How much of our own electricity will Scotland be left with?
To quote from the UK Government website on Eastern Green Lines: 'EGL1 and EGL2 are designed to unlock Scotland's renewable energy reserves by scaling up the UK's capacity to transport clean energy from where it is generated to where it is needed'. Note the carefully crafted language.
Once operational (2029), both EGL1 and EGL2 will have the capacity to deliver enough electricity for four million homes (two million each).
READ MORE: Glen Rosa delivery pushed back to 2026 as costs spiral further
Scotland's renewable electricity will then flow down two new subsea cables, costing a total of roughly £7 billion, from Peterhead and Torness to power-hungry England (Drax/EGL2 and Hawthorn Pit in County Durham/EGL1), while Scots continue to pay among the highest domestic and business energy bills in the UK. This all courtesy of Westminster, via Ofgem, to which energy is reserved! How many homes in Scotland are powered by Peterhead at the moment? How much of our own electricity will Scotland be left with?
This is blatant, brazen channelling of Scotland's natural resources to England without as much as a by your leave. There is no mention of Scotland being recompensed for all its clean, green energy. Scotland has arguably the best wind resource in the northern hemisphere, and by harnessing that resource could eliminate fuel poverty and revitalise our own economy.
It doesn't take an energy expert to work out that the wholesale price of electricity in Scotland should currently be the lowest in Europe, attracting very heavy users of electricity like data centres, electrolysers and such like. So instead of paying to export our renewable electricity subsea to England, data centres are increasingly looking to buy land in Scotland so they might be able to benefit from this low-cost electricity – should it ever materialise.
David Lowden
via email
YOUR comment piece 'I work at Holyrood – how toilets policy affects me' (May 12) is full of misinformation. Dylan Hamilton claims that the Scottish Parliament is following 'guidance they are not legally obligated to'. This is simply wrong. The guidance, issued by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, is simply a restatement of the law, as clarified by the Supreme Court. The court did not use the law 'to interpret whatever they wanted from it'. Instead, it analysed the Equality Act virtually line by line to establish what the law actually says.
Nor is it true to say that the mixed toilet facility is a 'secret third thing' and that people who identify as trans will be outed by using it. This is not a 'trans-only' toilet. but can be used by literally anybody. I dare say your correspondent's colleagues (amongst others) will be more than happy to use it as well.
READ MORE: BBC 'sorry' for wrong pronouns during Supreme Court gender report
Such third spaces have existed for years in many buildings, in Edinburgh and elsewhere. They are a compassionate solution which allows everyone their rights and does not insist that anyone is forced to use a facility which does not align with the way they feel about themself.
What this article – and much of the commentary in the media – demonstrates is that the trans movement does not want a world in which everyone is provided for, but one in which their insistence that everyone play along with their claim that they are literally members of the opposite sex takes precedence.
I can, to an extent, understand the howls of outrage. The lie that people can change sex has been widely adopted for many years, mostly at the expense of women and lesbians. As a result, trans-identifying men and women have become so used to imposing their preferences on the world that it will take a period of adjustment to find their rights do not trump everyone else's.
Over the last ten years or so, women and lesbians have increasingly been denied the rights to our own spaces, free from males no matter how they identify. The judgment has confirmed that right always existed, even if it has been ignored. It also clearly reiterated the rights of people who identify as trans to be fully protected against discrimination. They have lost nothing, but their dominance.
Sally Wainwright
Lesbian Persistence
IT is reported that the Westminster government may be breaking international law to avoid offending Trump. The English government is still sending arms to Israel, the government of which is committing widespread violations of international law.
READ MORE: David Lammy denies misleading parliament over Israeli arms exports
What logic is there for Westminster agreeing to sending weapons to such a state when it is abundantly clear that there is no money left in the coffers? No money for the NHS. No money for care homes. No money for schools or their teachers.
It gives me great pleasure to tell the story of a BBC head of department, having been invited as a substitute for Controller in Scotland, to a visit to Scotland by Margaret Thatcher. His wife, having been asked a question about libraries, was able to proclaim 'of course, they are all free in Scotland'. No money for libraries, either, it seems.
Tony Kime
Kelso
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Public sector struggling to define what a woman is, trans report finds
Public sector workers and trade unions are widely refusing to accept the Supreme Court's judgment on what a woman is, a think tank has warned. A new study by Policy Exchange shows that dozens of organisations across the public, private and charitable sectors have continued to question the legal meaning of 'a woman', despite the ruling. In April, the court ruled that the term 'woman' refers to a biological female in the Equality Act 2010. The decision means trans women, who were born male, should use men's toilets, changing rooms and other single-sex spaces, contradicting the previous stance of a string of public sector organisations. Policy Exchange's report, the fifth edition of its 'Biology Matters Compendium', compiles examples of organisations refusing to acknowledge the legal force of the court's judgment. These include universities, professional bodies and several trade unions, along with other public bodies. Rosie Duffield, the gender-critical MP who left the Labour Party last year, hailed the report and said it showed that 'radical positions on gender identity have become deeply embedded and it will be the work of years to rectify it'. Ms Duffield wrote in the foreword: 'There should be no illusions that this is over: there will be many more battles to fight before women's sex-based rights are secure.' Lara Brown, the author of the report, said that 'despite progress, our latest edition of the Biology Matters Compendium reveals there is still a great deal of ideological capture in the policy and practice of many public institutions'. 'The defence of sex-based rights does not end with a court ruling. It requires persistent scrutiny, open debate, and the courage to challenge ideological orthodoxy – wherever it may reside. This compendium finds that in this domain, there is still much more to be done.' The report notes that at least seven major trade unions have appeared to question the ruling in recent months. Unison, one of the UK's largest unions, and the University and Colleges Union, which represents academic and support staff in further and higher education institutions, have warned of the judgment's 'harmful implications'. The Fire Brigades' Union has said in response to the ruling that 'the law is not always on the right side of history'. The Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen (Aslef) released a statement on social media saying that it 'recognises the distress and uncertainty that the Supreme Court's ruling about the definition of sex in the Equality Act 2010 has caused to trans and non-binary communities.' The union declared: 'We have a proud history of championing the rights of our trans and non-binary members and we continue to stand in solidarity with them.' A collection of unions, including Unite, the civil service union PCS, the RMT and the BFAWU, a food industry union, have staged marches against the Supreme Court's decision, with one leading figure declaring that 'the trade union movement will protect and stand with trans people, whether the law cares or not.' Policy Exchange's report also draws attention to professional bodies such as the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy continuing to describe gender self-identification as 'valid'. After the Supreme Court judgment, a number of public bodies announced plans to change their policies on gender recognition. Within days, the British Transport Police announced that trans women could in future only be strip-searched by male officers. The NHS was also told by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, the equalities watchdog, to change guidelines that did not fit the newly clarified legal settlement. The Football Association announced that athletes would have to compete in their biological sex categories, going forward. But other bodies were more reluctant to accept the ruling. The British Medical Association, the doctors' union, branded the Supreme Court's decision 'scientifically illiterate'. Meanwhile, the National Police Chiefs' Council said it would 'not rush' to change rules on strip-searching in order to fall in with the court's decision.
The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Thousands join anti-austerity march in London to protest against Labour's cuts
Thousands of people marched through central London on Saturday calling for an end to public service and welfare cuts, in the first big anti-austerity march under Keir Starmer's Labour government. The campaign group People's Assembly, which organised the demonstration, called on the government to 'tax the rich and their hidden wealth to fund public services'. The People's Assembly said it was bringing together trade unionists, health, disability, housing and welfare campaigners with community organisations under the slogan: No More Austerity 2.0. Writer Kate Hardie, 57, was among those marching to Whitehall. She had voted for Labour in every election since she was 18, including last year, but said she will no longer support the party under Starmer. 'I worry about the fact that this government is making cuts that are unnecessary. People are really suffering because of it,' she said. She has friends who are disabled, who were 'devastated' when cuts to personal independence payments (Pip) were announced. 'It isn't just about my friends, because if we only vote for the people that we know, we're in trouble,' she added. Hardie was also dismayed over the prime minister's widely criticised 'island of strangers' speech, which was likened to the rhetoric of Enoch Powell. 'There's the problem of cuts and a problem with rising hate in this country and around the world,' she said. 'It's not just financial, it's also ideological and about how we treat each other.' She thinks the government's current approach will bear little fruit electorally. 'Why would you go and see a tribute band if you can get the real thing? It's not gonna work, it's ridiculous.' Daniel Kebede, the general secretary of the National Education Union, said: 'People are very disappointed in this government. Whether it has been cuts to winter fuel, the two-child benefit cap still being in place, we haven't seen enough investment. 'We appreciate that the government have a tight fiscal window to operate in, but we think they need to tax the wealthy more and start investing in communities.' He said the 'commitment to roll out free school meals to all families in receipt of universal credit' was welcome but called on the government to 'go much further much faster because the only person who is benefiting from cuts to communities is Nigel Farage'. Holding a sign calling for landlords to be taxed – including herself, Corinne Richeux, 57, who runs an NGO based in China, said: 'I'm really worried about the state of the country and I don't think British people can take austerity any more. We need a real radical change of direction and we need to tax the rich to make it happen. 'I think that many rich people would support more taxation. I think it's cowardly of the Labour government to pander to the rich when the people are really struggling.' She said she 'was shocked when the first thing they did was to start slashing benefits'. 'I kind of hoped that he was keeping his cards close his chest and that he was planning on taxing the rich when he got into office. I wasn't expecting it to be quite so bad.' Labour-run councils were also a target of criticism. Helen Davies, 59, a social worker, chanted in support of bin workers in Birmingham, who have been striking since January. On central government, she said: 'It's not what we expect from a Labour government. The social inequalities are being driven harder, there has to be a positive alternative to that.'
ITV News
30 minutes ago
- ITV News
Protesters raise environmental fears as wait continues for Sizewell C funding announcement
Hundreds of people voiced their concerns over the multi-billion pound Sizewell C nuclear power station on the Suffolk coastline ahead of an expected announcement from the Government. The rally on Sizewell Beach on Saturday, organised by Stop Sizewell C and Together Against Sizewell C, included speeches from campaigners against the major project including Greenpeace members, and musical performances. The peaceful protest ended with the 300-strong crowd walking to the Sizewell complex and tying ribbons with messages, emphasising people's concerns, to the gates. Plans for Sizewell C were given the go ahead by the then Chancellor in November 2022 but the funding is yet to be approved by the Government, although an announcement on the project is expected in Labour's Spending Review on Wednesday 11 June. Construction has already started for the nuclear site and surrounding infrastructure on the Suffolk coast which will sit next to the Sizewell B plant, and has already been given £250m in local funding. Once it is operational, it is expected to contribute £40m a year to the local economy and employ 900 people in skilled jobs, according to a Sizewell C spokesperson. But many people fear the environmental impact of Sizewell C and believe it will destroy the area. Jenny Kirtley, from Together Against Sizewell C, said: "You've only got to look around the area and see the devastation that's happened. I've been fighting this for 12 years. We knew it would be bad but we didn't know it would be so devastating. I mean a whole area is changing before our very eyes and it's heartbreaking. "There are a huge mountains of earth everywhere and of course the wildlife is suffering. The deers don't know where to go. They're rambling around everywhere. The birds are leaving their nests. "It's all very well saying it's going to create thousands of jobs but who's going to work in the supermarkets the care homes the restaurants you know this is a small area. "We've got six thousand people living around here so where are people going to live? We know rents are going sky high so it's going to get worse and it's going to be a real problem." Alison Downes, from Stop Sizewell C, also believed the project would be a waste of tax-payers money and there were better options to provide renewable energy. She said: "We've always had people behind us in the local area. I think a lot of new people have woken up and seen the destruction that's been caused by the project. They are now feeling the same the same sense of outrage that we do. "Sizewell C is too slow, risky and expensive to be the solution to our climate urgency. This is the wrong type of reactor. It's in the wrong place on an eroding coastline so we are here to express our outrage about size we see." The outrage rally, which was the third of it's kind, was also a tribute to Pete Wilkinson - a former chairman of Together Against Sizewell C, who died in January 2025. His daughters Emily and Amy Wilkinson, were at the event and spoke about their father and the rally. Emily Wilkinson, 29, said: "Dad was such a fantastic human being. He was a passionate and courageous man who spent his entire life fighting whatever he saw is wrong. That's what drove him in life. He saw the beauty in the planet and fought for it every single time." The Government said Sizewell C would be "an important role in helping the UK achieve energy security and net zero, while securing thousands of good, skilled jobs and supporting our energy independence beyond 2030". A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokesperson said: "Nuclear power has the potential to boost our supply of secure homegrown power and generate major investment nationwide.
