India abstains from UN resolution on Afghanistan, flags terror concerns
He noted that on the political front, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar recently spoke with the Acting Foreign Minister of Afghanistan Amir Khan Muttaqi.India welcomed 'the strong condemnation of the Pahalgam terrorist attack' of April 22 by the Afghan side.'This conversation followed a meeting between India's Foreign Secretary and the Acting Foreign Minister, where both sides discussed various bilateral issues and regional developments,' Harish said.Jaishankar had spoken with Muttaqi in May, his first interaction with the Taliban's acting Foreign Minister.'Good conversation with Acting Afghan Foreign Minister Mawlawi Amir Khan Muttaqi this evening. Deeply appreciate his condemnation of the Pahalgam terrorist attack. Welcomed his firm rejection of recent attempts to create distrust between India and Afghanistan through false and baseless reports.'Underlined our traditional friendship with the Afghan people and continuing support for their development needs. Discussed ways and means of taking cooperation forward,' Jaishankar had said.While reaffirming India's longstanding partnership with the Afghan people, Harish underscored that India's decision was based on both principle and pragmatism. 'I would like to reiterate India's historic ties with the people of Afghanistan and our enduring commitment to meeting their humanitarian and developmental needs,' he noted."While we remain committed to continued engagement with all relevant stakeholders and broadly support the international community's efforts towards a stable, peaceful and prosperous Afghanistan, India has decided to abstain on this resolution," he added.Harish stated that India's immediate priorities in Afghanistan include providing humanitarian assistance and implementing capacity-building initiatives for the Afghan people. 'India's commitment to Afghanistan's reconstruction is demonstrated through more than 500 development partnership projects across all provinces,' he said.- EndsMust Watch
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
14 minutes ago
- Business Standard
UNHCR concerned over widespread return of Afghan refugees from Iran, Pak
The UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has voiced concern over the widespread and disorganised return of Afghan refugees from Iran and Pakistan, terming the situation in Afghanistan critical, TOLO News reported. UNHCR head in Afghanistan, Arafat Jamal, said that the country is not well prepared to receive this influx of returnees. He demanded restraint, financial support, international dialogue, and cooperation to handle the chaotic situation better and achieve a more stable outcome. Arafat Jamal said: "However, today what we are seeing is the undignified, disorganised, and massive exodus of Afghans from both countries, which is generating enormous pressures on the homeland that is willing to receive them and yet utterly unprepared to do so. We are calling for restraint." Jamal said so far, more than 1.6 million Afghans, including 1.3 million from Iran, have come back to the country this year, a figure more than the UN's forecasts. He termed the intensity of this trend alarming, noting that on some days, over 50,000 people have been reported crossing through the Islam Qala border. He further stated, "Of concern to us is the scale, the intensity, and the manner in which returns are occurring. In terms of the scale, over 1.6 million Afghans have returned from both Pakistan and Iran this year alone, including 1.3 million from Iran," TOLO News reported. Some Afghan refugees living in Iran have expressed concerns regarding forced deportations. They have said that they are not able to go to work and are being taken into custody from markets and workplaces. Enayat Alokozai, an Afghan refugee in Iran, said: "We are facing a humanitarian disaster in the refugee sector. Afghan refugees in Iran are facing serious challenges and are being arrested from marketplaces and workplaces." The UN's warning comes as the number of Afghan refugees deported from neighbouring nations, particularly Iran, has increased, TOLO News reported. Meanwhile, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has issued a warning regarding the rising spread of infectious diseases among Afghan migrants deported from neighbouring nations amid poor sanitary conditions, Khaama Press reported. The WHO emphasised the need to enhance medical resources and staff capacity to address the increasing health risks. It has reported a rise in respiratory infections, skin conditions like scabies, diarrhoea and suspected COVID-19 cases among those deported from neighbouring nations. The ground assessments carried out at key border points, especially Islam Qala in Herat Province, reveal that upper respiratory infections are the most common diseases spread, followed by diarrhoea and dehydration, particularly among children and the elderly. The WHO has also flagged cases of scabies and COVID-19 among deported Afghan migrants. In response to the spread of diseases, the WHO has launched emergency health screenings and mass vaccination campaigns in collaboration with local health authorities at Islam Qala and Spin Boldak border crossings. These initiatives have been launched to stop further outbreaks and provide critical care to vulnerable people.
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
ICC warrant against Taliban chief gives world a second chance to do right in Afghanistan
Last week, the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague issued arrest warrants against the Emir of the Islamic Emirate, Haibatullah Akhundzada, and his chief justice, Abdul Hakim Haqqani, for crimes against humanity 'on gender grounds against girls, women and other persons non-conforming with the Taliban's policy on gender, gender identity or expression.' Two months before the execution, Najeba was sold by a marriage-broker to a man in Khost. Later, the same broker bought the younger daughter, Shaista. We do not know their stories, nor those of the sons left behind in Kabul. For twenty days after she was executed in the penalty area of Kabul's soccer stadium, as small boys roamed through the packed terraces selling tea and sweets, Zarmina's body lay outside the morgue, waiting for a loved one to claim it. Three years earlier, in 1996, Zarmina had poisoned her violent husband, Alauddin Khwazak, with sleeping pills. Later that night, according to an investigator, her older daughter, Najeba, crushed her father's head with a single blow from a five-kilo mason's hammer. Local authorities eventually buried Zarmina at the Khair Khana cemetery, the last page of her story marked with a small, blank tombstone. The warrants may mean little in practice, as experts Rachel Reid and Roxanna Shapour point out. Hibtaullah, like Chief Justice Haqqani, never leaves Kandahar, rendering him immune to arrest. The powers that matter—among them the United States, China, Russia, Israel, India, and Pakistan—are not parties to the Rome Statute, the treaty that established the ICC. Zarmina was killed before the court came into being in 2003. And yet, the ICC warrants matter. In 1997, as Zarmina was being tortured in a Kabul prison, United States diplomat Robin Raphel was lobbying for an oil pipeline from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan into Pakistan, declassified documents show. There were no diplomatic conversations about the reports of women being pulled out of schools, denied jobs, blocked from medical care, and flogged in public. This time, the proceedings at the ICC reveal Afghan women asking the most important question of our time: Are there some things so awful that they lie outside what it means to be human? Also read: No male 'chaperone' = no existence. Life under Taliban rule for Afghan women, in their own words The erasure of women The singer Inger Bosen recorded this landai, or couplet, as women worked or gathered in private: 'Isn't there a single daring man in this village? My flame-coloured pants are burning my thighs.' 'In an almost playful way,' scholar Rubina Saigol pointed out, 'patriarchy is turned on its head as women are openly expressing passion, while men are implicitly afraid to rise to the challenge. This makes women more powerful, more able to transgress.' 'A woman is best at home or in the grave,' records one old saying. But, as Saigol reminds us, women found other spaces too. Last year, the Emir silenced even these sounds of dissent. 'Women must also not be heard singing or reading aloud, even from inside their houses. Whenever an adult woman leaves her home out of necessity, she is obliged to conceal her voice, face, and body.' Walls have been ordered raised so women cannot see out of windows onto the street, Ghazal Goshiri reports. The ICC prosecutors note that for girls, 'secular education over grade 6 was banned and access to university education severely restricted.' Large numbers of women were removed from the workforce, and male relatives encouraged to take their place. Businesses owned and operated by women were shut down. Women could not travel without a male guardian, or mahram. Female students are now being steered toward madrasas, but their curriculum is limited, journalist Sharif Amiri reports, to Arabic grammar, rhetoric, jurisprudence and the prescribed conditions of prayer. Girls are also taught about the social roles expected of them, including obedience to their husbands and raising children to become jihadists. Eight out of ten girls are excluded from school, Mahjouba Nowrozi reports, and girls above the age of 12 may not receive any education at all. This has little to do with religion—and everything to do with control. Also read: Taliban makes women unsafe everywhere. 'Not as bad as in Afghanistan' is now a dangerous tool The state of jihad Late in 2022, Hakim published al-Emarah al-Islamiyya wa-Nizamuha, or the Islamic Emirate and Its Government—a constitution for Taliban-led Afghanistan that was authored, According to his son Abd al-Ghani al-Maywandi, the chief justice authored this document even as he led the negotiating team in Doha, discussing power-sharing with the Afghan republic and the United States. The leader of the Emirate, Hakim writes, is chosen by an elite council and bound merely to consult them. The role of the public is to acclaim their decisions and obey. For Haqqani, the Islamic Emirate is a vehicle for perpetual jihad. The soldiers of the Emirate, he writes, cannot 'forsake jihad solely with the exit of the Americans and their allies from Afghanistan. That is not the aim of the Afghan jihad. The aim of this jihad is the establishment of the order of Almighty Allah over His servants.' Educated at the Dar al-'Ulum al-Haqqania seminary in Akora Khattak in northwest Pakistan, from 1976 to 1980, Haqqani is deeply influenced by the toxic patriarchal values the leaders of the seminary perpetuated. To ensure a quiescent population, the Islamic Emirate has embarked on the annihilation of modern education: The Ministry of Education says it has set up 22,972 madrasas, while only 269 modern schools have been built. The curriculum has been excised of references to democracy and human rights, anatomical diagrams in biology, mention of music, television, and celebrations. Afghan cultural traditions, ranging from the Attan dance and Nawruz, to indigenous musical instruments and women's traditional dress, are being erased from textbooks. The objective is to transform Afghan youth into the kind of young people who made up the Taliban's early ranks, educated in refugee-camp seminaries across the Pakistani border. For the chief justice, indeed, secular education is a problem in itself—even for men, as religious studies scholar John Butt explains. 'Experience shows that immersion in modern, secular sciences is lethal,' Haqqani writes, both for people's beliefs and for their actions. Teachers and students of these sciences tend to abandon the Quran and sunnah, depend on intellectual reasoning, and abandon the requirements of Islam. Indeed, the wave of atheism that swamped the government of Afghanistan can be put down to the dominance of contemporary sciences over religious sciences. 'The Taliban—notorious before August 2021 for their terrorist attacks on teachers and students at Afghan universities, as well as their destruction of schools in rural areas—have no meaningful commitment whatever to modern, pluralist forms of critical education,' notes historian William Maley. Like the Komsomol and Hitlerjugend before them, they seek a production line of youth trained to kill—and to take delight in it. Also read: Taliban's Afghanistan has become a giant prison for women. The world couldn't care less A broken compass Since the Rome Statute came into force in 2003, most nation-states have found reason to remain outside: The United States will not have its soldiers prosecuted in a foreign forum. China does not want external jurisdiction over its human rights practices. India has concerns over interference in domestic conflicts. Russia faces ICC warrants against President Vladimir Putin for the war in Ukraine, just as Israel's Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, does for the murderous campaign in Gaza. These concerns aren't without merit. As law scholar KP Prakash argues, many believe prosecutions should be sanctioned by the UN Security Council. There are also serious questions about national sovereignty and institutional autonomy. And yet, while these debates rage, the stonings, shootings, and public executions have resumed. Diplomats from China, Russia, Iran, Pakistan, and India continue to deliberate over how best to do business with the Second Islamic Emirate. There has been no greater crime by an organised state since Apartheid: An entire half of Afghanistan's population lives under conditions of penal incarceration, subjected to vile and arbitrary punishments. Zarmina never got the grave she deserved, nor the justice she was owed. The world community now has a second chance to do the right thing in Afghanistan. The author is Contributing Editor at ThePrint. His X handle is @praveenswami. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Pakistan's dirty trick at UNSC, attempts back-door push for Kashmir issue as panel chair
As its month-long presidency of the UN Security Council comes to an end, Pakistan is set to hold an open debate on global disputes, with hopes of drawing attention to the Kashmir issue, though without naming it directly. read more As Pakistan's month-long presidency of the UN Security Council (UNSC) nears its end, Islamabad is preparing to hold an open debate on unresolved global disputes, indirectly aiming to highlight the Kashmir issue, according to a report from The Times of India. Pakistan plans to follow this with a resolution urging member states to use peaceful means to settle conflicts. Although Pakistan's main goal is to draw attention to Kashmir, it is unlikely to mention Jammu and Kashmir directly in the resolution, fearing a possible veto. For a UNSC resolution to pass, it requires at least nine votes and no veto from any of the five permanent members. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Ishaq Dar, will travel to New York to chair the debate on 22 July. UN Secretary-General António Guterres is also expected to brief the meeting. According to the Security Council Report, Pakistan hopes to pass a resolution encouraging the full use of all mechanisms under Chapter VI of the UN Charter. Article 33 of this chapter urges parties in a dispute that threatens international peace to seek solutions through mediation, arbitration, or other peaceful means of their choosing. 'This will likely be a broad, conceptual resolution focused on general principles rather than specific issues, to avoid objections,' says Syed Akbaruddin, former Indian Ambassador to the UN. Pakistan also knows that, apart from China, the other permanent UNSC members continue to view Kashmir as a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan. While member states recognise the UNSC's role in maintaining peace and security, many stress that any efforts must respect a country's sovereignty and cannot impose settlement terms without the consent of all involved parties. This open debate follows earlier closed-door discussions Pakistan initiated on 5 May to address India-Pakistan tensions after the Pahalgam terrorist attack. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pakistan is also planning another significant event during its presidency to promote cooperation between the UN and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), a 57-member group that has often supported Pakistan's stance on Kashmir.
