HDFC Bank faces regulatory scrutiny over alleged mis-selling of Credit Suisse bonds in UAE
Mumbai: HDFC, India's most valuable bank, continues to be in a bit of a pickle in the Middle East ever since it ran into a controversy two years ago over alleged mis-selling of high-risk bonds floated by the disgraced Swiss lender Credit Suisse (CS). In the wake of the glare that HDFC faced amid complaints from bond investors, at least one UAE regulator is now examining the episode to determine if the bank had breached any of the licensing conditions while marketing the soured third-party products.
A key issue is how the bank conducted business with customers through legal entities based in different jurisdictions. A customer might have been served by relationship managers (RMs) of its UAE office, while receiving advisory from officials attached to its operations in a separate entity at the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC), even as the accounts got booked with HDFC's full-service branch in Bahrain. Investors opened accounts with the Bahrain office and funded the account to buy the bonds, which is a common enough practice.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Chegou a São Paulo repelente de ratos e pombos
Repelente Super Sônico
Saiba Mais
Undo
DIFC, a financial free zone, functions as a separate jurisdiction under an independent legal system, different from general UAE laws. Financial services conducted in and from DIFC are regulated by Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), an independent regulator.
Play Video
Pause
Skip Backward
Skip Forward
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
0:00
Loaded
:
0%
0:00
Stream Type
LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
1x
Playback Rate
Chapters
Chapters
Descriptions
descriptions off
, selected
Captions
captions settings
, opens captions settings dialog
captions off
, selected
Audio Track
default
, selected
Picture-in-Picture
Fullscreen
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text
Color
White
Black
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Text Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Transparent
Caption Area Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Transparent
Semi-Transparent
Opaque
Font Size
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
200%
300%
400%
Text Edge Style
None
Raised
Depressed
Uniform
Drop shadow
Font Family
Proportional Sans-Serif
Monospace Sans-Serif
Proportional Serif
Monospace Serif
Casual
Script
Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values
Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Bonds Corner
Powered By
Adani Ports and SEZ to raise Rs 5,000 crore via long-term bonds
Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone plans to raise ₹5,000 crore. This will be through a 15-year non-convertible debenture issue. The issue opens on May 29. The funds will be used for capital expenditure and debt refinancing. This is Adani Ports' largest bond issuance. The company's net debt-to-Ebitda ratio has improved. The bonds are rated Crisil AAA.
How Laddering Fixed Income Can Help You Stay Agile in an Uncertain World: Jiraaf's Strategy for FY26
BOJ on alert to impact of super-long yield swings on borrowing costs
India bonds are a buy for Citi on diverging rates policy with US
US treasury yields dip on Japan's likely bond shift
Browse all Bonds News with
"If officials advising clients belong to the bank's DIFC office, and the RMs are employees of the Dubai representative office, which is under the UAE Central Bank, but the clients are not onboarded by the DIFC office, it can raise eyebrows among regulators. So when some aggrieved investors of the Credit Suisse bonds approached DFSA, alleging that they were misled, it was found that they were not onboarded in the DIFC branch of HDFC. The practice came to light as the regulators looked into the matter following investor complaints," a person with knowledge of the situation said.
An HDFC Bank spokesperson did not respond to queries.
Live Events
The know-your-customer rules, anti-money laundering regulations, and the risk assessment under the suitability rules all differ in DIFC. "Besides, DIFC banks focus on 'professional clients' who are typically categorised as those having a minimum liquid net worth of $1 million. We don't know whether some clients who did not meet the criteria were onboarded by the Dubai rep office but was advised by the DIFC outfit," said another person. In most banks, advisors come to the picture for high-valued clients as RMs often lack the skill.
The lender had extended leverage to some of the clients-offering loans to well-heeled non-resident Indians (NRIs) to invest in financial products. HNIs who had borrowed to invest were left fuming after a troubled Credit Suisse chose to write-down the AT1 bonds in 2023. "Even as their investments were wiped out, they faced margin calls from the lender as the bond prices dropped as CS' troubles intensified in the run-up to the write-down decision," said a finance professional in the region who had watched the episode closely.
Unlike regular bonds, AT1, or additional tier-one bonds, carry a higher risk and are issued by banks to shore up capital. "Both the UAE authorities as well as DFSA had sought explanation from the bank then and the examination in the matter is ongoing," said a third person familiar with the situation.
About 20 employees have quit HDFC UAE in recent months with the bank restricting bonuses and incentives, and going slow on the wealth management business in the UAE. This is understood to include a long-serving official. A number of them have joined a wealth advisory firm with roots in India.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why MMRDA has scrapped the tendering process for Thane-Bhayandar mega infra projects
The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) on Friday (May 30) informed the Supreme Court that it has decided to scrap the tender process for Thane-Ghodbunder to Bhayandar tunnel and elevated road projects worth over Rs 14,000 crore in 'public interest'. The Bench was hearing a challenge by Larsen & Toubro (L&T) Ltd to orders passed by the Bombay High Court on May 20 upholding MMRDA's position that the reasons for rejecting the technical bids need not be communicated to the company before the projects are awarded. The top court had on Thursday (May 29) asked Mumbai's infrastructure development authority whether it was willing to carry out a re-tendering process for the two major projects in the financial capital – and warned that failure to do so might lead the court to stay the current tenders. A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) B R Gavai and Justice A G Masih had asked this question to Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) first on May 26. On Friday, taking MMRDA's statement on the record, the SC disposed of as 'infructuous' the pleas by L&T. What is the background of this major development, and how did the matter reach the Supreme Court? What are these two infrastructure projects? The two projects will link Thane with Mira-Bhayandar. They are part of an extension of the Mumbai Coastal Road project. The first project is a 5-km twin tunnel of 14.6-metre diameter, connecting Gaimukh near the mouth of Vasai Creek in Mira-Bhayandar to the Fountain Hotel junction at Shilphata in Thane. The project cost is estimated at Rs 8,000 crore. The second project, a 9.8-km elevated creek road bridge, will connect Bhayandar with Ghodbunder Road in Thane. The cost of this project is estimated at Rs 6,000 crore. The elevated bridge is likely to be second in length only to the Mumbai Trans Harbour Link (MTHL) bridge, also called Atal Setu, which, at almost 22 km, is both the longest bridge and the longest sea bridge in India. What was L&T's contention? MMRDA invited tenders for the two projects on July 27, 2024. L&T approached the Bombay HC claiming not enough time had been allowed to collect geotechnical data. On October 8, MMRDA assured that the last date for the submission of bids would be extended by 60 days. Earlier this month, L&T filed two petitions before the HC, contending that MMRDA did not follow a fair and transparent tender process. The company said that it had submitted its technical bid on December 13, 2024, and the bid was opened on January 1, 2025 – however, it had received no communication about the outcome of the evaluation. After learning that MMRDA had scheduled the opening of financial bids on May 13 and invited select bidders for it, L&T suspected that it had been excluded from the process, the company submitted. This, L&T said, violated the principles of natural justice. The Instructions to Bidders (ITB) – which are detailed guidelines for potential bidders to prepare and submit their bids for a specific project – are discriminatory, L&T said. What was MMRDA's stand? MMRDA claimed that as per the clauses of ITB, it was not required to intimate L&T that its technical bid had been found unresponsive before the opening of financial bids. Once L&T had accepted the terms of the tender, it could not oppose the opening of the financial bids, MMRDA submitted. It argued that public infrastructure projects should not be delayed, and L&T's pleas deserved to be dismissed. And what did the High Court rule? A Vacation Bench of the court dismissed L&T's pleas and declined to continue the stay on opening of financial bids for the elevated road. In the case of the tunnel project, the Bench rejected L&T's plea, noting a 'suppression of material facts'. The HC said it had to be 'mindful' that the matter involved 'mega infrastructure projects of significant public importance', and 'any delay…would adversely impact the execution of the project'. The court gave L&T the opportunity to approach the Supreme Court in appeal. What happened in the Supreme Court? L&T submitted before the SC that there was an arbitrary declaration of the L1 (Lowest one) bid for both projects to Hyderabad-based Megha Engineering and Infrastructure Ltd (MEIL), even though its bid was at a substantially higher project cost compared to L&T's. L&T claimed that compared to MEIL, its price bid was almost Rs 2,521 crore less in case of the tunnel project, and Rs 609 crore less for the elevated road project. MMRDA argued that the question of price did not arise if the petitioner was disqualified. However, the Bench disagreed, and said it shall be considered in case of 'public interest matters' and 'public money would be saved'. On May 26, the SC said it was difficult to comprehend that the technical bids submitted by L&T – the company which had been chosen to execute the Central Vista project in New Delhi – had been rejected for the Thane-Ghodbunder to Bhayandar tunnel and elevated road projects. On May 29, the SC reiterated that the difference of nearly Rs 3,100 crore between the two bidders was 'not a small amount'. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta representing MMRDA submitted that the disqualification was not on 'flimsy or fanciful grounds' and the authority would justify its decision and respond to the court's queries during the next hearing. This hearing took place on Friday.
The Wire
34 minutes ago
- The Wire
‘Not a Single Project Completed on Time': Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh on IAF's Delivery Delay Woes
Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Security 'Not a Single Project Completed on Time': Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh on IAF's Delivery Delay Woes The Wire Staff 8 minutes ago 'While signing the contract itself, sometimes we are sure that it is not going to come up (in time), but we just sign the contract, thinking we will see what to do.' IAF Chief Air Chief Marshal A P Singh addresses the CII Annual General Meeting & Business Summit 2025, in New Delhi, Thursday, May 29, 2025. Photo: PTI Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now New Delhi: India's Chief of Air Staff Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh expressed concerns on delivery delays, noting how the Air Force signs contracts knowing full well that there will be such a delay. 'Why should we promise something, which can't be achieved? While signing the contract itself, sometimes we are sure that it is not going to come up (in time), but we just sign the contract, thinking we will see what to do. Obviously, the process gets vitiated,' the Indian Air Force chief was quoted by Deccan Herald as having said. The air chief marshal was quoted having said this at the Confederation of Indian Industry annual business summit in New Delhi. The report notes that even though Air Chief Marshal Singh didn't identify the project he was talking about, the reference is possibly to the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited's inability to deliver a combat-ready Tejas light combat aircraft on time. The defence ministry had signed the contract for 73 fighters and 10 trainers at Rs 45,696 crore. Delivery was supposed to be in March 2024. Earlier this week the Ministry of Defence announced that it would fast-track development of its indigenous fifth-generation fighter via the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) programme. Air Chief Marshal Singh stated that AMCA project was a 'big step' and reflected confidence. But as Rahul Bedi noted in his latest analysis for The Wire, this is not its first brush with such lofty ambitions. Earlier, Bedi had noted how, following Operation Sindoor, which exclusively involved the Air Force's combat platforms in executing precision strikes across Pakistan, the clamour for the Indian Air Force to fast-track its long-pending requirement for 114 Multi-Role Fighters Aircraft (MRFA), initiated nearly a decade ago, is expected to gather momentum. 'Timeline is a big issue. Not a single project that I can think of was completed on time. This is something, which we have to look at,' Air Chief Marshal Singh was quoted as having said. The Hindu has noted additionally that he called upon stakeholders to ensure that they did their best on their part as links in the bigger chain at the national level to plug any shortcomings. 'Building trust is not required with the armed forces, but retaining that trust depends on a lot of actions… we have to keep reinforcing that trust,' he said. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News Unexpected Fallout of Op Sindoor Has Been Tilt in Pakistan's Military Balance Toward Its Air Force Political Rent-seeking of Armed Forces is Detrimental to Democracy For Arms Dealers, Operation Sindoor Was Not a Crisis Conflict But a Business Opportunity Army Blames News Reports, Contradicts Corps Commander's Claim of Air Defence Guns at Golden Temple Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir Elevated to Field Marshal Rank Asim Munir's Elevation to Field Marshal Likely to Disturb Military Norms, Succession Dynamics 'Losses Are Part of Combat', IAF Says But Declines to Share Details of What Platforms India Lost Second Speech in 24 Hours, Modi Invokes Religious Figures But No Mention of Trump Mediation Claims 'Projectiles Appear To Be Coming in Waves': Jammu Plunged in Darkness, Loud Explosions Heard View in Desktop Mode About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
Hans India
35 minutes ago
- Hans India
India's defence production projected to jump 6-fold to Rs 8.8 lakh crore in 2047
The country's defence production is expected to surge over six-fold to Rs 8.8 lakh crore in 2047 from Rs 1.46 lakh crore in 2024-25, according to a report compiled by the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) and KPMG India. India's annual defence budget could increase around five-fold to Rs 31.7 lakh crore in 2047, from Rs 6.81 lakh crore currently allocated for financial year 2025-26. The report — titled 'Atmanirbhar, Agrani, and Atulya Bharat 2047' — released at the CII annual business summit here, estimates India's defence exports to rise to Rs 2.8 lakh crore in 2047, which represents a nearly 12-fold jump compared to the corresponding figure of Rs 24,000 crore for 2024-25. The report pegs the country's total defence expenditure at 4.5 per cnet of GDP for 2047, up from 2 per cent of GDP at present. The allocation for R&D (research and development) in the defence budget is also expected to from 4 per cent at present to 8-10 per cent as the country pursues the development of cutting-edge technology for military hardware. The report observes that achieving the vision of India as a developed nation by 2047 with a strengthened defence sector, faces some challenges. However, promoting robust public-private partnerships is necessary and incentives are required to encourage the private sector enter and sustain in the defence manufacturing domain. 'Intellectual property (IP) rights and technology-transfer issues with foreign collaborators also present obstacles in achieving self-reliance. Addressing these challenges requires strategic planning, increased budget allocations, streamlined procedures, robust policy frameworks, and fostering a culture of innovation and collaboration between the public and private sectors,' the report states. Highlighting India's aspirations to emerge as a leading nation in the global defence hierarchy, the report identifies 'strategic vectors' with specific timelines to achieve this goal. The vectors include achieving enhanced self-reliance in defence production and capabilities by 2032, by targeting critical areas for comprehensive indigenous development, reducing dependence on foreign suppliers, and fostering innovation through domestic R&D and manufacturing excellence. The report further states that by 2038, India should aim to become one of the top-five global exporters of high-quality defence equipment and technology by expanding international partnerships, meeting global standards, and vigorously promoting defence products in international markets. It fixes a 2045 target for India to become a world leader in developing and deploying cutting-edge niche technologies across the defence sector, by encouraging collaboration between industry, academia, and government, and driving substantial investments in futuristic R&D. By committing to these vectors, India can turn its aspirations into reality, the report added.
