Lost Ship Carrying $16 Billion Treasure Confirmed As "World's Richest Shipwreck", Sparks Ownership Battle
Colombian scholars have confirmed that the wreck discovered off the coast of Cartagena in 2015 is indeed the legendary San Jose galleon, which sank in 1708 during a fierce battle with the Royal Navy. The ship, dubbed the "holy grail of shipwrecks," was carrying treasure from Peru to Spain to fund the War of the Spanish Succession when it was intercepted by British forces led by Charles Wager.
As per The Express.co.uk, the San Jose galleon met its end when its powder magazines exploded during the battle, sending the ship and its treasure to the ocean floor. After being lost for centuries, an expedition in 2015 used underwater drones to locate the wreckage, and experts are now confident that the identity of the ship has been confirmed.
"This body of evidence substantiates the identification of the wreck as the San Jose Galleon, a hypothesis that has been put forward since its initial discovery in 2015," the academics found.
"The finding of cobs created in 1707 at the Lima Mint points to a vessel navigating the Tierra Firme route in the early 18th century. The San José Galleon is the only ship that matches these characteristics. This find presents a rare opportunity to explore an underwater archaeological site and deepen our understanding of colonial maritime trade and routes," they concluded.
Photographs of the wreck show silver coins minted in 1707 at the Lima Mint, Chinese porcelain from the Kangxi period (1662–1722), and cannons inscribed with markings dating back to 1665.
Who Owns The Treasure Now?
The discovery of the San Jose galleon's treasure has sparked a heated dispute over ownership, with multiple parties vying for the claim. The governments of Colombia, Spain, and Peru are all staking their claims, while indigenous communities and descendants of Peruvian miners are also seeking a share.
Additionally, the treasure hunting company Sea Search Armada, formerly known as Glocca Morra, claims a portion of the treasure, citing their earlier discovery of the wreckage in 1981. However, Colombia disputes this claim, and a $10 billion lawsuit is ongoing, adding complexity to the already contentious issue of who should rightfully own the treasure.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
6 months in Prem Nagar, lifetime in Shadipur: Inside convict marriages that shaped Andaman's local-born
Meerut: In the mid-19th century, on a strip of ground in Port Blair that would later be called Shadipur, men stood in straight rows under the watch of colonial warders. They were not soldiers, nor labourers seeking work. They were convicts — men who had survived years of penal labour, maintained spotless conduct, and earned the rare designation of first-class convict with a ticket-of-leave. Facing them were women, also convicts, brought from as far as Uttar Pradesh, Afghanistan, Karachi and Odisha. They walked slowly along the line, stopping when they found a man they chose. That moment—the meeting of two lives under the weight of chains—was the centrepiece of what the British called the "swayamvar parade". The match was only the beginning. For six months, the chosen couples lived in Prem Nagar — "Love Town" — a cluster of huts where they lived under constant oversight. A jury of officials decided whether they could marry formally and move to Shadipur, the "marriage settlement." Both places remain on the Port Blair map, unremarkable to the casual passer-by, but for 70,000 islanders today, they are points of origin. The Andaman Penal Settlement — kala paani — was born from the British response to the 1857 uprising. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo Thousands of men, freedom fighters and hardened criminals alike, were shipped across the Bay of Bengal to labour in a colony they would never leave. The marriage system was not designed for romance but for policy: a calculated measure to discipline convicts, settle them on land, and populate the remote outpost. From it grew what is now called the Local Born Pre-1942 community. Pronob Kumar Sircar, historian and author of 'The History of the Andaman Islands', said, "The system was layered. The jury assessed whether the couple had lived in harmony during the trial period. Only if satisfied would they approve formal marriage and allotment of land. The swayamvar was part of a colonial toolkit. The British sought to turn prisoners into settlers. They offered women, land and incentives to reshape the identity of these men—from convicts to colonisers. " Some unions trace directly to the revolt itself. Nine men from Mirzapur in Uttar Pradesh, among them Ayodhya Singh and Khedu Lakshman, were sent to the islands for killing the district magistrate and two British officers. Jaipal Singh, 68, a retired agriculturist and Ayodhya Singh's great-great-grandson, recalls family accounts of how his ancestor married an Odisha-born convict named Lalta Pradhan, known in settlement records as Billa, Convict No. 327. "As per the stories passed down, my ancestor once went back to his village, Samerpur, then in Banda district, but was turned away," Jaipal said. "The caste rules were rigid, his family refused to accept that he had married outside the caste, and his land had been confiscated. Relatives feared he would demand his share. He came back to the islands with his wife. There was no going back." Jhansi soldiers, too, became part of the colony's story. Itu Patel, Devi Prasad and others who had fought under Rani Lakshmi Bai arrived in the settlement and married through the same parade system. Their descendants—among them Dineshwar Lall and Dr Prem Kishen—still live on the islands. Dr Kishen, 77, an anaesthetist and great-grandson of Devi Prasad, says his family's oral history describes an Andamans of arid soil, dense forests, poisonous reptiles, and a survival rate barely above a third. "Later, the British shifted to generating revenue from the islands and brought in a 'brick & bouquet' approach—punishment with some incentives. Marriage became one such incentive, leading to the swayamvar parades," he said. Sircar says that colonial authorities erased caste markers among descendants, assigning surnames such as Ram and Lall to convicts from different regions. "From the parades in Shadipur to today's multi-generational households, these marriages were more than arrangements—they were a means to survive and a foundation for new lives in exile," he said. The system lasted into the early 20th century. "The British gave each newly married couple four acres of land, enough to start afresh," said Lall, Itu Patel's fourth-generation descendant. "But we were casteless in the eyes of the mainland. And since freedom fighters and hardened criminals had both gone through the same parades, everyone claimed to be a freedom fighter." Today, the streets of Shadipur and Prem Nagar carry no sign of the colonial experiment that created them. But for those who still call themselves local-born, the history is not in archives—it is in family names, land deeds, and a collective memory of how strangers in chains became the first families of the Andamans. ----------------- SIDEBAR: From exile to settlement: How the British built Andaman's penal colony British India established penal settlements in the Andaman Islands in the aftermath of the 1857 uprising. The first prisoners arrived in March 1858, tasked with clearing forest, building roads, and erecting colonial structures in harsh tropical conditions. Mortality rates were high due to disease, brutal labour, and inadequate food. Between 1858 and 1939, approximately 83,000 Indian and Burmese convicts were transported here, making it the largest such penal colony in the British Empire. Ross Island became a key administrative hub, while the term "kalapani" entered public memory as shorthand for exile and loss of caste. Women convicts, a smaller group, faced both hard labour and high mortality. From 1882 to 1887, female deaths averaged nearly 10 per 1,000 annually. Marriages were introduced partly to stabilise the male convict population and secure cooperation with colonial authorities. The construction of the Cellular Jail, completed in 1906, institutionalised solitary confinement for political prisoners, particularly those involved in India's independence movement. Today, the jail stands as a national memorial, but its history remains deeply entwined with the formation of the local-born community in the islands. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Striking tribute to a British Governor
The striking equestrian statue near the Island Grounds in Chennai is that of Sir Thomas Munro, a lion among British administrators. Installed in 1839, the lack of saddle and stirrups on the statue has long been a subject of controversy. One theory holds that this is because Francis Chantrey, the sculptor, forgot them. Another says Munro, a riding enthusiast, preferred to ride bareback. Sir Munro was Governor of Madras from 1820 till his death in 1827, and he had served in India for 40 years before that. The second of five sons of a Glasgow merchant, Thomas Munro was born on May 27, 1761. He landed in Madras early in 1780 and got the opportunity for active service within six months. Starting at the lowest rung as a soldier, he rose to the top office in the province, and he rejected the offer of Governor-Generalship.
Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
How I Conquered ‘Kindergarten Panic' in the Era of School Choice
When I was growing up in the Sacramento suburbs in the 1990s, kindergarten enrollment involved very little decision-making. My mother simply sent us to the elementary school closest to home. Now as a parent in Los Angeles, I discovered that finding a kindergarten is anything but simple. I report on education, yet the system of enrolling in this sprawling, metropolitan school district still overwhelmed me. For years, I'd heard chatter in my mom group about permits, lotteries, point systems, school ratings and the wisdom of buying a house zoned for a 'bad' school. Finding the best fit for my son soon became a part-time job. I learned my experience is increasingly common. Beyond sending their children to their zoned school, many parents can now apply to magnet programs, dual-immersion, gifted-and-talented tracks and publicly funded charter schools. Others opt to home-school or choose private school. 'Raising kids has always been work. But this idea of school choice adds a new layer of intensity,' says Bailey Brown, a Spelman College sociologist who spent years researching the complicated school-search process in New York City, the nation's largest school system. Federal data shows that nationwide, 42% of parents have choice within public-school systems, with 17% of public-school students attending a chosen rather than assigned school. In her new book, 'Kindergarten Panic,' Brown argues the school search is a burden that is being thrust upon parents—mostly mothers—whether they like it or not. While more options help parents find the best school, not everyone knows how to navigate the process, Brown found. Middle-income parents were more likely than low-income families to learn how to work the system and enroll children in higher-performing schools. Brown's findings helped me make sense of my own search, which began more than a year before my son started kindergarten. I live three blocks from a school that, like my home, dates back 100 years. The initial tour disappointed me—the kindergarten play area offered little beyond hot asphalt and a few tricycles. I was concerned that enrollment had fallen below 250 for the eight grades the school serves. What if the school kept dwindling? So I began to look around. On tours of two nearby schools, parents filled the multipurpose rooms and queued on a wait list to get in. Both are sought-after locally and part of the school-choice system because of their gifted-and-talented programs. There was only one problem, we learned as we walked down halls filled with cheerful children and bright murals: So many kids within the boundaries now attended that no one else stood much of a chance. That didn't stop the dozens of touring parents from seeking an edge. They asked variations of: So you let in two students from outside the neighborhood last year—what exactly did they do? A Spanish-language dual-immersion program within walking distance gave me my first glimmer of hope. Two parents with children at the school helped lead the tour and gushed about their experience. A grant meant the yard was being 'greened,' offering a break from the typical sea of asphalt. The Spanish program competed with a more well-established dual immersion down the street but had grown so popular it could no longer take everyone who applied. I detoured from my neighborhood to visit a school I'd long pined for in the district next door, one with an Italian-language immersion program. Though I'm Italian-American on both sides, I have long struggled to master the language. Having my son learn it at such a young age sounded idyllic. Our upbeat tour guide quickly walked us around the yard before launching into an hour-long slideshow on the pedagogy of dual-language immersion learning. As the minutes ticked by, I grew confused about why she was trying to sell us. The school is incredibly popular and we just wanted to know how to get in. She finally got to that question on the last slide. The school did take applications from families outside the district, but our priority would fall to the bottom. Still, kids with some Italian knowledge got an edge, so I eagerly followed up to tell them my son had been taking weekend lessons for a few years. A friend connected me to a mom whose daughter attends my zoned school. Sure, she said, the play yard only has tricycles, but her window overlooks it and she sees kids play happily all day. The teachers, she said, have worked there for years, and she loves walking to school and being part of the community. I appreciated the testimonial but remained unconvinced. With so many schools offering something unique, picking a standard neighborhood school felt like settling. On a lark I toured a nearby Waldorf-inspired charter school. We saw kindergartners baking bread and middle-schoolers learning a dance that triggered bad flashbacks to square dancing as a child. In the 'handwork' room, parents cross-stitched while our guide explained that all students learn crafts. 'What if my son doesn't want to knit?' one mom asked. The guide replied: 'Everyone can make a bunny. There are many different ways to do it.' I stifled a laugh. Each tour touted the school's distinction: a visual and performing-arts focus at one, a science and math bent at another. By the 10th tour, I had refined my questions. Do students get two recesses a day, or one? Do they take field trips? Is there after-school child care? Months later, decision day arrived. Parents anxiously awaited notice. In the neighboring district, emails went out at 5 p.m. My friends began texting their results. My son had been waitlisted for the Italian program. As I rapidly cycled through grief and contingency planning, I checked my email again. There, just hours after the initial email, was another message offering my son a spot. I was ecstatic. Brown said she hopes her research helps school districts understand parents need more support in the search process. Tools like hotlines or simplified applications would help—as would making assigned schools more attractive. In the vast Los Angeles Unified School District, families always have a seat at their neighborhood school but can also apply to 700 specialty programs. A district spokesman said that while navigating the options can feel complex, the district has tried to streamline the application and offer support such as regional fairs, targeted outreach and enrollment counselors. In her work, Brown saw the 'panic' of the kindergarten search manifest in many ways, including in the pressure parents put on themselves to make the perfect choice. 'They thought it was a reflection,' she said, 'of who they were as a parent.' Write to Sara Randazzo at
