Visit to training centre in Bathgate provides insight into skills required by HGV drivers
Kirsteen Sullivan MP stepped into a heavy goods vehicle simulator
Kirsteen Sullivan MP stepped into a heavy goods vehicle simulator during a visit to the Road Haulage Association's (RHA) training centre in Bathgate.
The Labour MP for Bathgate and Linlithgow was keen to learn more about the work being done to support the industry in Scotland and heard directly from those working to future-proof the sector.
As part of the visit, she entered the RHA's state-of-the-art HGV simulator, giving her first-hand insight into the high standards drivers are trained to meet. The simulator experience highlighted the skills and focus required to operate safely and efficiently on Scotland's roads.
Kirsteen also joined RHA Training Director Brian Kenny and Martin Reid for a wide-ranging and productive discussion on the key challenges and opportunities facing the sector, including:
Tackling the Skills Shortage – Exploring ways to address the growing demand for qualified drivers through enhanced training and recruitment efforts.
Attracting New Talent into Logistics – Discussing how to promote the industry to younger people and career changers, with a focus on the long-term sustainability of the workforce.
Removing Barriers to Entry – Emphasising the importance of improved rest and washing facilities, particularly to support and encourage more women into the profession.
The Urgent Need for Safe and Secure Parking – Highlighting the critical need for investment in safe, well-maintained parking infrastructure to protect driver welfare and safety.
RHA Training Director Brian Kenny said: 'Our hub here in Bathgate plays an important part in Scotland's haulage industry.
'It is a real success story and has grown positively over the past 10 years, equipping drivers with the skills they need to help keep the wheels of the economy turning, locally and nationally.
'It was great to meet Kirsteen, to show her the valuable work that takes place in the region, as well as talk through with her some of the issues faced by Scotland's haulage industry.'
Kirsteen Sullivan MP added: 'It was a pleasure to visit the RHA training centre in Bathgate and see first-hand the excellent work being done to support Scotland's haulage sector.
"The discussions I had with the team highlighted both the progress made and the challenges that remain. I am committed to advocating for the necessary investments and policy changes to ensure the industry continues to thrive.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Reform to end gold-plated pensions for council workers
Reform UK has unveiled plans to reduce gold-plated staff pensions at the councils it won from Labour and the Tories at the local elections. Richard Tice, the party's deputy leader, said it would take an axe to final salary schemes, describing them as unaffordable and an 'outrage'. Speaking to The Telegraph, he said Reform-controlled authorities would stop offering such generous terms to new recruits. He added that staff on existing contracts would have to accept lower annual pay rises to balance out the huge cost of funding their retirement. Nigel Farage's party won control of 10 councils across England last month, marking its major electoral breakthrough. It did so on a pledge to find huge savings, promising to end local authority focus on diversity and inclusion schemes and hitting net zero targets. 'Country is going bust' Mr Tice is fronting efforts to free up money that could be reinvested in improving services like bin collections or used to freeze council tax. He has identified wasteful and underperforming pension schemes as an area where Reform councils can save hundreds of millions of pounds. 'Whether people like it or not we should not be employing people on defined benefit contribution schemes,' he told The Telegraph. 'It's an outrage – the public can't afford it. It's absolutely ludicrous, and this is why the country is going bust and it's all got to stop. 'We're going to have to go to war with these people. Our job is to wake people up as to where their money is going and why we're all being ripped off.' Mr Tice said under many gold-plated pension schemes councils were having to contribute up to 30 per cent of their officials' salaries. Such final salary schemes are substantially more generous than those in the private sector. He said that if staff are on such terms 'then candidly that has to be taken into account when you look at people's annual pay rises'. 'You look at the overall cost of employment and if they're not prepared to then a whole load of people are going to have to be made redundant,' he warned. 'Councils are going bust all over the country – the country's going bust, and until we've come along no one dared admit it.' Last year it emerged that a quarter of council tax revenue was now being spent on pension schemes that are 'unjustifiably generous'. It means the average household is now contributing £230 a year to the retirement plans of officials who, on average, earn nearly £40,000 a year. Last year local authorities contributed almost £7 billion to staff pension pots, The Times revealed, making them one of their highest costs. Mr Tice said that, as well as the generous contributions, many councils were also investing in 'woke' pension funds that were underperforming. He said Reform would be examining how much money was being put into net zero funds and whether they were making below average returns. The councils controlled by the party could also save upwards of £200 million a year just by renegotiating the investment fees they are charged, he added. 'I can smell the taxpayer being ripped off,' he said. 'Their council tax is being gobbled up by pension fund contributions because they're overgenerous and they've been badly managed for decades.'
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Why is it that Britain cannot get anything done?
When elected to power, Labour promised to be the party of the builders, not the blockers, and committed itself to unleashing a housebuilding and infrastructure boom. Nearly a year into government, and the legislation that is supposed to make this happen, the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, is slowly wending its way through Parliament, having not yet been submitted to the House of Lords for scrutiny. The intention is to cut planning restrictions, but whether it also delivers in reducing the spiralling costs and interminable delays of development in the UK is anyone's guess. There are good reasons for scepticism. Meanwhile, the endless sorrow of HS2, the most expensive piece of infrastructure ever built in Britain, continues apace. According to a recent report in Rail magazine, which has not been denied, the London to Birmingham route is now likely to be pushed back a further six years, and may not be complete until 2039. Estimated costs have also further escalated to a jaw dropping £100bn, this despite the fact that the northern leg has been scrapped and that initially at least, the line will terminate not as planned at Euston but at Old Oak on the outskirts of London. Just to add a touch of the surreal to this towering example of ill-spent taxpayer pounds, the spanking new Birmingham terminal at Curzon Street is likely to be completed years before the line itself, and will therefore stand empty, its seven platforms gathering tumble weed in the long wait for their first passengers. In any case, the travails of HS2 have become a symbol of Britain's seemingly stultifying inability to get anything done. Somewhat misleadingly so, as it happens. The largest part of the problem with HS2 is not the planning constraints, or even the ruinous project management, but that it should never have been attempted in the first place, an admission disarmingly made by Peter Mandelson, now Britain's ambassador to Washington, more than 12 years ago. The previous Labour government only went ahead with the project, he admitted, because it was afraid of being upstaged by the Tories in creating a high-speed, north-south link. The economic case for it was always 'flimsy', he further conceded. Back then, it should be pointed out, the line was expected to cost 'only' £35bn before rolling stock, and include stage two branch lines to Manchester, Leeds and Wigan. The whole thing should have been axed there and then, but the Coalition government was terrified of the stick it would get from northern lobbies and voters for cancelling a project seen as totemic in any levelling up agenda. What's more, so much time, effort and money had by then already been expended that it was considered too big a write off to be politically palatable. So on it went, but the main explanation for its mounting costs was already obvious. Planning restrictions, constantly changing specifications, outlandish environmental demands such as the notorious £100m 'bat tunnel', were admittedly a part of it. Yet the contrast with HS1, which came in roughly on time and on budget, could scarcely have been greater. HS1, which links the channel tunnel and London, actually had a purpose and an economic rationale. Furthermore, it had a responsible minister, John Prescott, who after taunts from the French to the effect that the British couldn't organise a piss up in a brewery, was determined to grip the project and push it through. HS2 has never commanded a similar consensus or a convincing commercial justification, making it an ongoing object of bitterness, compromise and delay. Oppressive planning rules and environmental impact studies can no longer be used as an excuse; for HS2, these have all been put to bed, but still the costs keep rising. Shockingly, according to a report by the National Audit Office, simply cancelling the second phase of the project linking Birmingham to Manchester and Leeds is in itself likely to consume £100m. Why? Apparently it's to do with 'safely and efficiently' when closing down Phase 2 construction sites, insignificant though these are. Losses on land already compulsorily purchased but no longer needed further up the ante. And they wonder why the country is going bust. The Department for Transport, the authority responsible for overseeing and funding the project, might seem a particularly egregious example of Britain's inability to get anything done, but sadly these failings are not confined to the public sector. The other standout example is the privately funded Hinkley Point C nuclear power station in Somerset. It should have been up and running by now. Indeed, the one-time boss of the sponsoring company, EDF Energy, once ventured that by 2017 people would be cooking their Christmas lunches on power supplied by Hinkley. It scarcely needs restating that the latest target date for completion stretches out to 2031. In the meantime, costs have ballooned from an initial estimate of £18bn to £46bn in today's money. Once up and running, Hinkley will be one of the most expensive sources of electricity anywhere in the world. If it's any consolation, the UK is far from alone in the sclerosis that seemingly grips infrastructure development, gainful or otherwise. Like the UK, Germany used to be good at this kind of stuff, but became a laughing stock after Berlin's Brandenburg airport came in nine years behind schedule at a cost of more than three times the initial estimate. A McKinsey study of more than 500 global infrastructure projects found that only 5pc of them were completed within their original budget and schedule. The average project ran 37pc over budget and 53pc over schedule. Separate research by Oxford's Saïd Business School found that of more than 3000 infrastructure projects studied, only 0.2pc were completed on time and to budget. All the same, the situation appears to be notably worse in the UK than elsewhere. According to the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority (Nista), the cost of construction in Britain has risen by nearly a third more than GDP per capita since 2007. That often asked question – why is it that we seem to be getting ever fewer bangs for our bucks in terms of public services and state-backed infrastructure – is partly answered by phenomena such as this. It's not just about population growth or the demands of an ageing society; it's also about incompetence, lack of clear objectives, and a cartel-like contracting industry that knows how to play the system to its own ends. At both national and local level, it's endemic and verging on the corrupt. As it embarks on the fantastically costly and disruptive decarbonisation of Britain's electricity network, the Government promises that it will be addressing these and many of the other issues that have been slowing things down and compounding their cost.
Scottish Sun
8 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Hard-up households to get up to £150 in free cost of living cash
Read below for more councils providing financial support CASH IN Hard-up households to get up to £150 in free cost of living cash HARD-UP households can get up to £150 in free cost of living cash. Cash-strapped households can get access to money through the Household Support Fund (HSF). 1 The household support fund gives cash grants to struggling households The scheme has been extended multiple times with the latest round running between April 2025 and March 2026. Each council in England has been allocated a share of the £742million fund and can distribute it to residents in need. Eligibility criteria varies based on where you live but usually help is offered to those on benefits or a low income. Eligible households in Leeds will get payments of up to £150 to help. How much you will be given depends on factors like if you are a pensioner or if you have dependent children. All claimants must also be in receipt of Council Tax Support, a scheme where those on a low income or benefits can get money off the bill. The payment will be £125 to households with dependent children and £50 to all households without. Meanwhile, some pensioner households who are eligible for Council Tax Support but not the Winter Fuel Payment will receive £150. The £300 benefit was previously available to everyone aged 66 but cuts made by Labour now mean only those on means-tested benefits, such as Pension Credit get the help. Sir Keir Starmer has announced plans to ease cuts to the Winter Fuel Allowance, - however the PM was sparse on details about when the changes might take place. Cash for Care Leeds council said those who are eligbile for the support will recieve the payment in the autumn and winter. The council also said it would be in direct contact with those who meet the criteria. A qualifying date for when you need to have been in receipt of Council Tax Support to be eligible for the support has not yet been set. So if you think you may be eligible for the support it might be worth submitting an application. You can find out more by vising, APPLY FOR A COUNCIL TAX REDUCTION If you are on a low income or receiving benefits, you could be eligible for a reduction on your council tax. Whether you are eligible will vary depending on where you live. Also it does not matter whether you own your home or rent, anyone who is struggling financially can apply. You need to apply for a reduction via your local councils website. To make a claim, will need to provide the council with information on your earnings and what pensions, benefits, allowances and tax credits you receive. To find where your local council is visit In some instances your bill could be reduced by 100%, meaning you don't have to pay anything. You could also get a deferral if you're struggling to pay your bill, or you can speak to your council about setting up a payment plan to manage the cost. Pensioners may also find themselves eligible for a council tax reduction. If you receive the Guarantee Credit element of Pension Credit, you could get a 100% discount. If not, you could still get help if you have a low income and less than £16,000 in savings. And a pensioner who lives alone will be entitled to a 25% discount too. Again, to claim this, you will need to contact your local council. WHAT IF I DON'T LIVE IN LEEDS The £742million Household Support Fund has been shared between all councils in England. For example, North Somerset Council has also announced it will provide food vouchers worth up to £100 to those in need. And, families living in Worcestershire can apply for cost of living cash worth £500. Meanwhile, Cheshire West Council's latest allocation of the Household Support Fund is worth £200. Hartlepool council is also distributing £100 food vouchers to all children eligible for free school meals aged between two and 19. But even if you don't live in these areas but are struggling financially or are on benefits you will likely be eligible for help. This is because the fund was originally set up to help those on low incomes or classed as vulnerable. What type of help you can get will vary but it could range from a free cash payment to supermarket vouchers. It's worth bearing in mind, because the new round of the HSF has only just opened, you might not be able to apply for help yet. However, it's worth keeping an eye on your local council's website or social media channels.
