logo
How will the State support families in the budget?

How will the State support families in the budget?

Irish Times9 hours ago

How will the Government support families through
child benefit
and similar payments in the
budget?
It is a tricky and politically charged question. The Taoiseach has said consideration is being given to a second tier of child benefit for less well-off households, but will this happen, who would get it and what does it mean for the universal child benefit payments?
There is a lot still to decide, but here are the key questions?
Are the days of double payments over?
With a general election in the offing, the last
budget
gave parents two double child benefit months in late 2024, one in early November and one in early December.
READ MORE
This meant a payment of €280 per child, twice the usual monthly €140 payment. This was a substantial cash boost – particularly for bigger families. For example, a family with three children got an additional €840 over the two months.
[
Childcare in Ireland: 'Even as well-paid professionals, it was an exhausting struggle. The numbers never added up'
Opens in new window
]
Child benefit is paid to parents of children up to 16 years of age in all cases and up to 18 in they are in full-time education or have a disability. It is paid to approximately 678,000 families with more than 1.2 million children.
The two double payments came at a hefty cost of €371.4 million. A 'new baby grant' of €280 was introduced paid to families of babies born after December 1st 2024 in addition to child benefit.
While the new baby payment is permanent, the issue for the Government is whether to repeat any double child benefit weeks this year. Up to now, Ministers have suggested that these once-off payments will not continue, because inflation has come down sharply.
IATA Director General Willie Walsh on airline profits, air fares and why the Dublin Airport passenger cap makes Ireland a laughing stock
Listen |
35:56
However, Sinn Féin continues to push for a so-called cost-of-living package and the Government will know that not giving one will leave some families feeling worse off later in the year.
For now, senior Ministers continue to indicate that once-off universal payments – which also included the energy credits, will not be repeated this year. But we will see what happens.
What about the proposed new second tier of child benefit payment?
The idea of a second tier of payment to give more cash to lower income households goes back nearly 20 years and was first raised in papers from the National Economic and Social Council and later government officials. It featured as a recommendation in the 2022 report of the
Commission on Tax and Welfare
.
The Programme for Government said the Coalition would 'explore a targeted child benefit payment and examine the interaction this would have with existing targeted supports to reduce child poverty such as the working family payment and child support payment.' So it is on the agenda, but the word " explore' left no hostages to fortune.
The aim of the second tier of payment would be to tackle child poverty and disadvantage by giving more cash to lower income households.
[
Why most families can't afford to take paternity leave
Opens in new window
]
In additional to child benefit, families reliant on social welfare get additional child support payments (formerly called qualified child payments). Meanwhile, lower income families with a parent in work can qualify for the working family payment – and also increased amounts based on family size.
The idea of the second tier of child benefit would be to merge these two into one, additional income-based payment. This would be paid in addition to the existing child benefit payment.
The biggest beneficiaries would be many families on social welfare who would get significantly more cash than they currently do.
How would it work?
The most detailed work
has been done by economists Barra Roantree – now assistant professor in TCD - and Karina Doorley in
Economic and Social Research Institute
(ESRI) publications looking at child-related benefits.
They modelled a system where the second tier of payment would be structured similarly to the working family payment, providing families 60 per cent of the difference between what a measure of what a family earns and a set income level based on their circumstances including the size of the family.
This would be of most benefit to those on welfare but would also support lower income working families – similar to the working family payment.
[
New tier of child benefit could be introduced in October budget
Opens in new window
]
A 2023 paper estimated that a lone parent in receipt of only Jobseeker's Allowance would get another €170 per week. The measure, it said, would lift 40,000 children out of poverty.
The analysis suggested that this was a much more efficient route to tackle child poverty than other methods – such as increasing existing child benefit payments or working family payments.
Some work would be needed to examine exactly what rules would be put in place – and the researchers warned that decisions would also be needed to ensure that nobody lost out. The complexity of the welfare system and how people qualify for benefits comes into play here.
What would it mean for the existing child benefit payments?
In the short term, nothing. In the sense that there is no suggestion that resources would be transferred from the existing payment to fund the new one.
That said, the second tier of child benefit would be costly.
The latest ESRI research
costed its proposal at €772 million in a full year.
Directing this level of resources could have an impact on the affordability of increases in the main child benefit rate in the years ahead. It has fallen in cash and real terms since before the financial crash – in 2008 at its peak it was €166 per child, Adjusted for inflation that would be about €200 per month in today's terms.
[
New tier of child benefit could be introduced in October budget
Opens in new window
]
Could money be saved by taxing or means testing child benefit? The answer is yes but this is not likely to happen. The universality of the payment is generally seen as an important sign of the State's support for families with children.
Previous suggestions that it be taxed or means tested have met a decidedly frosty response from the public and the Commission on Tax and Welfare did not recommend going down this route. And
the Programme for Government
said it will continue to support families via this route.
Are other changes to child benefit possible?
Yes. For example, the idea has been floated of having a higher level of child benefit for larger families, perhaps those with three children or more. This would be designed to encourage larger families at a time when the average age of the population is ageing.
Families with more children can also be vulnerable to financial pressures for obvious reasons – though directing support to these households via child benefit would fall back on the issue of giving cash to better-off families as well as those in need.
[
The Irish Times view on cost-of-living increases: children are bearing the brunt
Opens in new window
]
A pointer to what options are under consideration will come this month when the Department of Finance publishes what are called the tax strategy papers, which look at the tax and welfare options for budget day. Pervious experience shows, however, that just because something is featured in these papers it does not necessarily mean that it will happen.
What about other supports to parents?
The general supports for parents have been increased in recent years, for example via additional childcare supports, medical and GP visits cards, the free schoolbooks and school meals scheme and the back-to-school clothing and footwear allowance.
The Programme for Government promises to expand some of these schemes – finishing the roll-out of the school meals scheme to all secondary schools in its term, looking at the income limits for the back to school schemes and extending support for people taking parental leave.
The supports for parents and families thus come via a combination of cash and social services. While money into parent's pockets is a vital part of this, the wider cost of and access to services in key areas like health and education are obviously central, too.
The question for the Government, in a budgetary era where resources may start to tighten, are where its priorities lie. The first indication of this will come in the October budget. Will the second tier of child benefit get the go-ahead? Given its significant cost and other priorities, you would not bet your house on it. We will just have to wait and see.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

British ambassador to leave diplomatic service but remain in Dublin after ‘falling in love with the city'
British ambassador to leave diplomatic service but remain in Dublin after ‘falling in love with the city'

Irish Times

time33 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

British ambassador to leave diplomatic service but remain in Dublin after ‘falling in love with the city'

British ambassador to Ireland Paul Johnston, who is finishing his posting in September, has announced that he and his wife will stay in Ireland and leave the British diplomatic service. Speaking at a garden party at the ambassador's residence to mark King Charles 's birthday, Mr Johnston says he will be taking up a new, non-diplomatic job in Dublin later this year. Saying he wanted to break 'a little bit of news' to 700 guests gathered at the Glencairn home, Mr Johnston quoted Russian author's Leo Tolstoy's remark that 'people are the lights of every city'. 'That's very much what it's felt like for Nicola [his wife] and me in Ireland – that the people we've met have been the highlight of our time here. And it's primarily because of the people that we've met that we've taken quite a big decision,' he told the attendance. They had 'so fallen in love with the city' that they had decided to stay in Dublin permanently. READ MORE 'After 35 years with the UK public service, and some wonderful postings and some wonderful experiences, we've decided that we want to open a new chapter in our life and to do it here in Dublin,' he said to cheers. Mr Johnston (57), who was born in Scotland, started his civil service career at the UK ministry of defence in 1990 before he moved to the foreign and commonwealth office in 1993. He has served in a number of diplomatic roles prior to his appointment as envoy in Dublin in 2020, including as the UK ambassador to Sweden from 2011 to 2016 and as the deputy permanent representative to Nato from 2016 to 2017. The ambassador came to Ireland five years ago during the height of the Covid pandemic and he was at the centre of often very difficult British-Irish relations over the UK's departure from the European Union. He said he cannot yet disclose what role he will take up later this year as it is 'subject to a UK government approval process'. 'I can say that we couldn't be more happy or more excited,' he added. Representing the Government, the Minister for Transport, Darragh O'Brien , said: 'We really want to thank you for the hard work that you've done here, for your friendship and wish you all the very, very best in your next posting. And we are looking forward to working, obviously, with your successor here,' the Minister said.

The Irish Times view on public transport in Dublin: keep pushing forward
The Irish Times view on public transport in Dublin: keep pushing forward

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

The Irish Times view on public transport in Dublin: keep pushing forward

It has been eight years since Ireland last delivered a fixed rail project – the Luas cross-city line, which was delivered efficiently, albeit with inevitable disruption. Since then headlines have been dominated by plans for new projects – including the giant Metrolink – but little enough by way of construction work. In this context, the expansion of the Dart network is a a vital element. It may not be as dramatic as the Metro, but it could offer better connectivity to a host of areas around Dublin and beyond into some of the commuter counties. Like all major infrastructure plans, various aspects of this strategy have been proceeding slowly through the planning and in some cases a procurement process. The announcement this week that two legal challenges to the Dart+West project will be avoided due to agreements being reached with two businesses in the Ashtown area is welcome. While the details of these agreements have not been revealed, studies had shown that the two businesses would be the most seriously affected in the area from work on the new line. Now a way has been found to deliver the huge advantages to the public, while avoiding the uncertainties of the legal process. New planning laws can help to lessen spurious objections, but it is also necessary to deal with genuine ones – like those held by the two businesses – if vital projects like this are to proceed. And ideally without recourse to the courts. READ MORE The Dart project is also proceeding on other fronts, too, with an announcement this week of a proposed new station in Cabra on the Dart+ South West project. Strikingly, 26,000 people live within 1Km of the chosen location. The idea emerged from a public consultation process. The Dart expansion is part of a complex web of projects planned for Dublin, also including Bus Connects and the Metro. Progressing these is vital to get people out of their cars, cut emissions and open up new land for housing. We must presume that the necessary funds will be set aside in the revised National Development Plan, which is due shortly.

Minister denies Sinn Féin's claim anti-terrorism Bill contains a ‘Kneecap' clause
Minister denies Sinn Féin's claim anti-terrorism Bill contains a ‘Kneecap' clause

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Minister denies Sinn Féin's claim anti-terrorism Bill contains a ‘Kneecap' clause

Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan has rejected Opposition claims that Kneecap band member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh could be prosecuted under antiterrorism legislation being introduced in the Dáil. Sinn Féin justice spokesman Matt Carthy described provisions of the Criminal Justice (Terrorism Offences) (Amendment) Bill as the 'Kneecap clause' in the wake of the prosecution in England of the Belfast band member whose stage name is 'Mo Chara'. He was charged under UK antiterrorism legislation with showing support for a proscribed organisation. It is alleged he draped himself in a Hizbullah flag at a London gig last November and shouted 'up Hamas , up Hizbullah', referring to the Palestinian and Lebanese militant groups respectively. He is contesting the charge. The proposed new Irish legislation broadens the category of terrorist offences to bring it in line with a 2017 EU directive, to include travelling or facilitating travel for the purposes of terrorism and receiving or providing training for terrorism. READ MORE The Bill also revises the definition of provoking terrorism, stating that the glorification of a terrorist activity, including by praise or celebration, 'may be considered publicly provoking the commission of a terrorist offence'. Mr Carthy, who called this the 'Kneecap clause', said it is 'deeply problematic' because 'there is a real fear that this inclusion could lead to charges against political activism and legitimate freedom of expression, similar to the manner in which Mo Chara from Kneecap is currently facing terrorism charges in the UK'. This sort of antiterrorism legislation 'undercuts civil liberties, free speech and the rule of law, with little or no effect on actual terrorist activity', he said. 'It is exactly the type of language that has been used, in the North in particular, to attempt to curtail the rights of families to remember loved ones killed in the conflict in the six counties. It has equally been used in arguments against commemorating the 1916 Rising or wearing an Easter lily,' he said. But Mr O'Callaghan said 'what Kneecap is being prosecuted for in the UK would not happen here'. [ Fans rally behind Kneecap after London court appearance: 'If you're supporting Ireland, you're supporting Kneecap' Opens in new window ] 'Under this legislation, people would be entitled to say they support Hamas, although it has been involved in reprehensible behaviour,' he said. Describing the UK legislation as 'alarmingly wide' and a provision 'that would not be enacted by this House', he said that under the UK law it is an offence if a person in a public place 'wears, carries or displays an article in such a way or in such circumstances as to arouse reasonable suspicion that he is a member or supporter of a proscribed organisation'. Sinn Féin's Mark Ward said people singing republican songs about Irish heroes could be prosecuted under the legislation. However, the Minister said the deputy could sing whatever songs he wants. 'People can sing songs about the Boys of Barr na Sráide and the Men Behind the Wire. In loyalist parts of Belfast, they can sing whatever they want.' He said TDs' 'concern that this will have a restrictive impact on protest or freedom of expression is not accurate'. 'The only time your message is going to come within the criminal law and face criminal sanction is if it is being done with the intention of inciting someone else to commit criminal terrorist activity.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store