Latest news with #Neiman
Los Angeles Times
6 days ago
- Business
- Los Angeles Times
Palisades Tennis Club member Cynthia Neiman becomes first female USTA Southern California president
Cynthia Neiman was recently elected as the board president of the Southern California section of the United States Tennis Assn. She became the first woman in the section's 138-year history to hold that spot. And she didn't know it until after the vote occurred. 'On the one hand, it's a long time coming,' Neiman said. 'But on the other hand, I just feel fortunate to be in a position to help in any way I can.' Neiman, a member at Palisades Tennis Club in Newport Beach, said tennis is a big part of her life. She walked onto the team at UCLA in the 1980s and remains capable of competing at a high level, recently playing on a top senior women's doubles 4.5-level team. 'We made it to third in the country, so we had a pretty good run,' Neiman said, adding that the Tennis Channel is constantly on the television in her Long Beach home. Neiman is now a history maker in her new role. She comes to it from a marketing background, formerly working at companies like Mattel and Ikea, among others. Neiman is currently the chief experience officer for Rady Children's Health, created when Children's Hospital of Orange County merged with Rady Children's Hospital San Diego in January. She joined the SCTA board in 2020. She said what drew her in was her experience on the board of the nonprofit Pete Brown Junior Tennis Program for under-served youth, run by her good friend Marty Woods in South Central Los Angeles. 'I really saw all of the good that tennis does, it's not just about the pros and elite players,' Neiman said. 'I'm so proud of what [USTA Southern California executive director Trevor Kronemann] and his staff do to really grow the game, promote the game. It's been incredibly rewarding. I view my role as supporting Trevor and the staff and removing roadblocks, and mirroring what the priorities are of USTA national. That really comes down to courts, coaches and programming.' Kronemann said he thinks the world of Neiman, who is also a two-time breast cancer survivor, and that they are on the same page. 'She's a people person, and she's a hard worker,' Kronemann said. 'She's had an incredible career … Tennis needs these stories to be told. It's not that Cynthia Neiman has won four Grand Slams or 18 Grand Slams. It's that Cynthia Neiman has built a life through tennis, and through the community. These are the stories that I think are great stories.' The USTA has an initiative called '35 by '35,' designed to create 35 million tennis players in the United States over the next 10 years. Kronemann said there are about 25 million tennis players nationwide, and roughly 10% of them play in Southern California. 'What's really interesting is that there's another 25 million who have identified themselves as wanting to play tennis, but they've never played,' Neiman said. 'How do we attract those folks? Something that certainly I think about now is, how do we just bring in these people who have never picked up a racket and make it easy and fun for them?' She said the Southern California chapter recently received a $70,000 grant from the national organization for a program called 'Taking it to the Streets.' The idea is to introduce the sport to people in an informal way. 'We're wrapping a van and going to show up in unexpected places, whether it's parking lots or malls or other venues, just putting up a court with a net and have rackets and balls for people to hit around a little bit,' Neiman said. She added that she feels fortunate to have other stellar officers recently elected to the executive board, including Laguna Beach resident and former UC Irvine standout Neel Grover, a business executive who is currently the Intercollegiate Tennis Assn. chairman and has won 27 USTA National gold balls.
Buzz Feed
25-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Buzz Feed
28 Matching Sets To Make Getting Dressed Easier
A linen set that looks like it was plucked from the set of a film where the main character has a terrible boss but a fabulous job in publishing. Please tell me that you know what I mean. Promising review: "Love this more than what I anticipated. I'm very picky and usually only shop for clothing at Nordstrom, Neiman, or other boutique brands, and for the price, this is 100% worth it. It's lined and the quality is great. Will be buying again." —Valerie R. Get it from Amazon for $49 (available in sizes S–XXL and in 16 colors). A high-neck lace set I'd like to wear on a cruise that hops from one Sicilian island to the next. My flight is not booked, and I'm actually probably not going, but I'll add this to my shopping cart in the name of hope. Promising review: "I absolutely love this set! The adjustable straps in the back are a fantastic feature, allowing for a perfect fit every time. The material is wonderfully light, making it ideal for hot summer days. Plus, the skirt has a second slip layer." —Amazon customerGet it from Amazon for $27.99+ (available in sizes S–XL and in 17 colors). A puff sleeve top and maxi skirt meant for frolicking through the forest, making bouquets from freshly-picked flowers, possibly baking bread from scratch, etcetera. Cottagecore in its purest form. Get the top for $13.48 (originally $44.95) and the skirt for $16.48 (originally $54.95) from Aerie (available in sizes XXS–XXL and in five colors). A tube top and skirt set because summer is in full swing, and this has me drooling at the mere thought of sand and seaweed-strewn beaches. Promising review: "This was an amazing purchase! I wore this on a Cancun trip and got so many compliments! Top stayed up with only a few pull-ups throughout the night while I danced, which is very impressive for this DD-chested lady." —Amazon customerGet it from Amazon for $39.99 (available in sizes XS–XL and in 11 colors). A pinstripe set that just called my cell and begged me to book a fancy dinner reservation, which I took as an immediate order, so I'll see you tonight. Get it from Princess Polly for $56 (originally $94, available in sizes 0–20). A vest-and-shorts set I'm officially dubbing my work-from-home and maybe-go-to-happy-hour wardrobe. My leggings are quivering in fear in the face of this comfy duo. Promising review: "LOVE!! This was a great purchase. The shorts are not too short, which is what I wanted. I will definitely be getting another color. This outfit can be dressed up or down, and when accessorized, and looks more expensive than it is." —LadyVGet it from Amazon for $43.99+ (available in sizes XS–XXL and in 23 colors). A wide-leg pants set with a matching tank to ease your woes when running late for, well, anything. A simple design makes this combo perfect for meetings and boozy brunches alike. A tailored vest and wide-leg pant that proves you *should* dress for the job you want. Job in this context? CEO of a cool creative company that (fill in your personal mission statement here). Promising review: "This suit is everything! Color, fit, quality! I got so many compliments and will be getting in other colors!" —Nicole B. Get it from Amazon for $66.99 (available in sizes S–XXL and in 14 colors). A bodycon skirt and top set you'll want to add to your carry-on stat thanks to the limitless (well, three) outfit possibilities. Promising review: "I bought this about three days before my surprise trip to Vegas, and it came in time and I was so glad! It was perfect! Very comfy material, and can be dressed up or down, or pieces can be separated. I wore the top and bottom to dinner and drinks with heels, and then changed into comfy shoes and some black pants to walk the strip in the late evening. I got it in black, too. I want more colors! Definitely try this set out." —Chris & LaurenGet it from Amazon for $43.99 (available in sizes S–XL and in 17 colors). A button-up top and pants for a chic, but equally comfortable upgrade to your most beloved pajama set. This duo + heels? Summer brunch, here you come. Get the top for $99 and the bottoms for $53.40 (originally $89) from Athleta (available in sizes XXS–3X and in seven colors). A knit set if you're trying to curate a wardrobe of additional "basics" that can be worn daily but want to add a little spice. Consider this mix-and-match set a win-win all around. Get it from Free People for $228 (available in sizes XS–XL and in two colors). A high-neck top and flared skirt set about to make those early morning ballet barre sessions feel so much less painful. Consider this a worthy investment that prevents you from canceling last-minute workout sessions (and having to pay a fine). Promising review: "Absolutely love this outfit. Perfect to play pickleball in. I got a size medium, the top fits well, the band on the waist is pretty tight, which helps keep it from falling down while playing. Definitely an outfit that'll last a while." —alexisGet it from Amazon for $37.99 (available in sizes XS–XL and in 12 colors). A patchwork top and mini skirt that doesn't come with a roundtrip flight but absolutely should because it deserves to be worn in a tropical climate, piña colada in hand as your sole accessory. Get the top for $59 and the skirt for $59 from Lulus (available in sizes XS–XL). A crewneck tee and wide-leg pant combo for a polished home office look that's not as formal as a pencil skirt but also not as *informal* as the pajamas you wore to bed last night. Promising review: "This set is so incredibly soft, lightweight, and comfortable. I wear it around the house, to run errands. It washes great and is definitely a staple in my closet." —KirstenGet it from Amazon for $39.98 (available in sizes XS–XL and in 14 colors). A tank and skirt set because you only have five minutes to get dressed for this event and no time to think, "what am I going to wear today?" Slip into this duo for your next outing — whether for a picnic or rooftop birthday party. Promising review: "Purchased to wear to work with a soft pink blazer, and I got so many compliments. It looks way more expensive than what I paid. Great material, great color, and great fit. You can probably dress it down with flats also, but I wore heels." —Amazon CustomerGet it from Amazon for $39.99 (available in sizes XS–XL and in 14 colors). A stylish matching set that screams "farmers market chic" and I don't know why because I have not been to a farmers market in like, three years. But this set! This set will be my motivation. Promising review: "I love this set, it's so versatile. You can wear the pieces separately or together and dress them up or down. I loved the set so much that I got both navy blue and army green, and they mix and match perfectly. JUST GET IT!!!" —Kristine it from Amazon for $29.99 (available in sizes XS–4X and in 25 colors). A breezy top and belted shorts channeling Nantucket attire. Consider this your uniform for shucking oysters and relaxing in a quaint coastal town filled with small bookshops and pedestrian pathways. Get the top for $70 and the shorts for $52 from Sabo Skirt (available in sizes XXS–XL). A seamless set adored by reviewers, who swear that the high-waisted leggings are squat-proof but "don't feel suffocating," which I'm pretty sure is allllll the proof we need that sorcery exists. Promising review: "This outfit fits so well but doesn't feel suffocating. The pants looked too small at first, but once I put them on, they stretched out easily, and the material is thick enough for it not to be see-through or show panty lines. The top is cozy to wear, supportive, and va-va voom if you wear it as a top on its own. It covers the back well, too. I plan on ordering more colors." —Jenny Get it from Amazon for $35.99 (available in sizes XS–L and in 18 colors). A ruffle set about to become your "going out" uniform and by going out, I mean heading to dinner at 7 p.m. and arriving home promptly by 10 p.m. to complete your nighttime skincare routine and watch another true crime doc. Get it from Nasty Gal for $53 (available in sizes 12–24). A gingham cami and mini skirt if you're ready to formally break up with boring clothes and embrace funner silhouettes to welcome rooftop weather season. The bows are the standout feature here, along with the fabric stretchy without being flimsy. Get the top for $105 and the skirt for $90 from Damson Madder (available in UK sizes 6–20). A ruched top-and-pants set because there's no reason to panic about what to wear to that Sunday brunch when you have this beauty. A sleeveless top and pleated pant set for a polished office look that's not as formal as a pencil skirt but also not as *informal* as your cherished Lululemon leggings. Promising review: "The top is roomy enough that I can wear a long-sleeved T-shirt under it, which not only will keep me warmer, but gives it a different look. Looking forward to taking it on a cruise to be comfortable on sea days." —Judy K. Get it from Amazon for $39.99 (available in sizes S–XL and in 15 colors). A lightweight matching set that can turn a walk around your local lake into a romantic gondola ride in Venice if you dream hard enough. Promising review: "Wore this on a cruise for my bachelorette trip and it received so many compliments. The overall outfit has nice fabric and great for warm weather." —Austin LaingGet it from Amazon for $37.99+ (available in sizes XS–XL and in 30 colors). A two-piece set so cute I can practically taste that post-beach day sunset in which you're hanging out at the boardwalk restaurant, having a wee cocktail, and the heat has finally broken to reveal a light breeze. Promising review: "The perfect beach coverup! Was so light, soft, and comfortable. The pants hugged in all the right places, and they weren't too long, just right." —lindseyGet it from Amazon for $48.99 (available in sizes S–XL and in 10 colors). A crochet set that feels like it should come with an all-inclusive resort package because, wow, this is a vacation 'fit if I ever did see one. Promising review: "I purchased this set for my recent trip to Mexico and received so many compliments. I love that it's matching and has pants. It's super comfortable, fits true to size, and the pants are long enough if you want them to be a little more on the high-waisted side." —JeanaGet it from Amazon for $34.99 (available in sizes S–XL and in 11 colors). A matching set with a smocked top and smocked elastic waistband for maximum stretch and comfort — even if you're wearing the below to a fancy event that requires heels and metaphorical pearls. Promising review: "I absolutely loved this outfit and wore it to dinner on my birthday. I got a lot of compliments on how colorful it was! I would suggest a quick steam/iron on the skirt when you get it to help the pockets settle. I honestly could have gone down a size as well because of how stretchy the fabric is." —Amazon customerGet it from Amazon for $39.99 (available in sizes S–XL and in 19 colors). A vest and skirt set that's basically a costume for picking figs right off the vine. These pieces can be worn separately as often as together: The dainty top is lightweight and the maxi is perfection. I am in love with both. Get it from Free People for $168 (available in sizes XS–XL and in three colors). A two-piece set for early mornings when the only effort you'd like to muster up before you hop on a Zoom is reserved for caffeine making and caffeine making only. This 'fit is easy peasy. Promising review: "For those of you who like to go to the store in your PJs and flannel pants, order this set! You will still be comfy, but look great. These sets are lightweight but not see-through. True to size without fitting skintight. Extremely comfortable and versatile. Dress it up or down." —Mimi Get it from Amazon for $38.99 (available in sizes S–3XL and in 39 colors).
Yahoo
21-05-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
What happens when the Freedom Caucus takes control?
CHEYENNE, Wyo. — Up until five years ago, Wyoming House Speaker Chip Neiman was focused on cows and hay — not RINOs. That changed when neighbors asked the rancher to consider getting involved in Republican precinct politics. He remembers a contentious early meeting with Republicans complaining about 'RINOS.' 'Why are we talking about African animals?' he whispered to someone next to him. Neiman was a quick study on 'Republicans in name only,' growing irked by GOP legislators whose votes deviated on the party's core issues. That led him to run for the Wyoming House and join the hard right Freedom Caucus, which he sees as following true conservative Republican ideals. There are plenty of voters in his state who agree: Wyoming now has the only state legislative chamber in the country controlled by the Freedom Caucus. 'This isn't a flash in the pan,' Neiman said during an interview in his office here in the state Capitol. Five years ago, the legislature had eight Freedom Caucus members. That grew over the past two election cycles to 42 out of 62 House members today. Meanwhile, Democrats are an endangered species in Cheyenne, holding just six seats in the chamber. With a supermajority, the Freedom Caucus in its first legislative session was able to adopt bills that will reshape daily life in Wyoming, from launching a universal school voucher program that directs taxpayer dollars to pay for private, home, and religious education options to eliminating most gun-free zones and approving a substantial property tax reduction. The Freedom Caucus also passed legislation aimed at limiting illegal immigration and transgender rights. It wasn't all smooth sailing, acknowledges Neiman, pointing to a Senate that doesn't have the same Freedom Caucus power behind it and a sometimes reticent Republican Gov. Mark Gordon, who allowed some bills to become law without his signature. And Wyoming's conservative lawmakers know it's the next legislative session that will put them to the test. That's when they'll have to wrangle a state budget at the same time the Trump administration is slashing federal funds and roiling the economy with on-again-off-again tariffs. Neiman says he's not concerned about the challenges, and expects other states will see more Freedom Caucus members joining the legislative ranks. 'I pray for their success, because obviously there are people in those districts that voted those people in and that want to have their voice heard,' said Neiman. 'They have a responsibility.' This conversation has been edited for length and clarity. Has it been difficult operating within the system after the Freedom Caucus here and across the country has for so long worked on the sidelines? There's just a bunch more people in here that have a much more conservative mindset — a more Republican platform mindset — than there have been for a lot of years. A big part of the success of the Freedom Caucus is that a lot more people are becoming involved in the process. There's a lot of folks who are very frustrated with the direction of their legislatures. States are bracing for how the Trump tariffs and federal cuts will trickle down to them. How is it affecting Wyoming and are there areas in the state that might be disproportionately impacted? Tariffs have identified a situation where we're relying on other countries to provide resources that we can produce here cheaper. Fuel is one. So the American consumer — me as a farmer, buying my diesel — if I'm going to continue to buy out of that plant in Montana that has a pipeline to Canada, I'm going to be paying for those tariffs. It creates additional costs to all of our operating expenses in that part of the country, which increases the cost of food. The frustrating part to me is that we have now identified our dependence on outside countries for things that we should be and should have been taken care of here at home. … Why in the world are we allowing another country like China to say, 'I'll send you something?' Until more products are produced in the U.S., how does Wyoming anticipate dealing with tariffs? We really haven't seen the effects of the tariffs here so far. Yet we are seeing an exponential increase in mining and exploration. We are seeing a reinvigoration of companies coming in to invest in Wyoming, because we do have coal, we do have oil. We have natural gas, uranium mining up in my part of the country [near Devil's Tower National Monument], it's just exploding. You can't find a drilling rig to drill a water well because they're all out there drilling holes for uranium mining. As cuts are made at the federal level, what do you say to a family struggling to make ends meet? Just hang in there. And just know that as things get high, they're going to hit a point where prices will come back down. … I'll tell people that are on lower income abilities that right now there's a massive regrowth of the cow numbers in the United States, which means people are retaining heifers. … We are going to successfully over produce for the market, and we're going to see a drop. And that's just how it works. So patience is a virtue, and it's hard to do when things are tight. We're already seeing the price of oil decline. And what that translates into is the costs of goods and services, and the input costs are going down. So people are going to actually be able to have more money in their pocket. What about Medicaid cuts? I don't see there being cutbacks on children, the elderly and infirm. What they are cutting back on is basically able-bodied adults. But Wyoming didn't take federal money (for Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act) so it won't be affected. Has it been difficult to work with GOP lawmakers who aren't in the Freedom Caucus? Not really. The big push is, how do you work with people that disagree with you — whether they're Republican or Democrat? As the speaker of the House, my job is to try to be able to listen, to try to work through differences that we can and to find common ground. Now, there's other things that I can't find common ground with. There's this real pushback and almost a resentment for holding Republicans (not just the Freedom Caucus) accountable for their votes, holding people accountable for their Republican stance. … You say you're a Republican. But when you go down to the Legislature and you vote a completely different way, to me, that's a lack of integrity. You're just using the R as a vehicle to get where you want into a position of power. You started your legislative session hoping to pass a handful of bills related to elections, immigration and education and you succeeded. Did you have to adjust to get them through? All those passed. One of them, [to restrict] voter identification, just got challenged. Wyoming was the first state in the union to pass U.S. citizenship to vote, and got a shout out from President Trump. I think it was only logical that you should be a Wyoming resident, be a U.S. citizen before you can vote. It was not difficult to get them passed in the House. They were very, very solid on that. The Senate took a little longer, but they got it passed and got it through. The big thing was waiting for our governor to sign it, which he ultimately did not — so it went into law without his signature. We overrode five vetoes, which was almost unheard of. … Our governor's, I mean, I work with people that are wrong all the time. I get along with him. We try to meet with him at least once a week, he or his people. State Freedom Caucuses are often criticized for taking their marching orders from the national Freedom Caucus. Did you do that to get bills passed? Absolutely not. But I don't go out of my way to try to reinvent the wheel. If I see a piece of legislation in another state that makes sense, we'll bring the bones of that here and try to shape it to fit Wyoming statutes. What do you say to Freedom Caucus members in the 49 other states? I pray for their success, because obviously there are people in those districts that voted those people in and that want to have their voice heard. They have a responsibility. I don't know if I would call them necessarily the conscience of the Republican Party, but if you're standing on the Republican Party platform of your state, voted on by the grassroots people, then I don't know what better place to stand other than the word of God. … I would encourage them to stay the course and make sure that integrity is the hallmark of your work, and that you listen to the people that elected you, and that you protect our Constitution and our Bill of Rights and know that that's what it's about.
Politico
21-05-2025
- Politics
- Politico
What happens when the Freedom Caucus takes control?
CHEYENNE, Wyo. — Up until five years ago, Wyoming House Speaker Chip Neiman was focused on cows and hay — not RINOs. That changed when neighbors asked the rancher to consider getting involved in Republican precinct politics. He remembers a contentious early meeting with Republicans complaining about 'RINOS.' 'Why are we talking about African animals?' he whispered to someone next to him. Neiman was a quick study on 'Republicans in name only,' growing irked by GOP legislators whose votes deviated on the party's core issues. That led him to run for the Wyoming House and join the hard right Freedom Caucus, which he sees as following true conservative Republican ideals. There are plenty of voters in his state who agree: Wyoming now has the only state legislative chamber in the country controlled by the Freedom Caucus. 'This isn't a flash in the pan,' Neiman said during an interview in his office here in the state Capitol. Five years ago, the legislature had eight Freedom Caucus members. That grew over the past two election cycles to 42 out of 62 House members today. Meanwhile, Democrats are an endangered species in Cheyenne, holding just six seats in the chamber. With a supermajority, the Freedom Caucus in its first legislative session was able to adopt bills that will reshape daily life in Wyoming, from launching a universal school voucher program that directs taxpayer dollars to pay for private, home, and religious education options to eliminating most gun-free zones and approving a substantial property tax reduction. The Freedom Caucus also passed legislation aimed at limiting illegal immigration and transgender rights. It wasn't all smooth sailing, acknowledges Neiman, pointing to a Senate that doesn't have the same Freedom Caucus power behind it and a sometimes reticent Republican Gov. Mark Gordon, who allowed some bills to become law without his signature. And Wyoming's conservative lawmakers know it's the next legislative session that will put them to the test. That's when they'll have to wrangle a state budget at the same time the Trump administration is slashing federal funds and roiling the economy with on-again-off-again tariffs. Neiman says he's not concerned about the challenges, and expects other states will see more Freedom Caucus members joining the legislative ranks. 'I pray for their success, because obviously there are people in those districts that voted those people in and that want to have their voice heard,' said Neiman. 'They have a responsibility.' This conversation has been edited for length and clarity. Has it been difficult operating within the system after the Freedom Caucus here and across the country has for so long worked on the sidelines? There's just a bunch more people in here that have a much more conservative mindset — a more Republican platform mindset — than there have been for a lot of years. A big part of the success of the Freedom Caucus is that a lot more people are becoming involved in the process. There's a lot of folks who are very frustrated with the direction of their legislatures. States are bracing for how the Trump tariffs and federal cuts will trickle down to them. How is it affecting Wyoming and are there areas in the state that might be disproportionately impacted? Tariffs have identified a situation where we're relying on other countries to provide resources that we can produce here cheaper. Fuel is one. So the American consumer — me as a farmer, buying my diesel — if I'm going to continue to buy out of that plant in Montana that has a pipeline to Canada, I'm going to be paying for those tariffs. It creates additional costs to all of our operating expenses in that part of the country, which increases the cost of food. The frustrating part to me is that we have now identified our dependence on outside countries for things that we should be and should have been taken care of here at home. … Why in the world are we allowing another country like China to say, 'I'll send you something?' Until more products are produced in the U.S., how does Wyoming anticipate dealing with tariffs? We really haven't seen the effects of the tariffs here so far. Yet we are seeing an exponential increase in mining and exploration. We are seeing a reinvigoration of companies coming in to invest in Wyoming, because we do have coal, we do have oil. We have natural gas, uranium mining up in my part of the country [near Devil's Tower National Monument], it's just exploding. You can't find a drilling rig to drill a water well because they're all out there drilling holes for uranium mining. As cuts are made at the federal level, what do you say to a family struggling to make ends meet? Just hang in there. And just know that as things get high, they're going to hit a point where prices will come back down. … I'll tell people that are on lower income abilities that right now there's a massive regrowth of the cow numbers in the United States, which means people are retaining heifers. … We are going to successfully over produce for the market, and we're going to see a drop. And that's just how it works. So patience is a virtue, and it's hard to do when things are tight. We're already seeing the price of oil decline. And what that translates into is the costs of goods and services, and the input costs are going down. So people are going to actually be able to have more money in their pocket. What about Medicaid cuts? I don't see there being cutbacks on children, the elderly and infirm. What they are cutting back on is basically able-bodied adults. But Wyoming didn't take federal money (for Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act) so it won't be affected. Has it been difficult to work with GOP lawmakers who aren't in the Freedom Caucus? Not really. The big push is, how do you work with people that disagree with you — whether they're Republican or Democrat? As the speaker of the House, my job is to try to be able to listen, to try to work through differences that we can and to find common ground. Now, there's other things that I can't find common ground with. There's this real pushback and almost a resentment for holding Republicans (not just the Freedom Caucus) accountable for their votes, holding people accountable for their Republican stance. … You say you're a Republican. But when you go down to the Legislature and you vote a completely different way, to me, that's a lack of integrity. You're just using the R as a vehicle to get where you want into a position of power. You started your legislative session hoping to pass a handful of bills related to elections, immigration and education and you succeeded. Did you have to adjust to get them through? All those passed. One of them, [to restrict] voter identification, just got challenged. Wyoming was the first state in the union to pass U.S. citizenship to vote, and got a shout out from President Trump. I think it was only logical that you should be a Wyoming resident, be a U.S. citizen before you can vote. It was not difficult to get them passed in the House. They were very, very solid on that. The Senate took a little longer, but they got it passed and got it through. The big thing was waiting for our governor to sign it, which he ultimately did not — so it went into law without his signature. We overrode five vetoes, which was almost unheard of. … Our governor's, I mean, I work with people that are wrong all the time. I get along with him. We try to meet with him at least once a week, he or his people. State Freedom Caucuses are often criticized for taking their marching orders from the national Freedom Caucus. Did you do that to get bills passed? Absolutely not. But I don't go out of my way to try to reinvent the wheel. If I see a piece of legislation in another state that makes sense, we'll bring the bones of that here and try to shape it to fit Wyoming statutes. What do you say to Freedom Caucus members in the 49 other states? I pray for their success, because obviously there are people in those districts that voted those people in and that want to have their voice heard. They have a responsibility. I don't know if I would call them necessarily the conscience of the Republican Party, but if you're standing on the Republican Party platform of your state, voted on by the grassroots people, then I don't know what better place to stand other than the word of God. … I would encourage them to stay the course and make sure that integrity is the hallmark of your work, and that you listen to the people that elected you, and that you protect our Constitution and our Bill of Rights and know that that's what it's about.
The Independent
09-04-2025
- Business
- The Independent
Trump ‘got it very wrong' over tariffs, says economist used by US president
A renowned economist who co-wrote research used by Donald Trump to justify his aggressive tariff hikes says the White House got it 'very wrong'. University of Chicago Economics Professor Brett Neiman, who was also a Biden administration Treasury official, said the Trump administration wildly overcalculated tariff rates placed on nearly all countries that export to the U.S. The U.S. Trade Representative released its workings and cited a paper produced by four economists, including Prof Neiman, supposedly supporting its approach. 'But it got it wrong. Very wrong. I disagree fundamentally with the government's trade policy and approach,' the professor wrote in a guest essay for The New York Times. 'Even taking it at face value, our findings suggest the calculated tariffs should be dramatically smaller — perhaps one-fourth as large.' Neiman said there are numerous mistakes with the new tariff regime, which has placed tariffs of at least 10 per cent of nearly all exporters to the U.S., and up to 50 per cent on some countries with large trade surpluses. The sweeping tariffs caused stock market chaos on Monday and led to calls from billionaire allies including Bill Ackman to call for a rethink, but Trump dismissed the turmoil, saying 'sometimes you have to take medicine to fix something'. Neiman said the biggest mistake with the tariffs is the fact that the Office of the Trade Representative said they were calculated at levels that would eliminate trade deficits, because that was not a reasonable goal. 'Trade imbalances between two countries can emerge for many reasons that have nothing to do with protectionism,' he said. He highlighted the trading relationship with Sri Lanka as an example: Americans spend more on Sri Lankan-made clothing than the South Asian country spends on American drugs and gas turbines, and that reflects differences in development and resources. 'The deficit numbers don't suggest, let alone prove, unfair competition,' Prof Neiman said. While there are some arguments for reducing the overall trade deficit - which is when the value of a country's imports exceeds the value of its exports - Neiman said it made little sense to apply this on a country-by-country basis. The economist also pointed out that the reciprocal tariffs would not even achieve this goal, particularly given the broad nature of the changes. 'A large tariff on Japanese auto parts could cause an increase in demand for imports from Mexico and vice versa. And the tariffs clearly invite retaliation and may over time increase the dollar's value, both factors that would most likely depress US exports,' he said. Ignoring both of those problems, Neiman said even the calculation used to formulate the tariffs, including the part using the research he co-authored, was incorrect. Based on the research he conducted with Alberto Cavallo, Gita Gopinath, Jenny Tang, Neiman said they estimated that domestic importers would bear a 95 per cent increase (pass through) in prices: 'In simple terms, that implies that the price paid for U.S. imports would rise almost as much as the tariff rate.' But he said the Trump administration used a different figure to calculate the rate of pass through, using a rate of 25 per cent. 'Where does 25 percent come from? Is it related to our work? I don't know. The reciprocal tariffs have enormous implications for workers, firms, consumers and stock markets around the globe. But the methodology note offers shockingly few details,' Prof Neiman said. He said the tariffs should be scrapped entirely, but barring that: 'the administration should divide its results by four'.
