logo
Trump ‘got it very wrong' over tariffs, says economist used by US president

Trump ‘got it very wrong' over tariffs, says economist used by US president

Independent09-04-2025
A renowned economist who co-wrote research used by Donald Trump to justify his aggressive tariff hikes says the White House got it 'very wrong'.
University of Chicago Economics Professor Brett Neiman, who was also a Biden administration Treasury official, said the Trump administration wildly overcalculated tariff rates placed on nearly all countries that export to the U.S.
The U.S. Trade Representative released its workings and cited a paper produced by four economists, including Prof Neiman, supposedly supporting its approach.
'But it got it wrong. Very wrong. I disagree fundamentally with the government's trade policy and approach,' the professor wrote in a guest essay for The New York Times. 'Even taking it at face value, our findings suggest the calculated tariffs should be dramatically smaller — perhaps one-fourth as large.'
Neiman said there are numerous mistakes with the new tariff regime, which has placed tariffs of at least 10 per cent of nearly all exporters to the U.S., and up to 50 per cent on some countries with large trade surpluses.
The sweeping tariffs caused stock market chaos on Monday and led to calls from billionaire allies including Bill Ackman to call for a rethink, but Trump dismissed the turmoil, saying 'sometimes you have to take medicine to fix something'.
Neiman said the biggest mistake with the tariffs is the fact that the Office of the Trade Representative said they were calculated at levels that would eliminate trade deficits, because that was not a reasonable goal.
'Trade imbalances between two countries can emerge for many reasons that have nothing to do with protectionism,' he said.
He highlighted the trading relationship with Sri Lanka as an example: Americans spend more on Sri Lankan-made clothing than the South Asian country spends on American drugs and gas turbines, and that reflects differences in development and resources.
'The deficit numbers don't suggest, let alone prove, unfair competition,' Prof Neiman said.
While there are some arguments for reducing the overall trade deficit - which is when the value of a country's imports exceeds the value of its exports - Neiman said it made little sense to apply this on a country-by-country basis.
The economist also pointed out that the reciprocal tariffs would not even achieve this goal, particularly given the broad nature of the changes.
'A large tariff on Japanese auto parts could cause an increase in demand for imports from Mexico and vice versa. And the tariffs clearly invite retaliation and may over time increase the dollar's value, both factors that would most likely depress US exports,' he said.
Ignoring both of those problems, Neiman said even the calculation used to formulate the tariffs, including the part using the research he co-authored, was incorrect.
Based on the research he conducted with Alberto Cavallo, Gita Gopinath, Jenny Tang, Neiman said they estimated that domestic importers would bear a 95 per cent increase (pass through) in prices: 'In simple terms, that implies that the price paid for U.S. imports would rise almost as much as the tariff rate.'
But he said the Trump administration used a different figure to calculate the rate of pass through, using a rate of 25 per cent.
'Where does 25 percent come from? Is it related to our work? I don't know. The reciprocal tariffs have enormous implications for workers, firms, consumers and stock markets around the globe. But the methodology note offers shockingly few details,' Prof Neiman said.
He said the tariffs should be scrapped entirely, but barring that: 'the administration should divide its results by four'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration denies daily quota for immigration arrests
Trump administration denies daily quota for immigration arrests

The Guardian

time18 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump administration denies daily quota for immigration arrests

In a new court filing, attorneys for the Trump administration denied the existence of a daily quota for immigration arrests, despite reports and prior statements from White House officials about pursuing a goal of at least 3,000 deportations or deportation arrests per day. In May, reports from both the Guardian and Axios revealed that during a meeting with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) leaders on 21 May, the White House adviser Stephen Miller and the Department of Homeland Security secretary, Kristi Noem, demanded that immigration agents seek to arrest 3,000 people per day. Following that report, Miller appeared on Fox News in late May and stated that 'under President Trump's leadership, we are looking to set a goal of a minimum of 3,000 arrests for Ice every day.' He added that Trump 'is going to keep pushing to get that number up higher each and every day'. However, in a court filing on Friday, lawyers representing the US justice department said that the Department of Homeland Security had confirmed that 'neither Ice leadership nor its field offices have been directed to meet any numerical quota or target for arrests, detentions, removals, field encounters, or any other operational activities that Ice or its components undertake in the course of enforcing federal immigration law.' The filing is part of an ongoing lawsuit in southern California, where immigrant advocacy groups have sued the Trump administration, accusing it of conducting unconstitutional immigration sweeps in the Los Angeles area. In mid-July a judge issued a temporary restraining order barring immigration agents from detaining individuals based on factors such as race, occupation or speaking Spanish anywhere in the central district of California, which includes Los Angeles. On Friday, an appeals court upheld that order. Politico reported that during a hearing earlier this week in the case, the justice department lawyers were pressed on the reports regarding the alleged arrest quota, and a judge reportedly asked whether it was a 'policy of the administration at this time to deport 3,000 persons per day?'. An attorney for the justice department, Yaakov Roth, reportedly responded 'Not to my knowledge, your honor' per Politico. And in the government's filing on Friday, the attorneys for the government said that the allegations of that the 'government maintains a policy mandating 3,000 arrests per day appears to originate from media reports quoting a White House advisor who described that figure as a 'goal' that the Administration was 'looking to set''. 'That quotation may have been accurate, but no such goal has been set as a matter of policy and no such directive has been issued to or by DHS or ICE' the attorneys added. The discrepancy was first reported by the Los Angeles Daily News and Politico. Neither DHS or Ice immediately responded to a request fro comment from the Guardian. In a statement to Politico, a White House spokesperson did not directly respond to questions about the discrepancy, but said that 'the Trump Administration is committed to carrying out the largest mass deportation operation in history by enforcing federal immigration law and removing the countless violent, criminal illegal aliens that Joe Biden let flood into American communities.' A justice department spokesperson told the outlet that there is no disconnect between the DoJ's court filings and the White House's public statements. The spokesperson added that 'the entire Trump administration is united in fully enforcing our nation's immigration laws and the DoJ continues to play an important role in vigorously defending the president's deportation agenda in court.' At various points during his 2024 election campaign, Trump claimed that he would target between 15 and 20 million people who are undocumented in the US for deportation. As of 2022, there were 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the US.

Photos from 'In Women's Words' exhibition that showcases modern Iranian women artists
Photos from 'In Women's Words' exhibition that showcases modern Iranian women artists

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Photos from 'In Women's Words' exhibition that showcases modern Iranian women artists

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.

The estate that could solve Scotland's problem with trees
The estate that could solve Scotland's problem with trees

The Herald Scotland

time4 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

The estate that could solve Scotland's problem with trees

The forests offer much needed shade in Greece and also allow a variety of species an environment where they can thrive. Here in Scotland it may feel like there are trees everywhere, but the exact opposite is true as it is one of the least forested countries on the planet. Just drive a small distance outside of the main population centres and you will be met with miles upon miles of bleak nothingness, apart from areas that are farmland. It comes as tree planting is seen as a key tranche in achieving net zero and with a projected housebuilding timber shortage on the horizon. But Scotland's forestry industry is facing a funding black hole of £24 million and national planting targets will not be met now for at least two years. A massive budget cut has knocked the forestry industry's confidence, potentially stalling planting projects and leading to trees being destroyed. Confor, the Confederation of Forest Industries representative body, signalled a wave of concern along the supply chain from tree nurseries to sawmills and wood-panel manufacturers. Scotland has consistently failed to meet its tree planting targets, aiming to plant amounts rising from 15,000 hectares, or 30 million trees, to now 18,000 ha each year, but the industry has faced harsh funding cuts. Rural Scots are right - maybe it is time to halt onshore windfarms Trump is right for once, it is time to drill, baby drill in the North Sea It is high time that irresponsible campervan users are taxed off the NC500 We're going to need a smaller boat: The large ferry dilemma for CalMac A 41% budget cut in 2023 was only partially restored last year by around 18% to £45m. Edinburgh-based Confor said a further £24m is needed for the target mathematics to work, but that low confidence is likely to impact new projects being brought forward. However, a 10,000-acre estate in the Highlands is a great example of what can be achieved with the proper ambition. Dundreggan rewilding centre in Glenmoriston has just been awarded special European status recognising its genetic diversity of tree species. Parts of the juniper and silver birch woodland at Trees for Life's site have been classed as Gene Conservation Units. A spokesperson for the conservation charity said the 'unusually wet location' of juniper and the 'extreme westerly location' of silver birch have helped make the tree populations unique. The classification has been awarded by the European Forest Genetic Resources Network (EUFORGEN) which is managed in the UK by nature agency Forest Research. The estate uses a 'dynamic conservation' technique to protect the trees' genetic diversity. The land is encouraged to regenerate naturally within its specific environment and weather conditions. Juniper is a slow-growing evergreen shrub or small tree, with small blue-green needles and berries that ripen to a dark, blue-purple colour. The species support biodiversity by providing shelter and food for wildlife. Juniper berries are also used to produce gin. Silver birch is a fast-growing species which spreads over open ground. The tree's roots draw up nutrients, and its leaves add richness to soil. The Gene Conservation Unit status means Dundreggan's juniper and silver birch will be monitored to ensure their survival and natural regeneration. The estate covers 10,000 acres and has so many rare species living within it that environmentalists have described it as a 'lost world'. Conservation charity Trees for Life bought the site for £1.65million which remains one of the UK's largest ever areas of land bought for forest regeneration. The former hunting estate was already home to ancient forest fragments, including outstanding areas of juniper and dwarf birch. The charity has since planted half a million trees at the site, ensuring natural regeneration of woodlands and encouraging the return of rare wildlife, plants and insects. A rare non-biting midge and several other species have since been discovered after surveys of the estate. In total, more than 3,300 species have now been recorded at the charity's forest restoration site with at least 68 of these are priority species for conservation. These include unusual species such as the strawberry spider with several never having been recorded in the UK before, or were feared extinct in Scotland. While it is relatively small in the grand scheme of things, it should be an inspiration for other land owners when it comes to rewilding land and planting forests. Scotland needs more native trees and it is baffling why such a large proportion of the country is entirely treeless. The timber industry is worth around £1billion a year to the economy but even commercial plantations barely scratch the surface of what is required. It is all well and good for ministers to set tree planting targets, but without proper funding these will never be met. Ministers should see what has been done elsewhere and replicate it at pace.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store