&w=3840&q=100)
UK reconsiders 'Tax on Love' rule, NRI sponsors may benefit: What it means
The UK government is considering easing the income threshold for sponsoring family visas after public backlash over what critics have called a 'tax on love.' The move, currently under review by the UK Home Office, could have far-reaching consequences for thousands of British families — especially those of Indian origin — separated due to tough immigration policies.
Currently, British citizens and residents sponsoring a spouse or partner must earn at least £29,000 annually, a rule introduced in 2024. The proposed change could lower this requirement to £23,000–£25,000, based on recommendations from the UK's Migration Advisory Committee (MAC).
Why this matters
Families across the UK, including many NRI households, have called the current threshold 'unfair,' especially for women, ethnic minorities, and part-time workers. Critics argue it disproportionately affects low-income British citizens married to foreign nationals and separates parents from their children.
'This judgment is not about relaxing borders — it's about reuniting families and supporting mental well-being of children and spouses,' said Carla Denyer, UK MP and Green Party leader, who has led calls to reverse the rule.
What's Changing
Current threshold: £29,000/year (as of April 2024)
Proposed threshold: £23,000–£25,000/year
Previous plan under review: £38,700 (was to take effect in 2025)
According to the MAC, a reduced threshold will increase net migration by only 1–3%, adding around 8,000 more family members per year. Importantly, the report stressed that this minor fiscal impact is outweighed by the emotional and social benefits of family reunification.
Why Current Rules Are Called 'Tax on Love'
Since 2024, British citizens or permanent residents sponsoring a spouse or partner need a minimum income of £29,000 annually—a rule originally tied to skilled-worker salary levels. Critics argue it has forced families apart, causing psychological strain on children across the UK.
One critic told BBC:
'Children are the biggest victims… we ask her to look to that evidence… those very real-life experiences.'
The threshold is termed a 'tax on love' by MPs and campaigners, including Carla Denyer of the Green Party, who argue it discriminates against working-class families, women, and people of colour.
The Migration Advisory Committee (MAC)—an expert panel advising the government—has recommended reducing the minimum income to £23,000–£25,000, as per The Guardian.
MAC said:
The current £29,000 requirement is among the highest globally, akin to Norway's
Lowering it would ease family separations without significantly increasing net migration—by an estimated 1–3% (8,000 people annually)
While reducing it may slightly impact public finances, this mirrors the reality of many self-sufficient British households.
Legal, Humanitarian & Economic Considerations
As per The Guardian, The MAC cautioned that raising the threshold further—such as the proposed £38,700—'may conflict' with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects the right to family life
Prof. Brian Bell, MAC Chair, said the choice is political:
'There is a cost to the UK economy and UK taxpayers… but… ignoring the massive impact that has on families.'
MAC also highlighted cases from The Guardian, including families with children and British partners who were forced to spend months apart due to the income rule.
What Happens Next?
The Labour government paused the previous Conservative plan to increase the income to £38,700 and asked MAC to review the rule
MAC's report is now with the Home Office, which will formulate new policy likely to be announced later this year
Campaigners from Reunite Families UK argue even the new minimum wage-level threshold could still separate some deserving families
What it means for you?
If you're a UK citizen married to a foreign partner, the rule may change soon, making family reunification easier.
If you're close to the threshold now, you might still need time to meet the lower adjusted requirement.
Campaigners will watch closely—some push for removing the income requirement entirely, citing a right to family life
What you should do?
If you are:
A UK citizen or settled person hoping to sponsor a family member — monitor Home Office announcements for official policy updates.
Earning close to the proposed £23,000–25,000 band — consider preparing your documents now, as the rule may change within months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Rail link for Maruti factory: What this means for car transport logistics in India
Gurgaon: Inauguration of a multi-modal cargo terminal at Maruti Suzuki 's manufacturing plant in Manesar is being touted as a shift towards sustainable transportation that will help India's largest carmaker reduce its carbon footprint. What is a multi-modal cargo terminal? As the term suggests, a multi-modal terminal is a specially designed facility that helps transfer goods between different modes of transportation. The idea is to leverage the strength of different transportation modes – cost-efficacy and eco-friendliness of railways, flexibility and last-mile connectivity of road, and speed of air freight. According to govt officials, there are 108 such terminals in India. What about the Manesar terminal? The two-storey terminal, India's largest such facility, was built over 46 acres inside Maruti Suzuki India's manufacturing plant in Manesar. It will be used exclusively by the automaker. How will it operate and what are its benefits? Cars manufactured at Maruti's Gurgaon plant will be transported by truck to the Manesar plant, where they will be loaded into railway coaches for dispatch to various destinations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Vehicles manufactured at the Manesar plant will be directly loaded into railway coaches from the cargo terminal for transporting across India. This will reduce the carmaker's reliance on trailer trucks, eventually easing road and highway traffic, including in NCR. Officials told TOI the company engages 9,000 truck transporters for ferrying its vehicles across India. How is this different from 'truck on train' RoRo (roll on, roll off) service? The 'truck on train' service for auto parts, rolled out on the western freight corridor from Rewari last year, allowed companies to send trucks loaded with auto parts or vehicles to be loaded onto trains. Once the cargo rakes reach their destination, trucks roll down the train and deliver the goods. How will cars be transported across India from the terminal? According to officials, the terminal will facilitate transport to 380 Indian cities. From the Manesar plant, cargo trains will go up to Patli station, which is part of the 126km Haryana Railway Orbital Corridor (HORC) project. HORC, of which only the Manesar-Patli portion has been completed till now, will connect Palwal to Sonipat through a broad-gauge double railway line for both passenger and goods traffic. The corridor, meant to decongest train traffic in Delhi with a bypass, will enable faster and more-affordable long-distance travel from Gurgaon, Manesar and other industrial hubs of Haryana. Patli station also falls on the Northern Railway line, which goes to Rewari, where it can switch to the Western Dedicated Freight Corridor (DFC). This 1,500km freight corridor starts from Dadri in UP and transports goods up to Gujarat — where Mundra and Pipavav ports are located. The freight corridor, once completed, will eventually reach JNPT port in Mumbai. What is railways' share in transporting Maruti vehicles? The automaker started dispatching its vehicles through railways over a decade ago. About 5% of vehicles manufactured by Maruti were transported via rail in 2014-15. This share steadily went up over the year, reaching 24% last financial year. The company says it aims to transport 35% of its production through trains by 2030-31.
The Hindu
24 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Caught in crossfire, Indians in Iran want to return home
With the Israel-Iran conflict entering its fifth day on Tuesday, Indian citizens – from workers in Israel to students and pilgrims in Iran – caught in the crossfire are distressed, with many desperate to return home. While on Tuesday 100 Indian students reached Armenia to fly back to New Delhi on Wednesday, Indian citizens in the warzone told The Hindu that the air strikes and missile attacks have left them scarred. From a safe house in Iran's Qom, Hania, a fourth-year MBBS student at Tehran University of Medical Sciences, recalled seeing the men's dormitory being hit by an Israeli air strike. 'The glass windows broke and the hit injured at least two Indian students who were in the dormitory,' said Ms. Hania, who is from Jammu and Kashmir. Israel-Iran conflict LIVE updates After receiving instructions from the Indian embassy, Ms. Haniya and her peers took a cab to reach Qom, around 180 km from Tehran. Ms. Hania said she is waiting for the Indian embassy to evacuate her and other fellow Indians. Mohammed Ali, 40, a Noida resident who had gone on a pilgrimage with 40 others to Mashhad, Iran, on June 3, said that there is no clarity on what to do next and no information on how long Qom will be safe. 'How long can we wait inside a room? We do not know if we should stay put here (Qom) or arrange for ways to reach the Armenian border,' said Mr. Ali. In north Iran, at least 130 students from Tehran University have been sheltered in a safe house, with 15 in each room. Speaking to The Hindu, Abrar, a fourth-year MBBS student, said that at least three students were injured in Israel's airstrike, and barring first aid, they did not get any medical treatment. 'The students need surgical attention. But because of the war here, such injuries are not being given attention,' he said. In Israel, Indian nationals engaged at construction sites for the past year are still going to work but are worried about the missile attacks. 'You could be doing your work at the construction site, and when you look up, you either see a missile being intercepted or one being launched. These have become part of our lives,' said Haryana's Dinesh Malik, 38, a construction worker in Rishon LeZion, Israel. Tilak Raj, 40, another construction worker from Haryana, said that on the day of the air strike on Tel Aviv, all he could do was think about his family. 'It felt like the entire place would blow up and all I wanted at that moment was to see my family,' said Mr. Raj. He and other colleagues were all shifted to a site in Or Akiva, almost 50 km from Tel Aviv. But that has not brought him any comfort, for every time he spots a flare in the sky, a chill runs down his spine, and he fears the worst.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India's AI regulation can be a model: Google executive Wilson White
Google's stance on the optimism and pro-innovation around artificial intelligence (AI) is very similar to the principles adopted by the Indian government under its IndiaAI Mission, the company's vice-president of government affairs and public policy in the Asia-Pacific Region, Wilson White, said. 'We see a very clear trend, particularly here in the Asia-Pacific region, on a much more robust view of how to regulate AI in ways that spur innovation, and are responsive to the optimism and pro-innovation kind of orientation around AI that exists in the region,' White told Business Standard. This approach, adopted by Asian countries such as India, Japan, and Singapore, is very different from the path taken by some of the Western countries and regions, such as the European Union, he said, adding that the ASEAN countries were 'expressly stepping away' from such prohibitive regulations. This approach, he said, aligns with Google's path and thinking around the development and deployment of AI to capitalise on the opportunities presented by the technology, White said. India's approach to regulating AI, where the government is very 'clear-eyed' about the risks associated with the technology, but also the dangers of overregulation in the early days, should be a model approach to lawmaking for AI, he said. 'For us, the mantra that we use is bold, responsible, together. We want to be bold and push the bounds of technology, publish our foundational research so that others, like small businesses, can benefit and innovate from that as well,' White said. The APAC government affairs and regulatory chief is on a short visit to India this week. There are some risks with AI that have been identified by experts across the globe. In such areas, Google will deliberately go slower to ensure that the company is not doing more harm than good, he said. The only way to continue with such research and development is to do so in conjunction with the entire ecosystem, especially startups that push the bounds of innovation, he said. Despite the rapid advancements made by companies and countries around AI models, large language models, and large reasoning models, the technology is still in the early days of development, White said, adding that the investments being made by the respective companies or countries were because the 'promise of AI' was real. 'We are seeing it in the areas of healthcare, where we are now able to get ahead of diseases that have vexed humankind for a long time. We are seeing it in places like agriculture and education, so I think it's clear to folks that the promise of AI is real,' White said.
