MP Sajih Attieh tells LBCI: Qlayaat Airport to be operational, with foreign and Arab companies interested in investing
Speaking on LBCI's ''Nharkom Said'' TV show, Attieh stated that Lebanon does not need the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and has alternative funding sources. He suggested investing in the country's gold reserves "if allowed."
He emphasized the need for the Lebanese state to protect its borders with Syria, noting that "the Lebanese army is doing its best."
Attieh also revealed that by the end of the year, Qlayaat Airport will become operational, with both foreign and Arab companies showing interest in investing in it.
He insisted that Lebanon is a wealthy country but added, "We are a gang of thieves."'
He described the current period as a turning point for the country and "its last chance."
"We must hold people accountable, and the president and prime minister must assert their authority," he said.
Attieh also explained that while the old-age pension law has been passed, it has yet to be implemented.
Furthermore, he mentioned ongoing consultations with specialized companies, meetings, and communications with 81 countries to determine Lebanon's financial needs.
According to these assessments, Lebanon requires approximately $900 million to $1 billion to cover those without social security.
"We have outlined how to secure these resources. If adopted, the health care system would be a major achievement for the current administration and could be implemented soon," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
L'Orient-Le Jour
an hour ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
The law on judicial independence is ‘a positive step' but ‘enough,' according to HRW
Human Rights Watch (HRW) said in a report published on Aug. 15, 2025, that the bill on judicial independence, adopted by the Lebanese Parliament on July 31, is 'a positive step' but 'does not sufficiently guarantee judicial independence.' The organization noted that 'the new law includes some advances in judicial independence, notably greater autonomy and a larger role for judges in electing their peers.' However, the report continues, 'it allows the government-appointed attorney general to order other prosecutors to halt ongoing judicial proceedings and limits the highest judicial body in Lebanon [the Supreme Judicial Council] in overcoming government deadlock and obstruction in judicial appointments.' Ramzi Kaiss, an HRW researcher in Lebanon, said that 'the Lebanese Parliament has made progress but has not truly seized the opportunity to protect the judiciary from political interference.' The report also notes that, although the bill was signed by Parliament Speaker Nabih Berry and sent to Prime Minister Nawaf Salam and President Joseph Aoun, the parliament and government should amend the text. It has been widely criticized by civil rights groups, including the Coalition for Judicial Independence in Lebanon and Legal Agenda, for not taking their recommendations into account and for amendments made during its passage through the Administration and Justice Committee. 'The draft presented in 2018 followed very high standards,' said Nizar Saghiyé, executive director of Legal Agenda, cited in the report. He acknowledged progress on transparency in judicial elections and freedom-of-expression guarantees but said there is still a long way to go. The new law indeed expands judges' in the process of electing their peers and strengthens self-governance in appointments, disciplinary measures, and the transfer of cases among magistrates. It also tasks the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) with developing internal judicial regulations and a judicial code of conduct. Article 53 states that 'judges are independent in the exercise of their functions' and 'cannot be transferred, evaluated, sanctioned, or suspended from their judicial duties, except in cases provided by law.' Judges remain irremovable for four years unless subject to disciplinary proceedings, and they cannot remain in the same position for more than five years. However, whereas the original version stipulated that the vast majority of SJC members should be appointed by their peers, following the recommendations of the Venice Commission (the Council of Europe's advisory body on constitutional matters), the bill was amended to increase the number of judges appointed by the government from three to four out of eight. What worries civil society most is that the government-appointed public prosecutor is still authorized by law to instruct other prosecutors to take legal measures of their choosing, giving them powers that remain excessive, according to the report. Civil society also highlighted significant violations in the legal process of adopting the text. These included 'last-minute amendments that members of Parliament could not examine before the vote, as well as a random tallying process that led some journalists and MPs to conclude that the bill had not received a majority of votes,' the report notes. 'We did not discuss the law, and the text was not put to a vote. They called certain names [of parliamentarians], then the law was approved,' said MP Halimé Kaakour (protesting) in a video posted on social media, a statement cited by HRW. Finally, the report raised the need for the government to ensure that the military prosecutor's office no longer handles civilian cases, contrary to its internal regulations. The appearance of civilians before this 'special' body had become commonplace in recent years, in what the organization described as attempts at 'intimidation.' The HRW report also notes that the newly adopted law is subject to review by the Constitutional Council and should be amended. 'The adoption of this law represents a first step in judicial reform, but the struggle will not be over until Lebanese leaders permanently remove the legal provisions used to obstruct and paralyze the work of the judiciary,' concluded Ramzi Kaiss.
L'Orient-Le Jour
an hour ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Bassil reveals he submitted a ‘black file' on telecommunications to Parliament
Lebanese MP Gebran Bassil, head of the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM), revealed on Saturday via his X account that he had presented last week to the parliamentary inquiry commission overseeing the telecommunications dossier a 'black file' related to the sector, stating that he 'had already submitted it to the competent judicial authorities back in 2009.' He added that 'the file has received no follow-up, despite our repeated calls.' 'This file contains violations and evidence of more than one billion dollars in waste, and it is accompanied by official documents and proof,' he continued. He expressed hope that 'the parliamentary inquiry commission will take charge of this file in accordance with its prerogatives.' Last July, Lebanese MPs referred three former Ministers of Telecommunications to a parliamentary inquiry commission, accused of squandering public funds, in a case that first emerged in 2019 during the widespread protest movement. One of the three former ministers, current MP Nicolas Sehnaoui, is a close ally of Bassil, while the other two are Jamal Jarrah and Boutros Harb. Bassil révèle avoir présenté au Parlement un « dossier noir » sur les télécommunications
L'Orient-Le Jour
an hour ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
New wave of condemnations after Qassem's speech
Reactions condemning the speech of the Hezbollah leader, who on Friday threatened confrontation if disarmament were imposed on his group, continued for the second consecutive day. These remarks were, however, supported by Iran's ambassador to Beirut, Mojtaba Amani, who said, 'American pressure will not break Lebanon.' The leader of the Lebanese Forces (LF), Samir Geagea, on Saturday called the statements of Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem 'unacceptable.' Kassem had declared on Friday that his organization was ready for confrontation, especially after the government tasked the Lebanese Army with drafting a plan to disarm it. 'The speech delivered yesterday by Sheikh Naim Kassem is unacceptable in every respect, as it constitutes a direct threat, first and foremost, to the Lebanese government, then to the parliamentary majority that has placed its trust in this government, and finally to all of Lebanon's constitutional institutions, including the presidency of the Republic and the presidency of the Council of Ministers,' Geagea said in a statement. 'It is also a direct threat to all free Lebanese,' he added. 'Supporting constitutional institutions' 'If Sheikh Naïm assumes that there are no longer any free Lebanese in Lebanon, he is gravely mistaken. If he assumes that he can thereby impose his authority, which does not exist, on these free Lebanese, he is also gravely mistaken,' added the LF leader, of the Christian sovereignist party opposed to Hezbollah's arsenal. In a barely veiled threat directed at Hezbollah's secretary-general, Geagea also promised to 'redouble efforts to support constitutional institutions' and to do everything possible 'to prevent anyone from undermining support for constitutional institutions again,' considering that the current phase is 'foundational' for Lebanon. 'These institutions, represented by the heads of state and government, are striving, with all their patriotism, energy, and strength, to restore Lebanon to itself, to reestablish order in the state, to bring Lebanon's friends back to its side, and also to bring the international community back with it,' he concluded. After more than a year of war between Israel and Hezbollah, the party, which has lost much of its leadership—including its chief Hassan Nasrallah, eliminated by the Israeli army on Sep. 27, 2024— continues to refuse to hand over its arsenal to the Lebanese Army, despite pressure from authorities and the international community. Beirut MP Ibrahim Mneimneh (opposition) said that Hezbollah 'should clearly declare that it is handing over its weapons and limit discussion on this matter to the Council of Ministers.' 'But Hezbollah continues to break its promises and move in a vicious circle,' he added in a radio interview. He also noted: 'The main problem still lies in the lack of trust in a state that is trying to recover. Therefore, Hezbollah should no longer make all Lebanese bear the burden of its crisis.' 'Threatening official authorities' Metn MP Elias Hankache, a member of the parliamentary group of the Kataeb Party, said, 'We cannot let pass an opportunity to build a country worthy of our ambitions in the face of a regional Iranian agenda.' In an interview with the Lebanese channel al-Jadeed, he accused Naim Qassem of 'threatening official authorities in Lebanon, the entire country, and all Lebanese,' noting that this escalation coincided with the visit of Iranian official Ali Larijani to Beirut. Meanwhile, MP Hadi Abou el-Hosn of the Democratic Gathering bloc (aligned with Jumblatt) said Qassem's speech is 'condemnable and unacceptable,' questioning why he used language from a bygone era, referring to the civil war invoked by the Hezbollah chief. 'This escalatory speech, which traps us in the Israeli game, is in total contradiction with Hezbollah's participation in the government, in which we are all integrated and whose ministerial declaration we have all approved,' he said in a statement. 'American pressure will not break Lebanon' Iran's ambassador to Beirut, Mojtaba Amani, stated that 'American pressure will not break Lebanon and its resistance.' In an interview with Al-Alam, reported by various Lebanese media, the diplomat said that his 'country resists pressures, government and people united, and wishes the same for Lebanon.' 'Iran supports Lebanon and its people without distinction between different communities, and its support for Lebanon is not a slogan but a concrete reality,' he added. Amani also said, 'If houses belonging to Christians, Druze, or other communities are destroyed, Iran is ready to help them, as it does for the oppressed people of Gaza.' Meanwhile, Hezbollah's deputy head of the political council, Mahmoud Comati, said on Saturday that Hezbollah is not 'in an internal Lebanese confrontation.' Naïm Kassem 'did not threaten, but said that we are ready, if cornered, to wage a Battle of Karbala,' referring to the battle in which Imam Hussein and his men were killed in 680 AD.
