India plays key role in bringing out FATF's latest report on terrorist financing risks
It is learnt that the United Nations Security Council Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate and France were the co-leads for the project. India also played a significant role in bringing out the report, which has, for the first time,e recognised state sponsorship as a means to fund and support terrorism.
'We have long identified Pakistan as a state that sponsors terrorism. India's 2022 National Risk Assessment (NRA) on Money Laundering and Terror Financing flagged state-sponsored terrorism — particularly from Pakistan — as a major concern. Accordingly, all financial institutions, including banks, are required to do enhanced due diligence with respect to any transaction related to Pakistan,' said a government official.
The findings highlighted in the FATF report are expected to reflect in the framing of subsequent NRAs of all the other countries. The United States, in its 2024 National Terrorist Financing Risk Assessment, has already noted that it faced terrorism threats from terror groups in Pakistan, apart from Afghanistan, Southeast Asia, and East Africa.
'Being an NRA, it is followed by all U.S. banks while adhering to their KYC guidelines. They are cautious about transactions with Pakistan, and this increases the cost of doing business for the Pakistani establishment and businesses. After this FATF Risk report — which carries higher precedence over NRAs — the U.S. and other countries will have to acknowledge the sources of state-sponsored terrorism in their risk assessments,' the official said.
In the FATF report, the global money laundering and terror financing watchdog has considered the inputs received from delegations and publicly available sources of information. They indicated that certain terror outfits had been and continued to receive financial and other forms of support from several national governments.
'While the FATF has not developed a typology specific to state-sponsored terrorism, it has explicitly noted that the funding of terrorism, or the resourcing of a terrorist entity, by any state, is incompatible with adherence to the FATF Standards and mandate, as well as the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, and paragraphs 1(a) and 2(a) of UNSC Resolution 1373 (2001),' it said.
The report recognised that the possibility of state-sponsored terrorism was a 'long-standing terror financing threat to international peace and security, as well as to the stability of regional financial and political systems.'
'Moreover, it undermines the effectiveness of FATF activities that are intended to support governments in adopting best practices to detect, deter, and otherwise disrupt terror financing,' it added.
'Among the various suspect modus operandi adopted for state sponsoring of terror outfits is the ongoing smuggling of oil from Iran to Pakistan. There is a high risk of funds so generated being used to finance terrorist activities,' said another official.
According to the report, sham non-profit organisations are also being used by Pakistan-based terror outfits such as Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba, both associated with the Al Qaeda, to raise, store, and move funds on the false pretext of charitable work. The outfits were reported to have abused humanitarian assistance programmes using such entities to finance their operational activities.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
Blanket ban on online money games to e-sports push, how new Bill proposes to alter gaming space
The bill is understood to have been considered in light of not just gaming addiction among the youth, but also concerns over cross-border and inter-state operations by extremists facilitating money laundering and terror financing. It proposes to outlaw all online betting and gambling activities, online fantasy sports, online casino games, including poker and blackjack, and online lotteries. New Delhi: From completely prohibiting 'online money games', including fantasy sports like Dream11, to promoting e-sports, like DOTA 2, the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 tabled in the Lok Sabha Wednesday proposes to alter the multi-billion-dollar online gaming industry. Notably, a Financial Action Task Force (FATF) report released last month had flagged that terrorists and extremists are increasingly using platforms for online gaming as a hunting ground for new recruits as well to raise and move funds. Mumbai-based technology and gaming lawyer Jay Sayta told ThePrint that traditionally, there has been a difference between skill-based and chance-based games, and that any game played online, if it was a game of skill, was permitted so far, even if it involved money. Sayta has represented online gaming companies in courts. 'But this bill makes no difference between online games of skill and chance. It says whether it is a game of skill or chance, any game played for stakes or money or money's worth is called an online money game, and there is a prohibition on such games, including endorsement, banking services, etc for them,' he said. The bill, therefore, proposes a complete ban on any online game played with money or money's worth, with the expectation of winning anything. This would impact all real money gaming apps, including Dream11, Rummy, Ludo, Winzo or Zupee. The bill carves out an exception, allowing e-sports like Dota 2 or Counter-Strike, and online social games, like Candy Crush or Ludo, which are purely for recreational or educational purposes, and don't involve money. India has a patchwork of laws on the issue currently, with several states, including Karnataka, having enacted different laws on online gaming, and high courts having given different rulings on such laws. This is because gambling & betting is a state subject under the Constitution of India. What the bill bars The new bill intends to prohibit 'online money games', which allow users to deposit money in the hope of making more money, and online money gaming services. According to the definition sought to be introduced in law, an 'online money game' would include an online game—irrespective of whether such a game is based on skill or chance or both— in which users pay fees, deposit money, or other stakes, in expectation of monetary returns. Anybody offering online money gaming services can be punished with a three-year jail term or a fine of up to Rs 1 crore or both, according to the draft bill. It also prohibits advertisements related to online money games in any media, purportedly including WhatsApp, or by social media influencers. Anybody who contravenes this can be punished with a two-year jail term or a fine of up to Rs 50 lakh or both. Additionally, the bill prohibits banks and financial institutions from facilitating any transaction or funds towards payment for any online money gaming service. Violation of this provision allows for punishment of up to three years or a fine of Rs 1 crore or both. Repeat offences can attract enhanced penalties, including imprisonment of three to five years, and fines up to Rs 2 crore. The bill also allows for blocking access to unlawful gaming platforms under the Information Technology Act, 2000. What the bill allows The draft bill proposes to empower the central government to take steps to recognise e-sports as a legitimate form of competitive sport in India. According to the draft bill, e-sports means an online game which may involve organised competitive events between individuals or teams, conducted in multiplayer format. These include games recognised by the National Olympic Committee or National Paralympic Committee or National Sports Federation or Regional Sports Federation. However, such an e-sport should not involve placing of bets, wagers or any other stakes by any person. Several Esports tournaments have come up in the past few years, including the Commonwealth Esports Championship 2022, in which the Indian Dota 2 team won the bronze medal. The bill also empowers the central government to take steps to recognise, categorise and register 'online social games' and facilitate their development and availability for recreational and educational purposes. 'Online social game' may include an online game which does not involve staking of money or other stakes, or participation with the expectation of winning in return of money. Such games are offered solely for entertainment, recreation or skill-development purposes. The game may allow access through payment of a subscription or a one time access fee, as long as the payment is not in the nature of a stake or a wager. The draft bill goes on to establish or designate an authority for recognition, promotion and development of e-sports and online social games. (Edited by Nida Fatima Siddiqui) Also Read: Spotlight on online gaming amid fraud, money laundering cases. MHA, MeitY & ED to firm up regulations


India.com
6 hours ago
- India.com
Will Congress support the blanket ban on real money gaming? Kharge issues Big Statement, says it will kill...
Bengaluru: Karnataka IT and Biotechnology Minister Priyank Kharge on Wednesday slammed the Centre's decision to impose a blanket ban on online real money gaming (RMG), calling it 'another masterstroke by Modi Sarkar in bad policy making.' Kharge, son of Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, said the decision would hit state revenues, jobs and investments. 'India earns Rs 20,000 crore annually from GST and income tax via online RMG. The ban means states lose this revenue stream,' he said in a post on 'X'. The minister noted that over 2,000 gaming startups and more than two lakh jobs in IT, AI and design would be at risk. 'A ban kills India's gaming talent pool and pushes entrepreneurs abroad,' Kharge said, adding that Rs 23,000 crore of foreign direct investment in the last five years could dry up and about Rs 7,000 crore spent annually on ads, data centres, sponsorships and cyber security would vanish overnight. Warning of unintended consequences, the minister said, 'Bans don't stop addiction or suicides. Instead, they push users to unregulated offshore platforms worth Rs 8.2 lakh crore annually where government has no control at all. 'Security risks: Unregulated sites ensure money laundering, terror financing, data theft. Even FATF and Rashtriya Raksha University warn against such risks.' Noting that the Supreme Court is still deciding whether the Centre or states have the power to regulate, Kharge questioned 'Why the rush to ban now?' He said prohibition is not the solution and called for regulating skill-based platforms, enforcing IT Rules, 2021, and whitelisting legitimate operators. 'A well-balanced regulation will ensure jobs, revenue, safer users, national security and global innovation,' he said, cautioning that 'a blanket ban will not only lead to revenue loss, but will give rise to illegal markets that might threaten national security and, of course, there will be a huge innovation setback. Regulation is the way forward.' The proposed promotion and regulation of online gaming bill, cleared by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday, prohibits online money gaming or its ads, and prescribes imprisonment or fine, or both, for those offering or advertising them, as it seeks to differentiate such games from eSports or online social games, according to a source. (With PTI Inputs)


Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Blanket ban on online real money gaming will kill jobs, revenue, innovation: Priyank Kharge
Karnataka IT and Biotechnology Minister Priyank Kharge on Wednesday criticised the Centre's decision to impose a blanket ban on online real money gaming (RMG), calling it "another masterstroke by Modi Sarkar in bad policy making."Kharge, son of Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, said the decision would hit state revenues, jobs and investments."India earns Rs 20,000 crore annually from GST and income tax via online RMG. The ban means states lose this revenue stream," he said in a post on 'X'.The minister noted that over 2,000 gaming startups and more than two lakh jobs in IT, AI and design would be at of unintended consequences, the minister said, "Bans don't stop addiction or suicides. Instead, they push users to unregulated offshore platforms worth Rs 8.2 lakh crore annually where government has no control at all."Security risks: Unregulated sites ensure money laundering, terror financing, data theft. Even FATF and Rashtriya Raksha University warn against such risks."Noting that the Supreme Court is still deciding whether the Centre or states have the power to regulate, Kharge questioned "Why the rush to ban now?"He said prohibition is not the solution and called for regulating skill-based platforms, enforcing IT Rules, 2021, and whitelisting legitimate operators."A well-balanced regulation will ensure jobs, revenue, safer users, national security and global innovation," he said, cautioning that "a blanket ban will not only lead to revenue loss, but will give rise to illegal markets that might threaten national security and, of course, there will be a huge innovation setback. Regulation is the way forward."The proposed promotion and regulation of online gaming bill, cleared by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday, prohibits online money gaming or its ads, and prescribes imprisonment or fine, or both, for those offering or advertising them, as it seeks to differentiate such games from eSports or online social games, according to a the same time, the bill calls for promotion of eSports and online social games, the source said, adding that it acknowledges that formal recognition of eSports will enable India to tune into global competitive gaming landscape, spur innovation, create opportunities for Indian startup ecosystem and make the country a global magnate for game bill proposes that any person offering online money gaming service in violation of the stipulated provisions will face imprisonment of up to three years or a fine that may extend to Rs 1 crore, or provisions also stipulate imprisonment of up to two years and or a fine of up to Rs 50 lakh, or both, for those indulging in advertisements in contravention of rules. Also, those engaging in any transaction or authorisation of funds will be liable for up to three years imprisonment, or a fine up to Rs 1 crore or both, according to the source.