BBC Scotland slammed for ‘farcical' Debate Night impartiality ruling
The panel show featured the SNP's Glasgow Council leader Susan Aitken, Scottish Tory MSP Annie Wells, Scottish Labour MSP Paul Sweeney, Labour peer Willie Haughey and artist David Eustace.
An SNP source at the time told The National that Debate Night appears to have 'thrown the BBC's proposed guidance on balance out of the window' by including two Labour representatives.
READ MORE: BBC Scotland breached accuracy standards with Labour peer on Debate Night
This was before we subsequently revealed that Eustace also appears to be a prominent Scottish Labour supporter.
The Glasgow Greens submitted a formal complaint to the BBC, highlighting that it has far more elected representatives than the Tories – for example – and branding it a 'farce'.
Now, the BBC have also responded to the complaint and argued that the panel makeup didn't breach its impartiality guidelines.
'While the composition of the panel would have been inappropriate for an item governed by the BBC's election guidelines, these apply in the case of by-elections only to coverage of the by-election itself or the constituency in which it is taking place,' the organisation's Executive Complaints Unit (ECU) ruled.
'The item in question was unconnected with the impending by-election, and focused on the future regeneration of Glasgow, a topic on which (as the ensuing discussion illustrated) there is a large measure of cross-party agreement.'
The statement added: 'The ECU considered the composition of the panel appropriate to the circumstances and found no breach of the BBC's standards of impartiality.'
(Image: Supplied)
This was a point that Glasgow Greens councillor Anthony Carroll (above) still took issue with, branding the decision 'farcical'.
'Even by the BBC's standards, this was a panel that was not representative of Glasgow. The Greens came 3rd in every constituency just last year, and the 3rd largest party in the council with 11 councilors – having just won a by-election last year for our party's first time ever,' he said.
"And yet the BBC think a panel of two Labour representatives and a supporter of that party is somehow representative of the city, but it's clearly not. If the BBC wants to be representative of Glasgow's politics then Green voices must be included in these debates.'
The ECU did rule, however, that it has breached its standards of accuracy by not making it clear that Haughey – as well as a Labour donor – is a Labour peer.
The Scottish Labour candidate, Davy Russell, ultimately won the Hamilton by-election by a little over 600 votes with the SNP's Katy Loudon coming second.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
JK Rowling compares Nicola Sturgeon to Twilight's Bella Swan
She accused Ms Sturgeon of being 'flat out Trumpian in her shameless denial of reality and hard facts' on issues relating to trans and women's rights. She was reviewing the former first minister's memoir. The Harry Potter author is a long-time critic of the former SNP leader and her views on gender self-ID. READ MORE: Inside the row between Scottish press and Nicola Sturgeon's team at book launch The near-3000-word review, published on her website, accuses Sturgeon, who passed gender reform legislation at Holyrood, of holding 'luxury beliefs' that have caused 'real, lasting harm' to women. The Twilight of Nicola Sturgeon My review of Franklyhttps:// — J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) August 14, 2025 Rowling published her review on X alongside what appears to be an AI-generated image of Sturgeon in the woods in front of a wolf and a vampire. She said of the politician's memoir, Frankly: 'She remains stubbornly wedded to her belief that it is possible to let some men into women's spaces on the men's say so, without letting any man who fancies it come inside. 'She denies there are any risks to a policy of gender self-identification. 'She can't imagine any male predator capitalising on such policies, in spite of the fact that it has, demonstrably, happened many times. 'She is flat-out Trumpian in her shameless denial of reality and facts' Rowling, who lives in Edinburgh, said the Glasgow Southside MSP had not been 'remotely humbled' by the Supreme Court ruling that sex in the UK Equality Act referred to biological sex. The Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Act, which was passed by MSPs, was ultimately scrapped by Westminster, with the then-Tory government saying it contravened equalities law. READ MORE: I went to the 'first legal wedding' at the Edinburgh Fringe – here's what it was like In her book, Sturgeon said she had never received as much abuse as when Rowling posted a picture of herself on social media with a T-shirt saying 'Nicola Sturgeon, destroyer of women's rights'. The former first minister said the post made her feel 'more at risk of possible physical harm'. Rowling defended the decision, writing in her review that she intended to encourage journalists to question Sturgeon on the impacts her gender reforms may have. She compares the MSP to Twilight character Bella Swan, saying both were 'monomaniacs', with Sturgeon being 'consumed' by independence.
Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
MP resigns as trade envoy over northern Cyprus visit
A government spokesman told the BBC Afzal Khan, who represents Manchester Rusholme, had stepped down from his position on Friday. Mr Khan said the trip to the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, which is not recognised by the UK Government, was to visit his nephew and to receive an honorary degree. He said he had paid for the trip himself. Turkish troops have occupied the northern section of the Mediterranean island since 1974. Shadow foreign minister Wendy Morton told the BBC that she welcomed Mr Khan's resignation, but said Sir Keir Starmer should have sacked him earlier.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Tens of thousands of renters booted out of homes as ‘no-fault' evictions surge – despite government plan to crack down
TENS of thousands of renters have been booted out of their homes amid a rise in "no-fault" evictions. Section 21 notices enforced by bailiffs have risen by 8% over the last year, according to Ministry of Justice figures. 2 That's despite the Labour Government promising to crack down on "no-fault" evictions, which allow landlords to force renters out during their tenancy without needing a specified reason. A total of 11,402 repossessions by county court bailiffs following a Section 21 notice were reported in the year up to June 2025. That's up from 10,576 over the previous 12 months. Labour had pledged to push through new rules that would give more power to tenants and ban Section 21 notices. The rules mean landlords will need to apply for a hearing before they can evict a tenant. But the Renters' Rights Bill hasn't been made into law yet and some landlords have been selling off their properties ahead of the reforms. It was due to come into force this autumn but a report in the Financial Times has suggested it will be pushed back because of delays in Parliament. Campaign group the Renters Reform Coalition raised fears the delay could mean the bill until spring next year. Director Tom Darling said at the time: "Renters will feel let down yet again on hearing that Section 21 no fault evictions are now unlikely to be scrapped until 2026 - a year and a half since the government was elected on a manifesto pledge to 'immediately abolish' them… "Everyone needs a decent, secure home, but with every month that passes thousands more renters are faced with a no-fault eviction." Landlord Responsibilities Homelessness charity Shelter has reacted angrily to the latest Section 21 figures. Spokesperson Mairi MacRae told The Telegraph: "It is unconscionable that more than a year after the Government came to power, thousands of renters continue to be marched out of their homes by bailiffs because of an unfair policy that the Government said would be scrapped immediately." A Government spokesman told the paper: "No one should live in fear of a Section 21 eviction and these new figures show exactly why we will abolish them through our Renters' Rights Bill, which is a manifesto commitment and legislative priority for this Government. "We're determined to level the playing field by providing tenants with greater security, rights and protections in their homes and our landmark reforms will be implemented swiftly after the Bill becomes law." What else is included in the Renters' Rights Bill? It's not just a ban on Section 21 evictions covered in the Renters' Rights Bill. A host of other changes are included in the legislation. These are just a few of the major ones: Ensuring possession grounds are fair to both parties - this will give tenants more security but also allow landlords to recover their properties "when reasonable" Providing stronger protections against backdoor eviction - this will ensure tenants can appeal above-market rents which are designed to force them out Introduce a new Private Rented Sector Landlord Ombudsman - this will mean renters can get impartial help if they have a grievance with their landlord Give tenants strengthened rights to request a pet in the property - a landlord will have to consider this and cannot refuse it unreasonably Apply " Awaab's Law" to the sector - this will set clear legal expectations about the timeframes within which landlords in the private rented sector have to take action to make homes safe where they contain serious hazards. What to do if you've been served a Section 21 notice Here is what you can do, according to the Renters' Reform Coalition… Check the form - a Section 21 notice must be on an official form, known as a 6a form. Your landlord can't issue an eviction notice just by telling you in person or by text/email. Check if the form is valid - you must be given at least two months notice to vacate a property. You also can't be given a Section 21 if your tenancy started less than four months prior. If you are on a fixed-term contract you can't receive a Section 21 unless there is a break clause in it. These things can also make a Section 21 notice invalid: The council has given your landlord an improvement notice to fix things, or an emergency works notice, in the last six months Your deposit isn't in a deposit protection scheme. In that case the landlord must return it to you before they can issue a Section 21 The property is a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) but it doesn't have a HMO licence from the council. In some areas all rented properties need a licence - check with your council The landlord has charged you illegal fees - such as a deposit worth more than five weeks rent, or admin fees. In this case they must return the money to you before serving a Section 21 You never received key paperwork for the property - the Energy Performance Certificate, the 'How to rent' guide, and a gas safety certificate (if there is gas) What to do if the Section 21 is valid You don't have to leave the property at the end of your Section 21 notice. Your landlord still has to apply to court for a possession order and a warrant for eviction, to use court bailiffs to evict you. If you are remaining in your property after the end of a Section 21 notice, make sure you inform your landlord and continue to pay rent while you look for another place to live. If you can't find somewhere to rent and are facing homelessness, tell your council immediately. They should be able to advise you on what to do and provide emergency temporary accommodation or other support. What is the section 21 rule and what are your rights as a renter? THE law - known as Section 21 - means a landlord can ask you to move out without needing a particular reason. The first step of every procedure is the section 21 notice - a letter of notification that the landlord must serve to the tenant, prior to the eviction. The notice to quit is purely informational and doesn't carry any legal power. If you've got a good relationship with your landlord, it might be worth asking them if you can stay in your home for longer. Send a letter to your landlord explaining your situation and keep a copy of any reply you get. Your landlord can't make you leave your home unless they've gone to court to get a possession order and a warrant for eviction. You might be able to challenge your eviction and stay in your home. A section 8 notice can require you to move sooner, but can only be served if the landlord has a reason, such as you breaking the terms of your tenancy. New rules introduced in October 2015 have made it harder to evict you for reporting problems with the property. If you're asked to leave because you've asked for repairs then you should see advice immediately. You can find more tips on how to challenge your eviction on Citizens Advice. 2
