&w=3840&q=100)
Great Nicobar tribals not against proposed project, lack info: NCST member
The project, titled Holistic Development of Great Nicobar, involves the construction of a transshipment port, an international airport, a township and a power plant over more than 160 sq. km of land. This includes around 130 sq. km of pristine forest inhabited by the Nicobarese, a Scheduled Tribe (ST), and the Shompens, a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG), whose population is estimated to be between 200 and 300.
In an interview with PTI, Lakra said she led an NCST team to the Andaman and Nicobar Islands from June 5 to 7 to review the issues faced by the tribal communities.
She said the commission held a detailed meeting with representatives of all tribal groups, including the Great Andamanese, Jarawa, Nicobarese and Shompens.
"We met everyone.... We also had talks with both Shompen and Nicobarese people living on Great Nicobar Island. Most of the people have no idea about the project. They are busy with their own lives.... They demand more ferries to travel between islands," Lakra said.
Asked about her interaction with the residents of Great Nicobar, she said, "They have no other problems. All they need is development.... Better transport, education and health facilities. This is what they told us. Everyone, barring the Sentinelese, said the same thing. They are in favour of development." "They want employment and their financial situation to improve," Lakra added.
She, however, stressed the need for a stakeholders' meeting with educated people from the island regarding "such a big project" and said all necessary information should be shared with them.
However, Barnabas Manju, chairman of the Little and Great Nicobar Tribal Council, told PTI over the phone that the council was not invited to the meeting and came to know about it through the local media.
The council had written to the Union environment ministry and the Andaman and Nicobar administration in November 2022, withdrawing the no-objection certificate (NOC) it issued in August that year for the denotification of 84.1 sq. km of tribal reserve and the diversion of 130 sq. km of forest for the project. It alleged that crucial information was withheld while seeking the NOC.
The tribal council had expressed shock on learning that parts of their pre-tsunami villages would be "denotified and diverted" under the project.
During a public hearing held at Campbell Bay in January 2021, the council's chairman had said that although they support the development plan, "we want to go back to our ancestral villages".
Tribal councils in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands are statutory bodies established under the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Tribal Councils) Regulation, 2009. They have limited advisory and executive powers, unlike autonomous councils under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution, which have legislative, executive and limited judicial powers and enjoy greater autonomy.
Around 853 sq. km of the island's total 910-sq. km area is designated as a tribal reserve under the Andaman and Nicobar (Protection of Aboriginal Tribes) Regulation, 1956.
In tribal reserves, the tribal communities own the land and have full rights to use it for their daily needs. However, transferring, acquiring or selling land in these areas is strictly prohibited.
Asked whether the commission looked into complaints of Forest Rights Act (FRA) violations related to the project, Lakra said, "The only kind of FRA violations that has been reported involves non-tribal outsiders, who come for construction work, marry ST women and settle on tribal land." This allows non-tribals to gain de-facto control over land protected under the FRA, she added.
In April 2023, the NCST issued a notice to the Andaman and Nicobar administration, seeking "facts and an action-taken report" on allegations that the mega project would violate the constitutional mandate and "adversely impact" the lives of local tribals.
Lakra said the commission would check whether a response has been received.
At a media interaction earlier this month, Union Tribal Affairs Minister Jual Oram said his ministry is examining objections raised by tribal communities regarding the proposed project.
"Yes, it is under examination. I had also answered a question (in this regard) in Parliament. We are currently examining the documents they have submitted. After that, we will decide the course of action," he had said, replying to a question.
On further questioning about what the ministry seeks to ascertain, Oram had said, "First, we need to determine whether the gram sabha (tribal council in this case) was held, what the gram sabha recommended and whether there have been any violations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
'If Trump were president in 2022, there would be no war': Putin after Alaska meeting; US President says no deal with Russia over Ukraine conflict
President Donald Trump greets Russia's President Vladimir Putin Friday, Aug. 15, 2025, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. AP/PTI(AP08_16_2025_000011A) Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday claimed that he would not have invaded Ukraine if Joe Biden had not been in office, a remark seen as courting Donald Trump, even as US tariff threats persist. 'I'd like to remind you that in 2022, during the last contact with the previous administration, I tried to convince my previous American colleague the situation should not be brought to the point of no return when it would come to hostilities,' Putin said after his nearly three-hour summit with Trump in Alaska. 'And I said it quite directly back then. 'That's a big mistake today, when President Trump is saying that if he was the president back then, there will be no war — and I'm quite sure that it would indeed be, so I can confirm that.' 'I think that, overall, me and President Trump have built a very good business-like [relationship],' he added. Trump has frequently expressed the belief that Putin would not have initiated the invasion had he been president in 2022, but he did not appear to engage with the dictator's provocation on Friday. Ahead of the meeting in Alaska, Trump, while in his flight, told Fox News that this Ukraine war is Biden's war and he was the one who screwed up. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo "I'm not doing it based on history, based on anything else — I'm doing it based on a deal. If we make a deal, great. If I see that there's no hope of making a deal, I'm out of there... This isn't my war. This is Biden's war. Biden screwed this up..." Putin said. Trump subtly reminded Putin that he would not engage in any business dealings with Russia until the Kremlin ceased its three-year war on Ukraine, highlighting the US' leverage. 'We … have some tremendous Russian business representatives here, and I think everybody wants to deal with us. We've become the hottest country anywhere in the world in a very short period of time,' he said. 'We look forward to dealing — we're going to try and get this over with. '… We'll have a good chance when this is over.' Trump said that he and Putin did not reach an agreement to resolve Moscow's war in Ukraine, though he characterized the meeting as 'very productive.' 'There were many, many points that we agreed on,' Trump said at a joint press conference with Putin. 'I would say a couple of big ones that we haven't quite got there, but we've made some headway. So there's no deal until there's a deal.'


News18
6 hours ago
- News18
Tariffing India won't stop Putin: House Foreign Affairs Committee
New York/Washington, Aug 15 (PTI) Imposing tariffs on India will not stop Russian President Vladimir Putin or address Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the House Foreign Affairs Committee Democrats said on Friday. The committee's post on X came in response to a statement by US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that if 'things don't go well" between US President Donald Trump and Putin at their Alaska summit meeting, then secondary sanctions on India for purchasing Russian oil could go up. 'Tariffing India won't stop Putin. If Trump really wanted to address Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine, maybe punish Putin and give Ukraine the military aid it needs. Everything else is smoke and mirrors," the House Foreign Affairs Committee Democrats said. Bessent, in an interview to Bloomberg on Wednesday, said, 'I think everyone has been frustrated with President Putin. We expected that he would come to the table in a more fulsome way. It looks like he may be ready to negotiate." 'And we put secondary tariffs on the Indians for buying Russian oil. And I could see, if things don't go well, then sanctions or secondary tariffs could go up," he added. When asked about China, the main purchaser of Russian crude, Bessent had said he is 'not going to get ahead of the president, but the president is the best at creating leverage for himself and he will make it clear to President Putin that all options are on the table". On whether sanctions can go up or loosened, Bessent had said, 'Sanctions can go up, they can be loosened. They can have a definitive life. They can go on indefinitely." He had added that even as Trump is meeting with Putin, the Europeans 'need to join us" and need to be willing to 'put on these secondary sanctions". Bessent recalled that at the G7 meeting in Canada this year, he asked the leaders at the table whether they are willing to put a 200 per cent secondary tariff on China. 'And you know what, everybody wanted to see what kind of shoes they were wearing," he said. Trump imposed tariffs totalling 50 per cent on India, including 25 per cent for Delhi's purchases of Russian oil that will come into effect from August 27. Responding to the tariffs, the Ministry of External Affairs has said that the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable. 'Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security," it said. PTI YAS GSP GSP view comments First Published: August 16, 2025, 00:00 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


The Print
7 hours ago
- The Print
Talks for treaty on plastic pollution end without agreement
Delegates from around 185 countries worked through the night at the UN's Palais des Nations, trying to bridge differences between a high-ambition group seeking global caps on virgin plastic and controls on hazardous chemicals, and a bloc of oil- and petrochemical-producing states that argued the treaty should focus on recycling, waste management and voluntary commitments. Governments negotiating the treaty were presented on Thursday with a new chair's draft that omitted binding limits on plastic production and did not include a dedicated section on chemicals of concern. The text drew sharp criticism from many nations and civil society groups for relying on voluntary, nationally determined actions. New Delhi, Aug 15 (PTI) Countries on Friday failed to reach an agreement during the resumed fifth round of international talks in Geneva that could have led to the first-ever global treaty to curb plastic pollution, with the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) saying negotiators will reconvene at a later date to be announced. Despite overtime talks, the meeting ended without a deal. The UNEP said the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5.2), which ran from August 5 to 15, adjourned with no agreement and would reconvene at a later date to be announced. Earlier, the UNEP had billed this session as an opportunity to 'finalise and approve' text for forwarding to a diplomatic conference, but that prospect has been pushed back. In the resumed talks, the European Union, many African and Pacific states and Latin American countries pressed for binding global measures, including production limits and phase-outs of the most harmful polymers and products. On the other side, major producers, including the United States and several Gulf states, resisted any cap on primary plastic production and opposed strong chemical controls, according to negotiators and observers. Several ministers accused a small group of countries of blocking progress. India reiterated its 'no product phase-out' stance in the treaty, aligning with countries favouring nationally determined approaches focused on waste management, design improvements and extended producer responsibility rather than global bans. Civil society organisations called the collapse 'a wake-up call', arguing that a handful of countries used procedures to drag down ambition. WWF said the chair's draft was 'not a treaty' without global phase-outs, product design rules, a robust finance mechanism and majority voting to strengthen obligations over time. Environmental groups nonetheless welcomed that a weak deal was not rushed through. The resumed fifth round of negotiations on the plastics treaty (INC-5.2) in Geneva was part of a process launched in 2022 to tackle what the UN describes as a 'plastic pollution crisis' threatening oceans, wildlife, human health and the climate. The talks were initially expected to conclude in Busan, South Korea, last December but negotiations there too ended without agreement. The UNEP estimates humanity produces more than 430 million tonnes of plastic a year, much of it is short-lived. Without stronger policies, OECD projects that plastics production and use could rise by about 70 per cent by 2040. Between 19 and 23 million tonnes of plastic waste leak into aquatic ecosystems annually, with around 11 million tonnes entering the oceans each year, according to UN-linked assessments. Business coalitions that back a strong treaty said globally harmonised obligations, such as criteria to phase out problematic products, would cut far more pollution than a patchwork of voluntary national measures. But industry groups tied to the plastics value chain continued to emphasise recycling and waste-management improvements. PTI GVS GVS MNK MNK This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.