Photos: Here Are the Piles of Used Bedding and Children's Play Sets Left Near DOGE's Old Offices
Elon Musk's associates at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) have begun vacating their headquarters at the General Services Administration (GSA) in Washington, DC. An apocalyptic scene of toddler play sets, mattresses, and pillows remains.
Near rooms where DOGE once operated, a seemingly abandoned children's wooden kitchen set sits next to a rainbow climbing arch and an easel covered in crumpled paper, according to photos obtained by WIRED. Other children's toys are within reach, with colorful books and other playthings neatly organized in white plastic bins. A few related items are strewn about the floor. Nearby, trash bags stuffed with pillows and five mattresses, some with sheets and mattress toppers still on them, are stuffed in a corner.
It looks like a scene out of a zombie movie, where villagers had to flee in the middle of the night to avoid a raid. But it's not a movie; it's the aftermath of DOGE's wholescale assault on the GSA, and the federal government writ large. DOGE isn't gone, but as it morphs into its new phase, post-Musk's chainsaw-style leadership, the children's toys have been left behind.
GSA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Mattresses have been left behind at GSA. Courtesy of WIRED Source
Chairs are piled up all over the office. Courtesy of WIRED Source
Pillows have been stuffed in garbage bags. Courtesy of WIRED Source
In January, after president Donald Trump's inauguration, Musk's DOGE took over a few key government agencies that provided the keys to dozens of others, including the Office of Personnel Management, which functions as the federal HR system, and the GSA, the government's operations and IT department.
Steve Davis and Nicole Hollander, two longtime Musk lieutenants who played a crucial role in Musk's acquisition of X, were listed as high-level GSA employees, according to directory screenshots obtained by WIRED. (Davis and Hollander are partners and have a child together. During Musk's acquisition of X, they moved into the company's office building in San Francisco with their newborn baby.) Thomas Shedd, a former Tesla engineer, became the director of the GSA's Technology Transformation Services division. A number of young, inexperienced technologists, as WIRED first reported, were also brought to the GSA: Edward Coristine, a former Neuralink intern, and Ethan Shaotran, a student at Harvard, joined the agency as well. Davis, Hollander, Coristine, and Shaotran all had A-suite access, linking them to the highest levels of the GSA org chart.
At the GSA, DOGE set up shop on the sixth floor of the office building. The area where they worked, which had previously been open, was redesigned to accommodate a locked door, a key card to swipe in, and a security guard. Longtime GSA employees reported seeing groups of young men walking around the office dressed in t-shirts and shorts, and, in some cases, wearing sunglasses. In March, GSA acting administrator Stephen Ehikian hosted an all hands meeting with GSA staff. During a Q&A, he was asked about the DOGE team at GSA. He responded that no such team existed. Many employees were in disbelief. 'Like we didn't notice a bunch of young kids working behind a secure area on the 6th floor,' a GSA employee told WIRED.
Children's toys and play sets have been abandoned at GSA. Courtesy of WIRED Source
Multiple bed frames have been piled in a corner. Courtesy of WIRED Source
Furniture has been packed into a room near DOGE's old offices. Courtesy of WIRED Source
That sixth floor of the GSA office is now open to other employees, following Musk, Davis, and Hollander's apparent step back from DOGE in May. On Monday, President Donald Trump announced Michael Rigas, deputy secretary of state for management and resources, as the new acting administrator of the GSA, according to an internal memo viewed by WIRED. The move effectively sidelines Ehikian, who enthusiastically carried out the DOGE agenda during his tenure as the acting administrator. Ehikian's wife previously worked as a designer at Musk's social networking company X.
But DOGE is not entirely gone from GSA—DOGE associates Nate Cavanaugh and Justin Fox have been seen in the office in recent weeks, multiple sources confirm to WIRED. And while DOGE has lost its flashy leadership, WIRED has reported that the so-called agency has continued embedding itself throughout the government, leading projects and cutting contracts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
a few seconds ago
- Business Insider
Tesla has discussed building a smaller version of the Cybertruck, its engineering VP says
Elon Musk's "apocalypse-proof" Cybertruck has been a major disappointment, but it could be about to get a smaller sibling. Lars Moravy, Tesla's engineering VP, said in an interview on Saturday that the EV giant is considering making a smaller pickup truck, as sales of the beefy science-fiction-inspired Cybertruck continue to struggle. "We always talked about making a smaller pickup," said Moravy, in response to a question about whether Tesla needed a mini version of the Cybertruck for international markets. "I think in the future, as more and more of the robotaxi comes into the world, we look at those options and we think about, OK, that kind of service is useful not just for people, but also for goods," Moravy, who was speaking at an event hosted by Tesla owners and investors in California, added. "We've definitely been churning in the design studio about what we might do to serve that need for sure." Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Moravy's interview, which was sent outside regular US working hours. The Cybertruck was launched with a huge fanfare in 2023, with Tesla CEO Elon Musk predicting the automaker could sell over 250,000 of the "apocalypse-proof" trucks a year. However, those stratospheric sales have failed to materialize. Tesla has shifted around 11,000 Cybertrucks in the US so far this year, after selling nearly 39,000 over the whole of 2024, per data from Cox Automotive. The futuristic pickup launched in the US with a price tag close to $100,000, far above the $39,900 Elon Musk suggested back in 2019. The cheapest version now starts at over $60,000. The Cybertruck is also not available in China and Europe, Tesla's biggest markets outside the US. Both markets have strict vehicle regulations that make selling big and bulky pickups like the Cybertruck — which weighs over 6,000kg — extremely difficult. One of the first Cybertrucks to appear in the UK was seized by police earlier this year for not being road-legal, while another that was registered in the European Union had to be modified to soften the trapezoid truck's notoriously sharp edges. Tesla has expanded Cybertruck sales to Canada and Mexico, and in April announced it would begin selling the pickup in Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar. The Cybertruck's slow sales and slower international expansion suggest it will be little help in turning around Tesla's sales slump. The EV giant said earlier this month that second-quarter sales had fallen 13.5%, its second year-over-year decline in a row.
CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
Elon Musk says Tesla and Samsung have signed a $16.5 billion chip deal
Tesla CEO Elon Musk said the U.S. automaker had signed a $16.5 billion deal to source chips from Samsung Electronics, a move expected to bolster the South Korean tech giant's loss-making contract manufacturing business. Samsung's shares jumped as much as 6.8% to their highest since September last year after news of the deal. Tesla shares were up 1.9% in U.S. premarket trading. Musk said Samsung's new chip factory in Taylor, Texas will make Tesla's next-generation AI6 chip, potentially re-energizing the project that has faced long delays amid Samsung's difficulties in retaining and attracting major clients. 'Samsung agreed to allow Tesla to assist in maximizing manufacturing efficiency. This is a critical point, as I will walk the line personally to accelerate the pace of progress. And the fab is conveniently located not far from my house,' Musk said in a post on X on Monday. 'The $16.5B number is just the bare minimum. Actual output is likely to be several times higher,' he said in another post. According to a senior analyst at NH Investment & Securities, Ryu Young-ho, Samsung's Taylor fab 'so far had virtually no customers, so this order is quite meaningful.' In October, Reuters reported that Samsung had postponed taking deliveries of ASML chipmaking equipment for its Texas factory as it had not yet won any major customers for the project. It has already delayed the plant's operational start to 2026. While no timeline was provided for AI6 chip production, Musk has previously said that next-generation AI5 chips will be produced at the end of 2026, suggesting AI6 would follow. Lee Dong-ju, an analyst at SK Securities, expects production in 2027 or 2028, but Tesla has a history of missing its targets. Samsung currently makes Tesla's AI4 chips, which power its Full Self-Driving driver assistant system, while TSMC is slated to make the AI5, initially in Taiwan and then Arizona, Musk has said. Samsung, the world's top memory chip maker, also produces logic chips designed by customers through its foundry business. The Texas project is central to Samsung Chairman Jay Y. Lee's strategy to expand beyond its bread-and-butter memory chips into contract chip manufacturing. It holds just 8% of the global foundry market, far behind industry leader TSMC, which has a 67% share, data from market researcher Trendforce show. Samsung had earlier announced the $16.5 billion chip supply deal without naming the client, saying the customer had requested confidentiality about the details of the deal, which will run through the end of 2033. Three sources briefed about the matter told Reuters that Tesla was the customer for the deal. The deal with Tesla comes as Samsung, which is due to report its earnings on Thursday, faces mounting pressure in the race to produce artificial intelligence chips, where it trails rivals such as TSMC and SK Hynix. This lag has weighed heavily on its profit and share price. Earlier this month, Samsung projected a 56% drop in second-quarter operating profit, partly due to widening losses of its foundry business. Pak Yuak, an analyst at Kiwoom Securities, said the deal would help reduce losses at Samsung's foundry business, which he estimates exceeded 5 trillion won ($3.6 billion) in the first half of the year. Analysts say Samsung has struggled to retain key clients, with many defecting to TSMC for advanced chips, underscoring technological challenges the firm faces in the race to stay relevant in the capital intensive business. TSMC counts Apple, Nvidia and Qualcomm among its customers. It is not clear whether the Samsung-Tesla deal is related to ongoing trade talks between South Korea and the United States. Seoul is seeking U.S. partnerships in chips and shipbuilding amid last-ditch efforts to reach a trade deal to eliminate or reduce potential 25% U.S. tariffs.
Forbes
24 minutes ago
- Forbes
DOGE Built An AI To Delete Half Of Federal Regulations. Will It Work?
The Dwight Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington, DC. The Washington Post recently revealed that the Department of Government Efficiency, known by its acronym DOGE, is developing and deploying an artificial intelligence tool designed to eliminate as much as half of all federal regulations. According to internal government documents obtained by the Post, the 'DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool' has already flagged approximately 100,000 federal rules that are not required by law. The hope is that AI can also be used to automate the most labor-intensive parts of the regulatory repeal process, so that a major deregulatory effort will be underway by the first anniversary of President Trump's second term in office. The internal documents reviewed by the Post include a PowerPoint presentation dated July 1, 2025, which lays out the assumptions and expectations driving the initiative. That document proposes that roughly 50 percent of the Code of Federal Regulations, or around 100,000 individual rule sections, could be repealed without violating any statutory obligations. DOGE estimates that the total cost of regulatory compliance in the United States is around $3.1 trillion annually. Stripping out rules that are not legally required could generate up to $1.5 trillion in annual compliance savings. Additionally, deregulation could unlock $600 billion in new investment and $1.1 trillion in new government revenue from untapped economic activity, according to DOGE. These are headline-grabbing numbers, though the methodology behind them isn't fully clear from the presentation. The AI tool at the center of DOGE's efforts is built to scan large volumes of regulatory text, compare those rules against their enabling statutes, and determine whether each section is mandatory or discretionary. In theory, if a rule goes beyond what Congress has required, or simply rephrases statutory language without adding any interpretive value, it could be marked for deletion. In practice, the task could get more complicated, as legal interpretation often lies in gray areas that AI algorithms may struggle to understand. DOGE's analysis suggests that repealing 100,000 regulations through traditional means would require about 3.6 million man-hours of legal and policy work. This includes the time required to research the law, draft proposed repeal notices, review and respond to public comments, and finalize repeal orders. Using the AI tool, the presentation claims this workload could be reduced by 93 percent. Most of the reduction would come from automation of tasks such as generating initial legal drafts and analyzing public comment responses. The AI tool has already been deployed at a couple of agencies. At the Department of Housing and Urban Development, it was used to evaluate over 1,000 regulatory sections in under two weeks. A similar effort at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau reportedly relied on the AI to draft 100 percent of the agency's deregulation proposals. Whether these pilot programs can be replicated across the government remains to be seen. Some agency officials have voiced concerns about the accuracy of the tool's legal interpretations. According to the Post, HUD staffers found that the AI misread the law in a number of cases. In the short term, the process to identify and repeal rules will inevitably require human oversight. Regulations exist within a complex and dynamic legal environment, and understanding their interactions with statutes, case law, and enforcement practices is not something that can yet be fully delegated to machines. However, DOGE has thus far framed the tool as an assistant that can reduce labor burdens and help focus legal expertise where it's most needed, not as a substitute for human judgment. Even so, the legal terrain surrounding this initiative is uncertain. The Administrative Procedure Act sets out specific requirements for repealing federal rules, including public notice and comment, reasoned explanation from the agency, and a prohibition on actions deemed 'arbitrary and capricious.' Courts have been skeptical in the past of deregulatory efforts that fail to meet these standards, and the use of AI could trigger new legal questions about what constitutes adequate administrative reasoning. There is also the matter of institutional resistance. The Post reports that some career staff have expressed reluctance to adopt DOGE's approach, citing concerns about outsourcing regulatory judgments to machines. Workforce reductions in the federal government may also have left agencies understaffed to manage a sudden surge in AI-generated repeal proposals. Still, the plan marches forward. DOGE intends to train all federal agencies on the use of its tool by the end of July. Each agency is expected to submit a finalized list of regulatory sections targeted for elimination by September 1. The timeline culminates in January 2026, when agencies are scheduled to submit repeal packages for review and approval. The slide deck calls this the 'Relaunch America' initiative. Whether that reboot is successful, or even legally viable, is an open question. It's possible that the courts will reject major parts of the initiative if AI-generated repeal notices fail to meet administrative law standards. But some degree of litigation may be inevitable, and perhaps even useful. The judicial system could play a constructive role in clarifying the extent to which AI can be used in regulatory decision-making. As with past episodes of administrative innovation, it often takes a few lawsuits to define the rules of the game. In the end, this DOGE initiative is a test of the federal government's appetite for experimentation. It is a wager that some portion of the administrative state is ripe for digitization. But it may also reveal the limits of current institutional capacity. In the coming months, we will find out which of limits are malleable, and which are not. The era of algorithmic governance may not be fully upon us, but it is no longer a thought experiment confined to white papers. It has arrived in the form of actual updates to government code. Whatever happens, the experiment is worth watching.
