coordinated by the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) which is calling for "clear, plain, distinct and mandatory" cancer warning labels rather than ambiguous language such as "drink responsibly". In January this year, the US surgeon general said alcohol was a leading preventable cause of cancer and alcohol products should carry a warning label like cigarettes do. Virginia Nicholls, executive director of the New Zealand Alcohol Beverages Council, said the industry did not support cancer warning labels. "The level of health risk associated with alcohol is more complicated than a label can convey. "Labelling does not take into account the difference between responsible and hazardous drinking. The best place to get information on any health concerns is from your doctor." Labels may raise awareness but did not change behaviour and called for policies to "target the minority of people who are hazardous drinkers and not the large majority of Kiwis who are responsible drinkers". Nicholls said cancer risk was low when drinking at "moderate levels" and claimed there were "benefits of moderate alcohol consumption" including reduced risk of heart attacks, ischaemic strokes and diabetes. But in a 2023 statement the World Health Organisation said "when it comes to alcohol consumption, there is no safe amount that does not affect health". "There are no studies that would demonstrate that the potential beneficial effects of light and moderate drinking on cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes outweigh the cancer risk associated with these same levels of alcohol consumption for individual consumers." The WHO says alcohol was classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer decades ago. "This is the highest risk group, which also includes asbestos, radiation and tobacco." Lisa Te Morenga, co-chair of Health Coalition Aotearoa, said New Zealanders were being kept in the dark. "Most New Zealanders don't really realise that alcohol is a carcinogen. So while the Irish are having their awareness raised, our consumers are missing out." ACT's Nicole McKee, the Minister responsible for alcohol policy, is working on reform of the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act. She said her focus was on "regulatory relief" to make business easier for retailers and hospitality venues and also on reducing alcohol-related harm. "I have not yet received any advice regarding cancer warning labels on alcohol products. Cabinet has yet to make any decisions regarding any reforms."
