logo
'I won't humiliate myself': Brazil's president sees no point in tariff talks with Trump

'I won't humiliate myself': Brazil's president sees no point in tariff talks with Trump

Straits Times3 hours ago
Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva poses for a picture after an interview with Reuters at the Alvorada Palace, in Brasilia, Brazil, August 6, 2025. REUTERS/Adriano Machado
BRASILIA - As U.S. tariffs on Brazilian goods jumped to 50% on Wednesday, Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told Reuters in an interview that he saw no room for direct talks now with U.S. President Donald Trump that would likely be a "humiliation."
Brazil is not about to announce reciprocal tariffs, he said. Nor will his government give up on cabinet-level talks. But Lula himself is in no rush to ring the White House.
"The day my intuition says Trump is ready to talk, I won't hesitate to call him," Lula said in an interview from his presidential residence in Brasilia. "But today my intuition says he doesn't want to talk. And I won't humiliate myself."
Despite Brazil's exports facing one of the highest tariffs imposed by Trump, the new U.S. trade barriers look unlikely to derail Latin America's largest economy, giving Lula more room to stand his ground against Trump than most Western leaders.
Lula described U.S.-Brazil relations at a 200-year nadir after Trump tied the new tariff to his demands for an end to the prosecution of right-wing former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is standing trial for plotting to overturn the 2022 election.
The president said Brazil's Supreme Court, which is hearing the case against Bolsonaro, "does not care what Trump says and it should not," adding that Bolsonaro should face another trial for provoking Trump's intervention, calling the right-wing former president a "traitor to the homeland."
"We had already pardoned the U.S. intervention in the 1964 coup," said Lula, who got his political start as a union leader protesting against the military government that followed a U.S.-backed ouster of a democratically elected president.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore MRT track issue causes 5-hour delay; Jeffrey Siow says 'we can and will do better'
Singapore ST Explains: What is a track point fault and why does it cause lengthy train disruptions?
Singapore Three people taken to hospital after fire in Punggol executive condominium
Singapore Elderly man found dead in SingPost Centre stairwell could have been in confused state: Coroner
Singapore 81 primary schools to hold ballot for Phase 2C of Primary 1 registration
Singapore S'pore and Indonesia have discussed jointly developing military training facilities: Chan Chun Sing
Singapore Two workers died after being hit by flying gas cylinders in separate incidents in 2025
Sport Young Lions and distance runner Soh Rui Yong left out of SEA Games contingent
"But this now is not a small intervention. It's the president of the United States thinking he can dictate rules for a sovereign country like Brazil. It's unacceptable."
The Brazilian president said he had no personal issues with Trump, adding that they could meet at the United Nations next month or U.N. climate talks in November. But he noted Trump's track record of dressing down White House guests such as South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy.
"What Trump did with Zelenskiy was humiliation. That's not normal. What Trump did with Ramaphosa was humiliation," Lula said. "One president can't be humiliating another. I respect everyone and I demand respect."
Lula said his ministers were struggling to open talks with U.S. peers, so his government was focused on domestic measures to cushion the economic blow of U.S. tariffs, while maintaining "fiscal responsibility."
He also said he was planning to call leaders from the BRICS group of developing nations, starting with India and China, to discuss the possibility of a joint response to U.S. tariffs.
Lula also described plans to create a new national policy for Brazil's strategic mineral resources, treating them as a matter of "national sovereignty" to break with a history of mining exports that added little value in Brazil. REUTERS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Philippine Senate shelves V-P Duterte's impeachment case
Philippine Senate shelves V-P Duterte's impeachment case

Straits Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Philippine Senate shelves V-P Duterte's impeachment case

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The move renders the impeachment complaint against the vice-president as 'dead' unless the top court reverses its ruling. MANILA – Philippine senators on Aug 6 voted to shelve the impeachment complaint against Vice-President Sara Duterte, after the top court ruled it as unconstitutional. The motion to archive – approved by 19 of 24 senators – adheres with the Supreme Court ruling voiding the complaint against Ms Duterte, Senate Majority Leader Joel Villanueva said during livestreamed proceedings. Four senators voted against the motion and one abstained. The move renders the impeachment complaint against the vice president as 'dead' unless the top court reverses its ruling, according to Senator Alan Peter Cayetano. That means the Senate won't proceed with the impeachment trial against the vice-president which was set to begin in August, in yet another relief for the embattled politician. 'Restraint is not weakness. It is obedience to constitutional order,' said Senator Juan Miguel Zubiri who voted in favour of archiving. The Supreme Court in July unanimously decided that the complaint against Ms Duterte defied the constitutional rule that only one impeachment proceeding may be initiated against the same official within one year. The House of Representatives, which impeached Ms Duterte, on Aug 4 asked the court to reverse its decision. It said impeachment is a political process entrusted to Congress, and that the proceedings followed the Constitution. Sara, daughter of ex-leader Rodrigo Duterte, was impeached in February by the House on accusations that include plotting to assassinate President Ferdinand Marcos Jr and misusing public funds. She denies the charges. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Some ageing condos in Singapore struggle with failing infrastructure, inadequate sinking funds World Trump eyes 100% chips tariff, but 0% for US investors like Apple World White House says Trump open to meeting Russia's Putin and Ukraine's Zelensky Singapore MRT track issue causes 5-hour delay; Jeffrey Siow says 'we can and will do better' Singapore ST Explains: What is a track point fault and why does it cause lengthy train disruptions? Singapore ST and Uniqlo launch design contest for Singapore stories T-shirt collection Singapore Three people taken to hospital after fire in Punggol executive condominium Singapore S'pore and Indonesia have discussed jointly developing military training facilities: Chan Chun Sing The vice-president has feuded with Mr Marcos after their 2022 election team-up collapsed due to policy differences and public criticisms against each other's families. The Duterte clan showed its political clout during the midterm elections in May, where Mr Marcos' Senate slate underperformed. 'The 1987 Constitution entrusted the duty to try and decide all cases of impeachment to the Senate. Today we are voting to abandon this mandate,' said opposition Senator Risa Hontiveros who voted against archiving the complaint. 'It is our institution which, in the words of colleagues, killed the articles of impeachment.' Bloomberg.

Britain asks China to clarify contested embassy plan
Britain asks China to clarify contested embassy plan

Straits Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Britain asks China to clarify contested embassy plan

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The project comes as the Labour government is looking to reset long-fraught ties with Beijing. LONDON - The British government on Aug 6 asked China to explain partially redacted plans it has submitted for its new London embassy project, which has fanned worries from residents and human rights advocates. China has sought for several years to move its embassy from the chic Marylebone district to a sprawling historic site in the shadow of the Tower of London. It would be the largest embassy complex in Britain, and the project comes as the Labour government is looking to reset long-fraught ties with Beijing. On Aug 6, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner sent a letter to the firm DP9 that represents the Chinese government, requesting details on some documents transmitted during a public inquiry. Ms Rayner sought in particular details on portions of the plans that had been 'greyed-out' or 'redacted for security reasons'. The letter was published online by Luke de Pulford of the Interparliamentary Alliance on China, an international body, one of its copied recipients. The British government gave China until Aug 20 to respond. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Some ageing condos in Singapore struggle with failing infrastructure, inadequate sinking funds World Trump eyes 100% chips tariff, but 0% for US investors like Apple World White House says Trump open to meeting Russia's Putin and Ukraine's Zelensky Singapore MRT track issue causes 5-hour delay; Jeffrey Siow says 'we can and will do better' Singapore ST Explains: What is a track point fault and why does it cause lengthy train disruptions? Singapore ST and Uniqlo launch design contest for Singapore stories T-shirt collection Sport Son Heung-min joins Los Angeles FC in record MLS deal Singapore S'pore and Indonesia have discussed jointly developing military training facilities: Chan Chun Sing The proposed embassy site, which Beijing bought in 2018 for a reported US$327 million (S$421 million), once housed the Royal Mint. It was earlier home to a Cistercian abbey built in 1348 but is currently derelict. In 2022, the local authority, Tower Hamlets Council, unanimously rejected China's plans, which include designs by the renowned firm David Chipperfield Architects. In July 2024, Beijing resubmitted the proposals almost entirely unchanged. AFP

Oil prices slide to 8-week low as US-Russia talks stir sanction uncertainty
Oil prices slide to 8-week low as US-Russia talks stir sanction uncertainty

Business Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Business Times

Oil prices slide to 8-week low as US-Russia talks stir sanction uncertainty

[NEW YORK] Oil prices slid about 1 per cent to an eight-week low on Wednesday after US President Donald Trump's remarks about progress in talks with Moscow created uncertainty on whether the US would impose new sanctions on Russia. Brent crude futures fell 75 cents, or 1.1 per cent, to settle at US$66.89 a barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate crude dropped 81 cents, or 1.2 per cent, to settle at US$64.35. Those moves marked a fifth consecutive day of losses for both crude benchmarks, with Brent closing at its lowest since June 10 and WTI closing at its lowest since June 5. Trump said on Wednesday that his special envoy Steve Witkoff made 'great progress' in his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, as Washington continued its preparations to impose secondary sanctions on Friday. Trump has threatened additional sanctions on Moscow if no moves are made to end the war in Ukraine. 'Everyone agrees this war must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come,' Trump said, without providing further details. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Russia is the world's second-biggest producer of crude after the US, so any potential deal that would reduce sanctions would make it easier for Russia to export more oil. Earlier in the day, oil prices rose after Trump issued an executive order imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on goods from India, saying it directly or indirectly imported Russian oil. The new import tax will go into effect 21 days after Aug 7. India, along with China, is a major buyer of Russian oil. 'For the time being, the 21-day start to the new Indian tariffs, while Russia tries to put together some kind of cease fire agreement ahead of President Trump's Aug 8 deadline, still leaves too much uncertainty around the situation,' Bob Yawger, director of energy futures at Mizuho, said in a note. In addition to the tariff and sanction uncertainty, analysts said a planned Opec+ supply increase has weighed on the market in recent days. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, meanwhile, will visit China for the first time in over seven years, a government source said on Wednesday, in a further sign of a diplomatic thaw with Beijing as tensions with the US rise. In other news, Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest oil exporter, on Wednesday hiked its September crude oil prices for Asian buyers, the second monthly rise in a row, on tight supply and robust demand. Oil inventories Oil markets found support earlier in the day from a bigger-than-expected decline in US crude inventories last week. The US Energy Information Administration said energy firms pulled 3 million barrels of crude from inventories during the week ended Aug 1. That was much bigger than the 0.6-million-barrel draw analysts forecast in a Reuters poll, but was smaller than the decline of 4.2 million barrels that market sources said the American Petroleum Institute trade group cited in its figures on Tuesday. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store