Pensioner in desperate plea to stop her home from being lost to the sea
Jean Flick, who has resided in the property in in Thorpeness, Suffolk, for 25 years, said she would be "heartbroken" if it were lost.
Ms Flick purchased the seaside residence after marrying her second husband in 1999.
She said she was looking for a "fresh start" after her first husband's death from cancer.
She recalled the couple were "very happy" in their coastal abode before her second husband also succumbed to cancer.
Ms Flick said coastal erosion has worsened in recent years, with a section of her garden wall dropping to the beach below earlier this year.
Another home in her street was demolished in 2022, and Ms Flick fears she could lose her home too.
She and her daughter Frances Paul, who lives nearby, are trying to secure planning permission for rock-filled cages called gabions to be placed at the foot of the cliffs to slow the erosion.
This would be a self-funded project, after previous defences were washed away.
Ms Flick said she has been told that if the cliff edge gets to within five metres of the house, the property will have to be demolished.
'If nothing is done, if it comes within five metres of the house it will be pulled down,' she said.
'No compensation, we have to pay for it to be pulled down and my heart will just break because it's my home.
'I know a lot of people have this problem (on) the coast and I sympathise with them because until it happens to you you don't realise the emotion that goes into the fact you're going to lose your home.
'Without any compensation, where do you buy a house with nothing?
'Your home is gone and it's just devastating really.'
The house was built in 1928 and had five bedrooms, now four after one was turned into a sitting room for the sea view.
'I just absolutely love it,' said Ms Flick, who is from a farming family.
'It's my home, I know the people, it's a village, we have lots of things going on in the village.'
The property is around two miles south of Sizewell, where a new nuclear power station is being built.
Ms Flick said that Storm Babet in 2023 'really ravaged' the cliffs.
'It really came with full force and I think that weakened the whole system along because it is sandy and there's no way of making sand stay still,' she said.
'Sand erodes.'
The policy in the Shoreline Management Plan – developed by agencies including the Environment Agency and the local authority – for the stretch of coast is of managed realignment.
This means measures might be allowed that slow – but do not stop – the erosion.
'We're working with the council and all the other people who are involved in it but it's a job getting them all to meet together and agree together,' said Ms Flick.
'We would have liked to have carried on with rocks as our next door neighbour has but we're not allowed that.'
She said it was a 'case now of getting paperwork signed which seems to be taking ages' before they could get permission for gabion defences.
'It's very urgent because most days you see another little bit gone,' Ms Flick said.
'It's the erosion coming underneath that brings the top down.
'My wall that was there is now on the beach.'
She continued: 'You just don't know.
'When I draw the curtains in the morning it can be there, when I draw them the next morning another piece can be gone.'
Her daughter Ms Paul, a retired retail worker, said: 'Even the low tides now are quite high.'
She said that as they would need to fund defences themselves, if permission were granted it would then be 'a question of what's it going to cost, is it possible'.
An East Suffolk Council spokesperson said: 'Our key priority is to keep people safe while managing a rapidly eroding coastline at Thorpeness.
'We are supporting affected residents to explore potential temporary, short-term interventions that could be applied within an achievable timescale while plans are explored for any possible longer-term solutions.
'We have been working closely with the community for a number of years and due to recent accelerated rates of erosion the options available are now quite limited.'
Defences must accord with the Shoreline Management Plan policy of managed realignment and would only be permitted to slow erosion, the spokesperson said.
'Therefore, it is important to consider alternatives to hard defences, to adapt and become more resilient to the risks of climate change and sea level rise.'
The village of Thorpeness was developed as a fantasy holiday resort by a wealthy friend of Peter Pan author JM Barrie.
Scottish playwright and barrister Glencairn Stuart Ogilvie had inherited an estate there in 1908, and Thorpeness was officially opened in 1913.
Thorpeness, with its large artificial boating lake and Peter Pan-inspired islands, is the earlier of two complete planned resort villages in Britain built before the advent of holiday camps such as Butlin's.
The other is Portmeirion in North Wales, designed by Clough Williams-Ellis between 1925 and 1975.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Wakefield museum tour guides' pay demands 'unaffordable'
The National Coal Mining Museum has confirmed that 40 members of staff will strike due to ongoing disputes over workers, who are mostly guides leading underground tours at the site in Wakefield, will walk out from Wednesday until 14 September, with further action planned if an agreement is not union, Unison, said museum managers proposed an uplift of 80p an hour or 5% for all workers, whichever would be the greater, but this was an "inferior offer".A spokesperson for the museum said it was "saddened" by its pay offer being rejected by the union, adding the industrial action meant its underground tours would not run during this time. The spokesperson said that during the strike period, "the museum will remain open and continue to share the important history of coal mining with our visitors".It added: "The majority of our workforce of over 100 people are not in Unison and do not support the industrial action. "It is largely made up of the museum guides who deliver our underground tours. Only 28 Unison members out of the 39 who voted in the original ballot, did so in favour of industrial action."After further negotiations and serious consideration, mindful of the wellbeing of our wider workforce and our visitors, the museum proposed an increased offer to all staff of 80p per hour or 5%, whichever is the greater." 'Simply unaffordable' The spokesperson added their offer would have equated to a pay rise of more than 6% for many of its workers, but it was "rejected" by the union, who "refused to share our revised offer with their members to see if they wished to accept it".They went on to say that the museum also relied on external funding and donations and "continues to face considerable financial pressures"."As a charity, our trustees feel this offer is fair and the counter-claim by Unison, which equates to over 8%, for many, is simply unaffordable," the spokesperson said"It would jeopardise people's jobs across the organisation and threaten the long-term sustainability of the museum. That counter-claim was suggested by Unison as part of the negotiation process and was at no point agreed."It is our intention to keep an open dialogue with Unison, with the sincere hope that this offer along with the many additional benefits included will be accepted to benefit our staff as a whole." Unison previously said the pay offer should be 5% or £1 an hour more, whichever is union added that it met with museum managers through the arbitration service Acas on Friday with the hopes that a revised figure could be agreed to put to staff as this would have suspended the Hooley, Unison Yorkshire and Humberside regional organiser, said the offer from the museum showed "how little managers value staff"."If museum managers actually care about their staff, they'll improve the offer. Unison is happy to meet right away to resolve this. That would allow families to enjoy the museum and its facilities throughout the summer holidays. "But until they are willing to do so, staff have no option but to strike." Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Rev Janet Jackson obituary
My friend Janet Jackson, who has died aged 79, spent more than a decade as lead chaplain at St Oswald's Hospice in Newcastle upon Tyne, and later set up a bereavement service for the Tynedale Hospice at Home in Hexham, Northumberland. Her work supporting the bereaved touched thousands of people in the north-east of England and she was a pillar of support for many during the most difficult periods of their lives. Janet was born in Bradford, West Yorkshire, as one of the seven children of Arthur Clarke and his wife, Ella (nee Straw), who were both bakers. She attended Bolling girls' grammar school in Bradford and met her future husband, Michael Jackson, on a trolley bus when they were young teenagers. Marrying in 1966, they lived in London and Hong Kong for a while before returning to the UK, where Janet worked as an office administrator while raising their family and Michael was a civil engineer until becoming a Church of England priest in 1984. After gaining a social work qualification in her 30s from Newcastle Polytechnic (now Northumbria University), Janet became a social worker for Durham county council until she felt called to the Church of England ministry herself. Following an ordination course in Durham she held a brief curacy at Westerhope, Newcastle upon Tyne, before becoming lead chaplain at St Oswald's, spending 14 years in that role and finding her true vocation working with people facing life crises. In addition she provided training to others, from medical students to clergy, on how to offer spiritual care for the dying. In 2007 Janet retired from St Oswald's to Hexham, where she set up the bereavement service at Tynedale Hospice at Home and also founded Rainbows, a group providing care for children whose siblings have died, as well as Forever Parents, a lifeline for parents coping with grief. She conducted services alongside Michael at Hexham Abbey and worked on a part-time basis with the groups she had founded. Her services to those who have been bereaved were recognised in 2019 with a British Empire Medal. She is survived by Michael, their children, Becky, Mike, Emma and Di, and grandchildren Jo, Ellis, Yasmin, Lily, Lal, Lola and Joanie.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Dear Richard Madeley: My husband plundered our joint account for Oasis tickets
Dear Richard, I've just discovered that my husband dipped into our joint account, which we reserve for things such as household expenses and holidays, to the tune of nearly £1,000, to fund his place on a lads' weekend centred on a reunion concert of a certain 1990s northern rock band. He clearly had a brilliant time, which I don't begrudge him – he is still wearing the hat – but we're not in a position to pay much into this account, and most of it gets eaten up with mortgage and bills. It will mean that on the trip we have booked together in the autumn, we will need to be more frugal in terms of meals out and so on. I really wish he'd checked, or at least found some of the money from his account. But I don't want to have to be 'the sensible one'. Is there any point bringing this up now? – A, Clwyd Dear A, Let me get this straight. You have a joint account with your husband to pay for joint expenses – household bills, shared holidays, and so on. You both pay into it. You also both hold separate accounts to handle personal spending – bills that have nothing to do with the other person. Fine. So far, so normal. Millions of couples do much the same. Joint account: us. Personal account: me. Yet your husband – with absolutely no reference to you whatsoever – removes close on a grand from your joint account to pay for (come on, let's say it) his super-expensive Oasis reunion concert ticket, and all the associated jollies. From what you tell me in your letter, he doesn't even touch a penny of his 'own' money. And yet you ask me whether you should bring up this trifling matter with him?! Are you kidding, A? I don't think I can recall such a naked example of rank entitlement. He decides a precious cash fund intended exclusively for your joint benefit is, for some reason, now for only his, as and when he decides. Does he deign to share this sudden and remarkably convenient insight with you? No. He takes exactly what he wants from your joint account without a word. When he announced his plans, did you ask him how he was paying for it all? Obviously not. You trusted him. Clearly you assumed he'd dipped into his own bank account. You discovered the truth only after he had come home, wearing his precious bucket hat and reliving his precious memories. Well, I'm sorry, A, but this is unacceptable. If you allow him to get away with it, he'll do it again. Maybe next time it will be to see his football team play in a big fixture abroad, or perhaps he'll decide your joint savings are a suitable fund to pay for another special weekend away with the lads. Entitlement is a pernicious trait. Nail it, now. So yes, confront him, and don't feel guilty about taking the shine off his Oasis away-day. Ask him what the heck he was thinking of, spending a huge amount of your money on himself without asking first or even bothering to tell you afterwards. Insist he pays it back – every penny – from his own personal account. Sit behind him and watch over his shoulder as he makes the transfer on his phone. And tell him that if he ever does anything like this again, you won't roll with it. You won't even look back in anger. But there'll certainly be a supernova – and it won't be a champagne one.
