
‘New ceasefire agreed' after clashes in Syria
A previous ceasefire announced the day before quickly fell apart.
The announcement came after Israel launched a series of rare air strikes in the heart of Damascus, part of a campaign that it said is intended to defend the Druze – who also form a substantial community in Israel – and to push Islamic militants away from its border.
The escalating violence has appeared to be the most serious threat yet to the ability of Syria's new rulers to consolidate control of the country after a rebel offensive led by Islamist insurgent groups ousted long-time despotic leader, Bashar Assad, in December, bringing an end to a nearly 14-year civil war.
As clashes have raged for days in the southern Syrian city of Sweida between government forces and Druze armed groups, Israel has launched dozens of strikes targeting government troops and convoys, and on Wednesday struck the Syrian Defence Ministry headquarters in the heart of Damascus.
That strike killed one person and injured 18, Syrian officials said. Another strike hit near the presidential palace in the hills outside Damascus.
Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said after the air strike in a post on X that the 'painful blows have begun'.
An Israeli military official said the army was preparing for a 'multitude of scenarios' and that a brigade, normally comprising thousands of soldiers, was being pulled out of Gaza and sent to the Golan Heights.
Syria's Defence Ministry had earlier blamed militias in the Druze-majority area of Sweida for violating a ceasefire agreement that had been reached on Tuesday, causing Syrian army soldiers to return fire.
It said they were 'adhering to rules of engagement to protect residents, prevent harm, and ensure the safe return of those who left the city back to their homes'.
Meanwhile, reports of attacks on civilians continued to surface, and Druze with family members in the conflict zone searched desperately for information about their fate amid communication blackouts.
The primarily Sunni Muslim leaders have faced suspicion from religious and ethnic minorities, whose fears increased after clashes between government forces and pro-Assad armed groups in March spiralled into sectarian revenge attacks.
Hundreds of civilians from the Alawite religious minority, to which Assad belongs, were killed.
In Jaramana near the Syrian capital, Evelyn Azzam, 20, said she fears that her husband, Robert Kiwan, 23, is dead. The newlyweds live in the Damascus suburb but Mr Kiwan would commute to Sweida for work each morning and got trapped there when the clashes erupted.
Ms Azzam said she was on the phone with Mr Kiwan when security forces questioned him and a colleague about whether they were affiliated with Druze militias. When her husband's colleague raised his voice, she heard a gunshot. Mr Kiwan was then shot while trying to appeal.
'They shot my husband in the hip from what I could gather,' she said, struggling to hold back tears. 'The ambulance took him to the hospital. Since then, we have no idea what has happened.'
The Druze religious sect began as a 10th-century offshoot of Ismailism, a branch of Shiite Islam.
More than half the roughly one million Druze worldwide live in Syria. Most of the other Druze live in Lebanon and Israel, including in the Golan Heights, which Israel captured from Syria in the 1967 Middle East War and annexed in 1981.
In Israel, the Druze are seen as a loyal minority and often serve in the military.
In Syria, the Druze have been divided over how to deal with the country's new leaders, with some advocating for integrating into the new system while others have remained suspicious of the authorities in Damascus and pushed for an autonomous Druze region.
On Wednesday, Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said in a statement that the Israeli army 'will continue to attack regime forces until they withdraw from the area — and will also soon raise the bar of responses against the regime if the message is not understood'.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
26 minutes ago
- The National
Netanyahu makes more enemies by the day within Israel's military
Throughout my many stays over decades there as a journalist, I was always struck by how Tzahal – the Hebrew acronym for the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) – was an inescapable part of life for Israelis. Just as most Americans will not hear a wrong word said about their 'veterans', so too have those who have served in Israel's armed forces historically been almost beyond reproach. READ MORE: Home Secretary 'made false allegations against Palestine Action' I'd go as far as to say that even above religion itself, Israeli military service, and by logical extension the IDF, is one of the most significant factors contributing to social cohesion in the country – or at least was up until now. In a country that historically has revered its military leaders and heroes, it's quite something then when those same figures, past and present, start to make their own voices heard by questioning the policies of the Israeli prime minister and government. Even long before the war in Gaza, the rumblings of disquiet were there. But with every day that passes, those voices are becoming more widespread and vociferous. This past week, though, what we have been witnessing is arguably a turning point in public dissent within Israel's influential and exalted military and security establishment. Just a few days ago, almost 600 former Israeli military, intelligence and law enforcement officials signed an open letter to US president Donald Trump (below) urging him to pressure prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to end the war in Gaza, arguing that Hamas no longer poses a strategic threat to Israel. Calling themselves the Commanders for Israel's Security (CIS) group, the list of signatories reads like a veritable Who's Who of soldiers and spies, some near legendary in Israel in terms of their deeds and service records. Among them were former prime minister and IDF chief Ehud Barak and former IDF chiefs of staff Moshe Ya'alon and Dan Halutz; ex-Shin Bet directors Nadav Argaman, Yoram Cohen, Ami Ayalon, Yaakov Peri, and Carmi Gillon; ex-Mossad chiefs Tamir Pardo, Efraim Halevy and Danny Yatom; and former Israel Police commissioners Dudi Cohen, Moshe Karadi, Rafi Peled, and Assaf Hefetz. Yes, admittedly, some have criticised Netanyahu and his policies before, but never so many and in such an orchestrated way. READ MORE: David Lammy contradicted as UK 'shares Gaza spy plane data with Israel' As the Times of Israel reported, the group also issued a joint video message with a call to end the war in Gaza, arguing that Israel has racked up more losses than victories and that the fighting has dragged on for political reasons rather than strategic military need. 'Each of these people sat in cabinet meetings, operated in the inner circles, attended all the most sensitive decision-making processes,' a voiceover at the start of the video says by way of introduction. 'Together, they have more than a thousand years' experience in national security and diplomacy.' Collectively, the CIS group is a powerful lobby, of that there is no doubt. But this will not stop some Netanyahu supporters asking 'So what?', given that most of the group are now retired. But what's important to recognise here is that it's not just past but very much present-day military voices too that are expressing their disquiet. Current IDF chief of staff Eyal Zamir might have been handpicked by Netanyahu to do the prime minister and his right-wing coalition government's bidding in Gaza, but even he, it would now seem, draws the line at plans for the complete 'conquest' of Gaza. Just to be clear here, Zamir is no Mr Nice Guy and politically pretty hard line. In fact, it was almost a given that his appointment would deliver the 'total victory' in Gaza Netanyahu promised. But last Monday, Zamir moved to reduce the size of the standing army, arguing that the decision to fully occupy Gaza constitutes a 'trap' for the IDF. According to Israel's state broadcaster Kan, Zamir told Netanyahu, 'You're going to create a trap in Gaza,' and was also quoted as saying that full occupation 'will significantly endanger the lives of the hostages and cause erosion in the army'. Such was the annoyance among the Netanyahu household, it seems, that Netanyahu's son went on social media to suggest that Zamir was behind a 'rebellion and attempted military coup that is fit for a banana republic in Central America in the 70s'. And so in the space of a week, Netanyahu finds himself under almost unprecedented attack from his top general of the moment and military and intelligence leaders of the past. There is a perverse irony in all of this. For ever since coming to power in his very first term, Netanyahu has insisted that Israel's security must override all other considerations. This, he hoped, would be his lasting legacy. Yet here right now, a pantheon of those who for decades served on the frontlines of Israel's security apparatus are quite simply telling him that his policies over Gaza will result in the opposite, creating more insecurity and deepening Israel's pariah status. Just as Netanyahu has tested the limits of Israel's relationship with Trump and its US and European allies, so too is he gambling with the unspoken limits of his government's relationship with its security establishment. It's worth remembering that Israel has legislative elections at the very latest by October next year, but which could quite easily be called before then. Netanyahu has, so far, prolonged the war in Gaza to remain in power and now his military is getting uneasy about a prolonged campaign. READ MORE: Harrowing before and after pictures show extent of devastation in Gaza As one academic commentator observed, for years, Israel's state-army-people trinity has been the bedrock on which the country has been built. That trinity is now fracturing like never before. This week, in their video address, the CIS group called for those currently in the posts they once held to take a stance against the continuation of the war. They must 'bravely stand up before the prime minister and before the cabinet and say their piece… about this war and its futility,' said ex-Shin Bet director Nadav Argaman. When not one but five of Israel's ex-chiefs of the Shin Bet internal security and counterintelligence service agree with such a statement, it's time to sit up and take notice. It's unlikely of course that Netanyahu will do so, which means that he will only further lose the allegiance of those on whom Israel's security has depended for so long.

The National
an hour ago
- The National
John Swinney to consider imposing state boycott on Israel
Scottish Greens co-leader Ross Greer has written to the First Minister demanding that he adopt the principles of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign, which aims to put pressure on the Israeli economy in the mould of the anti-apartheid boycott of South Africa. A Scottish Government spokesperson said ministers would 'consider' the proposal, which would see official guidance issued to businesses urging them to end trade with Israel, as was done with Russia in 2022. Greer's letter to John Swinney welcomed the First Minister's acknowledgement that 'there is a genocide in Palestine', but the MSP said he disagreed with the assertion that he was 'trying to do everything I possibly can do to make sure that we apply the pressure' on Israel. Before setting out a raft of measures to implement the BDS campaigns' demands, Greer (below) said: 'As we both know and have previously discussed, there is much more which the Scottish Government can be doing to put pressure on Israel to end its genocide in Palestine.' (Image: Gordon Terris) He called for the Scottish Government to scrap part of the Local Government Act 1988 to allow councils to bar companies from winning contracts if they participated in the illegal occupation of Palestinian territory. Greer suggested this could be achieved through an amendment to the Community Wealth Building Bill. As well as issuing guidance to businesses recommending that they halt trade with Israel, Greer suggested that the Scottish Government should stop funding arms companies which have supplied Israel during the genocide and 'all other companies directly complicit in the occupation'. READ MORE: David Lammy contradicted as UK 'shares Gaza spy plane data with Israel' Pension funds should also be encouraged to divest from companies 'complicit in Israel's apartheid regime', Greer added. Finally, he suggested imposing financial penalties on 'complicit companies' through the Scottish Government's powers to impose surcharges on non-domestic rates. Speaking to The National, Greer said: 'Unfortunately the First Minister's claim that he is doing everything possible for Palestine just isn't true. Most foreign policy powers lie with Westminster, but there are still meaningful actions the Scottish Government could take, yet hasn't. (Image: AP) 'John Swinney now rightly recognises what is happening as a genocide. Those words must be matched with action, but we've seen very little of that from his government. Taxpayers' money is still being handed to companies who the United Nations has identified as being directly complicit in Israel's campaign of ethnic cleansing. 'The worst crime against humanity of our time is being inflicted on the Palestinian people right in front of our eyes. 'Scotland has a moral responsibility to act. The same approach helped end apartheid in South Africa. Now we must show that solidarity with the people of Palestine.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Government has repeatedly called for an immediate and sustainable ceasefire, the unconditional release of all hostages and an urgent increase in humanitarian aid to Gaza. The Scottish Government will continue to press the UK Government to recognise a sovereign Palestinian state, as part of a two-state solution to secure lasting peace in the region. 'Ministers will consider and reply to Mr Greer's letter.'

Rhyl Journal
4 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
I push Keir Starmer to be more extroverted in Scotland
Mr Sarwar said he speaks to the Prime Minister every two or three weeks, often calling at weekends when they both have more free time. The Scottish Labour leader also said he will not engage in any 'back room stitch-ups' with other parties if he becomes first minister following the Scottish election next year. At an Edinburgh Fringe event in front of a live audience, Mr Sarwar was interviewed by Catherine Salmond, editor of The Herald. He was pressed on his relationship with the UK Labour leader and whether Sir Keir was comfortable coming north of the border. He said: 'We're different personalities… I am much more probably conversational, out there, a bit of an extrovert. 'I think it's safe to say he's a bit more introverted in that sense.' Mr Sarwar said Sir Keir had become more relaxed and confident in the five years since becoming Labour leader. He said Sir Keir was more relaxed in Scotland than in other parts of the UK, adding: 'I think we've built up a rapport, probably because I am pushing to be a bit more of extroverted than perhaps he is in other parts.' He said he spoke to the Prime Minister around 'two or three times a month'. However he said the early part of Labour's response to the war in Gaza had been 'challenging' for his party, referring to an interview the Prime Minister gave where he said Israel had the 'right' to withhold power and water from Gaza in response to the October 7 attacks. 'I think the early part was challenging, he himself accepts that what he said in the LBC interview wasn't right,' Mr Sarwar said. Discussing the Middle East further, he said: 'I think we have to be doing much more to hold the Israeli government to account. 'To provide evidence that there is not any components that are being used in a proactive way in Gaza.' Looking ahead to the 2026 Scottish election, Mr Sarwar said he was putting his 'heart, soul energy, time' into winning. He said it would be a 'very close election' likely to result in a 'parliament of minorities'. Rather than doing deals such as the SNP-Green powersharing agreement, he said he would 'work progressively with the parliament' if he became first minister. He said: 'We are looking to form a minority Scottish Labour government that does no kind of back room stich-up but instead moves to govern based on what we promised.'