logo
What happens when the Freedom Caucus takes control?

What happens when the Freedom Caucus takes control?

Yahoo21-05-2025
CHEYENNE, Wyo. — Up until five years ago, Wyoming House Speaker Chip Neiman was focused on cows and hay — not RINOs.
That changed when neighbors asked the rancher to consider getting involved in Republican precinct politics. He remembers a contentious early meeting with Republicans complaining about 'RINOS.'
'Why are we talking about African animals?' he whispered to someone next to him.
Neiman was a quick study on 'Republicans in name only,' growing irked by GOP legislators whose votes deviated on the party's core issues. That led him to run for the Wyoming House and join the hard right Freedom Caucus, which he sees as following true conservative Republican ideals.
There are plenty of voters in his state who agree: Wyoming now has the only state legislative chamber in the country controlled by the Freedom Caucus.
'This isn't a flash in the pan,' Neiman said during an interview in his office here in the state Capitol. Five years ago, the legislature had eight Freedom Caucus members. That grew over the past two election cycles to 42 out of 62 House members today. Meanwhile, Democrats are an endangered species in Cheyenne, holding just six seats in the chamber.
With a supermajority, the Freedom Caucus in its first legislative session was able to adopt bills that will reshape daily life in Wyoming, from launching a universal school voucher program that directs taxpayer dollars to pay for private, home, and religious education options to eliminating most gun-free zones and approving a substantial property tax reduction. The Freedom Caucus also passed legislation aimed at limiting illegal immigration and transgender rights.
It wasn't all smooth sailing, acknowledges Neiman, pointing to a Senate that doesn't have the same Freedom Caucus power behind it and a sometimes reticent Republican Gov. Mark Gordon, who allowed some bills to become law without his signature.
And Wyoming's conservative lawmakers know it's the next legislative session that will put them to the test. That's when they'll have to wrangle a state budget at the same time the Trump administration is slashing federal funds and roiling the economy with on-again-off-again tariffs.
Neiman says he's not concerned about the challenges, and expects other states will see more Freedom Caucus members joining the legislative ranks.
'I pray for their success, because obviously there are people in those districts that voted those people in and that want to have their voice heard,' said Neiman. 'They have a responsibility.'
This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.
Has it been difficult operating within the system after the Freedom Caucus here and across the country has for so long worked on the sidelines?
There's just a bunch more people in here that have a much more conservative mindset — a more Republican platform mindset — than there have been for a lot of years. A big part of the success of the Freedom Caucus is that a lot more people are becoming involved in the process. There's a lot of folks who are very frustrated with the direction of their legislatures.
States are bracing for how the Trump tariffs and federal cuts will trickle down to them. How is it affecting Wyoming and are there areas in the state that might be disproportionately impacted?
Tariffs have identified a situation where we're relying on other countries to provide resources that we can produce here cheaper. Fuel is one. So the American consumer — me as a farmer, buying my diesel — if I'm going to continue to buy out of that plant in Montana that has a pipeline to Canada, I'm going to be paying for those tariffs. It creates additional costs to all of our operating expenses in that part of the country, which increases the cost of food.
The frustrating part to me is that we have now identified our dependence on outside countries for things that we should be and should have been taken care of here at home. … Why in the world are we allowing another country like China to say, 'I'll send you something?'
Until more products are produced in the U.S., how does Wyoming anticipate dealing with tariffs?
We really haven't seen the effects of the tariffs here so far. Yet we are seeing an exponential increase in mining and exploration. We are seeing a reinvigoration of companies coming in to invest in Wyoming, because we do have coal, we do have oil. We have natural gas, uranium mining up in my part of the country [near Devil's Tower National Monument], it's just exploding. You can't find a drilling rig to drill a water well because they're all out there drilling holes for uranium mining.
As cuts are made at the federal level, what do you say to a family struggling to make ends meet?
Just hang in there. And just know that as things get high, they're going to hit a point where prices will come back down. … I'll tell people that are on lower income abilities that right now there's a massive regrowth of the cow numbers in the United States, which means people are retaining heifers. … We are going to successfully over produce for the market, and we're going to see a drop. And that's just how it works. So patience is a virtue, and it's hard to do when things are tight. We're already seeing the price of oil decline. And what that translates into is the costs of goods and services, and the input costs are going down. So people are going to actually be able to have more money in their pocket.
What about Medicaid cuts?
I don't see there being cutbacks on children, the elderly and infirm. What they are cutting back on is basically able-bodied adults. But Wyoming didn't take federal money (for Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act) so it won't be affected.
Has it been difficult to work with GOP lawmakers who aren't in the Freedom Caucus?
Not really. The big push is, how do you work with people that disagree with you — whether they're Republican or Democrat? As the speaker of the House, my job is to try to be able to listen, to try to work through differences that we can and to find common ground. Now, there's other things that I can't find common ground with.
There's this real pushback and almost a resentment for holding Republicans (not just the Freedom Caucus) accountable for their votes, holding people accountable for their Republican stance. … You say you're a Republican. But when you go down to the Legislature and you vote a completely different way, to me, that's a lack of integrity. You're just using the R as a vehicle to get where you want into a position of power.
You started your legislative session hoping to pass a handful of bills related to elections, immigration and education and you succeeded. Did you have to adjust to get them through?
All those passed. One of them, [to restrict] voter identification, just got challenged. Wyoming was the first state in the union to pass U.S. citizenship to vote, and got a shout out from President Trump. I think it was only logical that you should be a Wyoming resident, be a U.S. citizen before you can vote. It was not difficult to get them passed in the House. They were very, very solid on that. The Senate took a little longer, but they got it passed and got it through.
The big thing was waiting for our governor to sign it, which he ultimately did not — so it went into law without his signature. We overrode five vetoes, which was almost unheard of. … Our governor's, I mean, I work with people that are wrong all the time. I get along with him. We try to meet with him at least once a week, he or his people.
State Freedom Caucuses are often criticized for taking their marching orders from the national Freedom Caucus. Did you do that to get bills passed?
Absolutely not. But I don't go out of my way to try to reinvent the wheel. If I see a piece of legislation in another state that makes sense, we'll bring the bones of that here and try to shape it to fit Wyoming statutes.
What do you say to Freedom Caucus members in the 49 other states?
I pray for their success, because obviously there are people in those districts that voted those people in and that want to have their voice heard. They have a responsibility. I don't know if I would call them necessarily the conscience of the Republican Party, but if you're standing on the Republican Party platform of your state, voted on by the grassroots people, then I don't know what better place to stand other than the word of God. … I would encourage them to stay the course and make sure that integrity is the hallmark of your work, and that you listen to the people that elected you, and that you protect our Constitution and our Bill of Rights and know that that's what it's about.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who is Erika McEntarfer, the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner fired by Trump?
Who is Erika McEntarfer, the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner fired by Trump?

The Hill

time25 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Who is Erika McEntarfer, the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner fired by Trump?

WASHINGTON (AP) — The head of the agency that compiles the closely watched monthly jobs report usually toils in obscurity, but on Friday, the current holder of that job was loudly fired by the president of the United States. Erika McEntarfer, a longtime government employee, bore the brunt of President Donald Trump's unhappiness with Friday's jobs report, which showed that hiring had slowed in July and was much less in May and June that previously estimated. He accused her without evidence of manipulating the job numbers and noted she was an appointee of President Joe Biden. McEntarfer, a longtime government worker who had served as BLS head for a year and a half, did not immediately respond to a request for comment by The Associated Press. But her predecessor overseeing the jobs agency, former co-workers and associates have denounced the firing, warning about its repercussions and saying McEntarfer was nonpolitical in her role. Here's what to know about Erika McEntarfer: McEntarfer has a strong background on economics McEntarfer, whose research focuses on job loss, retirement, worker mobility, and wage rigidity, had previously worked at the Census Bureau's Center for Economic Studies, the Treasury Department's Office of Tax Policy and the White House Council of Economic Advisers in a nonpolitical role. She has a bachelor's degree in Social Science from Bard College and a doctoral degree in economics from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She was confirmed as BLS head on a bipartisan vote McEntarfer was nominated in 2023 to serve as BLS head, and the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions recommended that her nomination go to the full Senate for a vote. She was confirmed as BLS commissioner in January 2024 on a bipartisan 86-8 Senate vote. Among the Republican senators who voted to confirm her included then-Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, who is now Trump's vice president, and then-Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, who is now Trump's secretary of state. Before her confirmation hearing, a group called the Friends of the BLS, made up of former commissioners who served in both Democratic and Republican administrations, members of statistical associations and credentialed economists, said McEntarfer's background made her a great choice for the job. 'The many reasons to quickly confirm Dr. McEntarfer as the new BLS Commissioner all boil down to this: the agency, like the entire statistical system, is undergoing an intense, significant period of change and Dr. McEntarfer's wealth of research and statistical experience have equipped her to be the strong leader that BLS needs to meet these challenges,' Friends of the BLS wrote. Her former associates and co-workers decry her firing William Beach, who was appointed BLS commissioner in 2019 by Trump and served until 2023 during President Joe Biden's administration, called McEntarfer's firing 'groundless' and said in an X post that it 'sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau.' Former Labor Department chief economist Sarah J. Glynn, who received regular briefings from McEntarfer about BLS findings, said McEntarfer was generous with her time explaining what conclusions could or couldn't be reached from the data. If the data didn't support something an administration official was saying, McEntarfer would say so, Glynn said. She also never weighed in on how the administration should present or interpret the data, Glynn said — she would simply answer questions about the data. 'She had a sterling reputation as someone who is concerned about the accuracy of the data and not someone who puts a political spin on her work,' Glynn said. Heather Boushey, a senior research fellow at Harvard University, served with McEntarfer on the White House Council of Economic Advisers and said McEntarfer never talked politics at work. 'She showed up every day to focus on the best analysis and the best approach to her field and not get political. That is what I saw from her time and again. She is brilliant and well-respected among labor economists generally,' Boushey said. 'She wasn't coming into my office to talk politics or the political implications of something. She definitely wasn't engaging on that side of things.'

Trump Gets Rid of Those Pesky Statistics
Trump Gets Rid of Those Pesky Statistics

Atlantic

time26 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

Trump Gets Rid of Those Pesky Statistics

For decades, Donald Trump has been at war with numbers. Some capitulated more swiftly than others. His weight, his golf scores, and his net worth have long fallen in line. As I understand it, a Trump doctor appointment consists of going to a medical professional and announcing how much you would like to weigh and what your resting heart rate ought to be, and the wise doctor's patriotic, good equipment cooperates to measure you correctly. (I have tried this myself without success. My scale is not a true patriot.) Mean, wicked scales that display unflattering numbers, and foolish, incompetent golf balls that do not traverse the correct distance are promptly discarded and replaced with their more loyal counterparts. This is how value works! As Trump testified once in court, 'My net worth fluctuates, and it goes up and down with the markets and with attitudes and with feelings, even my own feelings … Yes, even my own feelings, as to where the world is, where the world is going, and that can change rapidly from day to day.' Some data, such as the number of votes he received at the polls in 2020, initially refused to budge. But with a little bit of threatening from some extra-patriotic patriots, the election turned out to have been a Trump blowout. Just ask any elected Republican; he'll tell you! Now these politicians are working on gerrymandering the country so that it will understand that Republicans are in the majority everywhere—which poll results would already be saying if they were more patriotic. And now at last Donald Trump has fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Once these disloyal statisticians are out of the way, the data will finally start to cooperate. The ONLY possible reason the economy could be doing anything other than booming is Biden-legacy manipulation. The economy is not frightened and exhausted by a man who pursues his tariffs with the wild-eyed avidity of Captain Ahab and seems genuinely unable to grasp the meaning of a trade deficit. No, the numbers are simply not patriotic enough. We must make an example of them! When they are frightened enough, I am sure they will show growth. Fumbling around in a fog of vibes and misinformation and things you saw on Fox News is good enough for the president; why should the rest of us ask for anything better? Soon no one will know what is happening—what the problem is, or what remedies to apply. What sectors are booming and which are contracting; whether interest rates should be higher or lower; whether it's hotter or colder than last year; whether mortality has gone up or gone down. It will be vibes all the way down. Soon we will all be bumping helplessly around in the dark. That's a good thing. We can all breathe easier and know that the economy is doing just what the president wants it to do. Try feeling like eggs are cheaper! Try feeling like you have a job. Try feeling like you can buy the amount of goods and services with your dollar that you desire. Close your eyes and try a little harder. Then you'll feel the prosperity. Trickling down, so warmly, from Trump on high. And the invisible hand, lifting you up.

Republican-led House committee postpones Ghislaine Maxwell deposition
Republican-led House committee postpones Ghislaine Maxwell deposition

NBC News

time26 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Republican-led House committee postpones Ghislaine Maxwell deposition

Congressional testimony by Jeffrey Epstein's co-conspirator and confidant Ghislaine Maxwell previously scheduled for mid-August will be postponed until at least October, the chair of the Republican-led House Oversight Committee indicated in a letter Friday. Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., said in the letter obtained by NBC News that the committee would consider next steps after the Supreme Court in late September decides whether it will review Maxwell's conviction as a sex offender. The committee subpoenaed Maxwell for a deposition last month and scheduled it for Aug. 11, citing the "immense public interest and scrutiny" surrounding her case and Epstein's. In Friday's letter, Comer reiterated his desire to interview Maxwell, calling her testimony "vital to the Committee's efforts regarding Mr. Jeffrey Epstein, including the 2007 non-prosecution agreement and the circumstances surrounding Mr. Epstein's death." "These investigative efforts may be used to inform potential legislation to improve federal efforts to combat sex trafficking and reform the use of non-prosecution agreements and/or plea agreements in sex-crime investigations," he wrote. Maxwell's lawyers, David Oscar Markus and Melissa Madrigal, said in a statement they "appreciate the Committee's willingness to delay" the deposition and "will continue to engage with Congress in good faith to find a way for Ms. Maxwell to share her information without compromising her constitutional rights." Maxwell's attorneys previously indicated that she planned to invoke her Fifth Amendment rights during the deposition unless the committee granted her immunity, telling Comer in a letter on Tuesday that absent the legal protection Maxwell's testimony "could compromise her constitutional rights, prejudice her legal claims, and potentially taint a future jury pool." The Oversight Committee in its letter Friday said it remains "unwilling" to grant Maxwell congressional immunity, but will "continue to engage in good faith negotiations" regarding the particulars of the deposition. Maxwell for months has been pleading with the Supreme Court to overturn her 2021 conviction on federal sex trafficking charges and subsequent 20-year prison sentence, arguing that her conviction violated a non-prosecution agreement prosecutors in Florida made with Epstein in 2007 that extended to several of his co-conspirators. Federal prosecutors have argued that the 2007 agreement applies only in Florida, where it was reached, and not New York, where Maxwell's 2021 trial took place. The federal judge who oversaw that trial, Judge Alison Nathan, agreed. The Supreme Court indicated Wednesday it would consider whether to review Maxwell's case during a private conference on Sept. 29. The Oversight Committee's subpoena for Maxwell was sent when the Trump administration was coming under increasing pressure to disclose more information related to Epstein, who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. His death by suicide has sparked conspiracy theories for years, some of which have been promoted by administration officials and Trump allies. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Maxwell and her attorney last week for an interview that spanned nine hours across two days. The Justice Department official has made no public statements about what Maxwell said during their meeting. On Friday, Maxwell was moved to a minimum-security federal prison camp in Texas that only houses women, unlike the Florida facility where she was previously held, which houses both men and women. Trump, alongside Attorney General Pam Bondi, had pledged to release all files pertaining to the investigation, including a purported "client list" of people who benefited from Epstein's crimes. In a stunning about-face last month, the Justice Department released a memo outlining its decision to cease additional disclosures while dismissing several conspiracy theories related to the case. The memo roiled Trump's base and proved to be a rare point of contention between the president and his supporters, particularly as additional news reports emerged highlighting Trump and Epstein's past relationship. Hours after the Wall Street Journal reported last month that Trump wrote a letter to Epstein in 2003 with a drawing of a naked woman, Trump directed Bondi to seek the release of "pertinent" grand jury testimony from Epstein and Maxwell's cases. A federal judge in Florida denied the request, while another in New York has sought additional information from the government before making a ruling.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store