
Rep. Jasmine Crockett is a no-show boss from hell who terrorizes staffers, aides say: 'All diva, no wow'
The liberal loudmouth, 44, has rocketed to fame since taking office in January 2023 as a fiery assailant of the Republican president and his allies.
But three sources who have worked with or for Crockett say she's rarely present when TV cameras aren't rolling — and terrorizes staff when she does appear.
Crockett is not often found at her government-provided suite in the Longworth House Office Building, with one insider saying she prefers to work from her nearby luxury apartment building, sometimes for weeks on end.
3 Rep. Jasmine Crockett has been among the loudest Democrats in Congress since taking office in 2023.
Houston Chronicle via Getty Images
'She is laying around her apartment, won't come into the office, and is really just indifferent to staff and will scream at them,' the former aide said.
'She is never in the office and is very disengaged. She does her bulls— that goes viral, and then freaks out over the most random things.'
A second source close to Crockett's team added: 'It is widely known that she's not nice to staff and is just not a really dedicated member focused on constituents.'
'She is focused almost exclusively on being an influencer, not a member of Congress,' said a third source who has worked with Crockett, describing her as 'all diva, no wow.'
'You're stupid if you think so'
When Crockett does show up for work on Capitol Hill — often to attend a committee hearing where she deploys a made-for-social media attack on Trump — she prefers to have a staff member drive her the short distance to her office in a rented car rather than the staffer's own, a cheaper option commonly used by lawmakers.
The staffer is expected to stand outside the vehicle, which 'has to be an Escalade' or similar upscale make, and open the door for her.
3 Sources describe the Democrat as a disengaged public servant when the cameras aren't rolling.
AP
'You're technically allowed to do this but it's wildly inefficient. Instead of using the scheduler's car, she rents a car every week in DC,' one source said.
'She expects her staff to drive her around while she's in the back seat,' they added, calling it a 'power play' akin to 'treating the staffer like an Uber driver.'
Crockett, a former criminal defense attorney and Texas state legislator, burst into the national spotlight in May 2024 when she attacked Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) at a committee hearing for having a 'bleach blonde bad built butch body' after Greene ridiculed her 'fake eyelashes.'
While Crockett tried to fundraise off the 'Real Housewives'-style viral clash, the congresswoman's staff — which includes multiple gay and lesbian members — were left with mixed feelings.
Complaints poured in from lesbians who objected to Crockett's derogatory use of the term 'butch' to attack Greene, which even left some aides uneasy.
'She told her gay staff members, 'That's not offensive. You're stupid if you think so',' a former aide recounted to the Post. 'It was kind of like how Trump says, 'The gays love me'.'
Three months later, Crockett was given a coveted speaking slot at the Democratic National Convention, where she ripped the former and future president as a 'vindictive vile villain.'
'Toxic staff environment'
Crockett has burned through employees at such a pace that she's becoming known as a present-day version of the late Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas), long known as the Capitol's toughest boss.
A number of staff have become fed up with their treatment, while others have either been fired or left on their own — a distinction often difficult to discern in Washington.
Some former aides cited fear of retribution when declining to participate in this story.
'She thinks she's her own best adviser, she knows best, and has this toxic staff environment,' a source said. 'She gets rid of press people because she's like, 'I do all of the press stuff.''
On one occasion described to The Post, Crockett reduced a legislative aide to tears, bellowing: 'Do you really want to be here? And if not you can leave!'
3 'The only person that she thinks about and cares about is herself,' a former Democratic aide said of Crockett.
REUTERS
Another aide, a young black woman, was fired abruptly and confided to a colleague: 'I don't want to hear Jasmine Crockett talk about helping black women when she just fired one for no reason!'
Capitol Hill jobs often are filled based on personal connections and openings are circulated among friend groups.
A source told The Post that a job listing for Crockett's team recently was shared among a large group of black Democratic women — but nobody expressed interest in the gig.
'You would think working for a black woman, if you were a young black woman or a young person of color, you would feel empowered in that space,' said a former Democratic congressional aide.
'But truly, the only person that she thinks about and cares about is herself.
'The staff is really just an island unto itself, because she doesn't care about the local issues happening in her district,' this person added. 'She's more focused on, 'Get me on 'The View,' get me on this late night talk show.
'A lot of [congressional] hearings are on the most boring, basic s—. So how is it at every hearing, it's about Trump? It's about Trump again and again and again. And it's like, she's not actually doing any real work. She's at a hearing — we can be talking about the budget, they can be talking about appropriations — and she brings it back to Trump every time,' the source griped.
'She causes some kind of tension and issue, the hearing has to stop, the chairman has to bang the gavel. It's like a spectacle and a show … Not everything has to be clipped for MSNBC.'
Crockett has also cycled through several chiefs of staff, with one observer saying it's 'because they want her to do her actual job, and the actual job of a member of Congress isn't fun and glamorous. So unless you are somebody willing to say yes to all of the outrageous things she would like to do, you're not gonna last long.'
'This looks like crap'
Crockett hasn't been coy about her treatment of staff — recently offering two examples of rough treatment of subordinates in an interview with Atlantic magazine journalist Elaine Godfrey.
'Behind the scenes, the representative speaks casually,' Godfrey reported.
'She can also be brusque. During our interview at the Waldorf, she dialed up a staffer in DC in front of me and scolded him for an unclear note on her schedule. Another time, in the car, after an aide brought Crockett a paper bag full of food from a fundraiser, she peered inside, scrunched her nose, and said, 'This looks like crap.''
The Texas congresswoman, despite granting Godfrey access for the profile, attempted to retract her interview remarks when the journalist didn't ask her permission to request comment from other members of Congress, most of whom reportedly would not volunteer flattering words.
The lawmaker claimed she was 'shutting down the profile and revoking all permissions.'
It wasn't Crockett's first self-inflicted PR problem.
In May, she allegedly boarded a commercial flight ahead of two handicapped people, according to Rep. Lisa McClain (R-Mich.).
'Her cutting in line in front of a handicapped person is really indicative of the type of person she is,' said a source who has worked with Crockett. 'She is interpersonally very rude and doesn't get along well with people.'
The Post did not receive a reply after sending multiple detailed emails requesting comment to a press-request email advertised on Crockett's website.
Nobody answered the phones at her DC or Dallas offices during the workday; both went straight to voicemail.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Federal court upholds Oklahoma law banning gender-affirming care for minors
A federal appeals court upheld an Oklahoma law banning gender-affirming care for minors Wednesday in a ruling hinging on a June Supreme Court decision to uphold a similar law in Tennessee. Oklahoma's Senate Bill 613, passed by the state's Republican-controlled Legislature and signed into law by Gov. Kevin Stitt (R) in 2023, makes it a felony for health care workers to provide treatments including puberty-blocking drugs and hormones to affirm a minor's 'perception of his or her gender or biological sex, if that perception is inconsistent with the minor's biological sex.' Five families of transgender children and an Oklahoma City physician specializing in adolescent medicine challenged the state's ban, arguing it violated their constitutional rights. The plaintiffs, represented by Lambda Legal, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the ACLU of Oklahoma, claimed state lawmakers adopted S.B. 613 with discriminatory intent, citing a 2022 law that froze pandemic relief funding for OU Health, one of the state's largest hospital systems, unless Oklahoma Children's Hospital agreed to suspend gender-affirming care for minors. A federal judge in Tulsa declined to stop S.B. 613 from taking effect in 2023, writing in an order that transition-related care for young people is 'an area in which medical and policy debate is unfolding,' and the state 'can rationally take the side of caution before permitting irreversible medical treatments of its children.' An appeal before the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was abated pending the Supreme Court's ruling in U.S. v. Skrmetti. In that case, the justices ruled 6-3 along ideological lines that Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care does not amount to sex discrimination, which would have triggered a higher level of constitutional scrutiny. The court's majority opinion, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, agrees with arguments made by Tennessee officials that the law distinguishes based on a treatment's medical purpose, not sex, and the court should defer to the Legislature's judgment about regulating medicine for children. Relying on the high court's decision, a three-judge panel for the 10th Circuit ruled unanimously on Wednesday that Oklahoma's law is constitutional. Tennessee's Senate Bill 1 and Oklahoma's Senate Bill 613 'are functionally indistinguishable,' Circuit Judge Joel M. Carson, appointed during President Trump's first term, wrote in Wednesday's order. 'Here, like in Skrmetti, both groups include transgender minors, so there exists a 'lack of identity' between transgender status and the medical diagnosis excluded under SB 613. And like Tennessee's SB1, under SB 613, a minor's ability to receive medical treatment under SB 613 does not turn on the minor's transgender status—it turns on the minor's medical diagnosis,' Carson wrote for himself and Circuit Judges Harris L. Hartz, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, and Gregory A. Phillips, appointed by former President Obama. The order, citing Skrmetti, states Oklahoma's law neither violates the Constitution nor was intended to discriminate against transgender youth. 'We recognize the importance of this issue to all involved. But this remains a novel issue with disagreement on how to assure children's health and welfare. We will not usurp the legislature's judgment when it engages in 'earnest and profound debate about the morality, legality, and practicality' of gender transition procedures for minors,' Carson wrote. 'While we respect that Plaintiffs disagree with the legislature's assessment of such procedures' risks, that alone does not invalidate a democratically enacted law on rational-basis grounds.' Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond (R) celebrated the court's ruling Thursday in a post on the social platform X. 'For years, radical left activists pushed the lie of 'gender transition' procedures for minors. The truth is much simpler: there is no such thing,' he wrote. Attorneys for the plaintiffs called Wednesday's decision 'devastating' in a joint statement. 'Oklahoma's ban is openly discriminatory and provably harmful to the transgender youth of this state, putting political dogma above parents, their children, and their family doctors,' the statement said. 'While we and our clients consider our next steps, we want all transgender people and their families across Oklahoma to know we will never stop fighting for the future they deserve and their freedom to be themselves.'


The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump ups aggressive redistricting war with call for new census
President Trump is going all in on the national redistricting war with his call for the Commerce Department to conduct a new census ahead of the next scheduled one in 2030. Trump said in his Truth Social post on Thursday that the census would not count those who are in the country illegally and use the 'results and information gained' from the 2024 presidential election. The plan would likely face significant legal hurdles as the Constitution's 14th Amendment states that the census should be conducted based on the total number of people in each state. But it adds a new dimension to the fight in which Republicans are trying to gain the upper hand ahead of next year's midterm elections. 'From a messaging standpoint, it is ingenious to push the envelope on this front,' said Republican strategist Ford O'Connell. This isn't the first time that Trump has pushed for such a change in how the population is counted and seats in the House are subsequently apportioned. He issued an executive memorandum during his first term in July 2020 to prevent those in the country illegally in the census, but this faced legal challenges that prevented it from taking effect, and former President Biden ultimately withdrew the memorandum upon taking office the next year. But his renewed effort is taking place at the backdrop of a wider conversation about how people are counted for purposes of their representation in Congress. Trump himself kicked off the arms race seen in various states with his call for Texas Republicans to approve a new map that would allow the GOP to pick up five seats in the state in next year's midterms. And now his call for a new census, to be conducted in the midst of the redistricting battles and years ahead of schedule, shows he's doubling down on this strategy of adjusting the terms of engagement in the elections to come. Republicans were enthused by Trump's tactics, even if his census plans face an uncertain future, and expect to gain a boost ahead of the midterms at least in the short term. A source close to the administration said the GOP's efforts will set off an 'arms war' between the parties fighting for political power, but what's happening is Republicans catching up to Democrats in drawing the congressional lines more favorably for them. This means Republicans have more room to grow through this redistricting process than Democrats do, they said. They pointed to various Democratic-led states that are significantly gerrymandered to cut Republicans out of power, including states that Democratic Texas state lawmakers went to in order to prevent the state legislature from passing the new map. 'What I think the Democrats, or their theatrics, are so hysterical about is the fact that they pretty much squeezed all the juice out of the lemon on this front and they just did it behind closed doors, so no one actually ever talked that way,' the source said. O'Connell said Trump's push will be particularly useful as part of the GOP's message because many voters don't understand how redistricting works and don't realize that those who are in the country illegally are currently counted for how many votes a state receives in the Electoral College and how many seats it receives in the House. The 14th Amendment's second section lays out how apportioning representation works, stating that 'the whole number of persons' should be counted in each state. While those who aren't citizens aren't allowed to vote in federal elections, they are still included in determining a state's population, even if they entered the country illegally. O'Connell said making this change would likely cost Texas and Florida, two Republican strongholds, some seats, but it would also take seats away from Democratic-led states. Making people realize how the system currently works will be beneficial to winning them over to Trump and the GOP's broader argument, he said. 'On that front, that will be mind-blowing to a lot of American people, and Trump, by doing this, is able to drive that home by getting around the minutia of what is redistricting, what is gerrymandering,' he said. Experts raised some doubts about the feasibility of Trump's proposal but said they believed it could add more enthusiasm to his base and sharpen the GOP's message. James Thurber, a professor of government at American University, argued that not enough time is left ahead of the midterms to find all the undocumented immigrants and exclude them from census counting. He also pointed to likely legal challenges that the move would face, which would also take time. Various groups sued in 2018 when the Trump administration sought to add a question asking people if they were citizens to the census. The legal battle took a year, and the Supreme Court eventually rejected the change. Thurber said Trump's push could hurt Democrats even if it doesn't go into effect, saying it could turn off immigrants in the country legally from wanting to engage with government officials and vote. While the redistricting battle is still in early stages and which states will ultimately redraw their lines is uncertain, he said the overall battle isn't helpful for Democrats, though they could still win in 2026 anyway. 'It's not good for the Democrats, but that doesn't mean that they won't pick up enough seats to be in the majority,' he said. Democrats brushed off Trump's census plan as unrealistic and unconstitutional and designed to increase pressure on Republican governors to go along with his plan for gerrymandering. Democratic strategist Jared Leopold said the proposal doesn't 'fundamentally' change the debate given Trump's power in the Republican Party, but Trump is turning to his 'classic' playbook. He argued the strategy could backfire on Republicans to a certain extent in adding onto a narrative that the Trump administration isn't listening to its constituents. He pointed to the unpopularity of the 'big beautiful bill' and Trump's tariffs. 'It fits into a broader narrative of a president who is out of touch with where the majority of the population is, and that I think people will be angry about,' Leopold said. 'The redistricting battle won't be the A-side of the record of why Donald Trump's in trouble for the midterm, but it could be the B-side.' Thurber said Texas' past mid-decade redistricting effort in 2003 proved effective at ousting a few Democrats, but the country hasn't experienced a true national redistricting 'war' before. He said he isn't convinced that the country is at that point yet despite 'rhetoric' and speeches. 'If it evolves into that, it will be unique, historic and something to watch,' he said.


Chicago Tribune
22 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
EPA cancels $7 billion Biden-era grant program to boost solar energy
WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday terminated a $7 billion grant program intended to help pay for residential solar projects for more than 900,000 lower-income U.S. households, in the latest Trump administration move hindering the nation's shift to cleaner energy. The funding, part of the Biden-era's Solar for All program, was awarded to 60 recipients including states, tribes and regions for investments such as rooftop solar and community solar gardens. Solar, a renewable energy, is widely regarded as a way to introduce cleaner power onto the electrical grid and lower energy bills for American consumers. Under Republican President Donald Trump, officials have pursued dozens of deregulatory measures related to federal rules intended to protect clean air and water. Last week, the EPA proposed rescinding the agency's 'endangerment finding' which serves as the scientific and legal basis for regulating planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions. Trump EPA moves to eliminate landmark scientific rule that's the basis for climate regulationsThe administration has taken steps to bolster fossil fuels such as coal, oil and natural gas as it pursues American 'energy dominance in the global market.' EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said in a statement on social media that authority for the solar program was eliminated under the tax-and-spending law signed by Trump last month. It eliminated the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, approved under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, that set aside $20 billion for community development projects to boost renewable energy and an additional $7 billion for the solar program. 'The bottom line is this: EPA no longer has the statutory authority to administer the program or the appropriated funds to keep this boondoggle alive,″ Zeldin said. 'Today, the Trump EPA is announcing that we are ending Solar for All for good, saving US taxpayers ANOTHER $7 BILLION!' Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt, who introduced the Solar for All program to cut electric bills for working families, said Zeldin's action was illegal. 'Solar for All means lower utility bills, many thousands of good-paying jobs and real action to address the existential threat of climate change,″ Sanders said in a statement. 'At a time when working families are getting crushed by skyrocketing energy costs and the planet is literally burning, sabotaging this program isn't just wrong — it's absolutely insane. We will fight back to preserve this enormously important program.' Only $53 million of the $7 billion awarded has been spent, according to a tally by the research firm Atlas Public Policy. Several grant recipients this week said their programs were in planning phases. Stephanie Bosh, senior vice president of the Solar Energy Industries Association, said the EPA has no legal authority to terminate grants already appropriated by Congress. 'These grants are delivering billions of dollars of investment to red and blue states alike,″ she said. Bosh said solar was one of the cheapest energy sources at a time of growing demand for electricity. 'This administration is continuing to dig itself into a hole,' she said. The EPA has argued that the tax and policy law allows the agency to rescind the money it has already obligated. The recipients of that money disagree, saying the bulk of the money had already been disbursed and is not affected by the law. Southern Environmental Law Center litigation director Kym Meyer said if the administration wants to move forward with canceling Solar for All funds, 'we will see them in court.' Grant recipients have already challenged the administration's actions, and a judge ruled in April the EPA cannot freeze the contracts. Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, the top Democrat on the Senate Environment Committee, called Zeldin's elimination of the solar program a betrayal 'that will further hike electricity costs and make our power grid less reliable.' 'Trump is — yet again — putting his fossil fuel megadonors first,' he added.