‘Hostile:' Bishop hit with damning claims
In an emotional statement to a Senate committee on the quality of governance at universities, former ANU council member Liz Allen accused Ms Bishop of threatening behaviour after she was wrongly accused of leaking information about ANU's leadership to the media.
Dr Allen alleged the bullying she suffered due to senior leadership, including Vice-Chancellor Genevieve Bell and Ms Bishop, pushed her into contemplating suicide, and senior leadership failed to support her after she suffered a miscarriage.
'ANU leaders behave with impunity, keep counsel in the dark and fail to adequately disclose conflicts,' Dr Allen told the Senate committee.
'Since 2024 I've experienced threats, intimidation and bullying because I sought greater probity of council conduct.
'I was bullied into near suicide. I miscarried a much wanted baby. I've lost the opportunity of a promotion. I fear for my job, and my career has been derailed.' Former Australian Foreign Affairs Minister, Julie Bishop, is now the Chancellor of Australian National University. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia
Under university leadership structures, the council acts as an institution's governing body and is chaired by the chancellor.
Dr Allen told the Senate committee during one council meeting in February, Ms Bishop specifically accused herself and another council member of leaking to the media – claims she rejects.
'I take my obligations extremely seriously and would never compromise my integrity,' she said.
'When I defended myself in this meeting, the chancellor suggested I defamed her. The repeated public allegations and increasing aggression was so distressing I cried and began to hyperventilate during the meeting.'
She said Ms Bishop 'further berated me' and another elected council member in a private room following the meeting, in which Ms Bishop threatened a legal investigation, and said she would call 'a journalist to confirm I wasn't leaking' and blocked her from exiting the room.
'I became further distressed with the continued pursuit of false leaking allegations,' she said.
'Chancellor Bishop laughed incredulously at my emotional response, and at one point blocked me leaving the room.
'I was so distressed I couldn't breathe and struggled walking.' ANU demographer Dr Liz Allen said she had been bullied into 'near suicide'. NewsWire/ Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia
Dr Allen, who was pregnant at the time, told the committee the 'traumatising' meeting affected her 'so deeply' that she 'decided to kill myself' while driving home from the meeting.
Two weeks later, she also suffered a miscarriage, after she was told her baby son's 'heart stopped beating'.
'I pulled over to write final goodbyes to my children and my partner. I emailed my supervisors so they knew I hadn't done anything wrong,' she said.
'A call from my husband stopped me taking my life I was pregnant at the time of these incidents.'
Dr Allen told the committee 'further bullying and threats' continued after she launched a workplace complaint following the meeting, and alleged the chief people officer 'implied' she had 'mental health problems and dismissed the dysfunction of council'.
She was also told by ANU Pro Chancellor Alison Kitchen that her 'position was untenable' and that she had a 'duty to resign all because I had no confidence in the council'.
While Ms Bishop and Prof Bell were invited to the inquiry, they were unable to attend.
ANU chief operating officer Jonathan Churchill said Ms Bishop was unable to attend the inquiry due to commitments as the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy on Myanmar, while Prof Bell was 'on sick leave' with the flu. Neither Ms Bishop or ANU Vice-Chancellor Genevieve Bell attended the inquiry. NewsWire/ Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia
While he didn't make specific reference to the claims, he said 'a number of the statements' made against ANU did 'not appear to be correct'.
'We have listened carefully to the proceedings from earlier today and the allegations made against the university. We take what has been said very seriously,' he said.
'We will examine all of the statements made and respond with particularity in writing to those assertions.'
He also withdrew from commenting on allegations put forward by Dr Allen, adding that it could compromise the current grievance procedure launched by Dr Allen.
Prior to Mr Churchill's appearance, inquiry chair and Labor senator Leah Blythe said that should ANU's representation not be able to 'answer senators' question' the inquiry would 'reserve our right to recall those witnesses at a later date'.
'Our inquiry goes till December, so I'm sure we will be able to find a time which is suitable for all, if that is required,' she said.
In a statement during questioning, Greens' higher education spokeswoman Mehreen Faruqi said she was 'shell shocked and shaken' by Dr Allen's comments, and questioned Prof bell and Ms Bishop's future at the university.
'I feel no other pathway here but for Vice Chancellor Bell and Chancellor bishop to resign or be sacked,' she said.
news.com.au mental health helplines
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'Appalling mistake': Prime Minister Anthony Albanese ‘adopts' language of terrorists in calling slain fighters ‘martyrs'
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has come under fire for 'adopting the language of terrorists' during his press conference to announce Australia would recognise a Palestinian state. Mr Albanese, alongside Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong on Monday, said Australia would formally recognise Palestine in the UN next month. Sky News host Chris Kenny said he was 'surprised' Mr Albanese's use of the word 'martyrs' had not gotten more backlash. 'Our government has made it clear that there can be no role for the terrorists of Hamas in any future Palestinian state. This is one of the commitments Australia has sought and received from President Abbas and the Palestinian Authority,' Mr Albanese said. 'The Palestinian Authority has reaffirmed it recognises Israel's right to exist in peace and security. It has committed to demilitarise and to hold general elections. 'It is pledged to abolish the system of payments to the families of prisoners and martyrs.' Speaking to Sky News, Shadow Finance Minister James Paterson said it was an 'appalling mistake, I hope'. 'Of course, that is what the Palestinian Authority calls people who get on school buses and blow themselves to smithereens and take Israeli and Jewish children with them,' Mr Paterson told Kenny on Tuesday. 'No Australian Prime Minister should endorse or use language like that. We should call it for what it is. The Palestinian Authority pays money to the family of terrorists after they kill Israelis. It's one of the many reasons why we should not recognise a Palestinian state.' Senator Paterson said the 'flimsy promise of reform' from Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas should be treated with 'contempt'. Mr Abbas is the Palestinian Authority President, Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organisation and the leader of radical political party Fatah. Fatah has numerous military arms - including the Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades which participated in the October 7 attacks in Gaza. Mr Albanese was given assurances about the future of democracy in Palestine, the demilitarisation of the territories and the elimination of Martyr funds by Mr Abbas. The Palestinian Authority operates a so-called 'Martyrs Fund,' which pays monthly stipends to the families of Palestinians killed or imprisoned for carrying out attacks against Israelis civilians. The longer the prison sentence, the higher the payment - with some families receiving the equivalent of $5,155 per month which have been linked to incentivising terrorism. Textbooks used in Palestinian Authority-run schools have long been condemned by international watchdogs for promoting hatred and glorifying violence. In one instance, a children's book about female suicide bomber Hanadi Jaradat - who killed 21 people in a 2003 bombing - was shared by the organisation's South Hebron Directorate of Education.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Albanese is crying poor, but we're losing billions a year from untaxed gas
The Australia Institute report finds that the total value of our natural gas exports over the four years to June 2024 was $265 billion. It estimates that 56 per cent of this resulted in no royalties, state or federal. 'This means that more than half the gas exported from Australia is given for free to the companies exporting it,' it says. The royalties that were paid over the past four years represented less than 4 per cent of the total value of the gas exported. It should have been nearer 9 per cent, yielding an extra $13 billion. We're always being told how important mining and gas are to the economy. But how, exactly? It's not our job to help big foreign companies make big profits. Mining and gas are capital-intensive industries, meaning they don't employ many people. And most of the capital equipment they use would be imported. The increasingly foreign-owned BHP tells us it's the Big Australian, while telling the taxman it's the Big Singaporean. So it's vitally important that the businesses – even when they're locally owned – pay a fair price for the natural resources we allow them to extract and take away. The energy and minerals are, after all, non-renewable. And it's equally important that the mineral and gas companies pay a fair bit of tax on their hefty profits. We've had far too much, for instance, of the increasingly foreign-owned BHP telling us it's the Big Australian, while telling the taxman it's the Big Singaporean. Which brings us back to next week's roundtable. The radical change in the way companies are taxed, proposed by the Productivity Commission as a way of improving our productivity, has been opposed by 24 business lobby groups, and isn't likely to fly. But it was intended to reduce the company tax paid by most of our companies, while covering the government's loss of revenue by increasing the tax on our 500 biggest companies, many of them the local subsidiaries of foreign multinationals. The change would have made it harder for them to fiddle their taxes. And they would have included our big foreign-owned gas companies. The Productivity Commission's modelling in preparation for the roundtable includes an assessment of each of our taxes: how much they damage the economy by discouraging people from working, saving and investing. Loading I have doubts about these exercises, but the commission's assessment gave the worst rating to the state governments' stamp duties, the rate of company tax, and the top rate of personal income tax. (I've been on that top rate for almost all my career, and it's done nothing to dampen my enthusiasm for bashing out another pontification about economics.) But here's the point: it gave the petroleum resource rent tax a small positive rating. In other words, it said that, if the rate of this tax were increased, it would do more to encourage working, saving and investing. That's an indication of the price we're paying by allowing the accidental free ride we're giving the gas exporters to roll on. Earlier this year, the boss of the Australia Institute, Dr Richard Denniss, caused a stir by claiming that the government takes more money from uni students through HECS than it collects from the petroleum resource rent tax. It was such a strange assertion the ABC set its fact-checkers on him. They had to admit his numbers were right.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Move may not tilt events in Gaza, but Palestine recognition a step forward
The Australian government has announced it will recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly next month. Australia, in joining a growing band of world opinion, which includes Britain, France and Canada, is declaring that recognition is a step towards giving to the Palestinians something desired by most people: a homeland. The state of Palestine should be more than a state of mind. It should be real. More than three-quarters of UN members agree. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong, like other world leaders, believe a two-state solution is the answer. It was, said the prime minister on Monday, 'humanity's best hope to break the cycle of violence in the Middle East. Until Israeli and Palestinian statehood is permanent, peace can only be temporary.' Critics, from many angles, may see this as both a hollow gesture, one that rewards bad actors and one powered by the engine of domestic politics. Tens of thousands of pro-Palestine demonstrators marching through the streets of Melbourne and across the Sydney Harbour Bridge can have that effect. Measuring the effect of recognition to the diabolically complex Middle East is harder to discern. The history of the past 100 years is a road strewn with false starts, dead-ends, betrayed hopes, terror and cities in ruins, and thousands dead. Half a century ago, the UN General Assembly reaffirmed the rights of Palestinians to self-determination and sovereignty. There have been accords, road maps, ceasefires and wars. In 2002, the UN Security Council affirmed a vision of two states – Israel and Palestine. In 2007, Hamas took power in Gaza. Its stated ideology, in part, is the eradication of Israel. To terrorists, a life is secondary to the cause.
