‘Not Trump's dumping ground': Outrage over arrival of foreign US deportees in tiny African nation
Roughly the size of New Jersey, Eswatini — formerly known as Swaziland — is governed by a monarch who has absolute power. On Wednesday, officials said that five deportees from the US were being held in isolated units in its jails, acknowledging 'widespread concern' but insisting the deported men 'pose no threat to the country or its citizens.'
The five men are being kept in solitary confinement, acting government spokesperson Thabile Mdluli told CNN Friday, but stopped short of disclosing the prisons they were held in, citing security risks.
Mdluli did not reveal how long the men would stay in Eswatini, but said: 'Critical engagements between stakeholders are still ongoing.' She had earlier stated that the deportation was the 'result of months of robust high-level engagements' between the US and the southern African nation.
Critics of the move say it is unacceptable for Eswatini to be treated as a 'dumping ground' for people considered unfit to live in the US.
US 'pressure' on African countries
While the Trump administration's mass deportations to the prisons of El Salvador have made headlines around the world, the White House has also been quietly attempting to strike agreements with a number of African countries to accept deportees originally from other nations.
President Donald Trump's aggressive clampdown on immigration has run into logistical hurdles, with some countries refusing to take back their nationals, or doing so only on a limited basis.
Some of those approached by the US, such as Nigeria, have decried being pressured to take in foreign deportees.
'The US is mounting considerable pressure on African countries to accept Venezuelans to be deported from the US, some straight out of prison,' Nigeria's foreign minister, Yusuf Tuggar, said in a televised interview last week, citing Washington's announcement of increased tariffs and recent reductions in the validity of visas.
The US Mission in Nigeria insisted visa changes were 'not the result of any nation's stance on third-country deportees' but rather 'to safeguard US immigration systems.'
'The Trump Administration is committed to removing criminal illegal aliens from the United States,' a White House official told CNN in a statement. 'The Administration frequently engages in conversations with foreign nations on a variety of topics, but we do not share information on private discussions.'
Earlier this month, the US Supreme Court paved the way for the Trump administration to deport certain migrants to countries other than their homeland with little notice. Soon after, eight third-country deportees said by the US to have criminal records landed in South Sudan, a nation on the cusp of civil war.
Who were the prisoners deported to Eswatini?
DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a post on X Wednesday that the five detainees flown to Eswatini were nationals from Jamaica, Laos, Cuba, Yemen and Vietnam.
'This flight took individuals so uniquely barbaric that their home countries refused to take them back,' she wrote. 'These depraved monsters have been terrorizing American communities but thanks to @POTUS Trump @Sec_Noem they are off of American soil,' McLaughlin added.
The prisoners were convicted of various crimes, including child rape, murder and robbery, she said.
Eswatini government spokesperson Mdluli said the nation would now collaborate with the US and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) 'to facilitate the transit of these inmates to their countries of origin.'
She told CNN Thursday, however, that 'there are no timelines at present' for their repatriation.
Why are people outraged?
Eswatini's decision to accommodate America's deportees has met with widespread public disapproval, both due to the perceived risk around their presence and the US portrayal of the nation as a 'safe third country.'
The landlocked country of just over one million people is already beleaguered by poverty, unemployment, high crime rates and congested prisons. Human rights are also deteriorating, according to Human Rights Watch, following a wave of crackdowns on pro-democracy movements. More than half its population lives on less than $4 a day, according to the World Bank.
Opposition party PUDEMO said accepting foreign deportees from the US 'poses a serious risk to our already vulnerable communities' which it said are 'battling a severe scourge' of crime, including rape and murder.
'Our country must not be treated as a dumping ground for those deemed unfit to live elsewhere,' the group said in a statement sent to CNN.
Lucky Lukhele, of the Swaziland Solidarity Network, an exiled civil society group based in South Africa, told CNN it was 'clear racism to think Africa is a dumping ground for Donald Trump.'
Lukhele said he was informed by unnamed sources that more US deportees would be sent to Eswatini, warning that 'Swazi prisons are (already) overcrowded' with prisoners who 'get one meal a day.'
The Multi Stakeholder Forum (MSF), a coalition of Eswatini's civil society groups, said in a statement that the country's 'sovereignty and dignity must not be traded off for unclear deals or political expediency.'
It's not clear how Eswatini stands to benefit from housing US deportees. Government spokesperson Mdluli told CNN that 'the terms of the agreement (with the US) remain classified information.'
Asked whether more foreign US deportees would arrive in Eswatini, she said there was currently no information to that effect.
Eswatini's trade privileges with the US came under threat in April after it was included in Trump's list of tariffs, facing a rate of 10% on its exports. Its neighbor and biggest trading partner, South Africa, was also slapped with a 30% tariff, triggering panic from Eswatini's central bank on the 'implications' for its economy. The tariffs are due to come into effect on August 1.
Its intake of US deportees has similarly generated uproar in South Africa, whose relations with the US have deteriorated under Trump.
A South African government source told CNN, 'There is a feeling that some inside the Trump administration could be using this (the deportation of prisoners to Eswatini) to destabilize South Africa,' given its porous borders and Eswatini's struggling economy.
'Everyone knows that these fellows (the deported convicts) will want to move to South Africa' another diplomatic source said, adding that the US 'did (ask South Africa to accept migrants) and we refused.'
The source said the deportations to Eswatini were a provocation by the US and a direct national security threat.
Ken Opalo, an associate professor at Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service in Washington, DC, said African nations are being pushed by the Trump administration 'into doing egregious things such as accepting migrants from random countries or giving them (the US) their mineral wealth in ambiguous deals that don't make much sense.'
He cautioned: 'It's foolhardy for African countries to think that they can make deals and expect a credible commitment from the White House, given their transactional nature, which means everything is subject to change.'
This story has been updated with additional developments.
CNN's Mary Kay Mallonee contributed to this report.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

11 minutes ago
Abrego Garcia's attorneys request 30-day stay if he is ordered released pending trial
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's attorneys on Monday asked a federal judge for a 30-day stay if he is ordered released from custody while awaiting trial. The lawyers said their request comes after they were advised by the government that if released, the Department of Homeland Security would begin removal proceedings for the accused MS-13 gang member. "Given the uncertainty of the outcome of any removal proceedings, Mr. Abrego respectfully requests that, should the Court deny the government's motion for revocation, the issuance of an order releasing Mr. Abrego be delayed for 30 days to allow Mr. Abrego to evaluate his options and determine whether additional relief is necessary," his lawyers wrote. Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran native, was deported in March to El Salvador's CECOT mega-prison -- despite a 2019 court order barring his deportation to that country due to fear of persecution -- after the Trump administration claimed he was a member of the criminal gang MS-13, which he denies. He was brought back to the U.S. last month to face charges in Tennessee of allegedly transporting undocumented migrants within the U.S. while he was living in Maryland. He has pleaded not guilty. Last week, U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw Jr. said he anticipates making a decision Monday on whether Abrego Garcia should be released pending trial. The attorneys said in Monday's filing that the government does not oppose their request for a stay.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
South African president removes minister criticised by key coalition partner
JOHANNESBURG (Reuters) -South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has removed the higher education minister from her position, his office said on Monday, after his party's key coalition partner accused her of misconduct. The removal of Nobuhle Nkabane from her post could help defuse tensions between Ramaphosa's African National Congress (ANC) and the Democratic Alliance (DA), the two biggest parties in the coalition government, ahead of a budget vote this week. The DA alleges that Nkabane helped engineer the appointment of ANC-connected individuals to the boards of skills development organizations and lied to parliament to cover that up. Nkabane has denied the allegations against her, according to local television station eNCA. She said in a statement that it had been a privilege to serve in her position. The DA welcomed Nkabane's dismissal. The party stepped up its criticism of the minister after Ramaphosa fired its deputy trade minister for not receiving presidential permission for an overseas trip, in the latest spat between the two main governing parties. The DA threatened to vote against the budgets of departments led by ANC ministers it has accused of wrongdoing, including Nkabane, potentially disrupting the national budget. Lawmakers are due to consider the last major piece of budget legislation, the Appropriation Bill, on Wednesday. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's deportation flip-flop reveals America's dirty economic secret
A small bit of reality seems to have infiltrated President Trump's draconian deportation plan, as it sunk in for him that removing immigrant labor means some businesses will be dramatically hurt. "Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace," Trump wrote June 12 on his Truth Social platform. Ironically, he hit key points of the economic argument against mass deportation: America needs valued workers who are established in their communities ― a description of most of the people in the country illegally. Trump then surprised immigration hardliners, telling Homeland Security to pause 'worksite enforcement' on agriculture, restaurant and hotel operation. While it's unclear that such raids have actually stopped, this is an echo of Trump's back-and-forth rhetoric on tariffs, which has prompted some in the financial sector to coin the acronym 'TACO,' or 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' Where does food come from? TACOs aside, let's think for a moment about your food. Nearly every bite you take is made possible in some way by immigrant labor. Fruits and vegetables are picked, packed and shipped by a workforce dependent on immigrants. Meat and eggs are produced mostly in massive livestock facilities that depend heavily on immigrant labor. Animals are similarly slaughtered and cut into the pieces we find in our grocery stores. After that dirty and bloody work is done at the front end of the food industry, our sustenance is unloaded on supermarket docks and stocked on their shelves by workers who include immigrants. Food served in restaurants very often is prepared and served by immigrants, who also clean up. Wait, there's more Food ― agriculture, retail sales and restaurants ― is but one facet of our daily lives touched by immigrant labor. Drive by a construction site, go to a hotel, notice a landscaping or road crew, call a moving company and you'll readily see that a great deal of our workforce is made up of immigrants. Home builders, short 370,000 workers nationwide, say mass deportations will push home prices higher and hamstring the industry. It's not a secret that some number of these workers are in the country illegally. When I worked as editor-publisher of a small western Colorado news operation roughly halfway between Aspen and Vail, about a third of the workers in the market were immigrants. They were essential for the resorts, restaurants and fancy second homes. It is not possible in daily life ― nor is it relevant ― to know which of these workers has proper documentation. What is important is that the work gets done. Most business leaders and politicians know full well that this is essential to our economic wellbeing, because otherwise, we don't have enough workers. U.S. immigration policy has, for decades, recognized the need for immigrant labor ― in no small part because the United States historically has prospered by exploiting the least expensive labor we can find, from slavery to Chinese laborers building our railroads to farmworkers living in deplorable conditions that improved only after massive protests in the 1960s. Our economy depends on exploitation Ancient history? No. During the COVID-19 pandemic, meatpacking workers, who make roughly 40% less than they did before union-busting in the 1970s, suffered disproportionately high rates of infection and death. Our economy depends on worker exploitation. It's pretty easy to exploit someone who's desperate and lacks power ― such as people who travel thousands of miles to do difficult jobs in a land that is increasingly hostile to them, and where they don't know the language. All of this raises the question: What would happen to our economy if, indeed, we were to deport any meaningful proportion of the estimated 8.3 million workers ― 5.2% of the labor force ― who are not legally authorized to be here? It would risk a deep recession, with businesses unable to fill jobs and unable to grow. I, for one, am confident that legal residents aren't going to be clamoring to fill those restaurant, hotel, landscaping, farm, road crew and packing plant jobs. Small businesses that depend on immigrant labor ― and immigrant spending ― would fold. Right now, the U.S. unemployment rate is 4%. Economists regard that as full employment, a point at which people looking for work is in rough balance with the number of positions available. What the hourly wage would have to be to coax your average coddled American into a slaughterhouse? Who knows. If employers who depend on immigrant labor raised wages sufficiently to fill their jobs after mass deportation, the resulting price increases would supercharge inflation. A self-imposed disaster Mass deportation, setting aside the civil rights and humanitarian catastrophe unfolding before our eyes, also would be a self-imposed economic disaster. Perhaps the economy would crash sufficiently that citizens would grovel for all that hard work. The solution, of course, is for Congress to find agreement on improving enforcement of immigration laws, adequately funding immigration courts and creating a realistic path to legal residency and, ultimately, citizenship for Trump's newly discovered 'very good, long time workers … (who are) almost impossible to replace.' That's what happened in our last meaningful immigration reform. That was in 1986, under Ronald Reagan, when 3 million undocumented immigrants were granted amnesty ― a recognition of their importance to the economy that also was humane. Randy Essex is a retired journalist who covered and edited business and political news, including at the Free Press, where this column first appeared. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Trump deportation plan would trigger economic disaster | Opinion Solve the daily Crossword