The pensions crisis forcing France into a doom loop it can't escape
Emmanuel Macron is trying to secure Europe's future in the teeth of Russian aggression with increased defence spending. But closer to home there is a more pressing financial crisis threatening to upend France's finances.
Once again, the French Government is teetering on the brink of collapse. But not because of spending on guns or tanks. Rather, it is over how much the state should fork out for its generous state pension system, which has become the country's most contested political and fiscal battleground.
Left-wing MPs are seeking to topple the administration of François Bayrou, French Prime Minister, with another no-confidence vote looming in the latest battle over the state pension age.
Macron faced down parliamentary opposition and street protests two years ago to pass legislation which would push the state pension age up from 62 to 64 – but his victory is not complete and the ongoing war is leaving French finances more precarious.
On the face of it, France's reform looks absurdly modest to those in many other countries.
Even raising the state pension age to 64 means France would remain the lowest in the G7 economies. It compares with much more radical plans in Italy, where the age is rising to 71 – suggesting that Rome is rather more serious than Paris when it comes to tackling its problems.
France spends more than 14pc of its GDP on public pensions, above almost every other nation in Europe, yet seems unable to accept even small steps to reduce the strain.
On top of that, there are further efforts to unpick the plans.
After negotiations between businesses and unions to tweak the measures ended in stalemate, the socialists in parliament filed a no-confidence motion against the Government.
Leo Barincou, senior economist at Oxford Economics, says leaders in France simply cannot agree – even though 'the state of public finances in France is dire'.
'There are fundamental disagreements on what pensions should look like, how it should be funded, whether we should limit the deficit by pushing back the retirement age or by increasing taxes on wages, which are already rather high,' he says.
'Most economists, me included, would say it makes sense to push back the retirement age.
'France is already taxed at a very high rate, and economically it is much better to keep a larger share of the population working later. It would have a lot of beneficial side effects in addition to just the accounting pension effects.'
That might be logical, but the government's position is weak – after last year's snap election left President Macron's party without a majority, he has had to rely on the support of opposition deputies to pass legislation.
It does not look like Bayrou will fall yet, as Marine Le Pen's far right National Rally (RN) said it would not join forces with the Left-wing on this occasion.
The Prime Minister himself has vowed to continue the 'difficult search' for a resolution to the pension dispute.
But the situation highlights the frailty of the French government at a time when it desperately needs to make more spending cuts, to try to rein in borrowing and pacify twitchy bond markets.
Neil Mehta, of RBC BlueBay Asset Management, says even surviving the pension row will not solve Bayrou's problems.
'For the government to collapse, the RN would need to vote against its plans. However, it seems likely that the RN will bide its time and wait for a more opportune moment, such as the upcoming budget season later this year,' he says.
'By doing so, they can further strengthen their leadership position and bolster their ambitions ahead of the 2027 presidential election.
'Meanwhile, political uncertainty in France continues to simmer beneath the surface, keeping investors on edge. This unease is compounded by the country's challenging fiscal dynamics, which urgently require a more sustainable path forward.'
France's national debt is placing even more pressure on negotiations.
The country's debt currently stands at 113pc of GDP, according to the IMF, compared to just over 100pc in the UK on the same measure and 64pc in Germany.
And it keeps rising – the French Government borrowed 5.8pc of GDP last year and is expected to run another deficit of around 5.3pc this year.
Even that apparent improvement is unlikely to last, as the figure is flattered by a temporary measure to raise more tax receipts from large companies, while the economy is struggling, worried households are saving instead of spending, and the threat of the trade war hangs over businesses.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicts the debt will rise to 128pc of GDP by the end of this decade. Andrew Kenningham, chief Europe economist at Capital Economics, expects that by 2035 the debt will hit 135pc on current plans.
But if the French Government is serious about hitting Macron's defence spending targets, the picture will be even worse.
'It only raises more questions about where they will find savings from,' he says.
'If they do meet the Nato target and not make offsetting cuts elsewhere, it would be more like 147pc of GDP. That would push it above where Italy's debt is now.'
That is a serious problem for a Government which already faces rising debt interest costs and could trigger a fresh round of turmoil in bond markets.
But Barincou says there is no sign those spending cuts will be made.
'There is currently no political path towards reducing the deficit. There is no majority that could agree on reducing social spending. Taxes are already very high and raising them would be extremely unpopular,' he says.
'With this kind of very weak minority government that we have, it is extremely difficult to see how France could reduce its deficit. Pensions are an area to look at, because it is such a huge category of expenditure for France, but once again it is politically explosive.'
It sets the scene for a debt spiral and the looming spectre of fresh crises at every turn.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
35 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Port Moody councillor pens letter to ministry of municipal affairs calling for end to local oversight of conduct codes
A Port Moody councillor is urging the provincial government to eliminate local council oversight of codes of conduct, warning that the current self-regulation model enables bullying, retaliation, and political weaponization – particularly against councillors in the minority. In a June 18 letter to Housing and Municipal Affairs Minister Ravi Kahlon, Coun. Haven Lurbiecki called for sweeping reform to how conduct concerns are addressed in B.C. municipal governments. She argued that locally adopted and enforced codes allow those in power to target dissenters, silence critics, and foster a toxic workplace culture without meaningful checks. 'Much more often than public feuds, local elected representatives, especially those in the minority, can face issues such as bullying, intimidation, or retaliation, alone and without adequate support,' Lurbiecki wrote. 'These issues rarely make headlines, yet their impact can be just as severe.' The letter comes after Minister Kahlon publicly committed to bringing forward new legislation to improve local government oversight, though no draft has been released. Lurbiecki said she hopes her letter will help shape that work. Lurbiecki has made these arguments before , frequently pushing for a larger provincial role overseeing municipal conduct. She is often a minority vote on council, particularly around development issues. While councils can hire external investigators or seek legal advice in response to conduct complaints, those decisions typically rest with a majority vote of council. That creates an inherent conflict of interest when a complaint is made by – or against –members of that same majority, Lurbiecki stated in the letter. 'There is currently little or no protection or support for local elected representatives in minority situations who may be facing bullying, retaliation or weaponization of a code of conduct,' she wrote. 'The mere threat of an investigation is enough to have a significant negative emotional and psychological impact.' Lurbiecki said the confidentiality often surrounding code of conduct investigations means that even when councillors are cleared of wrongdoing, they may be unable to speak publicly about their experience or the process, which itself can be isolating and traumatic. She described the model as fundamentally flawed, especially in cases where access to legal support depends on the approval of council – a potential obstacle if the councillor under scrutiny is not part of the majority. 'Minister, I respectfully ask: in the legislature can you imagine if a simple majority vote could take these types of actions against individual MLAs?' Lurbiecki wrote. Lurbiecki called on the province to scrap locally adopted codes of conduct entirely and establish a provincial or regional Municipal Government Ethics Commissioner. Such an office, she contended, could offer impartial and consistent oversight and reduce the risk of politically motivated abuse. She also pointed to Alberta's recent decision to eliminate local government codes of conduct as a potential model, suggesting B.C. should consider doing the same. As an interim step, Lurbiecki said the province should standardize conduct codes across all B.C. municipalities and create an independent body to oversee their application. 'I am not surprised so many in local government, often women, leave local politics disillusioned,' she wrote. 'Without institutional support, we risk losing more, and others may never run for office at all.' Code of conduct issues have often been raised during the council's current term. Following allegations of an illegal meeting between a majority of council and a developer, Lurbiecki introduced a motion calling for a municipal ethics commissioner. While a majority of council disputed that anything improper took place, the motion found unanimous support, with several councillors citing historical precedent. Lurbiecki also raised the issue following an somewhat murky altercation at a 2023 convention between Mayor Meghan Lahti and former Port Moody council candidate David Stuart, which resulted in the latter filing a formal complaint. One Port Moody councillor, Coun. Kyla Knowles, was subject to three code of conduct complaints in her first year in office, though no disciplinary action was taken. The city did not release any information about the complaints. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Inside the NATO charm offensive that shocked as much as it delivered
It must have been the last thing NATO's chief needed. Late Tuesday, on the eve of a crucial summit that would lock in a generational investment in NATO's defense, Donald Trump's Truth Social account pinged with a single photo: a gushing message signed 'Mark Rutte,' written in a carbon-copy Trump style and overflowing with sycophantic praise for the US president. 'You are flying into another big success in the Hague this evening,' Rutte's message read. 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win,' he continued. 'You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done.' While the diplomatic world has bent toward many norms of the Trump White House, this was extreme. Doubling down on the comments the following day, saying Trump deserved credit for his actions on Iran and NATO, Rutte waded through many observers' incredulity at his kowtowing tone. But as the summit crescendoed, there was a growing sense he may have pulled off a diplomatic masterstroke. Rutte, the former Dutch prime minister, is no stranger to dealings with Trump, having deployed his easy charm in several visits to Washington, DC, during Trump's first term. Exuding an easygoing, relaxed image – his signature boyish grin never far from his face – Rutte's charm offensive echoes that of other NATO leaders. French President Emmanuel Macron has charted up a boisterous bromance with Trump; Finnish President Alex Stubb bonded with him over rounds of golf, and Italian far-right Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has won a reputation as something of Trump whisperer: She's a 'fantastic woman,' in Trump's words. Rutte's message – signed with his surname – perhaps spoke of a less pally relationship. So did one of Trump's reactions Wednesday: 'I think he likes me. If he doesn't, I'll let you know. I'll come back and I'll hit him hard,' Trump announced in his Wednesday news conference. But in The Hague, Rutte seemed ready to do anything to burnish the US president's ego and save him face. Trump's decision to attack Iran's nuclear program was 'extremely impressive,' the NATO chief told Trump. 'The signal it sends to the rest of the world that this president, when it comes to it, yes, he is a man of peace, but if necessary, he is willing to use strength.' Time and again around the summit, Rutte's interjections soothed Trump's passage – softening his landing after a fiery 'f**k' at Iran and Israel's latest exchange of missiles lit up international headlines. Rutte's response: a jokey aside in front of the world's cameras. 'Daddy has to sometimes use strong language,' he said beside Trump, after the US president used the analogy of two children fighting to describe the conflict between Iran and Israel. Rutte later said he wasn't referring to Trump as 'daddy' but was merely using a metaphor. The Dutchman didn't spare praise for Trump's strikes on Iran – a conflict technically outside the NATO wheelhouse – as the president railed against suggestions in a leaked government assessment that undercut his claim the strikes 'obliterated' parts of Iran's nuclear program. 'The secretary general knows that personal relationships go a long way with this administration,' Torrey Taussig, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council and a former NATO policy adviser at the Pentagon, told CNN. 'I do think this is a kind of hold-your-nose moment. Ensure there are no fireworks in The Hague. Get a good photo op and go home,' she added. Beyond Rutte, the whole summit was sculpted around Trump. Slimmed down, the schedule featured a single session for leaders; experts have suggested this was for Trump, who earlier this month skipped the ending of the G7 summit, missing a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Of course, the summit result is largely pre-ordained, after rounds of pre-negotiations to ensure the leaders had to only rubber-stamp declarations. Ukraine's war with Russia – by far the most pressing issue on NATO's agenda – was also excised from the summit's final declaration, the first time it has been missing since Russian President Vladimir Putin's full invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Even the crown jewel of the gathering, the promise to spend 5% of gross domestic product on defense (split into core defense requirements and 1.5% on defense-related spending by 2035), was a Trump-branded product. Back in January, Trump lofted the idea of a 5% spending target for NATO members, a figure that hadn't been given serious consideration before, as members limped towards 2%. 'They can all afford it. They're at 2% but they should be at 5%,' he told journalists. But Rutte may have had the last laugh. The summit was, by all accounts, a win for NATO: Members unanimously agreed to boost spendings to post-Cold War highs – and thanked Trump for it. 'In diplomacy, you try to get a goal and an aim, and what did we achieve here? We achieved an historic result, where NATO went back to its roots of collective defense,' Finland's Stubb told CNN on the sidelines of the summit. Spain was a notable exception, pushing for softened language that may have left a loophole for the Iberian nation to meet its responsibilities for NATO military capabilities without having to spend 5% of GDP. (The final summit declaration signed by NATO members referred only to 'allies' in its clauses on spending, while others spoke of commitments 'we' will make.) Leaders – led, of course, by Rutte – singled out Trump as the sole pressure responsible for finally corralling NATO allies to previously unthinkable spending targets. Boosted defense spending 'is the success of President Donald Trump,' Polish President Andrzej Duda told journalists at the summit. 'Without the leadership of Donald Trump, it would be impossible,' he added. His Lithuanian counterpart suggested a new motto for the alliance, 'Make NATO great again,' as he welcomed the pressure Trump had levied on stingy allies. 'I'm up for all the pressure we can get,' Lithuanian Defense Minister Dovile Sakaliene told CNN. Smaller nations on the front lines with Russia were buoyed by an alliance-wide commitment to meeting spending levels they had largely led the charge on. One Western European official ahead of the summit shared fears with CNN the summit would be marred by another diplomatic spat around Trump. But in public, comment on Rutte's messaging to Trump was largely off limits, with leaders waving off or swerving around questions. Finland's president wouldn't be drawn on the NATO secretary general's messages, but he said, however, 'Diplomacy has so many different forms.' Casualties – particularly from diplomatic skirmishes with Trump – were fewer than expected. Only Spain caught flak from the US president over its foot-dragging over the 5% GDP spend. 'It's terrible what they've done,' Trump said, threatening to use trade talks to force Madrid into line. 'We're going to make them pay twice as much,' he said. Even Zelensky – who has had a turbulent relationship with Trump – came away with wins. While he stopped short of committing further US aid to Ukraine, Trump suggested Kyiv may see future Patriot missile system deliveries from the United States – and he slammed Putin as 'misguided,' conceding the Russian leader may have territorial designs that extend further than Ukraine. Finally, Trump's own views on NATO – often a prickly subject for the famously transactional president – saw a reversal. 'These people really love their countries,' Trump said of the NATO leaders at his news conference concluding the NATO summit. 'It's not a rip-off, and we're here to help them protect their country.' 'I came here because it was something I'm supposed to be doing,' he added, 'but I left here a little bit different.'


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
US Extends Debt-Limit Special-Measures Period Through July 24
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told US lawmakers he's extending the latest period for deploying special accounting measures to keep within the debt limit through July, 24, 2025. The Treasury chief also repeated his May guidance to congressional leaders that they must act to increase or suspend the debt limit as soon as possible, before its scheduled August recess.