logo
What happens when the Freedom Caucus takes control?

What happens when the Freedom Caucus takes control?

Politico21-05-2025
CHEYENNE, Wyo. — Up until five years ago, Wyoming House Speaker Chip Neiman was focused on cows and hay — not RINOs.
That changed when neighbors asked the rancher to consider getting involved in Republican precinct politics. He remembers a contentious early meeting with Republicans complaining about 'RINOS.'
'Why are we talking about African animals?' he whispered to someone next to him.
Neiman was a quick study on 'Republicans in name only,' growing irked by GOP legislators whose votes deviated on the party's core issues. That led him to run for the Wyoming House and join the hard right Freedom Caucus, which he sees as following true conservative Republican ideals.
There are plenty of voters in his state who agree: Wyoming now has the only state legislative chamber in the country controlled by the Freedom Caucus.
'This isn't a flash in the pan,' Neiman said during an interview in his office here in the state Capitol. Five years ago, the legislature had eight Freedom Caucus members. That grew over the past two election cycles to 42 out of 62 House members today. Meanwhile, Democrats are an endangered species in Cheyenne, holding just six seats in the chamber.
With a supermajority, the Freedom Caucus in its first legislative session was able to adopt bills that will reshape daily life in Wyoming, from launching a universal school voucher program that directs taxpayer dollars to pay for private, home, and religious education options to eliminating most gun-free zones and approving a substantial property tax reduction. The Freedom Caucus also passed legislation aimed at limiting illegal immigration and transgender rights.
It wasn't all smooth sailing, acknowledges Neiman, pointing to a Senate that doesn't have the same Freedom Caucus power behind it and a sometimes reticent Republican Gov. Mark Gordon, who allowed some bills to become law without his signature.
And Wyoming's conservative lawmakers know it's the next legislative session that will put them to the test. That's when they'll have to wrangle a state budget at the same time the Trump administration is slashing federal funds and roiling the economy with on-again-off-again tariffs.
Neiman says he's not concerned about the challenges, and expects other states will see more Freedom Caucus members joining the legislative ranks.
'I pray for their success, because obviously there are people in those districts that voted those people in and that want to have their voice heard,' said Neiman. 'They have a responsibility.'
This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.
Has it been difficult operating within the system after the Freedom Caucus here and across the country has for so long worked on the sidelines?
There's just a bunch more people in here that have a much more conservative mindset — a more Republican platform mindset — than there have been for a lot of years. A big part of the success of the Freedom Caucus is that a lot more people are becoming involved in the process. There's a lot of folks who are very frustrated with the direction of their legislatures.
States are bracing for how the Trump tariffs and federal cuts will trickle down to them. How is it affecting Wyoming and are there areas in the state that might be disproportionately impacted?
Tariffs have identified a situation where we're relying on other countries to provide resources that we can produce here cheaper. Fuel is one. So the American consumer — me as a farmer, buying my diesel — if I'm going to continue to buy out of that plant in Montana that has a pipeline to Canada, I'm going to be paying for those tariffs. It creates additional costs to all of our operating expenses in that part of the country, which increases the cost of food.
The frustrating part to me is that we have now identified our dependence on outside countries for things that we should be and should have been taken care of here at home. … Why in the world are we allowing another country like China to say, 'I'll send you something?'
Until more products are produced in the U.S., how does Wyoming anticipate dealing with tariffs?
We really haven't seen the effects of the tariffs here so far. Yet we are seeing an exponential increase in mining and exploration. We are seeing a reinvigoration of companies coming in to invest in Wyoming, because we do have coal, we do have oil. We have natural gas, uranium mining up in my part of the country [near Devil's Tower National Monument], it's just exploding. You can't find a drilling rig to drill a water well because they're all out there drilling holes for uranium mining.
As cuts are made at the federal level, what do you say to a family struggling to make ends meet?
Just hang in there. And just know that as things get high, they're going to hit a point where prices will come back down. … I'll tell people that are on lower income abilities that right now there's a massive regrowth of the cow numbers in the United States, which means people are retaining heifers. … We are going to successfully over produce for the market, and we're going to see a drop. And that's just how it works. So patience is a virtue, and it's hard to do when things are tight. We're already seeing the price of oil decline. And what that translates into is the costs of goods and services, and the input costs are going down. So people are going to actually be able to have more money in their pocket.
What about Medicaid cuts?
I don't see there being cutbacks on children, the elderly and infirm. What they are cutting back on is basically able-bodied adults. But Wyoming didn't take federal money (for Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act) so it won't be affected.
Has it been difficult to work with GOP lawmakers who aren't in the Freedom Caucus?
Not really. The big push is, how do you work with people that disagree with you — whether they're Republican or Democrat? As the speaker of the House, my job is to try to be able to listen, to try to work through differences that we can and to find common ground. Now, there's other things that I can't find common ground with.
There's this real pushback and almost a resentment for holding Republicans (not just the Freedom Caucus) accountable for their votes, holding people accountable for their Republican stance. … You say you're a Republican. But when you go down to the Legislature and you vote a completely different way, to me, that's a lack of integrity. You're just using the R as a vehicle to get where you want into a position of power.
You started your legislative session hoping to pass a handful of bills related to elections, immigration and education and you succeeded. Did you have to adjust to get them through?
All those passed. One of them, [to restrict] voter identification, just got challenged. Wyoming was the first state in the union to pass U.S. citizenship to vote, and got a shout out from President Trump. I think it was only logical that you should be a Wyoming resident, be a U.S. citizen before you can vote. It was not difficult to get them passed in the House. They were very, very solid on that. The Senate took a little longer, but they got it passed and got it through.
The big thing was waiting for our governor to sign it, which he ultimately did not — so it went into law without his signature. We overrode five vetoes, which was almost unheard of. … Our governor's, I mean, I work with people that are wrong all the time. I get along with him. We try to meet with him at least once a week, he or his people.
State Freedom Caucuses are often criticized for taking their marching orders from the national Freedom Caucus. Did you do that to get bills passed?
Absolutely not. But I don't go out of my way to try to reinvent the wheel. If I see a piece of legislation in another state that makes sense, we'll bring the bones of that here and try to shape it to fit Wyoming statutes.
What do you say to Freedom Caucus members in the 49 other states?
I pray for their success, because obviously there are people in those districts that voted those people in and that want to have their voice heard. They have a responsibility. I don't know if I would call them necessarily the conscience of the Republican Party, but if you're standing on the Republican Party platform of your state, voted on by the grassroots people, then I don't know what better place to stand other than the word of God. … I would encourage them to stay the course and make sure that integrity is the hallmark of your work, and that you listen to the people that elected you, and that you protect our Constitution and our Bill of Rights and know that that's what it's about.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem unveils plans for new migrant detention space in Indiana: ‘The Speedway Slammer'
DHS Secretary Kristi Noem unveils plans for new migrant detention space in Indiana: ‘The Speedway Slammer'

New York Post

timea minute ago

  • New York Post

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem unveils plans for new migrant detention space in Indiana: ‘The Speedway Slammer'

The Trump administration is collaborating with Indiana to expand capacity at a state correctional facility in order to hold illegal migrants, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced Tuesday – dubbing the new wing of the prison, 'The Speedway Slammer.' 'Today, we're announcing a new partnership with the state of Indiana to expand detention bed space by 1,000 beds,' Noem wrote on X. 'Thanks to [Indiana Gov. Mike Braun] for his partnership to help remove the worst of the worst out of our country.' 'If you are in America illegally, you could find yourself in Indiana's Speedway Slammer.' Advertisement 3 Noem indicated that Indiana's 'Speedway Slammer' would be opening 'soon.' AP The name is a nod to Indiana's auto racing culture, particularly the famous Indianapolis Motor Speedway, which is located about 75 miles south of the new detention space at the Miami Correctional Facility. Braun, a former Republican US senator, announced on Aug.1 that Indiana would 'fully partner with federal immigration authorities' to assist President Trump carry out mass deportations. Advertisement As part of the partnership, the Indiana Department of Correction would work with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to make available up to 1,000 beds at Miami Correctional Facility, near Bunker Hill, Ind., and the Grissom Joint Air Reserve Base, to house migrants slated for deportation, Braun said. Camp Atterbury – operated by the Indiana National Guard – will also be made available for temporary use by DHS to house illegal migrants subject to deportation, according to the governor. 'We are proud to work with President Trump and Secretary Noem as they remove the worst of the worst with this innovative partnership,' Braun said in a statement. 'Indiana is taking a comprehensive and collaborative approach to combating illegal immigration and will continue to lead the way among states,' he added. Advertisement 3 Braun said the facility would house 'the worst of the worst' migrants. Getty Images 3 The state-run Miami Correctional Facility will add 1,000 beds to house detained illegal migrants. Miami Correctional DHS noted the agreement was 'fully funded' by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act Trump signed into law on July 4, which authorized spending for 80,000 new beds for ICE to utilize when detaining and deporting migrants. Indiana's 'Speedway Slammer' follows the opening of Florida's 'Alligator Alcatraz' earlier this summer to assist the Trump administration's deportation efforts. Advertisement Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis opened the swampland facility, located deep in the Everglades and on the site of an old airport, on July 3. The property, outfitted with tent structures to house the illegal migrants, has the capacity for 2,000 detainees but will eventually hold 4,000. The Trump administration began deporting migrants directly from the Alligator Alcatraz airport, which is able to accept commercial-sized aircraft and conduct both day and nighttime operations, on July 25.

Andrew Cuomo Calls Gaza Crisis 'Heartbreaking,' Wants Aid Delivered
Andrew Cuomo Calls Gaza Crisis 'Heartbreaking,' Wants Aid Delivered

Newsweek

time2 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Andrew Cuomo Calls Gaza Crisis 'Heartbreaking,' Wants Aid Delivered

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo appeared to criticize Israel over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza in what Bloomberg News reported as a "shift" in tone as he revamps his campaign for mayor of New York after losing June's mayoral primary to upstart New York state Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani. In later comments to The New York Times, Cuomo argued that Israel was not solely responsible for the "heartbreaking" situation in Gaza. Newsweek reached out to Cuomo's campaign for comment on Tuesday night. New York City mayoral candidates Zohran Mamdani, left, is pictured in New York City on April 16, while Andrew Cuomo, right, is also shown in the city, on April 13. New York City mayoral candidates Zohran Mamdani, left, is pictured in New York City on April 16, while Andrew Cuomo, right, is also shown in the city, on April 13. Angela Weiss,Charly Triballeau/AFP/Getty Images Why It Matters Mamdani, 33, set off a political earthquake in June by winning New York City's Democratic mayoral primary, overcoming millions of dollars in ads and super PAC spending backing the campaign of political veteran Cuomo. A self-described democratic socialist, Mamdani leads a five-candidate New York City mayoral race by double digits and amasses more than 50 percent of the vote regardless of his opponent, according to a poll released at the end of July. Cuomo came in second, receiving 22 percent. Republican Curtis Sliwa garnered 13 percent in the poll, New York Mayor Eric Adams received 7 percent, former federal prosecutor Jim Walden collected 1 percent and "others/I don't know" totaled 6 percent. Cuomo is a staunch supporter of Israel while Mamdani's criticism of Israel's war in Gaza has set him apart from many mainstream Democrats and brought accusations of antisemitism, which he has fiercely denied. The issue could divide New Yorkers when they vote for mayor in November. What To Know Cuomo, in an interview with Bloomberg News, appeared to criticize Israel over conditions in Gaza, where aid agencies have warned of growing famine. "Do I support what the Israel government is doing vis-à-vis Gaza? No. Do I support Israel impeding humanitarian aid? No," he said. Israel has denied an intentional campaign to withhold food to Gaza's 2 million residents. Bloomberg said Cuomo "shifts [his] tone on Israel" as he revamps his campaign following his June primary defeat. But in later comments to the Times, Cuomo seemed to back off those earlier remarks, saying all sides had to act to ensure humanitarian aid gets through, the outlet reported. "Everyone should do everything they can to get the humanitarian aid delivered," Cuomo said, adding: "It's heartbreaking as a father to imagine what children are going through." Cuomo told the Times that in the earlier interview, he was expressing the views of some New Yorkers, but not his own. "I was airing what some people feel. You have some people who feel that Israel is not acting appropriately. That's their opinion," he said. What People Are Saying In his later interview with the Times, Cuomo said: "It is incumbent on every entity that is involved — Israel, Palestine, the United Nations, the Red Cross — to do everything to expedite the food and water." What Happens Next The New York City mayoral general election is set for November 4.

Will pro-Trump Latinos vote Republican in the 2026 midterms? A new poll casts doubts
Will pro-Trump Latinos vote Republican in the 2026 midterms? A new poll casts doubts

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Will pro-Trump Latinos vote Republican in the 2026 midterms? A new poll casts doubts

A quarter of Latinos who supported President Donald Trump in the November election are not guaranteed to vote for Republicans in the 2026 midterm elections, according to a new national poll by Equis, a leading research and polling group. Last week Equis, alongside progressive think tank Data for Progress, released a July memo that summarized key findings from a national poll of 1,614 registered voters, conducted between July 7 and July 17. This time frame coincides with some notable turning points in politics: namely, when Trump signed the "One Big Beautiful Bill" into law, as well as his execution of mass deportations and controversial handling of the Epstein files. Respondents were asked, "If the 2026 election for United States Congress were held today, for whom would you vote?" Only 27% replied that they would vote for a Republican candidate, marking a significant political party drop from the 45% who said they voted for Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election. A quarter of those polled said they were not sure whom they would vote for (16%), would vote for someone else (5%), or would not vote at all (4%). This shaky political alignment comes at a critical time for Republicans, who are banking on continual Latino support in 2026 — especially as Texas Republicans plan to flip five blue seats under a newly proposed congressional map. The Equis study also found that 63% of Latinos disapproved of Trump's job as president in July, a slight uptick from polling numbers in May, when 60% disapproved. This rating seems to reflect broader sentiments regarding the state of the U.S. economy: 64% of Latinos rated the economy as "somewhat or very poor," while only 34% viewed it as "somewhat or very good." However, a disapproval of Trump does not mean Latinos have rushed to back the Democratic Party. Half the Latinos polled said Democrats care more about people like them, versus the 25% who said Republicans care more. Meanwhile, 17% said they believe that neither party cares. Swing voters — including those who Equis calls "Biden defectors," or voters who elected Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2024 — are twice as likely to say that neither party cares about people like them (38%). "Growing dissatisfaction with Trump offers Democrats an opportunity, but only if they are willing to capitalize on it," the July memo states. Overall, Trump's national approval ratings are taking a nosedive, according to aggregate polling by the New York Times, which notes that Trump's approach to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation has angered his base. On Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the Justice Department for the files; lawmakers believe they could implicate Trump and other former top officials in the sex-trafficking investigation. Trump's anti-immigration policies have also likely shifted his popularity. Early July Gallup polling revealed that Americans have grown more positive toward immigration — 79% of Americans say immigration is a "good thing" for the country, which marks a 64% increase from last year and a 25-year record high. Get our Latinx Files newsletter for stories that capture the complexity of our communities. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store