US Democrats, Republicans plan bills to pressure China as Trump pushes trade
The three bills, seen by Reuters ahead of their introduction, have Democratic and Republican sponsors, a departure from the fierce partisanship dividing Washington.
Trump's push to reach economic agreements between the world's two biggest economies has strong support in the US Congress, especially from his fellow Republicans, but has prompted some China hawks to worry that the US government is de-emphasising security issues.
'It does appear that President Trump is keen to negotiate some kind of deal with China, and gaps are opening between his approach to China and the approaches of some members of his team, as well as with Congress, which overall has been quite hawkish on China,' said Bonnie Glaser, an Asia expert at the German Marshall Fund of the United States.
The desire for a hard line on China is one of the few truly bipartisan sentiments in the perennially divided Congress, even as many lawmakers support Trump's efforts to rebalance the bilateral trade relationship.
'The United States cannot afford to be weak in the face of the People's Republic of China and its aggression around the world,' said Democrat Jeff Merkley of Oregon, a lead sponsor of all three bills.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'No matter who is in the White House, America's values of freedom and human rights must remain at the heart of a clear and principled vision that guides our leadership on the global stage,' Merkley said in a statement.
Trump administration officials have said that Trump remains fully committed to Asia-Pacific security issues as he pursues his trade agenda and a good personal relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping.
Asked for comment on Monday, White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly said administration officials do not get ahead of the president on pending legislation.
'President Trump has publicly discussed his desire for a constructive relationship with China. He is focused on advancing American interests, such as leveling the playing field for American industries and getting China to stop the flow of fentanyl into our country,' she said via email.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a Reuters query about the bills.
Trade vs security
One bill, co-sponsored by Republican John Cornyn of Texas, would deny entry into the United States of current or former Chinese government officials who were deemed to have engaged in the forced repatriation of members of China's Uyghur minority.
Human rights groups accuse China of widespread abuses of Uyghurs, a mainly Muslim ethnic minority numbering about 10 million in its northwestern region of Xinjiang. Beijing denies any abuses.
Another bill, co-sponsored by Republican John Curtis of Utah, aims to help Taiwan as the island faces increasing pressure from China. It would support countries in Latin America and the Caribbean that maintain official diplomatic relations with Taiwan and would take other steps to deepen coordination with Taipei.
China claims the democratically governed island as its own and has never renounced the use of force to bring Taiwan under its control. Beijing has stepped up military and political pressure against the island in recent years.
A third bill, co-sponsored by Republican Dan Sullivan of Alaska, seeks to combat 'transnational repression' - efforts by any foreign government to reach beyond its own borders to intimidate, harass or harm dissidents, journalists or activists.
Facing Trump's Aug 12 deadline, top US and Chinese economic officials will meet in Stockholm on Monday to try to tackle their longstanding disputes, hoping to extend a truce by three months and keep sharply higher tariffs at bay.
Trump 'cares about opening foreign markets to American trade, and that's what he's always cared about. And that is going to run counter to a lot of national security imperatives,' said Michael Sobolik, who specialises in US-China relations at the Hudson Institute.
Democrats and some of Trump's fellow Republicans raised concerns about the announcement this month that Nvidia will resume sales of its H20 artificial intelligence chips to China, days after its CEO met with Trump.
This reversed an AI restriction imposed in April that was designed to keep the most advanced AI chips out of Chinese hands. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
13 minutes ago
- Business Times
China polysilicon firms plan 50 billion yuan fund to shut a third of industry capacity
[BEIJING] Chinese producers of polysilicon, a building block for solar panels, are in talks to create a 50 billion yuan (S$8.9 billion) fund to acquire and shut down roughly a third of production capacity and restructure part of the loss-making sector, GCL Technology Holdings said. The top polysilicon producer said on Thursday (Jul 31) that plans were being discussed to acquire and shut at least one million tonnes of lower-quality polysilicon capacity. 'It is sort of like the Opec of the polysilicon industry, wherein total supply for a specified timeframe has to be agreed by the central committee and production quotas to be allocated to producers,' GCL's investor relations director Jun Zhu said. The plan is one of the strongest signals yet that the heightened rhetoric against overcapacity rolled out by the Chinese government this month is translating into action. Chinese industries, from solar to electric vehicles, are grappling with massive overcapacity and vicious price wars that are wiping out profits. Beijing restructured industries including polysilicon, steel and cement in previous waves of reforms more than a decade ago. However, this latest round is expected to be more difficult, given that many of the problem sectors are now filled with private firms and there are fewer growth sectors to pick up the slack. The polysilicon acquisition vehicle would be launched late in the third quarter of this year and would start making purchases in the fourth quarter, both of excess capacity and of market inventories, Zhu said. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The proposed closures would leave approximately two million tonnes of capacity remaining in the market, he added. China's production capacity was 3.25 million tonnes at the end of 2024, according to Bernreuter, an industry research group. GCL chairman Zhu Gongshan said at an industry conference in June that major firms were working to restructure the industry, while local media Caixin reported producers were in talks to create an acquisition fund. Reuters is reporting the size, scope and timing of the plan for the first time. China's state planner, the National Development and Reform Commission, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. China has a near-monopoly over solar-grade polysilicon, producing 95 per cent of the world's total in 2024, according to Bernreuter. China's share of the rest of the solar supply chain, including cells, modules and wafers has also reached over 80 per cent in recent years. Polysilicon prices are up nearly 70 per cent this month, alongside a range of other industrial commodities as Beijing's rhetoric, plus smaller initiatives from various ministries and provincial governments, led markets to bet supply side reform was on the way. Financing questions It is unclear where the money to finance the vehicle would come from given major players GCL and Tongwei are losing money. 'No one knows how the capacity acquisition will be implemented, because there's no past experience to refer to,' said UBS analyst Yishu Yan, adding that most of the companies in the sector are indebted. Also unclear is how active a role the provincial and central governments will play in the vehicle and the factory closures it plans to make. Jun Zhu said the vehicle's central committee would be made up of producers, lenders and potentially regulators, without specifying who they would be. Local governments are increasingly expected to fall in line with restructuring plans, given signals this week that the highest levels of China's government are determined to combat price wars, Yan of UBS said on Friday, even though local officials might privately baulk at the employment and GDP impacts of plant closures. Top Chinese leaders called again for disorderly competition among enterprises to be reined in, including tightening oversight of local governments' investment promotion practices, at a meeting on Wednesday of the Politburo, a top decision-making body of the Communist Party whose July gathering typically sets the economic tone for the rest of the year. Involution is a term widely used in China to describe a situation where intense competition leads to diminishing returns. 'My own feeling is that the anti-involution campaign has been escalated' after the Politburo meeting, Yan said. 'It will be politically incorrect to still push back.' Yan had previously said any plan to shut capacity may face opposition from local governments, where officials are scored on jobs and economic growth. Many of these governments also have stakes in local private solar firms. 'If the solar companies are facing bankruptcy or to be acquired, there could be some pushback by the local governments,' she said in an interview in mid-July. Natixis economists, in a note on Friday on China's anti-involution drive, cautioned that mergers and acquisitions alone may not shrink investment in renewables by enough to fix oversupply. 'All in all, it seems quite clear that the very large number of zombie renewable companies needs to shrink, possibly via defaults. If social stability is too important for such a clean-up to happen, the mergers and acquisitions, the Chinese government seems to be willing to push need to bring about a massive reduction in capacity for this sector to see the light at the end of the tunnel,' the economists wrote. REUTERS
Straits Times
13 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Appeals court allows Trump order that ends union protections for federal workers
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A ruling by a federal appeals court on Aug 1 authorises a component of US President Donald Trump's sweeping effort to assert more control over the federal workforce to move forward. WASHINGTON – A federal appeals court on Aug 1 allowed US President Donald Trump to move forward with an order instructing a broad swath of government agencies to end collective bargaining with federal unions. The ruling authorises a component of Mr Trump's sweeping effort to assert more control over the federal workforce to move forward, for now, while the case plays out in court. It is unclear what immediate effect the ruling will have: the appeals court noted that the affected agencies had been directed to refrain from ending any collective bargaining agreement until 'litigation has concluded', but also noted that Mr Trump was now free to follow through with the order at his discretion. Mr Trump had framed his order stripping workers of labour protections as critical to protect national security. But the plaintiffs – a group of affected unions representing over 1 million federal workers – argued in a lawsuit that the order was a form of retaliation against those unions that have participated in a barrage of lawsuits opposing Mr Trump's policies. The unions pointed to statements from the White House justifying the order that said 'certain federal unions have declared war on President Trump's agenda' and that the President 'will not tolerate mass obstruction that jeopardizes his ability to manage agencies with vital national security missions.' But a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, a famously liberal jurisdiction, ruled in Mr Trump's favour, writing that 'the government has shown that the president would have taken the same action even in the absence' of the union lawsuits. Even if some of the White House's statements 'reflect a degree of retaliatory animus', they wrote, those statements, taken as a whole, also demonstrate 'the President's focus on national security'. The unions had also argued that the order broadly targeted agencies across the government, some of which had no obvious national security portfolio – including the Department of Health and Human Services and the Environmental Protection Agency – using national security as a pretext to strip the unions of their power. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 60 years of building Singapore World Trump deploys nuclear submarines in row with Russia Singapore Sheng Siong to open first store in Orchard by end August Asia 'This isn't some concubine selection': Why matchmaking events for rich Chinese have drawn flak Life Tastemakers: Burnt-out serial entrepreneur cooks up $16m success with Lau Wang Claypot Delights Sport Spurs captain Son Heung-min says he is leaving the English Premier League club Life The story of you: What might Singapore look like for those born today? Singapore Man in army uniform allegedly vaping on bus released from SAF custody; investigations ongoing The panel sidestepped that claim, writing in the 15-page ruling that 'we question whether we can take up such arguments, which invite us to assess whether the President's stated reasons for exercising national security authority – clearly conferred to him by statute – were pretextual'. The order, they continued, 'conveys the President's determination that the excluded agencies have primary functions implicating national security'. NYTIMES
Straits Times
13 minutes ago
- Straits Times
New Zealand will make it easier to run businesses in conservation areas
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Foreign visitors will also be charged between NZ$20 and NZ$40 (S$15-$30) to access some popular sites, while locals will continue to go free. NEW ZEALAND - New Zealand will make it easier to run businesses in conservation zones and charge foreign tourists to enter some areas in an effort to create jobs and increase economic growth, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said on Aug 2. The decision by the centre-right government, elected in 2023, is part of its efforts to boost New Zealand's tourism industry and stimulate a limp economy. It also comes at a time when people in countries around the world are protesting what they see as excessive numbers of tourists. 'We're going to fix the Conservation Act to unleash a fresh wave of concessions – like tourism, agriculture, and infrastructure, in locations where that makes sense,' Mr Luxon said in a statement. Business activities from guided walks and skiing to livestock grazing and infrastructure construction already take place in conservation areas, but permission takes too much time and effort to obtain, he said. 'Unleashing economic growth on one-third of New Zealand's land will create jobs and increase wages across the country,' the statement said. Foreign visitors will also be charged between NZ$20 and NZ$40 (S$15-$30) to access some popular sites, while locals will continue to go free. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 60 years of building Singapore World Trump deploys nuclear submarines in row with Russia Singapore Sheng Siong to open first store in Orchard by end August Asia 'This isn't some concubine selection': Why matchmaking events for rich Chinese have drawn flak Life Tastemakers: Burnt-out serial entrepreneur cooks up $16m success with Lau Wang Claypot Delights Sport Spurs captain Son Heung-min says he is leaving the English Premier League club Life The story of you: What might Singapore look like for those born today? Singapore Man in army uniform allegedly vaping on bus released from SAF custody; investigations ongoing 'Tourists make a massive contribution to our economy, and no one wants that to change. But I have heard many times from friends visiting from overseas their shock that they can visit some of the most beautiful places in the world for free,' said Conservation Minister Tama Potaka. REUTERS
