
US, China to resume tariff talks in effort to extend truce
China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached a preliminary deal in June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs.
Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from duties exceeding 100%.
The Stockholm talks, led by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, take place a day after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen meets Trump at his golf course in Scotland to try to clinch a deal that would likely see a 15% baseline tariff on most EU goods.
Trade analysts on both sides of the Pacific say the discussions in the Swedish capital are unlikely to produce any breakthroughs but could prevent further escalation and help create conditions for Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to meet later this year.
Previous U.S.-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing U.S. and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia H20 AI chips and other goods halted by the United States.
So far, the talks have not delved into broader economic issues. They include U.S. complaints that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, and Beijing's complaints that U.S. national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth.
'Stockholm will be the first meaningful round of U.S.-China trade talks,' said Bo Zhengyuan, Shanghai-based partner at China consultancy firm Plenum.
Trump has been successful in pressuring some other trading partners, including Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines, into deals accepting higher U.S. tariffs of 15% to 20%.
He said there was a 50-50 chance that the U.S. and the 27-member European Union could also reach a framework trade pact, adding that Brussels wanted to 'make a deal very badly'.
Two of Trump's top trade officials, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, will attend the Scotland talks and then travel to Stockholm.
Analysts say the U.S.-China negotiations are far more complex and will require more time. China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on U.S. industries.
In the background of the talks is speculation about a possible meeting between Trump and Xi in late October.
Trump has said he will decide soon whether to visit China in a landmark trip to address trade and security tensions. A new flare-up of tariffs and export controls would likely derail any plans for a meeting with Xi.
'The Stockholm meeting is an opportunity to start laying the groundwork for a Trump visit to China,' said Wendy Cutler, vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute.
Bessent has already said he wants to work out an extension of the August 12 deadline to prevent tariffs snapping back to 145% on the U.S. side and 125% on the Chinese side.
Still, China will likely request a reduction of multi-layered U.S. tariffs totaling 55% on most goods and further easing of U.S. high-tech export controls, analysts said. Beijing has argued that such purchases would help reduce the U.S. trade deficit with China, which reached $295.5 billion in 2024.
China is currently facing a 20% tariff related to the U.S. fentanyl crisis, a 10% reciprocal tariff, and 25% duties on most industrial goods imposed during Trump's first term.
Bessent has also said he would discuss with He the need for China to rebalance its economy away from exports toward domestic consumer demand. The shift would require China to put an end to a protracted property crisis and boost social safety nets to encourage household spending.
Michael Froman, a former U.S. trade representative during Barack Obama's administration, said such a shift has been a goal of U.S. policymakers for two decades.
'Can we effectively use tariffs to get China to fundamentally change their economic strategy? That remains to be seen,' said Froman, now president of the Council on Foreign Relations think-tank.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
6 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Moscow warns of 'titanic efforts' to disrupt Putin-Trump meeting
Certain countries will make "titanic efforts" to disrupt the meeting U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Friday (August 8, 2025) with Russian President Vladimir Putin for August 15, Russia's investment envoy Kirill Dmitriev said on Saturday (August 9, 2025). Mr. Trump had said earlier that Russia and Ukraine were close to a ceasefire deal that could resolve the three-and-a-half-year conflict. The contents of the deal have yet to be announced, but it could require Ukraine to surrender significant territory - an outcome many European nations oppose. Mr. Dmitriev accused unnamed countries of seeking to prolong the war. "Undoubtedly, a number of countries interested in continuing the conflict will make titanic efforts to disrupt the planned meeting between President Putin and President Trump," he said in a post in his Telegram account, specifying that by efforts he meant "provocations and disinformation". Mr. Dmitriev did not specify which countries he was referring to or what kind of "provocations" they might undertake. The Kremlin earlier confirmed the summit. The two leaders will "focus on discussing options for achieving a long-term peaceful resolution to the Ukrainian crisis," Mr. Putin aide Yuri Ushakov said, adding: "This will evidently be a challenging process, but we will engage in it actively and energetically."


Mint
6 minutes ago
- Mint
Inside the Trump administration's strong-arm trade negotiations
After a faltering start to his effort to remake global trade, President Trump wanted deals, and he wanted them quickly. To deliver for their boss, senior administration officials embarked on an aggressive campaign beginning this spring to pressure trading partners into agreements that would allow Trump to declare victory. On trips to Europe, a top economic adviser, Stephen Miran, delivered a warning to his counterparts: If they didn't start seriously negotiating and find a way to come to a deal with the US, then their countries would face high tariffs. Miran conveyed the message in May to France and Germany, and later in June to officials in Brussels, where the European Union's executive arm is based, according to a senior administration official. The behind the scenes campaign was launched after Trump paused a wave of tariffs he announced in April, according to people familiar with the matter. He had pulled the plug on his large-scale reciprocal tariff plans that were initially announced on 'Liberation Day" as global markets faltered. The effort has resulted in a tariff truce with China and deals with some of the country's largest trading partners, including the EU, Japan and South Korea, as well the highest overall US tariffs since the Great Depression. On Thursday, higher tariffs on nearly 100 nations went into effect. The private negotiations since the pause were largely led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. All three men used their own methods of trying to set up Trump with trade deals featuring enormous investment promises in the U.S. by trading partners and a range of Trump's beloved tariffs. 'President Trump has assembled the best and most experienced trade and economic team in modern history, and their full court efforts have delivered one historic trade deal after another to level the playing field for American industries and workers." said White House spokesman Kush Desai. Trump's deals with the EU and others highlight a new type of accelerated negotiation strategy used by the administration with allies and adversaries alike. Instead of months or years of talks that arrive at extensive, legally binding trade agreements, Trump's team has sought broad, fast-tracked trade agreements in which enforcement relies on Trump's personal interpretation of emergency economic powers, rather than typical dispute-settlement processes that often involve neutral arbitrators. 'This is not like a free-trade agreement, where there's a dispute settlement system and we have to give consultations for 45 days and then select arbitrators," Greer told reporters after a recent round of talks with the Chinese officials in Stockholm. 'This is a situation where we are…trying to control our trade deficit" using an emergency measure and an International Emergency Economic Powers Act order that the president can modify as needed, he said. While the administration has trumpeted initial successes from its aggressive approach, officials have left some important details unfinished in their rush to announce deals. In Southeast Asia, the administration has said that nations will face higher tariffs—double their normal rate or more—if their goods contain too much content from nonmarket economies, particularly China. But no information has been released on how much Chinese content would make goods eligible for higher tariffs—a detail that will determine how the brunt of exports from nations like the Philippines, Vietnam or Malaysia are handled. A senior administration official said the Trump team knows 'what that rule of origin is going to be" for Chinese content, but isn't yet ready to implement it and declined to give more details. Major retailers are still in the dark, as are several Southeast Asian trading partners that haven't been notified of U.S. plans and haven't agreed to any rule of origin when it comes to the Chinese content, said people familiar with the discussions. Elsewhere, the administration is still working through details of trade frameworks that it has already announced. The U.S. and U.K. are still negotiating the finer points of the trade pact they struck back in May, including details for U.K. steel exports. U.S. and Japanese negotiators met this past week to iron out how automotive tariffs would be treated under their deal. There are still open questions about how the Japanese government plans to fulfill its pledge to provide $550 billion in funding for infrastructure—projects that Trump has insisted will be under his sole discretion. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer spoke at a recent news conference following trade negotiations with Chinese officials in Stockholm. The administration faces another self-imposed deadline on Aug. 12—the date that tariffs on China will climb to 80%-85% if the president doesn't extend a tariff truce with Beijing. Greer and Bessent concluded what they termed constructive talks with the Chinese recently in Stockholm, but Trump hasn't yet said if he would extend the deadline. Still, the administration said its aggressive, personalized approach to trade talks is yielding results. In the days leading up to Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's announcement of a deal in July in Scotland, Lutnick personally called French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and other leaders in the EU, according to U.S. officials. Lutnick was concerned that von der Leyen couldn't make a deal with Trump on her own authority without the backing of key European leaders, these people explained. When Lutnick got on the phone with Macron, the French president pushed back on a larger agreement with the EU. Trump had threatened in July that it might include zero tariffs on the U.S. and potentially up to a 30% tariff on Europe. Lutnick warned Macron that if he wanted the pharmaceutical giant Sanofi to remain based in France, he shouldn't put up too much of a fight, the people said. Trump, at the time, was publicly threatening a tariff of over 200% on non-U.S. pharmaceutical companies, which could have hurt the likes of Sanofi, possibly spurring them to relocate. The deal eventually struck by Trump and von der Leyen featured a 15% tariff on European pharmaceutical products as well as no tariffs on U.S. goods. The EU also agreed to purchase $750 billion of U.S. energy exports through 2028. Just before the president signed an executive order on July 31 imposing a 39% tariff on Switzerland, Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter spoke to Trump on a tense phone call. Trump said in a subsequent CNBC interview that during their call, Keller-Sutter 'didn't want to listen" to the points he made about the trade deficit between the two countries. In a separate call, an aide to Greer told Keller-Sutter she must come to the negotiating table with a compelling case of how the Swiss plan to help eliminate the deficit. The U.S. has a $38 billion trade deficit with Switzerland as of 2024. The calls led to the Swiss president's scrambling to get to Washington to meet with Trump's advisers. During her trip she was unable to have a meeting with Greer, Lutnick or Bessent, according to people familiar with the matter. She met with Secretary of State Marco Rubio instead. A Swiss government official insisted that their offer to Rubio would lead to a reduction in trade deficits between both countries but declined to provide further details. No deal has been struck yet. Write to Brian Schwartz at and Gavin Bade at
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
6 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Prestige Estates acquires 102 acres in Q1, to build homes worth ₹20,400 cr
Realty firm Prestige Estates Projects Ltd has acquired 102 acres of land in the April-June quarter to build housing projects, with a potential to generate revenue of more than Rs 20,000 crore. Looking to expand its residential real estate business, Bengaluru-based Prestige Estates Projects has been acquiring land parcels outright and also partnering with landowners. According to its latest investor presentation, the company acquired a total of 102 acres of land in Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai and Mumbai in the first quarter of this fiscal year. These land parcels will be used to develop residential projects, which would have an estimated gross development value (GDV) of Rs 20,400 crore. According to the presentation, Prestige Estates in Hyderabad acquired two plots -- 28 acres in Tellapur and 37 acres in Pulimamidi. In Bengaluru, the company has acquired three land parcels -- 10 acres in Poojanahalli - Devanahalli, 7 acres in Kothanuru, KR Puram and 10 acres in Ittangur, Sarjapura. At Velachery in Chennai, the company acquired 3.48 acres. Prestige acquired 6.3 acres of land in Mumbai. The presentation did not mention the cost of the land. On financial performance, the company recently reported a 26 per cent increase in its consolidated net profit to Rs 292.5 crore during the first quarter of this fiscal. Its net profit stood at Rs 232.6 crore in the year-ago period. The total income rose to Rs 2,468.7 crore during the April-June period of this fiscal from Rs 2,024.5 crore in the corresponding period of the preceding year. Last month, Prestige Estates Projects Ltd reported a four-fold jump in its sales bookings to Rs 12,126.4 crore in the first quarter of FY26, mainly due to strong demand for its housing project in Ghaziabad. The company's sales bookings or pre-sales stood at Rs 3,029.5 crore in the year-ago period. During the entire last fiscal year, Prestige Estates sales bookings declined 19 per cent to Rs 17,023.1 crore, "reflecting the impact of deferred launches amid approval delays". The company has given guidance of achieving Rs 27,000 crore worth of sales bookings during the current fiscal year. Prestige Group has delivered over 300 projects and has a pipeline of around 140 projects. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)