
Young graduates most likely to be wrong about student loan repayments
A study, by the Policy Institute at King's College London (KCL), and the Higher Education Policy Institute (Hepi) think tank, reveals a number of misunderstandings about universities – including tuition fees and student debt.
The survey, of more than 2,000 adults in the UK in June, suggests that the public believes around 40% of graduates would not go to university if they could choose again.
But the actual proportion who say this is only 8% – as measured in a survey last year, the report said.
Many also misunderstand how student debt works, particularly young graduates themselves, it found.
More than a third (35%) of the public wrongly think university graduates must start paying back their student loan as soon as they get any paid job, which rises to 58% among graduates aged 18 to 34.
The report also suggests that the public underestimates higher education's contribution to the economy.
Only 6% correctly ranked the University of Oxford as having the highest revenue out of a list of seven organisations – even though its income was more than £1 billion higher than Greggs (the second on the list).
The study also found that 13% of the public believe that remaining in the UK to seek asylum is the most common outcome among overseas students who entered the country three years prior.
But only 0.5% of international students do this, the report suggested.
Professor Bobby Duffy, director of the policy institute at KCL, said the standout finding for him was the 'overestimation' of the sense of regret about going to university.
'This will be driven by vivid, individual stories of graduate regret and the generally negative background noise about the declining value of a degree,' he said.
Prof Duffy: 'It's extremely difficult to first get public attention, and then cut through the noise of individual negative stories that are much more likely to stick in our minds.'
Nick Hillman, director of the Hepi, said: 'Universities are bigger in terms of income and employment and more successful in terms of student outcomes than the public often recognise.
'However, it would be absurd to blame the voters for this major misunderstanding.
'Those of us who work in the higher education sector have not done a good enough job of telling people the true role of universities in modern Britain today.
'We should start correcting that record by inviting more people onto more campuses more often.'
A spokesperson for Universities UK (UUK) said: 'Universities create new opportunities for millions, underpin the government's industrial strategy and supercharge the whole UK economy.
'They deserve to be celebrated as one of the UK's greatest success stories. In 2021-22, the sector contributed more than £265 billion to the economy.
'However, the results of the survey demonstrate that the sector and the Government must work better together to ensure that the public have the information they need to make informed choices about their future, including how student finance works, so more people see going to university as a realistic option.'
A Department for Education spokesperson said: 'This report shows that we have a world class higher education sector that can deliver great outcomes for students, and university remains a fantastic option for people looking to get in-demand skills and get into a rewarding career.
'We have been clear that universities must deliver a high-quality experience and we are determined to support the aspiration of every person who meets the requirements and wants to go to university – regardless of their background.
'We will soon publish our plans for reform as part of the Post-16 Education and Skills Strategy White Paper as we fix the foundations of higher education through our plan for change.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
Millions lost by Norwich City Council housing firm 'shameful'
A council lost millions of pounds on a housing development company whose performance was "not regularly tracked", according to a leaked month Norwich City Council agreed to liquidate Lion Homes, which had been set up to generate revenue for the authority and build more affordable councillor Alex Catt said it was "shameful" that a review found the firm's shareholder panel - which included councillors and was supposed to meet four times a year - had not met since November Labour-run council – which had to write off a £6m loan to the firm – said it had struggled because of "spiralling borrowing costs and a hostile planning system". Carli Harper, cabinet member for finance and major projects, said there would be "a full scrutiny and audit review" of what happened with the as Norwich Regeneration Limited in 2015, the company was supposed to develop private housing projects to raise income for the council, while also providing some affordable some of its developments struggled and in 2020 it emerged £6m was lost when homes in Bowthorpe were sold for less than they cost to build. With the company close to collapse last year, consultants 31Ten were commissioned to review the financial risk posed to the BBC has seen the report from October 2024, which found that objectives for the firm "were not clear" or "clearly linked to key performance indicators nor regularly tracked".It said it was "critical" for the shareholder panel – set-up to oversee the business – to meet regularly, but it had not done so for consultants also found that the four Lion Homes employees also worked in the council's housing delivery team and warned that could "lead to a perception of conflict of interest".They also said the firm had built up loses of £5.72m over a number of years, while the council had invested £3.42m in it and provided a loan of £6.15m, which has since been written off. A separate report from accountants Grant Thornton said liquidating the company and its assets could recoup the council £ Catt, who leads the council's opposition Green group, said concerns raised by his party about how the firm was run "had been completely ignored"."It's frankly just a mess," he said."It's lacked basic governance, any accountability, any sort of purpose and was going forward on the basis of financial calculations that were completely wrong."Harper said selling Lion Homes' assets "will help us to significantly reduce any outstanding debt" and insisted the council was "always transparent about finances".She said other housing companies had faced the same problems of "spiralling borrowing costs and a hostile planning system" and that the council would develop housing projects itself, instead of using a private firm."Bringing Lion Homes in-house… ensures the council continues to deliver the housing Norwich needs in a more transparent, accountable way," she said. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
Classic TT return aims to reverse post-Covid August visitor dip
The return of the Classic TT has been designed reverse a post-pandemic slump in visitors to road racing on the Isle of Man in August, organisers have in 2013, the brand was scrapped by the Manx government after a review in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic but is set to return alongside the 2025 Manx Grand Prix (MGP).A peak of 16,019 people visited the event in 2019 but that had dropped to 14,229 last year after being run solely under the MGP banner since government's head of motorsport Paul Phillips said while the three-year return of the Classic TT would provide a "spectacle", it aimed to boost the economy by growing visitor numbers beyond pre-pandemic levels. Mr Phillips said: "The event exists to boost the economy, it is funded by several million pounds of public money and it exists to generate a benefit to the visitor economy."As part of the reintroduction, the event has been expanded to a 13-day format from its truncated 9-day schedule introduced in said early indications on accommodation and ferry travel showed that bookings "were up" for 2025, but it was too early to say to "what degree".Organisers were "optimistic" that "over a number of years it could return to pre-pandemic levels".It was hoped the figures would "ultimately surpass" the previous peak in order to "ensure the financial sustainability" of the event in future, he the return of the Classic TT late last year, the Department for Enterprise (DfE) said the "strategic intervention" was designed to "encourage additional visitors to the latter part of the event".As there had been a "significant increase in global interest" in the TT the move looked to "leverage this momentum", it added. Wednesday evening sees the start of qualifying for the Classic TT classes, with racing on classic and vintage machinery scheduled for 27 and 29 Phillips said the paddock would become "a home to a whole lot of really interesting bikes and memorabilia" during the event."At TT the machines are kind-of similar, whereas at Classic TT there's a huge range of motorcycles from decades of motorcycling racing," he "great bikes from yesteryear being ridden to their maximum" was a "spectacle" and a "really important" part of the competition, he with the mountain circuit's "unique heritage" and there were also "lots of stories from over 100 years of racing that the Classic TT can tell", such as motorcycle legend Joey Dunlop's final three wins on the island 25 years ago, he feat is set to be showcased in a pop-up exhibition featuring Joey's race leathers, helmets, and trophies at the Mercury Club located near the TT the milestone will be marked again n the final day of the festival when Joey's nephew and all-time TT race win record holder Michael Dunlop will ride a replica of his uncle's 2000 Honda SP1 in a tribute lap."That will be big moment, it will be special," Mr Phillips said. Read more stories from the Isle of Man on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC Isle of Man on Facebook and X.


The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Six ways to get real about rail fares
Everyone seems to be talking about rail fares. The excitement is due to the third Wednesday in August traditionally being Act One of the annual festival of rail fare misery. The publication of the retail prices index figure for July has long heralded an outpouring of despair. That is because train tickets normally increase in line with last month's RPI (or sometimes 1 per cent more). Act Two usually takes place in November, when the rail industry confirms the worst fears of the travelling public. Anyone with a calculator and a bit of time could have worked out the actual fare rises during the previous three months. But there is fresh shock when they are published. For example, a 3.6 per cent rise for 2026 would see the price of a one-way Anytime ticket from Manchester to London rise to exactly £200, and a monthly season ticket from Bristol to Cardiff hit £400. The last act is performed on the day the rises take effect. Platoons of camera crews converge on a London rail terminal – usually Euston or King's Cross, due to the abundance of coffee facilities as well as fed-up commuters to 'vox pop'. The finale is the same every year: an unharmonious chorus of condemnation which goes, approximately, 'Why should we pay even more for unreliable trains that are standing-room only?' Ministers hint this cycle is different: that there is nothing special about the July figure that suggests it will define the fare rise early in 2026. 'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares,' a spokesperson for the Department for Transport (DfT) told me. 'But our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.' Allow me to add a couple of lines that have unaccountably been left out of the DfT statement: 'The way to rescue the railway and reduce the astonishing subsidy of £400 per second taxpayers pump in is to entice more people on board. 'Prospective passengers find the tangle of ticketing highly confusing and suspect they are being ripped off. In addition, the way we distribute tickets loses a chunk of revenue. So we are finally going to overhaul the ticketing system, as every government this century has promised to do.' With the railway celebrating 200 years next month, you might have thought we would sort out ticketing in that time. We haven't. Happily, I am here to help with this quest, with my top six recommendations. How many do I expect the government to adopt? Zero. I hope I am wrong. Go 100 per cent digital 'We have to provide tickets in whatever form the passenger prefers: paper from a machine or ticket office, or an e-ticket.' No you don't. Follow the airlines. Saves a fortune. That vital QR code ticket can always be in paper form, perhaps printed at helpdesks at stations, but very quickly the travelling public will adapt. Especially if they sense someone is actually thinking about their journey. Show you understand the passenger To make life easier for long-suffering passengers, the railway could deploy some logic in its online offering. I estimate that 99.9 per cent of all passengers from Swansea who tap 'C-A-R' into the National Rail website are keen to travel to Cardiff Central. Yet this is the seventh choice in a long list. The top three destinations offered: Carlisle in the far northwest of England; the tiny halt of Carbis Bay in north Cornwall; and Cardenden in Fife. The one in a million passenger who actually wants to go from Swansea to beautiful Carbis Bay will cope. Tie every ticket to a particular train On Wednesday I am travelling from Manchester to Preston. I don't know which train I will catch, but I do know that Northern Rail (state owned, by the way) will offer me a reasonable and appropriate Advance fare, up to a few minutes before departure, as I walk to the station. The exact price is calibrated by algorithms according to expected demand, just like the low-cost airlines that have transformed aviation to everyone's benefit. Opportunity for fare dodging will shrink, helping to rescue perhaps half-a-billion pounds of lost revenue. And if sensible fares are offered, the practice of splitting tickets simply vanishes. Many long-in-the-tooth rail users (probably including me) will complain about a lack of flexibility. Tough: allowing a ridiculous range of options to get from A to B – such as London-Manchester via Leicester and Sheffield or Reading and Oxford – is just not relevant for most passengers. Remind the old groaners that delay repay (compensation for late journeys) will be handed out instantly under the new system, refunded back to the payment method. Intercity optimisation Imagine asking British Airways: 'What is the fare from London Heathrow to Glasgow?' BA's revenue management team – who squeeze the maximum cash out of every passenger while simultaneously trying to fill every seat – would look blankly at you. Then they might shrug and say: 'It's whatever the market will bear.' On Thursday, a peak demand day, BA's answer is anywhere between £159 and £323. On other days, it might be as low as £50 for people who commit in advance and as high as £500 for those desperate to travel at two hours' notice. Rail revenue managers should have the same freedom, rather than saying: 'The most you will ever pay between London and Glasgow, however many people want to travel, is £205.' Railcard revolution Either remove railcard discounts – which would be deeply unpopular – or do as the Swiss do, and allow anyone to buy a railcard. That will help those disenfranchised people aged between 31 and 59 who don't particularly want to travel with a specified Other Person or an annoying child aged 5-15. Will overall revenue rise? Who knows? The best way to find out is to try it, and then have the guts to retract it should the plan prove 'abstractive' (railway term for losing revenue). Stand-up standbys LNER, the state-run main operator on the East Coast main line, has an annoying habit of claiming its trains are full. Friday's departures from Edinburgh to York between 8am and 1pm are all shown as 'not available'. This is tosh, because anyone who knows how to work the system (you pretend you want to start your journey from nearby Haymarket and pay £63.80 for an off-peak ticket) can climb on board and stand if necessary. In Korea the national railway monetises busy trains by selling standing tickets at around half-price – with the standee able to sit down if there's an empty seat.