logo
Three Algerians Charged in Kidnapping of Opposition Figure in France

Three Algerians Charged in Kidnapping of Opposition Figure in France

Asharq Al-Awsat13-04-2025

Three men, including an employee at the Algerian consulate in France, were indicted in Paris on suspicion of involvement in the April 2024 kidnapping of Amir Boukhors, an opponent of the Algerian regime, judicial sources told AFP on Saturday.
The three men were charged Friday in Paris with kidnapping and unlawful detention in relation to a terrorist organization, as well as participation in a criminal terrorist conspiracy, according to the National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor's Office (PNAT).
Later, a French judge ruled that all three be placed in pre-trial detention.
One of the suspects works for an Algerian consulate in France. While he holds a service passport rather than a diplomatic one, the issue of diplomatic immunity is expected to be addressed during the proceedings, a source close to the case told AFP.
Boukhors, a well-known critic of the Algerian regime, had previously survived two serious attacks — one in 2022 and another on the evening of April 29, 2024, according to his lawyer, Eric Plouvier.
The kidnapping, which initially fell under the jurisdiction of the Créteil prosecutor's office, was later taken over by PNAT in February 2025.
'This shift to an anti-terror investigation shows that a foreign power, Algeria, did not hesitate to carry out violent acts on French soil — acts of intimidation and terror that threaten lives,' Plouvier said, calling the case a 'state affair.'
Neither of the suspects' attorneys responded to AFP requests for comment.
Boukhors' name also surfaced in a separate probe by the Paris prosecutor's office.
In that case, a French Economy Ministry employee was indicted in December for allegedly providing confidential information about Algerian dissidents — including Boukhors — to an Algerian national working at the Algerian consulate in Créteil.
According to sources, some of the individuals targeted in that investigation later became victims of violence, death threats, or abduction attempts.
The latest developments between the two countries coincided with the statements of French President Emmanuel Macron, who said last Friday he is 'confident' on the release of French-Algerian writer Boualem Sansal, sentenced to five years in prison in Algeria.
Sansal's case is under 'special attention' by Algerian authorities, Macron commented during a visit to the Paris Book Festival, adding that the evolution of the case makes him confident that the writer would soon be released.
'I am confident because I know that there is particular attention. I am simply waiting for the results,' Macron said.
He added, 'Our strongest wish is for the Algerian authorities to make the decision that will allow him to regain his freedom, receive treatment, and return to writing.'
Observers believe that the decision to charge the three Algerian men in France would disrupt the fresh efforts to revive bilateral relations between Paris and Algiers, particularly following the March 31 phone call between Macron and Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune, who voiced their willingness to repair relations and after French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said last week that ties with Algeria were back to normal.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India 'hopeful' of reaching deal with US before Trump's tariff deadline
India 'hopeful' of reaching deal with US before Trump's tariff deadline

Saudi Gazette

time2 hours ago

  • Saudi Gazette

India 'hopeful' of reaching deal with US before Trump's tariff deadline

DELHI — India is "hopeful" of reaching a trade agreement with the US before the 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs ends on 9 July, the country's foreign minister has said. In an interview with French daily Le Figaro on Tuesday, S Jaishankar, who is on a four-day visit to Belgium and France, said India and the US had already begun trade negotiations before Trump unveiled his 2 April 'Liberation day' tariffs on global partners, including up to 27% on India. "Prime Minister [Narendra] Modi met with Donald Trump in February and they decided to further open access to our respective markets," Jaishankar told the paper. "We are hopeful of reaching an agreement before the end of the tariff suspension on 9 July." Earlier in the day, a US delegation held closed-door meetings with Indian trade ministry officials in Delhi. An unnamed Indian official told Reuters news agency that the recent set of trade talks with US officials had been productive and "helped in making progress towards crafting a mutually beneficial and balanced agreement including through achievement of early wins".Until recently, the US was India's largest trading partner, with bilateral trade reaching $ has already reduced tariffs on a range of goods - including Bourbon whiskey and motorcycles - but the US continues to run a $45bn (£33bn) trade deficit with India, which Trump is keen to and Modi have set a target to more than double this figure to $500bn, though Delhi is unlikely to offer concessions in politically sensitive sectors such as this month, the White House told its trade partners that the US wants them to make their best trade offers, with the deadline fast approaching, Reuters news agency week, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said he was "very optimistic" about a deal between India and US, which he said said would come in the "not too distant future".In May, Trump made global headlines by claiming that Delhi had offered to drop all tariffs on goods imported from the US. These claims were swiftly disputed by India, with the foreign minister saying that "nothing is decided till everything is".Jaishankar had previously emphasised that any trade deal must be mutually beneficial and work for both separately about US foreign policy under Trump, Jaishankar told Le Figaro he sees the US "looking at things from the perspective of its immediate interest and seeking benefits for itself"."Frankly, I will do the same with them," Jaishankar added. — BBC

Lebanon Says Two Dead in Israel Strike
Lebanon Says Two Dead in Israel Strike

Asharq Al-Awsat

timea day ago

  • Asharq Al-Awsat

Lebanon Says Two Dead in Israel Strike

An Israeli strike killed a Lebanese father and son Tuesday in a southern village, the Lebanese health ministry and state media said, the latest deaths despite a November ceasefire. A second son was also wounded in the strike in Shebaa, the state-run National News Agency reported. There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military. "An Israeli enemy drone carried out a strike in the village of Shebaa, killing two people and wounding one," a health ministry statement said, AFP reported. Israel had warned on Friday that it would keep up its strikes on Hezbollah targets across Lebanon despite the condemnation expressed by the Lebanese government after a massive strike on south Beirut the previous night on the eve of the Eid al-Adha holiday. Hezbollah said the strikes levelled nine residential blocks. The Israeli military said they targeted underground drone factories. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun condemned the strikes as a "a flagrant violation" of the November 27 ceasefire agreement, which was supposed to end more than a year of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah that culminated in two months of full-blown war.

Israel's antisemitism card wears thin amid Gaza genocide
Israel's antisemitism card wears thin amid Gaza genocide

Arab News

timea day ago

  • Arab News

Israel's antisemitism card wears thin amid Gaza genocide

Amid mounting global criticisms and denunciations of its conduct during its 18-month blitz on the Gaza Strip, which has so far killed more than 55,000 people and injured over 100,000, Israeli leaders have chosen to brush aside any censure by playing the antisemitism card and accusing critics of 'blood libel.' This response has picked up pace in recent months, as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his extremist coalition partners have hurled insults at some of their closest allies, such as French President Emanuel Macron, for simply calling out the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. Zionists have lambasted Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer for suggesting that their countries may be closer than ever to recognizing a Palestinian state at a UN conference next week. Both have been strong supporters of Israel after Oct. 7. Still, once they began to hint that war crimes may have been committed in Gaza, the Zionist propaganda machine started stalking them. Many other leaders, celebrities and organizations have been labeled as antisemitic because they dared to point out the obvious: Israel has committed a long list of war crimes in Gaza, most of which are well documented. Israel is the only country in the world that has this false image of itself: a nation that can do no wrong simply because Jews suffered an unspeakable calamity at the hands of Europeans many decades ago. Its claim that Israel represents the entire world's Jewry is also contestable. But the most outrageous assertion is that criticism of Zionism, a political ideology that is more than a century old, is a form of antisemitism. The most outrageous assertion is that criticism of Zionism, a political ideology, is a form of antisemitism Osama Al-Sharif Israel has used the antisemitism card for decades. But the war on Gaza has forced its leaders to flash that card left, right and center in an absurd manner. It has by now worn out the card itself and emptied it of any substantial meaning. One such example is that of famous British TV presenter Piers Morgan, whose weekly program has millions of followers on social media. Morgan has been a strong backer of Israel's war on Gaza and a major critic of anyone who has criticized its actions since the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks. He even peddled some of Israel's false claims about the atrocities Hamas allegedly committed on that ominous day. But in recent weeks, Morgan has had a change of heart, accusing Israel of deliberately targeting women and children in Gaza while resorting to the collective punishment of Palestinians in both the enclave and the West Bank. Subsequently, Morgan has been demonized for grilling Israeli officials about Gaza and asking the right questions. Ardent Zionists now accuse him of 'blood libel.' Accusing Israel of killing children or carrying out a genocide is enough to earn the accuser the label of being an antisemite. In fact, in his speech at the UN's General Assembly last year, Netanyahu denounced the entire UN, describing it as a 'swamp of antisemitic bile.' His envoy to that body had famously and arrogantly shredded the UN Charter before members just a few months previously. There are two key points to remember here. One, criticizing Israel is not a sin, a taboo or a moral lapse. The second thing is that antisemitism is a serious charge, but it is not something Israel can use freely, as a blank check to break the law of free will. Israel's sense of impunity, buffered by its increasing arrogance and sense of entitlement, would not have reached this degree of depravity if it were not for the blind political backing and subservience of most US politicians. In addition to Israel, only American politicians and administrations have dared use the slander of antisemitism. The Trump administration has gone as far as sanctioning four sitting judges at the International Criminal Court for their role in supporting the issuance of an arrest warrant for Netanyahu and a past decision to open a case into alleged war crimes by US troops in Afghanistan. The White House has defined any pro-Palestine activism at US universities as antisemitism and has taken measures to deport students accused of expressing anti-Israel and pro-Palestine views. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has issued a directive to check the backgrounds of student visa applicants to find any criticism of Israel. Antisemitism must be neutralized as a card that Israel can throw around whenever its actions breach international law Osama Al-Sharif Such short-sighted — not to mention illegal under the US Constitution — policies do Jews around the world no service, as they conflate any criticism of Israel or Zionism with hatred of Jews. This is simply absurd. The irony is that even progressive Jews, including Holocaust survivors, who denounce Zionism and condemn Israeli crimes have been labeled as antisemitic. In recent months, former Israeli premiers and army generals have come out to accuse their government of committing war crimes in Gaza. This is further proof that extremist Israeli leaders and pro-Israel US politicians have weaponized the antisemitism card and, by doing so, they have denigrated the memory of those Jews who perished in Europe simply because of their religion. Zionism as a nationalistic political ideology must be delinked from the Jewish religion — an idea that is not preposterous, since many followers of various Jewish sects have already made that distinction. And as the bedrock ideology of the state of Israel, it is subject to international laws and conventions just like any other. In 1975, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution determining that Zionism was a form of racism. It was revoked in 1991. Antisemitism must be neutralized as a card that Israel can throw around whenever its actions breach international law. Zionist Israel cannot use the blood of Jews who died because of their religion to justify the mass murder of others. Since the start of the Gaza war, antisemitic acts have spiked in the West. But one must first separate hatred of Jews based on their religion from the perfectly 'kosher' criticism of Israeli state crimes. Such crimes must not be blamed on the followers of the Jewish faith. One must dare ask about the direct correlation between the rise in antisemitic crimes and the Gaza genocide. It is Israeli arrogance and bigotry that have become a liability for international Jewry. The fact is that Israel and its allied groups have widely adopted accusations of antisemitism to suppress those advocating for Palestinian rights and to shield Israeli policies from scrutiny. Critics argue this blurs the line between hatred of Jews and criticism of Israel's government and its actions in the Occupied Territories. The final irony, which is missed by many, is that the Palestinians, one of the ancient Semitic peoples of the region, are now being killed and starved to death in the name of the Jews. At the same time, their supporters are targeted and labeled as antisemitic. Osama Al-Sharif is a journalist and political commentator based in Amman. X: @plato010

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store