Thrapston warehouse plan criticised at public inquiry
Objections to the scheme included concerns about country lanes becoming rat-runs, ruined views from nearby towns and villages, and the effects on wildlife.Speaking on "behalf of the birds and the animals that can't speak for themselves", John Franklin said: "How is it right that these developers assume they can play God over the lives of our wildlife?"We need to protect our green and pleasant land from this onslaught of warehouse construction."North Northamptonshire Council have argued for the appeal scheme to be turned down, the Local Democracy Reporting Service said.Developers IM Properties and Harworth Group backed their view that logistics development was desperately needed within North Northamptonshire.The testimony from residents will also be considered in the government-appointed planning inspector's decision.
'Catastrophic threat'
Jayne Rolfe, the manager of Titchmarsh community shop, said the Upper Nene Valley was an important tourist attraction for the area. She said the business wouldn't survive with just visitors from the village alone if the views were destroyed by "out-of-place big box sheds"."A development of such magnitude would destroy our village as we know it," Ms Rolfe said.Member of the Titchmarsh History Association, Ian Curtis, said the development was "larger than the village itself" and represented the "most catastrophic threat to the heritage of our village in several generations".Planning applicants, Equites Newlands, said the employment site would create about 2,700 jobs and emphasised the "unmet need" for logistics in the area.Dr R Catchpole, the planning inspector, will reach a verdict after the public inquiry, expected to finish on 13 August.
Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Bungalows balloon but flats shrink – analysis into changes in typical home sizes
The average floor area of a flat or a detached home in England has shrunk over the past decade, according to analysis by Nationwide Building Society. But bungalows, terraced homes and semi-detached properties have typically grown in size between 2013 and 2023, according to the research, which used data from the English Housing Survey. Andrew Harvey, Nationwide's senior economist, said: 'Typical property sizes have increased slightly over the last decade. Since 2013, the average floor area has increased from 95.3 square metres to 96.2 square metres. He added: 'The largest increase has been in terraced houses, where the average floor area is 3.6% bigger than in 2013. But the average size of flat, the smallest property type, is now 1.7% smaller than 10 years ago at 60.3 square metres. 'Reflecting the composition of the stock, the owner occupier sector has the highest average floor area at 112 square metres. The average floor area in the private and social rented sectors is smaller at 76 square metres and 65 square metres respectively, due to greater concentration of flats.' Mr Harvey said the total housing stock in England has increased by 2.1 million homes to 25.4 million in 2023. He added: 'Of the total, 16.3 million dwellings are owner occupied, while 4.9 million are privately rented, with the remaining 4.2 million in the social rented sector (local authority or housing association properties).' Here are average floor areas for property types in England in square metres in 2013 followed by 2023 and the percentage change, according to Nationwide Building Society: Flats, 61.4, 60.3, minus 1.7% Bungalow, 77.0, 77.5, 0.6% Terraced, 88.7, 91.9, 3.6% Semi-detached, 96.9, 99.1, 2.2% Detached, 152.9, 151.9, minus 0.6%
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Young graduates most likely to be wrong about student loan repayments
Nearly three in five young graduates wrongly believe they must start repaying their student loans as soon as they get any job, a report has suggested. A study, by the Policy Institute at King's College London (KCL), and the Higher Education Policy Institute (Hepi) think tank, reveals a number of misunderstandings about universities – including tuition fees and student debt. The survey, of more than 2,000 adults in the UK in June, suggests that the public believes around 40% of graduates would not go to university if they could choose again. But the actual proportion who say this is only 8% – as measured in a survey last year, the report said. Many also misunderstand how student debt works, particularly young graduates themselves, it found. More than a third (35%) of the public wrongly think university graduates must start paying back their student loan as soon as they get any paid job, which rises to 58% among graduates aged 18 to 34. The report also suggests that the public underestimates higher education's contribution to the economy. Only 6% correctly ranked the University of Oxford as having the highest revenue out of a list of seven organisations – even though its income was more than £1 billion higher than Greggs (the second on the list). The study also found that 13% of the public believe that remaining in the UK to seek asylum is the most common outcome among overseas students who entered the country three years prior. But only 0.5% of international students do this, the report suggested. Professor Bobby Duffy, director of the policy institute at KCL, said the standout finding for him was the 'overestimation' of the sense of regret about going to university. 'This will be driven by vivid, individual stories of graduate regret and the generally negative background noise about the declining value of a degree,' he said. Prof Duffy: 'It's extremely difficult to first get public attention, and then cut through the noise of individual negative stories that are much more likely to stick in our minds.' Nick Hillman, director of the Hepi, said: 'Universities are bigger in terms of income and employment and more successful in terms of student outcomes than the public often recognise. 'However, it would be absurd to blame the voters for this major misunderstanding. 'Those of us who work in the higher education sector have not done a good enough job of telling people the true role of universities in modern Britain today. 'We should start correcting that record by inviting more people onto more campuses more often.' A spokesperson for Universities UK (UUK) said: 'Universities create new opportunities for millions, underpin the government's industrial strategy and supercharge the whole UK economy. 'They deserve to be celebrated as one of the UK's greatest success stories. In 2021-22, the sector contributed more than £265 billion to the economy. 'However, the results of the survey demonstrate that the sector and the Government must work better together to ensure that the public have the information they need to make informed choices about their future, including how student finance works, so more people see going to university as a realistic option.' A Department for Education spokesperson said: 'This report shows that we have a world class higher education sector that can deliver great outcomes for students, and university remains a fantastic option for people looking to get in-demand skills and get into a rewarding career. 'We have been clear that universities must deliver a high-quality experience and we are determined to support the aspiration of every person who meets the requirements and wants to go to university – regardless of their background. 'We will soon publish our plans for reform as part of the Post-16 Education and Skills Strategy White Paper as we fix the foundations of higher education through our plan for change.'
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Budget cost hikes drive 79% of hospitality firms to raise prices
Almost four-fifths of pubs, restaurants and bars say they have increased their prices after Budget cost hikes, according to new figures. New data from the UK hospitality sector's trade bodies also showed that more than half of firms have axed jobs in a bid to help their finances. Industry bosses warned that firms across the UK are being squeezed by 'unsustainable' taxes, and urged the Government to relax taxation on the sector at the autumn Budget. The survey of members of the British Institute of Innkeeping (BII), the British Beer & Pub Association (BBPA), UKHospitality and Hospitality Ulster shed light on the pressures being felt by hospitality operators. It found that 79% of operators have increased prices as a direct result of increases to operating costs in April. It also showed that 73% of respondents have less than six months of cash reserves, with one in five having no cash reserves at all. The data comes after firms were impacted by increases to the national minimum wage, national insurance payments and business rates payments. In April, the national living wage rose by 6.7% to £12.21 an hour for workers aged 21 and older. At the same time, the Government increased the rate of employer national insurance contributions (NICs) from 13.8% to 15% and also lowered the threshold at which firms would pay the tax. Many pubs were also hit by changes to discounts on business rates, the property tax affecting high street businesses. Hospitality businesses received a 75% discount on their business rates bills up to a cap of £110,000 but saw this cut to only 40% in April. Earlier this week, analysis of separate Government data showed that 209 pubs shut their doors for good in the first six months of this year. Bosses said the Chancellor needs to look at changes to VAT, business rates and NICs to ease the burden of firms. In a joint statement, the trade bodies said: 'This shocking data reinforces the urgent need for Government to recognise the incredible pressure hospitality businesses have been put under, particularly since April, and illustrates why it should come forward with measures to support this vital sector at the Budget. 'Unsustainable tax increases are squeezing businesses, stifling growth and investment, and threatening local employment, especially for young people. 'It is forcing businesses across the sector to make impossible decisions to cut jobs, put up prices, reduce opening hours and sadly limit the support they desperately want to give their communities. 'Hospitality is united in which measures will reverse this trend and drive growth: a reduction in VAT for hospitality, changes to employer NICs and permanently lower business rates for the sector.'
