logo
Andrew Cuomo Calls Gaza Crisis 'Heartbreaking,' Wants Aid Delivered

Andrew Cuomo Calls Gaza Crisis 'Heartbreaking,' Wants Aid Delivered

Newsweek15 hours ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo appeared to criticize Israel over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza in what Bloomberg News reported as a "shift" in tone as he revamps his campaign for mayor of New York after losing June's mayoral primary to upstart New York state Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani.
In later comments to The New York Times, Cuomo argued that Israel was not solely responsible for the "heartbreaking" situation in Gaza.
Newsweek reached out to Cuomo's campaign for comment on Tuesday night.
New York City mayoral candidates Zohran Mamdani, left, is pictured in New York City on April 16, while Andrew Cuomo, right, is also shown in the city, on April 13.
New York City mayoral candidates Zohran Mamdani, left, is pictured in New York City on April 16, while Andrew Cuomo, right, is also shown in the city, on April 13.
Angela Weiss,Charly Triballeau/AFP/Getty Images
Why It Matters
Mamdani, 33, set off a political earthquake in June by winning New York City's Democratic mayoral primary, overcoming millions of dollars in ads and super PAC spending backing the campaign of political veteran Cuomo.
A self-described democratic socialist, Mamdani leads a five-candidate New York City mayoral race by double digits and amasses more than 50 percent of the vote regardless of his opponent, according to a poll released at the end of July. Cuomo came in second, receiving 22 percent.
Republican Curtis Sliwa garnered 13 percent in the poll, New York Mayor Eric Adams received 7 percent, former federal prosecutor Jim Walden collected 1 percent and "others/I don't know" totaled 6 percent.
Cuomo is a staunch supporter of Israel while Mamdani's criticism of Israel's war in Gaza has set him apart from many mainstream Democrats and brought accusations of antisemitism, which he has fiercely denied.
The issue could divide New Yorkers when they vote for mayor in November.
What To Know
Cuomo, in an interview with Bloomberg News, appeared to criticize Israel over conditions in Gaza, where aid agencies have warned of growing famine.
"Do I support what the Israel government is doing vis-à-vis Gaza? No. Do I support Israel impeding humanitarian aid? No," he said.
Israel has denied an intentional campaign to withhold food to Gaza's 2 million residents.
Bloomberg said Cuomo "shifts [his] tone on Israel" as he revamps his campaign following his June primary defeat.
But in later comments to the Times, Cuomo seemed to back off those earlier remarks, saying all sides had to act to ensure humanitarian aid gets through, the outlet reported.
"Everyone should do everything they can to get the humanitarian aid delivered," Cuomo said, adding: "It's heartbreaking as a father to imagine what children are going through."
Cuomo told the Times that in the earlier interview, he was expressing the views of some New Yorkers, but not his own.
"I was airing what some people feel. You have some people who feel that Israel is not acting appropriately. That's their opinion," he said.
What People Are Saying
In his later interview with the Times, Cuomo said: "It is incumbent on every entity that is involved — Israel, Palestine, the United Nations, the Red Cross — to do everything to expedite the food and water."
What Happens Next
The New York City mayoral general election is set for November 4.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mamdani holds double-digit lead over Cuomo in DDHQ average
Mamdani holds double-digit lead over Cuomo in DDHQ average

The Hill

time15 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Mamdani holds double-digit lead over Cuomo in DDHQ average

New York City Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani leads former Gov. Andrew Cuomo by 13 points in Decision Desk HQ's recently formed average tracking the race. The average, made up of a mix of independent and campaign-associated polls, shows Mamdani ahead in the five-candidate field with 38.1 percent as of the most recent polling, followed by Cuomo, who is running an independent campaign after losing the Democratic primary, with 25 percent. Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa is in third with 15 percent, followed closely by incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who is also pursuing an independent campaign, with 11.5 percent. Independent Jim Walden, a former assistant U.S. attorney, trails well behind in last with just over 1 percent. Mamdani has been in the process of coalescing Democratic support behind his candidacy after his upset win in the primary in June over Cuomo. Some top Democratic leaders have withheld their endorsement for Mamdani despite him being the Democratic nominee, and polling has shown Mamdani with less support than what would normally be expected for the Democratic nominee for mayor in the heavily Democratic city. But Mamdani's support has been ticking up, while Cuomo's support has been dropping. Mamdani has also picked up endorsements from New York Democrats like Reps. Jerry Nadler and Adriano Espaillat, the latter of whom backed Cuomo in the primary. The other candidates in the race have expressed concern about the possibility of splitting the vote among them in November and allowing Mamdani to win the general election. Cuomo has suggested that the candidates should unify behind whichever candidate is in the strongest position to face Mamdani in September. But Adams and Sliwa, who have consistently trailed Cuomo in polling for second place, have been adamant that they will not drop out.

Was dropping atomic bombs on Japan justified? 80 years later, views have changed
Was dropping atomic bombs on Japan justified? 80 years later, views have changed

Miami Herald

time15 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Was dropping atomic bombs on Japan justified? 80 years later, views have changed

American public opinion toward the atomic bombing of Japan has changed significantly over time. The latest poll from the Pew Research Center reveals that less than half of Americans currently view the bombings as justified, marking a notable drop from earlier years. The survey was conducted ahead of the 80th anniversary of the bombings of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The two nuclear blasts killed around 200,000 people, many of whom were children, and left survivors with debilitating side effects, including higher rates of cancer and chronic illness. The attacks — which took place on Aug. 6 and Aug. 9, 1945 — were quickly followed by Japan's surrender to the U.S., which brought an end to World War II. They also signaled the dawn of the nuclear age, sparking a worldwide arms race that has led at least nine countries to develop atomic arsenals. In the recent Pew survey, 35% of respondents said the bombings were justified, while a slightly smaller share, 31%, said they were not justified. An additional 33% said they were not sure. The results appear to follow a trend of declining support for the nuclear attacks. In 1945 — in the immediate aftermath of the bombings — a Gallup poll found the vast majority of Americans, 85%, approved of the U.S. decision to drop the newly invented weapons on Japanese cities. Many years later, in 1990, another Gallup survey revealed that a much smaller share of respondents, 53%, approved of the attacks. And, in four subsequent Gallup surveys conducted between 1991 and 2005, approval fluctuated between 53% and 59%. In 2015 — on the 70th anniversary of the bombings — a Pew poll found 56% of Americans believed the attack was justified, while 34% said it was not. However, this survey did not include a 'not sure' option, unlike the most recent one. The latest survey — which sampled 5,044 U.S. adults June 2-8 — also revealed noticeable differences in views based on gender, partisanship and generational lines. For example, 51% of men said the bombings were justified, while just 20% of women said the same. Similarly, 51% of Republicans and those who lean Republican said the attacks were justified, while just 23% of Democrats and Democrat-leaning respondents said the same. Older Americans were also more likely than their younger counterparts to approve of the U.S. bombings. Nearly half of those 65 and older, 48%, said they were justified, while just 27% of 18- to 29-year-olds agreed. The poll — which has a margin of error of 1.6 percentage points — also asked respondents whether they believe the development of nuclear weapons has made the world more or less safe. The vast majority, 69%, said the creation of atomic weapons has made the world less safe. Just 10% said it's made the global community more safe, and 21% said they were not sure. When asked if nuclear weapons made the U.S. in specific safer, 47% said no and 26% said yes. Republicans were more likely than Democrats to say both that the development of nuclear weapons has made the world and the U.S. more safe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store