logo
Rebel Wilson sued by production company of her own film

Rebel Wilson sued by production company of her own film

1News5 days ago
Star Australian actor Rebel Wilson is facing more legal action, accused of trying to block distribution of the first film she directed.
Filed in the NSW Supreme Court today, production company AI Film has alleged Wilson falsely accused it of trying to block the release of her directorial debut.
The lawsuit also alleged Wilson falsely accused a producer of sexual misconduct towards the lead female actor on the movie.
The film in question is the 2024 musical The Deb, which premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival in September.
Months earlier, Wilson is accused of using her Instagram account to make "false and derogatory statements" about the film's other producers, with Wilson's mother company Camp Sugar and AI Film splitting the rights.
ADVERTISEMENT
"They included that they had engaged in inappropriate conduct toward the lead actress in the film, embezzled the film's funds and were trying to block the release of the film," the filings read.
The sexual misconduct allegations centre around actor Charlotte MacInnes, who Wilson claimed on Instagram had been subject to inappropriate advances by one of the film's producers.
"When an actress on her first feature film is asked by a producer to stay in the same apartment as them, and then makes a complaint to me as the director saying said producer 'asked her to have a bath and a shower with her and it made her feel uncomfortable' – what am I supposed to do?" Wilson posted.
Where to get help for sexual violence. (Source: 1News)
MacInnes has denied the allegations and said "false accusations undermine real victims and I won't be the subject of a fabricated narrative".
Wilson has since reiterated the allegation and said MacInnes had since been given a job by the producer and secured a record deal.
"(That) should be all the proof you need as to why she has now changed her story," she said.
ADVERTISEMENT
The suit accused Wilson of undermining the attempts of producers to secure a distribution deal for the film by "continuing to make public and false allegations and by deliberately undermining the negotiations with potential distributors".
It does not specifically allege why she would attempt to prevent distribution of her own film.
A separate lawsuit filed in the United States has claimed Wilson wanted "credit for work she did not do, and to overshadow young, upcoming artists who truly deserved the credit".
Wilson was not awarded a writing credit for the film.
The legal action is seeking damages, an apology and corrective advertising.
AI Film said the legal proceedings were "regrettable but essential to ensure The Deb's timely release".
MacInnes also backed the legal action.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I love this film and I can't wait for it to be released ... it would be wonderful if these proceedings can help make that happen," she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sydney Sweeney's provocative new ad campaign leans into retro sexiness — and it's sparking debate
Sydney Sweeney's provocative new ad campaign leans into retro sexiness — and it's sparking debate

NZ Herald

time16 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Sydney Sweeney's provocative new ad campaign leans into retro sexiness — and it's sparking debate

Shane O'Neill: Well, the imagery is pretty scattershot, and so is the messaging. We have Sydney Sweeney looking kinda femme and kinda butch. We have her 'auditioning' for the commercial and also holding a camcorder, recording herself. RT: There's a narrative in these images of that small-town gal moving to the big city, hoping to become a star. I found the audition video really strange – Sweeney is a mega-actress and superbly talented, and she seems very confident and savvy about how she chooses roles. To see her in that uncomfortable setting – where a guy off-camera is asking to see her hands?! – is unsettling. A large part of her success is her ability to appeal to men and women. And that seemed to be the first point of controversy here: Many of the images and videos, like her filming herself with a camcorder or that audition moment, seem tailored for the male gaze specifically. SO: The most provocative part of the campaign is when she's talking about offspring and genes. (She says, 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair colour, personality and even eye colour,' and the camera pans to her blue eyes. 'My jeans are blue.') Sweeney also has softer copy in the press release. She says of American Eagle, 'They have literally been there with me through every version of myself.' There's a message about mutable identity there. And that could be extended into a vision of America as a place where you're NOT bound by who you are at birth. But they went the full opposite of that. RT: I love what you're saying about the potential of this ad versus the direction it ran toward. Jeans are really fertile ground for fashion brands to explore identity and are almost always marketed with provocation: I'm thinking of the Calvin Klein ads, but also smaller labels like Eckhaus Latta. Or the Diesel ads from 2010 that declared 'SEX SELLS! Unfortunately we sell jeans.' SO: To be honest, I think the ad campaign didn't exactly know what it wanted to be. If we just had these images without any supporting text or dialogue, I don't think they'd really merit a second glance. RT: I think what's getting people talking – or rather, why everyone was watching these TikToks obsessively over the weekend and picking them apart – is how regressive the ads seem. The line about her having great jeans – several people are suggesting in the comments on Instagram and TikTok that this is a 'pro-eugenics ad'. Whether or not that's the case, it is part of a wave of imagery of influencers, pop stars and musicians that feels tethered to the values of another time. SO: Yes. The first thing I thought of when I heard the tagline 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans' was the DHS Instagram account, which posted a subtly racist painting a few weeks ago and an explicitly racist painting last week. The latter depicted a gigantic blonde buxom woman chasing away native people to make way for white settlers. When this is the imagery being promoted by our Government, a pun about 'genes' hits differently. RT: The tagline is simply bizarre. Are they trying to say that what matters is not what you look like but what you put on your body? Or that you are assigned a denim style at birth and you must never waver from it? Also: is Sweeney the every girl or the only girl? For the past five or six years, it seemed like fashion and pop culture were very interested in – even dedicated to – body positivity. Now we're being fed a lot of images of thinness, whiteness and unapologetic wealth porn, what with this campaign, influencers like Alix Earle, and Sabrina Carpenter's album cover. Sabrina Carpenter's 'Man's Best Friend' album cover. Photo / Instagram SO: I found that album cover really disturbing. The fact that it looked exactly like a Terry Richardson shoot from the early 2000s, the fact that it came when people are hiring him again, and when Dov Charney is releasing Los Angeles Apparel ads that look exactly like the American Apparel ads he made in the early 2000s, is very freaky to me. RT: It's unclear where the irony is. SO: But that arguably makes it a meaningful and successful image. RT: Look, you know I'm a fashion fanatic. Images that make you stop and think – whether you're disturbed or delighted or, even better, have no clue what to make of what you're seeing – are really exciting and too rare in this era. But it is strange to see a brand like American Eagle go in this direction. Should teenagers be served a vision of sexuality and fashion that feels so regressive? SO: Seeing these images with no accompanying text, I don't think I would have guessed 'American Eagle in 2025.' I will say that the far right's embrace of Sweeney – and the gleeful reaction from right-wing creators to 'woke' backlash to the campaign – lends credence to my initial alarm when I saw the ads. RT: She is someone appreciated across the political spectrum. Recall in 2022 that she was called out online for a picture of a family birthday party in which an attendee was wearing a Blue Lives Matter T-shirt. And her own TikTok page pitches her as a car obsessive, not afraid to get under the hood though her hair looks perfect. She is also a Hollywood powerhouse who is producing movies and starring in iconic Gen Z movies and TV shows. How does she do this? SO: There's something about her giant sleepy eyes and slightly flared nostrils that evokes distance and disaffection. RT: As our colleague Sam pointed out, she codified the Gen Z stare on the first season of White Lotus. SO: Yes! But there is something so deeply unattainable about what Sweeney serves. RT: I'm gently pushing back on that. As a woman, I find her combination of sex appeal, smarts and strong but surprising instincts really inspiring. She is able to create these truly oddball characters. And I'll always be fascinated by someone who can capture attention so broadly in our fragmented pop culture landscape. But let's get back to the ad. Are the jeans good? SO: They seem to want to have it both ways: dark blue classic American girliness and a stonewashed sloppy guy's girl. RT: I thought the jeans were cute! But it's still funny that they are very sexually promoting … a baggy jean with a little adorable butterfly on the back? SO: Enter the Möbius strip of outrage, dismissal of the outrage, outrage at the dismissal of the outrage … and eventually a huge bump in stock for American Eagle. RT: Up 18 per cent this morning! SO: In a time of prolonged economic uncertainty, I think other brands will learn the lesson that it pays to lean into controversy and trigger snowflakes like me. RT: Absolutely. The only thing we can say for sure: the 'success' of this ad – stirring controversy and conversation and the big stock jump – will inspire more brands to try the same.

Destiny's Child reunites for Beyoncé's last tour show
Destiny's Child reunites for Beyoncé's last tour show

NZ Herald

time17 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Destiny's Child reunites for Beyoncé's last tour show

The cameo was the first time the trio has performed together since 2018. Photo / Instagram/beyonce. Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Already a subscriber? Sign in here Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen. The cameo was the first time the trio has performed together since 2018. Photo / Instagram/beyonce. Beyoncé has ended her Cowboy Carter tour with a bang as she brought back 90's girl group Destiny's Child for a cameo performance. It was a Millennials dream as the trio of Beyoncé, Kelly Rowland and Michelle Williams performed some of their biggest hits including 2001 track Bootylicious and 2005 song Lose My Breath to wrap up the 32 show United States and European tour. They also stuck around to take part in the song Energy from Beyoncé's 2022 album Renaissance. The performance was the first time the group has performed since US music festival Coachella in 2018.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store