Cannabis seeds, leaves not ganja: Andhra Pradesh High Court weeds out confusion
The case was based on the arrest of the petitioners under provisions of the Act for allegedly being in possession of over 1.5 kilograms of what was reported as ganja. Upon examination of the material seized, the petitioners' counsel argued that the substance consisted only of seeds and leaves, and not of the prohibited flowering or fruiting parts. The counsel further relied on previous judgments that clarified the definition of ganja under the law.The court concurred with the argument and said that there was no material on record to show that the seized substance contained flowering or fruiting tops. In such a scenario, the seizure did not attract the penal provisions of the Act. Accordingly, the High Court granted bail to the petitioners.advertisementThe judgment is expected to have implications for law enforcement practices and could potentially impact pending cases where the seizure consists solely of cannabis seeds or leaves without the flowering components.The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, provides the legal framework for controlling and regulating operations relating to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in India. Section 2(iii)(b) of the Act defines ganja specifically as 'the flowering or fruiting tops of the cannabis plant (excluding the seeds and leaves when not accompanied by the tops).'Justice Reddy's ruling reinforces this distinction and reiterates the legislative intent to criminalise only the possession and trade of the intoxicating parts of the plant. - EndsMust Watch
IN THIS STORY#Andhra Pradesh
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Gujarat HC initiates contempt proceedings against man who ‘sat on toilet' during virtual hearing
Days after a video of a man attending a virtual proceeding of the Gujarat High Court while sitting on a toilet was widely shared on social media, the HC directed the Registry to register a suo motu contempt proceeding against the resident of Surat. A Division Bench of Justice AS Supehia and Justice RT Vachhani passed an oral order on June 30, which was uploaded Thursday, directing the Registry to register suo motu contempt proceedings against Abdul Samad 'upon verification', and to produce a 'necessary report' before the next date of hearing. 'After the registration of contempt proceedings, the Registry shall issue the notice to the contempt or as to why he should not be prosecuted and punished for committing Contempt of Court as defined under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. A suo motu proceedings shall be listed after a period of two weeks,' the court said in the oral order. Stating that the Presiding Judge of a court may direct to stop live streaming in such situations, the court also directed the Registrar, Information Technology to 'apprise this court about the mechanism to stop contumacious litigants in participating in livestreaming proceedings'. The court said that 'such disorderly and uncontrolled behaviour has become frequent'. The incident took place on June 20, when Samad, a complainant in an FIR lodged at the Kim police station in Surat district, had joined the virtual proceedings of the court of Justice Nirzar Desai and was seen sitting on a toilet while awaiting his turn to consent to quashing a petition. 'The infamous video tarnishing the image of this Court is widely circulated in social media and is required to be immediately banned and deleted,' the Court said. In the now-viral video clip of the live streaming of the High Court proceedings, Samad was initially seen in a close up with headphones. However, as he set his phone aside moments later, the video shows him on a toilet. He is then seen washing, and walking out of the bathroom to a different surrounding while awaiting his turn. Earlier in March this year, the Gujarat High Court had imposed a fine of Rs 2 lakh on a litigant who had joined a virtual hearing from a lavatory and sentenced him to community service on an eight hour shift daily for two weeks — cleaning and watering the garden of the HC in Sola in Ahmedabad. The court had rejected the defence of the man that he had joined the HC proceeding virtually for the first time and therefore committed a mistake.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Rights panel orders inquiry into alleged overpricing of food items at Kalabhavan Theatre
Thiruvananthapuram: State human rights commission (SHRC) ordered an inquiry into the alleged overpricing of food items at Kalabhavan Theatre, owned and operated by Kerala State Film Development Corporation. Commission chairperson Justice Alexander Thomas issued the directive following a complaint that food was being sold at rates nearly double to the rates displayed there. The complaint was lodged by Waheed, a Kottur resident, who claimed that customers were being charged Rs 100 for popcorn, while the displayed price was only Rs 60. He noted that the discrepancy was not limited to Kalabhavan but was also reportedly prevalent in other theatres across the city. Justice Thomas instructed secretaries of local self-govt department, civil supplies department and corporation to examine the complaint and submit a detailed report within a month. SHRC emphasised that consumers have the right to be charged transparently and fairly, especially at public or govt-affiliated venues. If the allegations were found to be true, it could amount to unfair trade practices and exploitation of cinemagoers, SHRC observed. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Gold Is Surging in 2025 — Smart Traders Are Already In IC Markets Learn More Undo This incident also reignited broader concerns about unchecked food pricing in cinema halls, which remain outside the purview of standard consumer protection norms in many cases. Consumer rights activists have welcomed the SHRC move, urging authorities to implement price regulation more strictly across all theatres. The outcome of the investigation could lead to regulatory changes or fines for violators, particularly in govt-affiliated venues like Kalabhavan, which is expected to follow public accountability norms. Further action will be based on the findings submitted by the departments concerned.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
SC agrees to hear Kalanithi Maran, KAL Airways appeal against SpiceJet
Sun Group founder and chairman Kalanithi Maran and KAL Airways moved the Supreme Court on Friday against an order dismissing their pleas seeking damages of Rs 1,323 crore from SpiceJet. The apex court agreed to hear the plea on 18 July. Maran and KAL Airways filed the plea against the Delhi High Court order dated 26 May, which had dismissed their petitions seeking over ₹1,300 crore in damages from SpiceJet. Earlier, the petitions by Maran and KAL Airways had been rejected by an Arbitral Tribunal and later by a single-judge Bench of the High Court. The High Court in May said Maran and KAL Airways had engaged in a calculated gamble by delaying and re-filing their challenge to the arbitral award. 'This... is not a simple case of delay in removing objections in refiling the appeals. It is a case of deliberate and wilful concealment of facts both from the Division Bench as well as from the respondents and a calculated gamble taken by the appellants,' the Delhi HC said. The court declined to condone the delay of 55 days in filing and 226 days in re-filing the present appeals. 'As the application for condonation of delay in filing and re-filing have been dismissed, the appeals also stand dismissed on the ground of delay without going into merits,' the High Court order had stated.
