US Supreme Court lets Trump revoke 'parole' status for migrants
By Andrew Chung
(Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday let President Donald Trump's administration revoke the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan, Cuban, Haitian and Nicaraguan migrants living in the United States, bolstering the Republican president's drive to step up deportations.
The court put on hold Boston-based U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani order halting the administration's move to end the immigration "parole" granted to 532,000 of these migrants by Trump's predecessor Joe Biden, potentially exposing many of them to rapid removal, while the case plays out in lower courts.
As with many of the court's orders issued in an emergency fashion, the decision was unsigned and gave no reasoning. Two of the court's three liberal justices, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor, publicly dissented.
The court botched its assessment of whether the administration was entitled to freeze Talwani's decision pending the litigation, Jackson wrote in an accompanying opinion.
The outcome, Jackson wrote, "undervalues the devastating consequences of allowing the government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are pending."
Immigration parole is a form of temporary permission under American law to be in the country for "urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit," allowing recipients to live and work in the United States. Biden, a Democrat, used parole as part of his administration's approach by to deter illegal immigration at the U.S.-Mexican border.
Trump called for ending humanitarian parole programs in an executive order signed on January 20, his first day back in office. The Department of Homeland Security subsequently moved to terminate them in March, cutting short the two-year parole grants. The administration said revoking the parole status would make it easier to place migrants in a fast-track deportation process called "expedited removal."
The case is one of many that Trump's administration has brought in an emergency fashion to the nation's highest judicial body seeking to undo decisions by judges impeding his sweeping policies, including several targeting immigrants.
The Supreme Court on May 19 also let Trump end a deportation protection called temporary protected status that had been granted under Biden to about 350,000 Venezuelans living in the United States, while that legal dispute plays out.
In a bid to reduce illegal border crossings, Biden starting in 2022 allowed Venezuelans who entered the United States by air to request a two-year parole if they passed security checks and had a U.S. financial sponsor. Biden expanded that process to Cubans, Haitians and Nicaraguans in 2023 as his administration grappled with high levels of illegal immigration from those nationalities.
The plaintiffs, a group of migrants granted parole and Americans who serve as their sponsors, sued administration officials claiming the administration violated federal law governing the actions of government agencies.
Talwani in April found that the law governing such parole did not allow for the program's blanket termination, instead requiring a case-by-case review. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to put the judge's decision on hold.
In its filing, the Justice Department told the Supreme Court that Talwani's order had upended "critical immigration policies that are carefully calibrated to deter illegal entry," effectively "undoing democratically approved policies that featured heavily in the November election" that returned Trump to the presidency.
The plaintiffs told the Supreme Court they would face grave harm if their parole is cut short given that the administration has indefinitely suspended processing their pending applications for asylum and other immigration relief.
They said they would be separated from their families and immediately subject to expedited deportation "to the same despotic and unstable countries from which they fled, where many will face serious risks of danger, persecution and even death."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
10 minutes ago
- New York Post
Biden admin admitted chances of cancer affecting East Palestine residents after Norfolk Southern crash was ‘not zero,' bombshell emails show
WASHINGTON — The Biden administration admitted possible cancer-causing toxins were spread in East Palestine, Ohio, following the Norfolk Southern train derailment in 2023, explosive new emails show, despite the White House insisting residents were safe. 'The occurrence of a cancer-cluster in EP [East Palestine] is not zero,' FEMA recovery leader James McPherson wrote in a March 29, 2024, email to other public health officials — a little more than a year after the crash. 'As you all are aware, the first 48 hours of the fire created a really toxic plume,' he said in the chain of communications, which were first reported by News Nation. 4 'The occurrence of a cancer-cluster in EP [East Palestine] is not zero,' Federal Emergency Management Agency recovery leader James McPherson wrote in a March 29, 2024, email. Xinhua News Agency via Getty Images Just two months earlier, President Biden had excoriated 'multimillion-dollar railroad companies transporting toxic chemicals' for the fiasco — but praised his administration's 'herculean efforts' to resolve the 'vast majority' of East Palestine's problems. The crash spewed harmful chemicals into the air and resulted in 115,000 gallons' worth of carcinogenic vinyl chloride undergoing an open burn — displacing residents and leading to reports of strange illnesses as well as the death of livestock in the weeks following the Feb. 3, 2023, disaster. Michael Regan, the Environmental Protection Agency administrator, showed up on Feb. 22 with TV cameras in tow to capture himself drinking from the local water supply, and months later claimed unequivocally that people in East Palestine were 'not in danger.' 4 President Biden excoriated 'multimillion-dollar railroad companies transporting toxic chemicals' for the fiasco — but praised his administration's 'herculean efforts.' AP 'Since the disaster, EPA has collected more than 100 million air monitoring data points and more than 25 thousand samples in and around the community,' Regan said in an Oct. 17, 2023, statement. 'This data collection continues, and ongoing science-based reviews show that residents of East Palestine are not in danger from contaminated drinking water, soil, or air from the derailment.' But a watchdog group that has been investigating the toxic fallout from the train derailment said the Biden administration's approach was 'flawed' from the start — and has now released emails obtained via Freedom of Information Act requests to prove it. 4 Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Michael Regan showed up on Feb. 22 with TV cameras in tow to capture himself drinking from the local water supply. C-SPAN 'They didn't always test for the right chemicals; they didn't test in the right locations; they didn't have the right detection limits,' Government Accountability Project investigator Lesley Pacey told The Post, saying the Biden admin wasn't 'worrying about public health' but, rather 'public reassurances.' 'They delayed testing for dioxin, and then when they did the testing for dioxin — and also did the testing in people's homes for other chemicals — they used Norfolk Southern contractors, and those contractors used equipment that wasn't correct,' said Pacey, who's been investigating the incident. 'They completely botched this event from the very beginning.' So-called 'ASPECT' planes that monitor air quality weren't deployed due to apparent bad weather until four days after the derailment, she added, when they should have been flown within eight hours of the incident. 4 The federal response also lacked robust monitoring of the water supply and ignored agency policies in order to burn the harmful chemicals, according to Pacey, leaving East Palestine natives 'acutely very, very ill.' Bloomberg via Getty Images The federal response also lacked robust monitoring of the water supply and ignored agency policies in order to burn the harmful chemicals, according to Pacey, allowing East Palestine natives to get 'very, very ill.' The new emails — including batches from FEMA, the EPA, the White House, the National Security Council and the Justice Department, which later settled with Norfolk Southern for $310 million to redress harms to the Ohio community — also show that one year after the chaos admin officials were still discussing the need to develop a 'tripwire to identify cancer clusters.' Biden, who was diagnosed earlier this month with an 'aggressive' form of prostate cancer that has already spread to his bones, often claimed that his late son Beau died from a brain cancer possibly caused by exposure to toxic fumes while serving in Iraq. He also claimed in a 2022 speech that he had cancer due to growing up near oil refineries in Claymont, Delaware, though the White House maintained he was referencing 'non-melanoma skin cancers' that had previously been removed.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Asked Musk if DOGE Was BS Then Called Him Half ‘Boy'
Even President Donald Trump doubted Elon Musk's ability to cut $1 trillion in federal spending. 'Was it all bulls--t?' Trump asked advisers of Musk's cost-cutting under the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), the Wall Street Journal reported in a behind-the-scenes look at the pair's working relationship. Musk pledged to cut $1 trillion from the federal budget but ultimately managed to cut only $170 billion, according to DOGE's own calculations, which have themselves been called into question. Trump was often at odds with Musk. The billionaire's eccentric humor often confused the president, who told his aides that Musk was '50 percent genius, 50 percent boy,' the Journal reported. Musk announced his departure from the White House this week after a contentious tenure marked by mass layoffs, reversals, and court setbacks. Musk frequently butted heads with Trump's staff, according to the Journal, and it escalated to the point that Trump asked White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles to step up and better manage Musk. Trump didn't even know the exact moment Musk was leaving DOGE until Musk himself posted it on X. Musk has also been less forthcoming with money after giving Trump $288 million during his most recent campaign, the Journal noted. He told Trump's advisers this year that he would give $100 million to groups controlled by the president's team before the 2026 midterms. But as of this week, the money hasn't come in. Musk's four-month stint at the White House also included frequent drug use, according to a bombshell New York Times report. Musk told associates he took ecstasy and magic mushrooms and was a regular ketamine user, which led him to develop severe bladder problems. He also carried a pill case with Adderall, the Times reported. In the wake of the Times report, Republicans and Democrats alike have connected Musk's drug use with his erratic behavior—including his Nazi-like salute during Trump's inauguration and mumbling interviews. Musk's departure from the Trump administration is also fueled by his rapidly plummeting Tesla sales. 'I have to get some heat off me and my companies,' he has said privately, the Wall Street Journal reported. The electric car company's net income dropped by 71 percent in the first quarter. Trump, however, said Musk won't stay away entirely. 'Elon is not really leaving,' Trump said on Friday. 'He's going to be back and forth.'
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
PBS challenges executive overreach
PBS filed a lawsuit this week challenging a Trump-era executive order that stripped the public broadcaster of key federal funding, calling the move 'unconstitutional, retaliatory and a direct threat to public media's independence.' The order, signed early this month, is meant to cut money from public media that Trump believes is "radical, woke propoganda disguised as 'news.'" This isn't the first time they tried this. In the last days of the first Trump era, they tried to cut funding for PBS and NPR. But this time, this cut is from the start of the term. This time, the U.S. Department of Education canceled a $78 million grant to the system for educational programming that makes shows like 'Sesame Street' and 'Reading Rainbow.' PBS now argues the long-term effects have been deeply damaging particularly to rural and underserved communities that rely heavily on public broadcasting. The lawsuit specifically singles out rural Minnesota's PBS station, KAWE, known locally as Lakeland PBS. This station is situated in the north-central region of the state, between reservations, lakes and farms, hours away from the Canadian border or larger cities like Duluth or Grand Forks. A Tampa PBS intern spoke with Salon on how this is affecting her station. "It's saddening to hear about all the threats to their jobs," said college senior Nicole Droeger Stephens. "The local community relies on networks that will provide education, entertainment, and news that bigger networks won't cover. Public television and radio provide access to all communities no matter the size, demographics or incomes." That station immediately started their campaign to remind its viewers and online visitors just how important their station is and how to fight back. In this case, Lakeland PBS is the only source of local news in the area. The lawsuit, filed in federal court, alleges the defunding was in response to PBS's editorial choices and coverage that drew criticism from Trump and his allies. Legal experts suggest the case may test the boundaries of executive power over independent media. Local stations have also kicked off their own campaign of pushing back to the Executive Order. Even larger markets, like Tampa's WEDU, posted heartfelt pleas and information on how its viewers can help keep public broadcasting on the air. The White House has made no statement on this development. This suit continues the debate over the future of public media. Advocates argue that PBS remains one of the last truly non-commercial, trusted media institutions in the U.S. and one that now finds itself fighting to stay independent in an increasingly politicized media landscape.
