logo
European democracy is in peril: failing, sclerotic elites are to blame

European democracy is in peril: failing, sclerotic elites are to blame

Telegraph19 hours ago
Is European youth giving up on democracy? The latest YouGov poll of Generation Z (born between 1997 and 2012) suggests that only 57 per cent now support democratic forms of government, while one in five would prefer authoritarian rule.
In France, Spain and Poland, only about half of young people choose democracy. And criticism of the European Union is rising too: 39 per cent say that the EU is not very democratic. They see Europe as less influential than the authoritarian powers Russia and China.
This is the first generation to have lived their entire lives in the post-Cold War era. Yet they are deeply disillusioned with the freedoms their parents embraced when the Berlin Wall fell in 1989.
Young men, in particular, are not just pessimistic: they are angry. Among those who see themselves as disadvantaged, just one in three supports democracy.
Why has the Europe that promised so much proved to be such a disappointment for a generation that has enjoyed the fruits of democracy?
The answer seems to be that they feel let down by complacent and incompetent elites who have been leading the Continent to perdition. Panicked by the pandemic, humiliated by Trump and menaced by Putin, Europe has never felt weaker or more irrelevant. No wonder the siren song of dictatorship is resonating once more.
It was assumed that the Nazis had inoculated Germans against autocrats. Yet many are now voting for the extremes of Left and Right. Nearly two thirds of young Germans see their democracy as endangered.
The blame for this lies with the governments of Angela Merkel and Olaf Scholz, who have governed Germany for more than 20 years. Gen Z Germans have never known any other leaders.
Friedrich Merz, the new conservative Chancellor, has an uphill struggle to convince them that his government really will be different. His pledge to create Europe's biggest army to maintain Nato's credibility has been received with dismay by the young Germans who may have to fight for their country.
In Italy, a quarter of the young say they are sick of the unstable democracy which has allowed mass migration and stolen their prospects. Only Giorgia Meloni and her Brothers of Italy are authoritarian enough to stave off a re-emergence of Mussolini's fascism.
France is caught between the far-Left demagogue Jean-Luc Mélenchon and the faux-patriotism of Marine Le Pen and her musketeer Jordan Bardella. After seven years of Emmanuel Macron's posturing, the centre-ground of French politics is deserted, with Socialists, liberals and Gaullists almost extinct.
Half of French youth yearn for a strongman: a latter-day Napoleon or De Gaulle. To them, democracy appears as at best the preserve of self-serving technocrats, at worst a mug's game.
Europe's intellectual elites have done nothing to inspire a new generation with the glories of Western civilisation. Instead, their masochistic obsessions with decolonisation, race and gender have instilled what the American historian of Germany Fritz Stern called the politics of cultural despair.
The cause most promoted among students and other young Europeans has not been Ukraine, but Gaza. Instead of campaigning for an embattled democracy in the heart of Europe, struggling to survive against the naked aggression of an imperial war machine, Gen Z has embraced the death cult of Hamas and the theocracy of Iran.
Israel, sole beacon of freedom and democracy in the Middle East, has been demonised to the point where outrage aimed at a confected 'genocide' morphs into open anti-Semitism and protest marches escalate into terrorism. The Palestine Action attack on Brize Norton is only the latest of numerous incidents across Europe in which violence against individuals and the state has been normalised in the pursuit of 'justice' for Gaza.
Once deep disenchantment with democracy and the rule of law are combined with the justification of violence for political aims, it is a short step to dictatorship. Only a cult of the authoritarian personality is lacking — and the burgeoning of social media offers the means to create such cults.
Europe resembles a volcano, ready to erupt at any time. The radicalisation of Gen Zers leaves them prey to manipulation. Last weekend's scenes at Glastonbury, with chants of 'Death to the IDF', evoke the Two Minutes Hate described in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four: 'A hideous ecstasy of fear and vindictiveness, a desire to kill, to torture, to smash faces in with a sledge-hammer, seemed to flow through the whole group of people like an electric current, turning one even against one's will into a grimacing, screaming lunatic.'
The novelist and Nobel laureate Elias Canetti, a Jewish refugee from Nazism, devoted much of his life to his 1960 treatise, Crowds and Power. People do not even need to be in the same place, like the Nuremberg rallies, he thought, to merge into a hate-filled mob. In fact, Canetti had anticipated social media.
Responding to Canetti's prophetic work, the poet Geoffrey Hill wrote: 'But hear this: that which is difficult preserves democracy; you pay respect to the intelligence of the citizen.' A dumbed-down generation is easy meat for those who emulate Trump and, like him, openly despise our political system.
After decades of condescension from the elites, the young are tempted by the Pied Pipers of populism, from Alice Weidel to Nigel Farage. Yet they may turn out to be enablers of Putin. For too long, the political class used democracy for their own benefit. Is the posterity of Europe, the youthful demos, now turning to the despots?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Switzerland seeks trade deal with Trump without getting into EU bind
Switzerland seeks trade deal with Trump without getting into EU bind

Reuters

time17 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Switzerland seeks trade deal with Trump without getting into EU bind

ZURICH, July 3 (Reuters) - Switzerland is exploring what concessions it can make to secure a deal with Washington on trade, but it must tread carefully to protect its interests with key trading partner, the European Union, politicians and people familiar with the matter said. The Swiss cabinet last month approved its biggest trade policy overhaul in years with the EU, two months after the U.S. stunned Switzerland by announcing 31% tariffs - well above the 20% rate Washington set out for the 27-nation bloc. That shock prompted a scramble by business leaders and officials to underline how much Switzerland invests in the United States and the tariff threat was suspended for a 90-day period ending July 9. Talks are continuing. Nicolas Walder, a Greens member of the lower house of parliament's foreign policy committee, said Switzerland must insist on its commitment to multilateralism with the U.S. "A deal should not interfere with any agreement that Switzerland has signed or wants to sign, and should specifically mention the bilateral agreement with the EU," said Walder, whose committee is regularly briefed on the trade talks. The Swiss mandate for negotiating with the U.S. stipulates that relations with its other trade partners be upheld. Any U.S. deal must be compatible with Switzerland's future relations with the EU, a Swiss source familiar with the matter said. Swiss officials and lawmakers believe that a 31% tariff can be averted, but say U.S. President Donald Trump's existing 10% baseline tariff looks likely to stay. "Switzerland is negotiating in good faith with the U.S. government, aiming for a positive outcome," the Swiss Economy Ministry said in a statement in response to questions on the points made by Reuters in this article. The EU trade agreement faces a lengthy approval process and is almost certain to be put to a national referendum under Switzerland's system of direct democracy. Trump's unpredictable approach to trade policy has been a challenge for Switzerland, which abolished its own industrial tariffs last year and sets great store by adherence to rules. Eager to offer Trump something, Switzerland is exploring granting concessions to the U.S., such as greater market access for produce like seafood and citrus fruits, the source said. Home to pharmaceutical giants Roche and Novartis - both big U.S. investors - Switzerland also knows Washington has been investigating trade practices in the sector and does not want any deal to be muddied later by pharma tariffs, the source said. "This is absolutely crucial," said Simon Michel, a federal lawmaker and CEO of medical technology company Ypsomed. Jean-Philippe Kohl, deputy director of industry association Swissmem, said even if only a 10% tariff applies, the dollar's decline against the Swiss franc amid the trade uncertainty was already making exporters' goods dearer in the U.S. And if the EU secured better tariff terms with Washington, that could put Swiss firms at a disadvantage. "It's therefore important that the dialogue with the U.S. quickly lead to a positive outcome," he said.

If the US president threatens to take away freedoms, are we no longer free?
If the US president threatens to take away freedoms, are we no longer free?

The Guardian

time41 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

If the US president threatens to take away freedoms, are we no longer free?

Threats of retribution from Donald Trump are hardly a novelty, but even by his standards, the US president's warnings of wrathful vengeance in recent days have represented a dramatic escalation. In the past week, Trump has threatened deportation, loss of US citizenship or arrest against, respectively, the world's richest person, the prospective future mayor of New York and Joe Biden's former homeland security secretary. The head-spinning catalogue of warnings may have been aimed at distracting from the increasing unpopularity, according to opinion surveys, of Trump's agenda, some analysts say. But they also served as further alarm bells for the state of US democracy five-and-a-half months into a presidency that has seen a relentless assault on constitutional norms, institutions and freedom of speech. On Tuesday, Trump turned his sights on none other than Elon Musk, the tech billionaire who, before a recent spectacular fallout, had been his closest ally in ramming through a radical agenda of upending and remaking the US government. But when the Tesla and SpaceX founder vowed to form a new party if Congress passed Trump's signature 'one big beautiful bill' into law, Trump swung into the retribution mode that is now familiar to his Democratic opponents. 'Without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa,' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, menacing both the billions of dollars in federal subsidies received by Musk's companies, and – it seemed – his US citizenship, which the entrepreneur received in 2002 but which supporters like Steve Bannon have questioned. 'No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE.' Trump twisted the knife further the following morning talking to reporters before boarding a flight to Florida. 'We might have to put Doge on Elon,' he said, referring to the unofficial 'department of government efficiency' that has gutted several government agencies and which Musk spearheaded before stepping back from his ad hoc role in late May. 'Doge is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Wouldn't that be terrible.' Musk's many critics may have found sympathy hard to come by given his earlier job-slashing endeavors on Trump's behalf and the $275m he spent last year in helping to elect him. But the wider political implications are worrying, say US democracy campaigners. 'Trump is making clear that if he can do that to the world's richest man, he could certainly do it to you,' said Ian Bassin, co-founder and executive director of Protect Democracy. 'It's important, if we believe in the rule of law, that we believe in it whether it is being weaponized against someone that we have sympathy for or someone that we have lost sympathy for.' Musk was not the only target of Trump's capricious vengeance. He also threatened to investigate the US citizenship of Zohran Mamdani, the Democrats' prospective candidate for mayor of New York who triumphed in a multicandidate primary election, and publicly called on officials to explore the possibility of arresting Alejandro Mayorkas, the former head of homeland security in the Biden administration. Both scenarios were raised during a highly stage-managed visit to 'Alligator Alcatraz', a forbidding new facility built to house undocumented people rounded up as part of Trump's flagship mass-deportation policy. After gleefully conjuring images of imprisoned immigrants being forced to flee from alligators and snakes presumed to reside in the neighbouring marshlands, Trump seized on obliging questions from friendly journalists working for rightwing fringe outlets that have been accredited by the administration for White House news events, often at the expense of established media. 'Why hasn't he been arrested yet?' asked Julio Rosas from Blaze Media, referring to Mayorkas, who was widely vilified – and subsequently impeached – by Republicans who blamed him for a record number of immigrant crossings at the southern US border. 'Was he given a pardon, Mayorkas?' Trump replied. On being told no, he continued: 'I'll take a look at that one because what he did is beyond incompetence … Somebody told Mayorkas to do that and he followed orders, but that doesn't necessarily hold him harmless.' Asked by Benny Johnson, a rightwing social media influencer, for his message to 'communist' Mamdani – a self-proclaimed democratic socialist – over his pledge not to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) roundups of undocumented people if he is elected mayor, Trump said: 'Then we will have to arrest him. We don't need a communist in this country. I'm going to be watching over him very carefully on behalf of the nation.' He also falsely suggested that Mamdani, 33 – who became a naturalized US citizen in 2018 after emigrating from Uganda with his ethnic Indian parents when he was a child – was in the country 'illegally', an assertion stemming from a demand by a Republican representative for a justice department investigation into his citizenship application. The representative, Andy Ogles of Tennessee, alleged that Mamdani, who has vocally campaigned for Palestinian rights, gained it through 'willful misrepresentation or concealment of material support for terrorism'. The threat to Mamdani echoed a threat Trump's border 'czar' Tom Homan made to arrest Gavin Newsom, the California governor, last month amid a row over Trump's deployment of national guard forces in Los Angeles to confront demonstrators protesting against Ice's arrests of immigrants. Omar Noureldin, senior vice-president with Common Cause, a pro-democracy watchdog, said the animus against Mamdani, who is Muslim, was partly fueled by Islamophobia and racism. 'Part of the rhetoric we've heard around Mamdani, whether from the president or other political leaders, goes toward his religion, his national origin, race, ethnicity,' he said. 'Mamdani has called himself a democratic socialist. There are others, including Bernie Sanders, who call themselves that, but folks aren't questioning whether or not Bernie Sanders should be a citizen.' Retribution promised to be a theme of Trump's second presidency even before he returned to the Oval Office in January. On the campaign trail last year, he branded some political opponents – including Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, and Nancy Pelosi, the former speaker of the House of Representatives – as 'the enemy within'. Since his inauguration in January, he has made petty acts of revenge against both Democrats and Republicans who have crossed him. Biden; Kamala Harris, the former vice-president and last year's defeated Democratic presidential nominee; and Hillary Clinton, Trump's 2016 opponent, have all had their security clearances revoked. Secret Service protection details have been removed from Mike Pompeo and John Bolton, who served in Trump's first administration, despite both being the subject of death threats from Iran because of the 2020 assassination of Qassem Suleimani, a senior Revolutionary Guards commander. Similar fates have befallen Anthony Fauci, the infectious diseases specialist who angered Trump over his handling of the coronavirus pandemic, as well as Biden's adult children, Hunter and Ashley. Trump has also targeted law firms whose lawyers previously acted against him, prompting some to strike deals that will see them perform pro bono services for the administration. For now, widely anticipated acts of retribution against figures like Gen Mark Milley, the former chair of the joint chiefs of staff of the armed forces – whom Trump previously suggested deserved to be executed for 'treason' and who expressed fears of being recalled to active duty and then court-martialed – have not materialised. 'I [and] people in my world expected that Trump would come up with investigations of any number of people, whether they were involved in the Russia investigation way back when, or the election investigation, or the January 6 insurrection, but by and large he hasn't done that,' said one veteran Washington insider, who requested anonymity, citing his proximity to people previously identified as potential Trump targets. 'There are all kinds of lists floating around … with names of people that might be under investigation, but you'll never know you're under investigation until police turn up on your doorstep – and these people are just getting on with their lives.' Yet pro-democracy campaigners say Trump's latest threats should be taken seriously – especially after several recent detentions of several elected Democratic officials at protests near immigration jails or courts. In the most notorious episode, Alex Padilla, a senator from California, was forced to the floor and handcuffed after trying to question Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, at a press conference. 'When the president of the United States, the most powerful person in the world, threatens to arrest you, that's as serious as it gets,' said Bassin, a former White House counsel in Barack Obama's administration. 'Whether the DoJ [Department of Justice] opens an investigation or seeks an indictment, either tomorrow, next year or never is beside the point. The threat itself is the attack on our freedoms, because it's designed to make us all fear that if any one of us opposes or even just criticises the president, we risk being prosecuted.' While some doubt the legal basis of Trump's threats to Musk, Mayorkas and Mamdani, Noureldin cautioned that they should be taken literally. 'Trump is verbose and grandiose, but I think he also backs up his promises with action,' he said. 'When the president of the United States says something, we have to take it as serious and literal. I wouldn't be surprised if at the justice department, there is a group of folks who are trying to figure out a way to [open prosecutions].' But the bigger danger was to the time-honored American notion of freedom, Bassin warned. 'One definition of freedom is that you are able to speak your mind, associate with who you want, lead the life that you choose to lead, and that so long as you conduct yourself in accordance with the law, the government will not retaliate against you or punish you for doing those things,' he said. 'When the president of the United States makes clear that actually that is not the case, that if you say things he doesn't like, you will be singled out, and the full force of the state could be brought down on your head, then you're no longer free. 'And if he's making clear that that's true for people who have the resources of Elon Musk or the political capital of a Mayorkas or a Mamdani, imagine what it means for people who lack those positions or resources.'

Trump's admission about Ukraine peace talks after Putin call
Trump's admission about Ukraine peace talks after Putin call

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump's admission about Ukraine peace talks after Putin call

Donald Trump announced on Truth Social that he spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin , but acknowledged peace with Ukraine is not on the immediate horizon. On the call that lasted about one hour and 15 minutes, Trump disclosed they discussed the recent drone attacks by Ukraine on Russia 's air bases. Kyiv delivered a devastating blow to the Russian air force on Sunday and Putin has vowed revenge including by stockpiling a massive contingent of battle tanks and ammunition. 'It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace,' admitted Trump. The president also stated that Putin told him he plans to retaliate against Ukraine after the recent attacks. 'President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields,' Trump disclosed, without details about whether he pushed back on the Russian leader. Trump has been vocal about wanting to end all fighting and bombing between the two nations immediately as the death toll continues to rise in the now years-long conflict. 'We also discussed Iran , and the fact that time is running out on Iran's decision pertaining to nuclear weapons , which must be made quickly! I stated to President Putin that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and, on this, I believe that we were in agreement.' 'President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion. It is my opinion that Iran has been slow-walking their decision on this very important matter, and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store