
The MAGA backlash over Epstein isn't dying down
Clearly, his followers on Truth Social disagreed. As of today, this post has 43.2k likes, 13.7k ReTruths, and 48K comments, nearly all of which express fury about the information — or lack thereof — that the Trump administration has provided about the well-connected billionaire, who died in prison shortly after being arrested for alleged sex trafficking of minors. Last week, after months of promises to release more information about the Epstein investigation, the Department of Justice and FBI released a joint memo, stating that there was no list of high-powered 'clients' who joined Epstein in his activities, no evidence that Epstein blackmailed anybody, and that Epstein did actually die by suicide.
Even though Trump's Truth Social post was trying to address the attacks on Attorney General Pam Bondi, who was partly responsible for publishing the Epstein memo (and, according to conspiracy theorists, the reason why the supposed client list isn't being made public), his followers didn't care. 'We want the ELITE PEDOS exposed! You promised us that,' one user responded, in a post with 19.6K likes. 'Pam promised us that. Kash [Patel, FBI Director] promised us that. Now it's OUR fault bc we want that promise fulfilled and call Pam out every time she lies? What else has she lied to us about?'
The like-to-comment ratio shows how thoroughly the Epstein files have jeopardized the MAGA base's relationship with Trump. Over the past several months, the administration has had mixed success in keeping the populist base in its corner, due to things like Trump's tariffs and the 'big, beautiful bill,' to the point that the possibility of a 'MAGA civil war' keeps emerging in the news cycle. Most times, those brewing fights get extinguished before they go further. But the backlash to the Epstein files is unusually fierce and may not be extinguished as easily, if at all.
The source of the conflagration: the world of MAGA influencers, whose audiences implicitly trust them to carry out the 'America First' agenda. Their status and functions vary wildly: media moguls like Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, and Steve Bannon; solo talents like Laura Loomer, Candace Owens, and Nick Fuentes; political organizers like Charlie Kirk; content creators like Cattturd; and hundreds of others who've established lucrative careers by attacking the globalist elite online. They're normally pro-Trump, and many of them now have access to the White House. Some of them even brag about having Trump's cell phone number. But now they won't stop talking about how angry they are about the flimsiness of the Epstein files, which means their followers won't let go of it either.
'The real question is not 'was Jeffrey Epstein a weirdo who was abusing girls?' The real question is why was he doing this, on whose behalf, and where did the money come from,' Carlson said during a keynote speech at a Turning Point USA summit on July 11th. He then insinuated that Epstein was running a blackmail operation on behalf of a foreign government — possibly Israel, though he caveated with 'there's nothing antisemitic about saying that' and that 'every single person in Washington, DC,' suspected that Epstein was a Mossad asset. Bannon agreed with him at the same conference, while Loomer, who once got three members of the National Security Council fired, called for Bondi to be fired, accusing her of 'harming Trump's administration [and] embarrassing all of his staff and advisors.'
Even the influencers that wield direct government power are starting to revolt. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene demanded that the administration reveal the truth about Epstein 'and the rich powerful elites in his circle.' And last week, several mainstream outlets reported that Dan Bongino, a right-wing podcaster who was appointed to serve as deputy director of the FBI, had threatened to resign unless Bondi was fired. According to Axios, Bongino was so upset about the rollout of the Epstein evidence — including a video taken of Epstein's cell phone on the day of his death, which had a full minute missing from it, fueling even more conspiracy theories — that he screamed at her in front of Trump and his senior advisors, and then took a day off from work.
Trump's 10-year relationship with the MAGA base has been an endless cycle of breaking and making up: Trump does something that infuriates the base, they revolt, Trump smooths things over, and the base goes back to loving the president. In every case, he's always assisted by a network of online MAGA influencers who are effectively his proxies — enforcing message discipline when interacting with their audiences, amplifying his talking points, defending him from his haters, and making sure the base sticks with him no matter what.
But the strength of an influencer, especially a MAGA influencer, is that they don't have to rely on elite-controlled media — cable and broadcast news, print journalism, etc. — to build their massive followings. In fact, they could use their internet platforms to hold those powerful elites accountable, touting themselves as 'independent' content creators, which works exceedingly well when they can present themselves as outsiders deliberately shut out of the system and therefore need subscribers to pay a monthly fee to support their mission. Unfortunately, they now have unprecedented access to the president, which makes them insiders with power — and their followers sure would love for them to use it to get to the bottom of things.
It doesn't help that there's no 'deep state' to hide behind this time, and it may be the reason why QAnon — another powerful conspiracy theory that involved pedophile elites in Washington — hasn't revived itself. Trump could easily attack the career agents at the FBI and DOJ for investigating him during his first term, but upon his reelection, he purged those agencies and immediately chose MAGA influencer loyalists to run them. (Prior to becoming FBI director, Patel had a podcast, wrote a children's book about 'King Donald,' and opened his own merch store.)
The Epstein files have scrambled MAGA influencers, who now have to decide what is more important to them: access and loyalty to Trump or maintaining their brand
It's no wonder why the Epstein files have scrambled MAGA influencers, who now have to decide what is more important to them: access and loyalty to Trump or maintaining their brand. If they want to stay loyal to their followers and their brand reputation, they should be trying to get to the truth of Epstein's death. But if they were trying to do that — or at least, convincing their insatiable audience that they were working on it — it would jeopardize their relationship with the Trump administration, or worse, Trump himself.
The cullings are already underway, if Alex Jones is to be believed. On July 13th, he alleged that Trumpworld surrogates had started reaching out to 'talk show hosts and journalists and influencers,' threatening to cut off their access if they kept going on about Epstein. 'You'll never be invited to a Trump event again. You'll never be invited to the White House. You'll never be any other stuff. You're not getting any conservative sponsorship, no campaign contribution, ads running next cycle if you do this. That's been going on,' Jones claimed. 'That, A, is not very moral, that's how the Democrats try to censor and control, and then B, it's gonna create a mega-Streisand effect, as I said seven, eight days ago. And that is exactly what all of this has done.'
A few of the influencers, however, are circling the wagons again. 'Honestly, I'm done talking about Epstein for the time being. I'm going to trust my friends in the administration. I'm going to trust my friends in the government to do what needs to be done,' Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk said on his podcast yesterday, reiterating that he would support whatever the Trump administration concluded on the matter.
Kirk, a key player in Trump's political machine, also distanced himself from Carlson's Epstein conspiracies, which were made at his youth group's conference. 'I think that there was plenty of, let's say, speeches that were directed towards this topic this last weekend. So we don't need to spend our valuable time on this program relitigating it,' Kirk said.
Around that time, other influencers began attempting to deflect the Epstein flack
Around that time, other influencers began attempting to deflect the Epstein flack: promising that the government was about to start a real investigation soon (Benny Johnson), attacking Carlson as 'not trustworthy' and 'obsessed [with] making everything about Jews' (Loomer), suggesting that maybe 'demons' were at work and not the government (Mike Cernovich), or hyping up a new discovery about Lee Harvey Oswald and the CIA (Rep. Anna Paulina Luna).
But a growing faction of influencers are going the other way with Carlson, Greene, and Jones: Candace Owens, who's attacking the former Israeli prime minster about the Mossad; Matt Walsh, who wants the 'evildoers [to] be dragged in front of us, weeping and begging for mercy'; white nationalist Nick Fuentes, who accused TPUSA world of 'appeasing' a base that wanted 'authentic opposition to organized Jewish influence'; and Tim Pool, who pointed out the strange new messaging coming out of the White House influencer pool, 'After speaking with my friends in government and also private island equity holdings I have decided that no one cares about Epstein anyway. I mean, like who? Lol who's Epstein amirite?'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US House poised to send stablecoin bill to Trump after 'crypto week' drama
(Reuters) -The U.S. House of Representatives appeared poised to pass key crypto legislation on Thursday, including the creation of a regulatory framework for U.S.-dollar-pegged cryptocurrency tokens known as stablecoins, after two days of fraught negotiations. House lawmakers in Washington were due to convene on Thursday afternoon to consider passing the stablecoin bill and another that would develop a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies more broadly. The stablecoin measure, which has already been agreed to in the Senate, is expected to pass and move on to be signed by President Donald Trump as soon as Friday. That would be a major victory for the digital assets industry, marking the first major crypto law enacted in the United States and paving the way for greater integration of crypto into traditional financial markets. Stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a constant value, usually a 1:1 dollar peg, are commonly used by crypto traders to move funds. They have gained much momentum in recent years, offering faster and cheaper transaction costs than moving money through a bank. Their use has grown rapidly in recent years, and proponents say they could be used to send payments instantly. The week's negotiations to consider the legislation - dubbed "crypto week" by Republican lawmakers - ran into unexpected hurdles after some conservative hold-outs voted against considering the measures. Trump huddled with skeptics at the White House on Tuesday to try to save the initiative. Even after Trump announced an agreement, it still took about nine hours for the bills to clear key procedural hurdles late on Wednesday as private talks continued. In negotiations that went late into Wednesday evening, lawmakers decided to include language to prohibit the United States from issuing a central bank digital currency in an unrelated defense spending bill as a compromise to conservatives who strongly supported the ban. The anti-central bank currency bill had become a sticking point for conservative Republicans. While central banks in some nations have explored issuing their own digital currencies, the topic has been met with quick resistance in the United States from conservative Republicans, who argue it could allow the government to monitor Americans' spending. The Fed has studied the issue, but Chairman Jerome Powell has said that the central bank would never pursue one absent explicit approval from Congress. House lawmakers have said they are aiming to vote on all three crypto measures later in the day. When asked if he expects the crypto bills to pass on Thursday, House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters: "I do."
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Seth Meyers Debunks Trump's ‘Full Hallucination' About His Uncle and the Unabomber
Amid ongoing efforts to not talk about the Epstein scandal, President Donald Trump went on a tangent about his uncle this week, claiming that the man taught Ted Kaczynski — a.k.a the Unabomber — and declared Kaczynski a good student. But on Wednesday night, Seth Meyers fully debunked that story. While speaking at the Pennsylvania Energy & Innovation Summit, the president paused to 'brag' about his uncle, 'because when I first heard about AI, you know, it's not my thing,' but his uncle worked at MIT. Trump repeated his claim that his uncle worked at the university for 51 years and was the longest serving professor at the school, neither of which is true. More from TheWrap Seth Meyers Debunks Trump's 'Full Hallucination' About His Uncle and the Unabomber | Video 'Untamed' Review: Eric Bana Is Excellent in Netflix's Moody Yosemite Mystery Senate Votes to Cut Federal Funding for PBS, NPR Stephen Colbert Channels the Beach Boys to Solve Latest Trump Mystery: 'What Happened to Jeffrey Epstein? God Only Knows' | Video 'Kaczynski was one of his students. Do you know who Kaczynski was? There's very little difference between a madman and a genius,' Trump said. 'But Kaczynski, I said, 'What kind of a student was he, Uncle John? Dr. John Trump.'' 'Then he said, 'Seriously, good.' He said he'd correct, he'd go around correcting everybody, but it didn't work out too well for him,' Trump continued. As the clip ended, Meyers paused to soak it in, before picking apart the story even further, beyond Trump's false claim about his uncle's tenure. 'It turns out, A) the Unabomber didn't go to MIT,' Meyers explained (which is true, Kaczynski actually went to Harvard). 'And B) Trump's uncle died 10 years before Kaczynski became known as the Unabomber,' he continued. 'So the whole thing we just heard wasn't just a small lie, it was like a full hallucination. Including the conversation Trump made up between him and his uncle. Although, how could you tell it was made up? I mean, it sounded so natural.' The late night host then mimicked the exchange, poking fun at the idea that Trump would refer to his uncle as Dr. John Trump in casual conversation. You can watch Seth Meyers's full 'A Closer Look' segment in the video above. The post Seth Meyers Debunks Trump's 'Full Hallucination' About His Uncle and the Unabomber | Video appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Private equity billionaire David Rubenstein on Jerome Powell: He's done a very good job
In 1997, billionaire Carlyle co-founder David Rubenstein hired a then-relatively unknown member of the George H.W. Bush administration named Jerome Powell. Over the course of eight years, Powell led the private equity firm's industrial group and was a partner. Fast-forward to today, Rubenstein owns the MLB's Baltimore Orioles, and Powell is a Trump-appointed Fed chairman under attack from... President Trump. A great example that one never knows where life will take you. "Not everybody says he's done a perfect job, but I think he's done a very good job because he tells you what he's going to do or what the Fed's likely to do before they do it, which is unusual for a lot of Fed chairs," Rubenstein told me on Yahoo Finance's Opening Bid (see video above). Rubenstein added, "Secondly, we haven't had a recession since Jay Powell has been chairman of the Fed. Recessions occur in the United States roughly every seven years or so. And obviously, the Fed chairman is not the only person responsible for there being or not being a recession. But I think we haven't had one because I think he managed the inflation reasonably well." Tell this to President Trump and his Cabinet members, who have gone on the attack against Powell, whose term as chair ends in May 2026. The US dollar tanked more than 1% on Wednesday after reports saying Trump had polled a group of lawmakers on whether he should fire Powell. Trump also reportedly drew up a resignation letter. Trump later said in a press conference with the leader of Bahrain that it was 'highly unlikely' he would fire Powell in the near term. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said this week that a formal process to pick Powell's successor has begun. This is the latest drama between Trump and the Federal Reserve. Trump has publicly called Powell a "numbskull" and nicknamed him "too late" for holding firm on interest rates in large part due to the administration's tariff policy. The president has signaled a desire for the Fed to cut interest rates by as much as three percentage points. Read more: How much control does the president have over the Fed and interest rates? Interest rates currently stand at 4.25% to 4.5%. The Fed last cut interest rates in December 2024 by 25 basis points. "I haven't talked to him specifically about it, so I'm just surmising, but my guess is that nobody likes to be criticized by the president of the United States," Rubenstein said. "But he hasn't responded to any of the criticism, which I give him great credit for doing." Trump is reportedly eyeing longtime loyalists Kevin Hassett and Kevin Warsh to replace Powell. Bessent is also reportedly in the mix, as is Fed governor Christopher Waller. The problem with all four respected economic minds is that they are perceived as too close to Trump, thereby potentially risking the Fed's long-held independence. "I think the independence of the Fed is absolutely critical, and not just for the current Fed chairman, who I respect, Jay Powell, but the next Fed chairman," JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon told reporters on a call earlier this week. Rubenstein agrees. "The Federal Reserve is really the crown jewel of the governmental system in many ways because it's seen as very independent and very merit-oriented," Rubenstein said. "I think the markets would respond better if somebody is seen as independent." "I think overall it would be a good thing for the country to have a strong Fed chair succeed Jay Powell rather than a weak Fed chair," he added. Rubenstein co-founded the Carlyle Group in 1987. Today, the private equity powerhouse boasts more than $447 billion in assets under management. The company has been led by CEO Harvey Schwartz, a Goldman Sachs (GS) alum, since February 2023. Rubenstein, a former aide to President Jimmy Carter, has become a noted philanthropist and has signed the Giving Pledge. President Joe Biden awarded Rubenstein the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Brian Sozzi is Yahoo Finance's Executive Editor and a member of Yahoo Finance's editorial leadership team. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data