logo
What Iran's two different flags say about its divided opposition

What Iran's two different flags say about its divided opposition

As people take to the streets amid the crisis in Iran, more than one version of the country's flag can be seen being waved.
Both the official flag and another flag, the Lion and Sun, are politically charged, with deep ties to Iran's history and the ongoing struggles of its people.
The official flag is associated with the current regime in power, while the lion and sun design is the pre-revolutionary flag and is used by some opposition groups.
At first glance, it might seem like a simple case of divided loyalties — two sides, two flags — but the reality is more nuanced.
The official flag represents the Islamic Republic of Iran, established after the 1979 revolution led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, which overthrew the monarchy of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (also known as "the Shah").
Dr Dara Conduit, a political science lecturer at the University of Melbourne, explains that "the flag of Iran is really, really political, and so… if you were to raise the current flag of Iran, you would possibly be associated with the regime, or it may be interpreted that you're a supporter of the Iranian regime".
Not necessarily.
Martin Kear, a lecturer in government and international relations at the University of Sydney, points out that in some contexts, the flag may be waved by individuals protesting Israel and the United States bombing Iran rather than an overt support for the regime.
Context is key.
For example, Dr Conduit and Professor Kear agree that in the below image taken in Lebanon, the flag likely signals support for the regime.
This is because it appears alongside flags that support terrorist organisation Hezbollah, which receives backing from the Iranian regime.
Though these protests are happening at the same time and use the same symbols, they can express different political messages.
Before the 1979 revolution, Iran's flag featured the lion and sun emblem, which symbolised the Pahlavi monarchy.
Though banned by the Islamic Republic, the flag is still displayed by some Iranians both inside the country and in the diaspora.
According to Professor Kear, displaying the lion and sun flag inside Iran is often "an act of resistance and defiance of the regime", and is not necessarily a call to restore the monarchy.
Dr Conduit cautions, however, that the lion and sun flag does not represent all opposition groups, as it is sometimes associated with controversial political agendas.
The lion and sun flag is closely tied to opposition factions linked to Reza Pahlavi (the Shah's son) and Maryam Rajavi, both polarising figures in Iranian politics.
"[Pahlavi and Rajavi] are extremely controversial figures, and certainly do not represent a democratic future for Iran," said Dr Conduit.
As a result, flying this flag can signal a specific political stance, which not everyone opposing the regime would support.
The Iranian opposition is very divided and that can be seen through the politics of its flag.
"The politics of the flag in Iran is symptomatic of the broader politics of the opposition movement, in that there is no one flag that the opposition is united behind," said Dr Conduit.
Previously, protesters have rallied behind slogans like "Women, Life, Freedom" or images of Mahsa Amini, the young woman whose death sparked the 2022 protests.
But no single banner has emerged as a symbol for the entire opposition.
While opposition to the Iranian regime is widespread, it's not always straightforward.
Many critics of the regime also oppose foreign intervention from the United States and Israel.
"There's a lot of nuance at the moment in the opposition community … you can be anti-regime, and you can want the fall of the regime, but it doesn't mean that you want Israel to decapitate the regime, and possibly lead to a civil war," Dr Conduit says.
While the Iranian regime has many domestic critics, the idea of foreign intervention complicates the situation for some.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Breakfast Wrap: Furious President drops f-bomb
Breakfast Wrap: Furious President drops f-bomb

ABC News

time33 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Breakfast Wrap: Furious President drops f-bomb

US President Donald Trump has lashed out at Israel and Iran urging both sides to refrain from strikes, as the fragile ceasefire now appears to hold. On the Breakfast Wrap podcast today, hear why the President had such strong words, particularly for Israel. We'll also head to the NATO summit where Mr Trump has just flown to, along with other world leaders including Australia's Deputy Prime Minister. And then back home, the Australian Human Rights Commission will today deliver its final recommendations into a long-running sexual harassment inquiry in the wake of the global #MeToo movement. Recap the morning's news, politics and global affairs with the Breakfast Wrap

US military intelligence suggests Iran's nuclear program remains intact, contradicting Donald Trump's claims of ‘obliteration'
US military intelligence suggests Iran's nuclear program remains intact, contradicting Donald Trump's claims of ‘obliteration'

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

US military intelligence suggests Iran's nuclear program remains intact, contradicting Donald Trump's claims of ‘obliteration'

An initial report from US military intelligence has concluded Donald Trump's air strikes on Iran left most of its nuclear infrastructure intact, and its capacity to develop nuclear weapons was 'likely only set back by months'. That wildly contradicts the claims, from both Mr Trump himself and senior members of his administration, that the Iranian nuclear program was 'obliterated', and the regime's ambitions to obtain a bomb crippled. Operation Midnight Hammer, launched at the President's command on Saturday, US time, targeted three nuclear facilities in Iran using GBU-57 'bunker buster' bombs. The point of the mission was to destroy crucial infrastructure, most of it hidden deep underground, at the Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz enrichment sites. According to the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA), America's military intelligence arm housed within the Pentagon, it may have failed in that task. The agency's initial findings, which could of course change as more intelligence is gathered, suggest America's air strikes collapsed the entrances to two of the Iranian facilities, but didn't penetrate far enough to destroy the buildings inside. The country's stockpile of enriched uranium remains largely untouched, having been moved to other locations before the US attacked, and most of its centrifuges are still operational. The above is being reported by multiple US media outlets, including but not limited to The New York Times and CNN, both of which spoke to multiple sources familiar with the DIA's initial report. 'The assessment is that the US set them back maybe a few months, tops,' one of these sources, none of whom were named, told CNN. The White House has hit back hard, calling the DIA's assessment 'flat-out wrong' and condemning the unnamed sources for leaking it. But it has not denied the existence of the report, nor the characterisation of its contents. 'This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community,' said White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. 'The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program. 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000-pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.' Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth was similarly scathing. 'Based on everything we have seen, and I've seen it all, our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons,' Mr Hegseth said. 'Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target and worked perfectly. The impact of those bombs is buried under a mountain of rubble in Iran. 'So anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the President and the successful mission.' Members of Congress were scheduled to receive a briefing on the mission today, where some of them, having seen the DIA's report, intended to ask about it. That briefing has now been postponed until Thursday, US time. Meanwhile, Iran claims it is ready to resume its nuclear development. 'Iran's nuclear program will resume without interruption and we are ready to restart enrichment,' the country's Atomic Energy Agency said today. 'Our program will not stop.' Ms Leavitt and Mr Hegseth have every reason to doubt the DIA here; both characterised America's attack on Iran as a total success immediately after the operation. 'Iran's nuclear ambitions have been obliterated,' said Mr Hegseth. Ms Leavitt said the strikes 'took away Iran's ability to create a nuclear bomb'. 'They no longer have the capability to build this nuclear weapon,' she said. Mr Trump himself told the world that 'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated'. No ambiguity there.

Sunrise host Nat Barr confronts Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadegh over top secret report US bombing failed to destroy nuclear program
Sunrise host Nat Barr confronts Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadegh over top secret report US bombing failed to destroy nuclear program

7NEWS

timean hour ago

  • 7NEWS

Sunrise host Nat Barr confronts Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadegh over top secret report US bombing failed to destroy nuclear program

Sunrise host Nat Barr has confronted Iranian Ambassador to Australia Ahmad Sadeghi over the damage to the country's nuclear facilities bombed by the United States last weekend. US President Donald Trump announced the US bombed three major facilities in Iran on Saturday, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Trump claimed the strikes 'completely and totally obliterated' Tehran's nuclear sites. However, CNN leaked a report overnight of an intelligence assessment stating US strikes did not destroy the country's nuclear program. Instead, it only set it back by months. White House press secretary Karoline Levitt said the report was just a 'clear attempt to demean Trump'. Barr confronted Sadeghi on Wednesday, asking about the extent of the damage. 'I do not have any exact technical assessment and estimate (on what was destroyed),' Sadeghi said. 'That is something that the technical teams, with regard to Iran, and IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) maybe, later on, have to find out about it, the dimension of the damage. 'Iran does have the right to peaceful nuclear usage.' The IAEA governs the global proliferation of nuclear resources and technology and conducts inspections to ensure compliance. Sadeghi called the US bombing an 'illegal action' and Iran's retaliation a defensive action. Asked if Iran still has a working nuclear program, Sadeghi said: 'We have the right to use a peaceful nuclear program, including enrichment for peaceful uses.' However, he said Iran is open to negotiations. '(Iran has) been for a long time in co-operation with IAEA and in negotiation with the different international bodies ... and (we) just recently had five rounds of negotiations with the US Government,' he said. 'Therefore, we are ready to negotiate with them, but we keep our right for peaceful use of energy.' Israel and Iran 'don't know what they are doing' Earlier Trump had said of the Israel-Iran conflict: 'You know what? We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the (bleep) they're doing. Do you understand that?' Sadeghi claimed the Israeli strikes were 'unprovoked'. 'Just reminding once more, it was started from an unprovoked attack by the Israeli regime against Iran that killed many innocents and 500 people martyred and also about 3,000 people injured and hospitalised,' he said. 'We just took defensive measure based on our right upon the Charter of United Nations and hard defensive actions and operations ... Iran has not attacked within 1400 years of the recent history to any neighbours. 'But Israelis have attacked, you know, about 10 major wars against the neighbourhood and many other countries. 'Therefore, as soon as we got the agreement about the ceasefire, we observed it. 'I believe that Mr Trump's reference was mainly to the Israeli side.' Where is Iran's Supreme Leader? Sadeghi was asked about the whereabouts of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. '(It) depends on the exigencies, and periodically the Ayatollah (will) address the people of Iran,' Sadeghi said. 'He's not in hiding. He just takes the proper measures, that is ordinary in war time that the enemy just imposed on us.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store