Kerala: Get ready to say no to plastic from October 2
KOCHI: From October 2, Gandhi Jayanti, you'll have to sacrifice the luxury of using small plastic water bottles and food containers during gatherings for the sake of environment.
The Kerala High Court on Tuesday banned the use of water bottles of capacity below five litres, soft drink bottles of capacity lower than 2 litres, straws, plates, cups, and cutlery (all made of single-use plastic) at all government functions and private gatherings. These plastic materials are also banned at all wedding auditoriums, hotels and restaurants. Prohibition of these items at functions in hotels and auditoriums shall be made a part of the licence conditions issued to such establishments, the court ordered.
A Division Bench comprising Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas and Justice Gopinath P also banned the use and sale of single-use plastics in hilly tourist areas with high footfall. The areas are Munnar, Thekkady, Vagamon, Athirappilly, Chalakudy- Athirappilly sector, Nelliyampathy, Pookode Lake-Vythiri, Sultan Bathery, Karlad Lake, Ambalavayal, and Wayanad Heritage Museum. The court made it clear that the plastic ban shall not apply to 5-litre water bottles and 2-litre soft drinks bottles.
Instructing the state to take adequate steps to implement the order by October 2, the court directed it to set up sufficient water kiosks at different locations in hilly tourist areas to provide clean and safe drinking water. Alternative measures should be taken for the supply or purchase of water, through glass bottles or kiosks or such other modes.
Set up water dispensing machines, kiosks for sale of water: High Court
Arrangements should be made by the district administration and the local self-government institutions to provide drinking water to tourists in hilly destinations with high footfall at reasonable distances. Facilities like water dispensing machines, kiosks for sale of water in steel, copper, or glass bottles can be resorted to for the purpose.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
Kerala High Court slams state for not enacting law to ban black magic, sorcery
The Kerala High Court expressed dissatisfaction with the state government's stance of not proceeding with the legislation to ban black magic, sorcery and other inhuman practices. The state told the High Court that it has decided not to pass such a law, and this decision was taken by the state cabinet— which means it is a policy its position, the government maintained that the court cannot issue a writ of mandamus compelling the enactment of such a law, as this falls within the domain of executive court's observation came during the hearing of a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Kerala Yukthi Vadhi Sangham, seeking the enactment of a specific law against black magic and sorcery — The Kerala Prevention of Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices, Sorcery and Black Magic Bill, 2019. This Bill was originally recommended by a commission headed by Justice K.T. government also told the court it had decided not to implement the recommendations of the commission led by former Supreme Court judge Justice KT Thomas in 2019. The proposed legislation sought to ban all practices that result in bodily division bench, comprising Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji, however, asked the government to propose alternative measures to curb the spread of black magic and sorcery if it holds a similar view on the affidavit does not mention that the State has endorsed such practices and does not wish to eradicate the same,' the court noted, while questioning the state on its course of action regarding the bench remarked that taking such a stance when illegal practices continue to be carried out amounts to an implicit endorsement of those activities. It reiterated that while the legislature has the authority to decide on whether to frame laws, the High Court cannot issue a directive mandating such a move. Nevertheless, the court directed the government to file a detailed affidavit within three Yukthi Vadhi Sangham is an organisation that leads campaigns against black magic and other similar practices. The organisation had sought the enactment of 'The Kerala Prevention of Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices, Sorcery and Black Magic Bill 2019'.The matter will be heard again on July 15.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Kerala
NDTV
4 hours ago
- NDTV
'God Knows Who Is Still Languishing In Jails': Supreme Court Raps UP Police
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday reprimanded Uttar Pradesh Police for failing to ensure that persons granted bail by a court of law, including itself, were not promptly released. The top court directed PC Meena, the Director-General (Personnel) of UP Police to conduct a statewide video conference with officers to ensure the court's orders on bail are not countered by 'vested interest' masquerading as 'nit-picking' of the instructions to release someone. The top court also directed the UP government to pay Rs 5 lakh as compensation to a man it had granted bail on May 27 but was not released till an irate court intervened Tuesday. Suspecting 'vested interests' in keeping the man jailed, the Supreme Court also ordered a judicial inquiry by the Principal District and Sessions Judge of Ghaziabad. Officers found to be at fault will be fined Rs 5 lakh, the court warned. Reports of the inquiry and confirming compliance are expected by Friday, the court said. Expressing serious concern over people being forcibly jailed in UP despite court orders for their release, the bench of Justice KV Vishwanathan and Justice NK Singh hauled up the state's police force for denying individuals their fundamental right to liberty. "Nit-picking of court orders to deny bail amounts to a serious dereliction of duty," the Supreme Court warned state officials. Mr Meena and other senior officers had been summoned as the Supreme Court heard a petition by a man called Aftab, who was denied release from Ghaizabad Jail despite securing bail. He told the top court he had been detained for 28 days, a delay the authorities claimed before the court was due to a 'clerical error' in sections of the bail and release orders. The court, though, batted away the claim, saying personal liberty could not be denied by 'useless technicalities and irrelevant errors', and asked the police to not repeat such mistakes. "God knows how many persons are languishing in UP jails like this... Sensitise your officers by Friday... via video conference... to ensure no person enlarged by a court should be in jail..." The bench also warned the police of further action if the 'vested interests' are revealed. Mr Meena assured the court he would conduct the VC immediately, and told the court there are as many as 90,000 people in jails across the state, as of June 24. Earlier, senior counsel Garima Prasad, appearing for the state government, told the court 'certain apprehensions' about a bail order, and the resulting delay, were not deliberate. In the Aftab case, he pointed out, the police sent the order back to a lower court, on the same day the Supreme Court ordered his release, for a clarification. The delay, therefore, was from the lower court, he declared. But Justice Vishwanathan was unimpressed. Warning that he would increase the compensation ordered to Rs 10 lakh, he asked, "Is 'sub section not mentioned' a valid ground to be taken by officers manning our prisons?" The bench pointed out the fact the authorities knew what the 'error' with the subsection was, but still failed to release Aftab for nearly a month.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Human rights are sacrosanct': J&K HC asks Centre to bring back 63-year-old woman deported to Pakistan after Pahalgam attack
The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has directed the Ministry of Home Affairs to facilitate the return of Rakshanda Rashid, a Pakistani national deported in April. The court emphasized the protection of human rights, ordering her return within 10 days after her deportation was questioned. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Popular in India The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has ordered the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) to facilitate the return of 63-year-old Rakshanda Rashid , a Pakistani national who was deported from India in April, observing that human rights must be protected 'at all costs.'Justice Rahul Bharti, delivering the order on June 6, directed the central government to bring her back within 10 days and submit a compliance report by July 1. The directive came in response to a petition filed by Rashid's daughter, Falak Zahoor , who informed the court that her mother was critically ill and had no family or support system in who had been living in India for nearly four decades on a valid long-term visa, was deported on April 30, the same day her legal challenge against deportation was scheduled to be heard in court took exception to this sequence of events, noting that no detailed hearing or formal order preceded the deportation, which it said should have been assessed on merit before such an 'extreme step' was taken.'Human rights are the most sacrosanct component of a human life and, therefore, there are occasions when a constitutional court is supposed to come up with SOS like indulgence, notwithstanding the merits and demerits of a case which can be adjudicated only upon in due course of time,' Justice Bharti wrote in the court's intervention follows a pattern of similar cases in recent April 30, the High Court also granted interim relief to Ifthkar Ali, a Poonch-based police constable, and his eight siblings, halting their deportation and allowing them to reunite with family in Jammu and Kashmir. In a separate case, Minal Khan, a Pakistani woman married to a CRPF jawan, was also spared deportation at the last deportations came in the wake of heightened scrutiny, and India's decision to downgrade diplomatic ties with Pakistan, following the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, where 26 civilians were killed by armed terrorists.
