Voices: Britain isn't broken, but people believe it is, and that is a big problem for Keir Starmer
There is less crime in Britain today than there has been for decades, Nelson pointed out at one of Farage's media conferences this week.
This reduction in crime is nothing to do with people not bothering to report crime to the police any more, because the figures come from the Crime Survey for England and Wales, a large survey of a representative sample of the population that asks people if they have been the victim of a crime in the previous 12 months. The number of crimes has fallen by four-fifths since 1995.
Farage waved the Crime Survey aside, saying it was 'discredited' because it does not include shoplifting. It doesn't, because it asks people about crimes of which they have personally been the victim, and it is true that shoplifting has increased. But that does not mean the Crime Survey is discredited. On the contrary, it is the best and most reliable evidence, and it is especially useful for measuring trends over time, because it is not affected by changes in the way police record crime.
What did Farage say to that? 'We all know that crime has risen significantly over the course of the last few years.' A big welcome back, please, to that dread phrase, 'we all know'. For years I would point out that four public inquiries had found that Tony Blair told the truth about Iraq, only to be told that 'we all know' he didn't.
As Nelson comments: 'This is the politics of perception.' As he points out in an excellent article in The Times today, it is the same with road safety, air pollution, sewage, and living standards. 'We all know' they are getting worse – when in actual fact they are getting better.
So it does not matter to most people what the Crime Survey says. Most people believe that crime is rising, and the numbers who believe that have not changed over the years that crime has been falling. People are influenced by reports of terrible things happening to other people, and misremember their own experience. Anything more than five or 10 years ago was a golden age when there was some decent music in the charts and Mars bars weren't behind perspex screens.
Why, though, has what 'we all know' become so much worse in the past year? Probably because some highly visible crimes have increased: shoplifting, phone thefts and graffiti. These are crimes that make people feel threatened by disorder, even as more of us than ever report feeling safe walking alone in their local area at night.
What is corrosive is the perception – 'we all know' – that the authorities are not securely in control. Behind that perception lies the reality of asylum-seeker hotels and a government that is powerless to stop the boats. What has changed since the election is that Farage is more active, at the head of a social-media movement and a TV channel, GB News, dedicated to portraying the country as a hellhole.
The intensity of this campaign to spread fear and insecurity seems to have reached a critical mass that is dangerous to Keir Starmer. He cannot fight it with facts – or not only with facts – because the answer will always be that 'we all know' that the facts are wrong.
As Ian Leslie, the advertising executive turned social commentator says, 'Instead of asking, 'Why are people angry?' we should ask, 'What are we missing?''
What the government needs is to take visible and forceful action on the things that people care about, the shoplifting, phone snatching and graffiti, but above all on asylum hotels and stopping the boats.
So far, Starmer has tried to do all these things, but limply. There have been roundtables at No 10 with the police and representatives of the retail industry and phone companies. Even these feeble initiatives have been undermined by people in authority doing foolish things, such as the police in Wales telling off a shopkeeper for calling thieves 'scumbags' and Andy Lord, the London Underground boss who accused citizen graffiti-removers of defacing trains themselves so that they could pose as heroes for cleaning it up.
Most importantly, Starmer now has a treaty with France to return some of the cross-Channel migrants, but it will take a long time to build up to returning all or nearly all those who arrive – at which point the crossings would stop – and it is not clear that the French are in it for the long haul.
One thing that Tony Blair understood, as he faced spikes of street crime, anti-social behaviour and asylum-seeker numbers, was the importance of 'grip'. It may sound like annoying spin-speak, but it was critical to communicating that he understood how people felt and he was doing something about it.
Starmer should be grateful to Fraser Nelson, formerly of The Spectator, for pointing out that we are safer, richer and healthier than ever before – but if the perception is that we are not, the government has to get a grip on what 'we all know'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'I'm a victim of cuckooing - I'm ashamed, my Thornton Heath home wasn't mine anymore'
'I felt like it wasn't my home anymore. It was awful. I felt ashamed that I let the situation happen... I'm a grown man,' Richard said, talking to me in his small flat in Thornton Heath. Richard, whose real name we aren't using for his safety, was a victim of cuckooing, where criminals take over a vulnerable person's home to deal, store or take drugs. Richard's vulnerability due to his mental health – he said he 'hears voices' - was exploited by a group of people who used his home as a drug den. 'It started when they knocked on my door. They were homeless, or so they said, so I let them stay for a little bit but they started to take over. I didn't say anything - I thought they would just leave eventually... out of politeness - but they started inviting their friends over and would stay for nights at a time,' Richard said. 'They used to sit outside the front door smoking. The neighbours blamed me. I felt so embarrassed. I eventually asked them to leave. They wouldn't. It got confrontational and we had a few scuffles.' The group came and went from Richard's home as if it belonged to them for over a year but Richard is hopeful that's now over following a police intervention. Chief Inspector James Weston, whose team were called to Richard's flat on June 29, said: 'We found three drug users inside along with a zombie knife. 'Two of them were on his sofa and one was on the bed next to it, so Richard didn't even have anywhere to sit. These criminals completely take over the home.' Richard said the group have returned since the police visit but he stood firm and turned them away. But with Thornton Heath and surrounding areas being a hot spot for county lines operations, many other vulnerable people have found themselves in the same position as Richard. I joined Met Police and Croydon Council officers on Tuesday, August 5, as they made visits to addresses which have been cuckooed in the past with the aim of safeguarding the victims and building intel to target the perpetrators. It took us to the home of a man in his late 60s – we'll call him Andy rather than his real name - who was very vulnerable because of a brain injury. Just days before our visit, officers attended Andy's home following a call about his welfare from a concerned neighbour. When police knocked on his door a man jumped out of the window and ran away, officers then found two zombie knives at the scene. On returning to Andy's address a few days later, we saw evidence that his living room had been taken over by drug dealers. A large amount of white powder – most likely a cutting agent to mix with drugs – was found alongside other drug paraphernalia and a broken knuckle duster. A knuckle duster found in Andy's home (Image: Newsquest) The lightbulb was removed from the living room, which officers believed may have been an attempt by the drug dealers to make the room unusable for Andy – who said 'I don't sit in the living room, I just sit in my bedroom.' Sergeant George Bartlett said: 'He's a prisoner in his own home, and he's not the only one.' Cuckooing victims are frequently subjected to threats or actual violence and abuse to keep them compliant. Often the victims are substance abusers, but people with disabilities are also seen as fair game for these criminals. In Andy and Richard's cases the police have been able to put a stop to the abuse before it escalated any further, but in September of last year a woman in north London a suspected cuckooing victim jumped to her death from her balcony. Sergeant Bartlett said local officers team are committed to stamping out cuckooing in the Croydon. 'If we can work together – local officers, the local authority, county lines, Project Adder (addiction, diversion, disruption, enforcement and recovery) - we can help,' he said.
CNN
4 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump gets what he wants in DC crackdown as Democrats fumble response
Donald Trump FacebookTweetLink President Donald Trump's militarized crime crackdown in Washington, DC, is a clarifying political moment. It's again exposed Democrats' struggles to combat Trump's hardline law-and-order rhetoric and splits within their party that the president exploited to win two elections. Party leaders who keep citing statistics showing crime coming down are hardly consoling residents of a relatively small city that has seen 100 homicides this year. Trump might be better at recognizing fears of violent crime. But as usual, he's adopted an extreme position, declaring a state of emergency when one doesn't exist. He has few ideas to tackle the underlying causes of crime. He demonizes the homeless, but his economic policies could make the problem worse. Like his peace deals and trade agreements, his crime purge may be mostly for show. Residents of the District of Columbia, meanwhile, have a right to feel unsafe. Trump's surge of federal officers and soldiers onto the streets might fill personnel shortages in the police department. But the move is likely temporary, and the same dangers will return once the city is no longer Trump's prop. This all points to a big problem with the vicious politics of the Trump era. Every issue gets boiled down to partisan fights that forestall solutions and good governance. The fight against crime is nuanced. Three things can be true at once. Namely, that Democrats are hopeless at coining winning messaging; Trump's drastic measures do fit into an increasingly chilling turn toward authoritarianism; and while crime may be down, DC can be dangerous. The city in many ways falls short of what Americans might want for the capital of a great nation. Trump's bombastic White House press conference on Monday, when he announced his takeover of DC's Metropolitan Police Department, was characteristic demagoguery designed to appeal to his hard-core voters. It also underscored how Democrats are hampered by the lack of their own powerful figurehead. Nine months after the last election and 14 before the next one, the party has no one with the skill to parry Trump's flood-the-zone presidency. Once-in-a-generation communicators like presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama had the capacity to shape language and positions appealing to multiple constituencies at once. Party lawmakers and candidates then adopted the messaging as their own. Great politicians are teachers; they intuit the electorate's emotions and fears and shape persuasive arguments and policy. But such linguistic dexterity was missing in initial Democratic reactions to the Trump crime surge. Most party leaders raced to proclaim yet another power grab by a wannabe dictator rather than touching on the perils of violent crime. 'For all the talk Republicans give about giving their localities their rights, where are they now?' Senate House Minority Leader Chuck Schumer wrote on X, saying the crackdown was merely an attempt to detract from Trump scandals. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries wrote on the same site that 'the crime scene in D.C. most damaging to everyday Americans is at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.' Maryland Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin told CNN's Kasie Hunt on Monday that Trump wasn't reacting to a 'real emergency' but was instead trying to deflect from his past ties to accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. 'He doesn't want to release the Epstein files. So, he wants everybody to look in another direction,' Raskin said. And a group of Democratic lawmakers from Maryland and Virginia warned of the 'soft launch of authoritarianism.' They noted that crime was still too high for those victimized in the final sentence of a long statement. None of these arguments are necessarily wrong. But by focusing first on Trump's repressive motives, they do not immediately address voter concerns over safety. This recalls the last election. When Democrats failed to meet Americans' worries about high immigration rates and high prices, they opened a lane for Trump and his extreme solutions. Saving democracy is great. But people need to feel secure first. Some Democratic strategists want their party to do better. 'Democrats, listen to me, please. Talk about wanting a safe street and lean into wanting safe neighborhoods, while at the same time saying we shouldn't have federal officers in our streets,' Chuck Rocha, one Democratic consultant, told Audie Cornish on 'CNN This Morning.' Democrats have long struggled to make convincing arguments on crime and justice — issues that tease out divisions between the party's right and left flanks and societal and racial themes that are central to its heritage and ideology. The most recent example was over the murder of Minnesota man George Floyd in 2020 by a police officer. Nationwide protests pushed the party to the left amid outrage at police brutality and a justice system that often fails Black Americans. But when some progressive activists demanded the defunding of the police, they handed a priceless political weapon to Republicans and alienated many moderates and independents. This is not a new problem. President Bill Clinton and then-Sen. Joe Biden seemed to have found the answer to the left's vulnerability on law and order in the 1990s by writing crime bills that boosted law enforcement funding, expanded the death penalty and mandated life in prison for criminals with three or more felony convictions. This insulated Democrats from conservative claims that they were weak on crime. But the bills had unintended consequences. They ushered in an era of mass incarceration in which Black Americans were disproportionately condemned to life in overcrowded prisons for comparatively minor offenses. The political impact was corrosive, haunting then-candidate Hillary Clinton in her 2016 primary campaign and Biden in his 2020 White House bid. This week is a reminder that Democrats are still vulnerable to the classic GOP law-and-order gambit deployed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, and most ruthlessly by Trump. It's far easier to demonize criminals than to produce real solutions. But Democrats need to come up with something before 2028. Their position is similar to that of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, a political communicator on the same plane as Bill Clinton. As opposition leader, Blair needed to win over Britons who wanted more law enforcement while reassuring core Labour Party voters concerned with the socioeconomic origins of crime. He became known for a slogan — 'tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime' — that positioned him as a new kind of progressive politician with a strong appeal to the critical center. It stole the Conservative Party's tough-on-crime mantra and helped win the 1997 election. The Democrats' best hope of a similar act of triangulation might lie with its governors, some of whom may run for president in 2028, and who are already experienced at the executive level of the nuances of addressing crime. One of their number, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, told CNN's Anderson Cooper on Tuesday that Trump was using the military 'as a cudgel and as a tool to be able to advance his political purposes.' Moore said Trump should emulate methods which he said had reduced homicides and other violent crimes in Baltimore. 'I did it without ever having to once operationalize our National Guard to do municipal policing,' Moore said. While Democratic responses to Trump were politically ineffective, they were often based in truth. Raskin, for instance, pointed out that the Trump's claim to be a champion of the law was absurd. The largest mass crime event in recent years in Washington, DC, was precipitated by the president — the mob assault by supporters he incited against the US Capitol on January 6, 2021. The Maryland Democrat argued that if Trump were serious about law and order, 'he would not have pardoned 1,600 insurrectionists and violent cop beaters.' By sending National Guard soldiers into the streets in the absence of a crisis, Trump really is adopting the intimidatory tactics of strongman leaders. Some critics worry that his federalization of the capital police force is a test run for a later authoritarian takeover of the city. And the president may also foment lawlessness with his warning that cops could 'do whatever they hell they want.' If Trump really wanted to improve conditions in Washington, he might reverse the GOP-led Congress's $1 billion budget cut to the city that local officials warn will hit public schools, public safety and an overstretched police department. And does the White House have any long-term plans beyond window dressing and shows of force? White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday said that homeless people in the city had a choice of shelters, addiction and mental health services, 'or jail.' She had no specifics on any new administration housing or social services options or long-term care and solutions. But Trump already has what he wants. Military vehicles lined up Wednesday night near the Washington Monument in a striking image that captured his obsession with military projection and the challenges to US founding values his actions represent.
Bloomberg
5 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
The Nuclear Test That Britain Can't Afford to Fail
The UK is embarking on its most ambitious nuclear expansion in decades. It has committed billions of pounds to new projects, including a large-scale reactor in the southeast, a proposed small modular reactor led by Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc, and some of the world's most advanced fusion research. After decades of drift, this marks a welcome shift. But it's also a test — not just of energy policy but also of Britain's ability to take on big projects of all kinds. Nuclear is one of the few low-carbon technologies capable of delivering reliable, round-the-clock baseload power at scale. With all but one of the UK's existing reactors set to retire, new capacity is urgently needed. Industrial electricity prices are roughly four times higher than in the US and 46% above the median for advanced economies, squeezing consumers and companies alike.
