Bernie Sanders Issues Stark Warning About Trump at Coachella
Sen. Bernie Sanders speaks onstage before Clairo's performance at the Coachella Valley Music And Arts Festival on April 12, 2025, in Indio, Calif. Credit - Katie Flores/Billboard—Getty Images
Sen. Bernie Sanders, an Independent serving Vermont, made an unexpected appearance at the Coachella music festival in Indio, Calif., on Saturday evening. He offered a stark warning about President Donald Trump during a rousing on-stage speech.
Sanders' surprise address included calls for the younger generation to 'stand up' against the fossil fuel industry, insurance companies, and U.S. states that are looking to roll back abortion rights.
Upon his first mention of the "President of the United States," the crowd started to boo—a reaction which prompted Sanders to say: 'I agree.'
'[Trump] thinks that climate change is a hoax. He's dangerously wrong,' Sanders warned. 'And you and I are going to have to stand up to the fossil fuel industry and tell them to stop destroying this planet.'
The Trump Administration has taken multiple actions that threaten to dismantle climate mitigation efforts since January—from the rollback of protections at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and an Executive Order to increase logging, to mass staff cuts at prominent agencies including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
'This country faces some very difficult challenges, and the future of what happens to America is dependent upon your generation,' Sanders opened his speech saying, appealing to the younger members of the crowd. 'Now you can turn away and ignore what goes on, but if you do that, you do so at your own peril. We need you to stand up and fight for justice, to fight for economic justice, social justice, and racial justice.'
Sanders went on to ask that the crowd 'stand up and fight for women's rights,' and work for economic justice and equality.
'We have an economy today that is working very well for the billionaire class, but not for working families,' Sanders said. Ending on healthcare, he called for the audience 'to stand up to the insurance companies and the drug companies and understand that healthcare is a human right.'
Despite earning much applause of his own, Sanders was on stage to introduce singer-songwriter Clairo—born Claire Cottrill—who he praised on account of her own activism.
'I'm here because Clairo has used her prominence to fight for women's rights, to try to end the terrible, brutal war in Gaza, where thousands of women and children are being killed,' Sanders said.
Earlier in the day, Sanders spoke with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Democrat serving New York, in Los Angeles as a part of their 'Fighting Oligarchy Tour.' Their rally drew thousands of attendees, and featured appearances from musicians Maggie Rogers, Neil Young, and Joan Baez. Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez have been touring the nation in hopes to 'take on the Oligarchs and corporate interests who have so much power and influence in this country,' and address the growing influence of billionaires on the U.S. government.
Contact us at letters@time.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
11 minutes ago
- Politico
Mamdani surges in new poll, leading Cuomo for first time in New York mayor's race
NEW YORK — Zohran Mamdani, the young democratic socialist who has been rising in the mayor's race, is now ahead of Andrew Cuomo with just two weeks until the Democratic primary, a new poll reviewed in full by POLITICO found. The survey, conducted by Public Policy Polling for Democrat Justin Brannan's city comptroller campaign, found Mamdani beating Cuomo 35 percent to 31 percent — a difference that is narrowly within the 4.1 percent margin of error. Cuomo has been the constant frontrunner since his March 1 entrance into the race to oust Mayor Eric Adams, with most publicly released polls showing him with comfortable leads. This new survey, which did not include a ranked-choice voting simulation, stands to signal a re-ordering of the highly unusual contest ahead of the June 24 election. The poll of 573 likely Democratic voters was conducted between June 6 and June 7 — after nine candidates faced off in the first televised debate. The following day, June 5, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez endorsed Mamdani, lending political star power to his campaign. Thirty-nine percent of the poll's responses came from landlines and 61 percent from text messages — a methodology that favored Mamdani given his strength with those responding via text, according to the results. The survey showed the race continuing to narrow to a two-person contest between the youngest and oldest candidates in the field. But it didn't offer respondents the chance to rank up to five candidates in order of preference, as they will be able to do on primary day. A Cuomo campaign poll conducted by Expedition Strategies and shared with POLITICO earlier this week found the former governor leading Mamdani by 12 points, 56 percent to 44 percent, after eight rounds of voting. That poll was conducted over the same period as the Public Policy Polling survey showing Mamdani's lead. A separate survey by Data for Progress for a Mamdani-allied super PAC found Cuomo winning by 2 points, 51 percent to 49 percent, also after eight rounds. 'It's telling that the only polls showing this trend line are paid for by Zohran Mamdani Inc,' said Cuomo spokesperson Rich Azzopardi, referring to Mamdani's choice to cut a fundraising video for Brannan, though that video came after Brannan's team commissioned this poll. 'As you know, we have had a poll in the field at the same time and our poll showed a race with us maintaining what has now been a consistent double digit lead for more than three months — which is rare for any NYC Mayoral race in recent memory. It's not lost on us that Politico is the only NYC media outlet that continues to take these outlier polls.' Mamdani's camp took a victory lap. 'When you run a disciplined, grassroots campaign relentlessly focused on an agenda to address the crises in working people's lives, these are the results,' Mamdani spokesperson Andrew Epstein said. 'New York City is so close to turning the page on the corrupt politics of the past and winning a future we can afford.' The poll found the remaining candidates, some of whom have been running for far longer, nowhere near the two frontrunners. City Comptroller Brad Lander was the choice of just 9 percent of those surveyed, despite his citywide platform, high rate of campaign spending and long history with New York's left-flank movement. His predecessor, Scott Stringer, who has roots on the vote-rich Upper West Side of Manhattan, received 5 percent. And City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams gained the support of only 4 percent of respondents, despite the high-profile endorsements of New York Attorney General Letitia James and municipal labor powerhouse District Council 37. Support for Mamdani was strongest among white and Asian voters, but 27 percent of Black voters surveyed supported him, as did nearly one-third of Hispanic voters — an indication he is gaining multi-racial support among New Yorkers. Cuomo's lead with Black voters, remains particularly durable at 42 percent, the poll found. Mamdani, a member of the state Assembly, has leveraged social media to gain attention in the crowded race, employing slickly produced videos highlighting his platform — like free bus service or government-run grocery stores. His voters don't seem to mind that he hasn't articulated a robust, realistic plan to pay for those programs. What was once a long-shot candidacy by the 33-year-old candidate has evolved into a competitive effort to lead the nation's largest city. Cuomo has sharpened his attacks against Mamdani in recent days by questioning his thin resume and ability to lead a complex city government. The two will face off in another debate Thursday night.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Performative Austerity Vanishes As GOP Flees Town Before Trump's Dictator-Style Parade
Hardly any Republicans in the Senate want to be caught dead at President Trump's big boy parade this weekend. The two most powerful Republicans in Congress — House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) — are not going to come. Johnson's office claims he has other plans, Thune's office says he's engaged with constituents back home on Saturday. Reporters from HuffPost, Politico, the Wall Street Journal and others all tried to pin a handful of Republicans down on this issue in pieces published this week. Many said they weren't coming, offering shrugs of excuses for their absence. Most refused to even touch questions surrounding the price tag on the whole spectacle: $45 million in taxpayer funds for Trump to roll out a bunch of military tanks and show off America's lavishly unmatched spending on weaponry, all in honor of Trump's 79th birthday (and the 250th anniversary of the Army). It, of course, all comes on a week of growing public pushback, not just to Trump's mass deportation agenda but to his use of the military as a prop, escalating mostly peaceful protests and infringing on the power of politicians who lead cities he doesn't like. Bookending the week of overreach on state sovereignty with a garish military parade — which will involve rolling out 150 military vehicles and more than 50 aircraft into the streets of the capital — has at least one Republican comparing it to a scene out of North Korea. Most of the Republicans who spoke to the media about their planned absence suggested they had other plans, or indicated that their decision to not RSVP had nothing to do with the outlandish cost of the event designed specifically for Trump's ego. 'I don't like spending on anything, but if you're going to splurge on something, this is probably not a bad thing,' Johnson told WSJ this week, while avoiding questions about what he's doing on Saturday instead. Ironically, Johnson is the Republican in the Senate most vocally opposed to the sweeping reconciliation package that'll fund much of Trump's fiscal agenda if it passes the upper chamber in coming weeks — primarily due to his belief that it doesn't do enough to cut federal spending on social safety net programs like Medicaid, which are, as I get into below, already on the chopping block. For those observing at home for at least the past two decades, austerity matters most, to this group of politicians, when a Democrat is in the White House. And it matters the least when the wannabe dictator head of the Republican Party decides to throw himself a multi-million dollar bday bash. As they have for decades, Republicans in recent months have attempted to spin their devastating proposed cuts to Medicaid and supplemental nutrition programs like SNAP as necessary 'reforms' to cut out the amorphous 'waste, fraud and abuse' supposedly baked in to these programs. They've also championed the implementation of so-called common sense 'work requirements' in order to be eligible for the coverage (which conveniently ignores the fact that a significant number of those on Medicaid are either people with disabilities or children). This spin is, of course, spin, as TPM has reported, and all the changes listed as provisions in the House's reconciliation package will result in some 16 million Americans losing their health care. By other estimates (from researchers at Yale University and University of Pennsylvania) 51,000 people may die annually as a direct result of proposed cuts to the program. It's real and devastating stuff. Republicans have historically, famously spun their efforts to gut social safety net programs under the same guise of 'reforms' that House Republicans are using now. They promise to never touch Medicare or Social Security, while salivating for the very types of 'reforms' to the social safety net that may soon become law, that are stuffed into the House's latest reconciliation package. In one of his last truly eloquent moments as president, Biden was able to back Republicans into a corner during his 2023 State of the Union address, and got the Republican conference to agree, on live TV, to drop their at-the-time-latest effort to sunset Medicare and Social Security every five years. New polling from Quinnipiac University today shows that Republican efforts to obscure what exactly it is they're doing to Medicaid may not have been as successful as it has been in the past — or perhaps the opposition party's telegraphing of the horrors to voters actually broke through this time. Per Quinnipiac: As the Senate debates the GOP tax and spending bill titled One Big Beautiful Bill Act and President Donald Trump pushes for a July 4 deadline to sign it, voters 53 – 27 percent oppose the legislation, with 20 percent not offering an opinion, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll of registered voters released today. I mean, who among us doesn't do a little self deprecative soul searching at such an hour. According to some reports, Trump and the world's richest man actually spoke on the phone late on Monday night after their messy, public breakup last week. Musk posted the tweet early Wednesday. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) on Tuesday night succinctly articulated the longstanding punditry norms that have Democrats policing the largely organic Los Angeles protests: 'It is 100% carrying water for the opposition to participate in this collective delusion that Dems for some reason need to answer for every teen who throws a rock rather than hold the Trump admin accountable for intentionally creating chaos and breaking the law to stoke violence.' One of the most dependable formulations in political commentary is that Democrats are responsible for everyone vaguely, even just aesthetically, associated with the left, while Republican politicians can directly fraternize with neo-Nazis and still claim ideological distance. — Kate Riga How Some Very Bad Luck Has Made It Even Harder To Rein In Trump Passing Big Beautiful Bill Would Mean 'Effectively Dismantling' Obamacare, Gutting Inflation Reduction Act New episode of the Josh Marshall Podcast: Ep. 377: Protest Politics Stephen Miller Demanded ICE Target Home Depots Judge Bars Trump Administration From Detaining Mahmoud Khalil National Guard troops have temporarily detained civilians in LA protests, commander says Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to deploy National Guard across the state in response to protests
The Hill
33 minutes ago
- The Hill
‘Immaturity': Rand Paul rips White House after being ‘uninvited' from picnic
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) had harsh words for the White House on Wednesday after he said he was 'uninvited' from its annual picnic, a snub that came amid the Kentucky Republican's vocal opposition to President Trump's tax cut and spending package. Paul — who has criticized the debt limit provision in the 'big, beautiful bill,' along with its impact on the deficit — said he had planned to attend the White House picnic on Thursday with his wife, son, daughter-in-law and six-month-old grandson, but he was informed on Wednesday that he was no longer welcome. 'I've just been told that I've been uninvited from the picnic; I think I'm the first senator in the history of the United States to be uninvited to the White House picnic,' Paul told reporters. 'The White House is owned by the taxpayers, we are all members of it, every Democrat will be invited, every Republican will be invited, but I will be the only one disallowed to come on the grounds of the White House.' 'I just find this incredibly petty,' he added. 'I have been, I think nothing but polite to the president. I have been a intellectual opponent, a public policy opponent, and he's chosen now to uninvite me from the picnic and to say my grandson can't come to the picnic.' Paul continued, saying 'the level of immaturity is beyond words' before tearing into Trump himself. 'I'm arguing from a true belief and worry that our country is mired in debt and getting worse, and they choose to react by uninviting my grandson to the public,' he said. 'It really makes me lose a lot of respect I once had for Donald Trump.' The senator said he was not offered an explanation for the rescinded invitation, and noted that he was not sure who at the White House made the decision. The Hill reached out to the White House for comment. The White House has been hosting picnics for decades — under both Democratic and Republican presidents — inviting lawmakers from both parties to mingle on the lawn. This year's confab comes as the administration is trying to muscle its sprawling agenda bill through Congress — specifically the Senate at the moment — which has been met with some opposition. Paul, a Libertarian-minded Republican, has expressed opposition to the inclusion of a $4 trillion debt limit increase in the bill, voicing concerns about the ballooning deficit. He has said on multiple occasions that he will not support the legislation if the debt limit provision remains. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said Congress must raise the borrowing limit this summer to avoid an economic default. Senate Republicans, meanwhile, can only afford to lose three votes and still squeak the package through the chamber, making Paul's opposition a point of concern. On Wednesday, Paul suggested that the White House's rescinded invitation did not help move him closer to supporting the behemoth bill. 'When they tell you your grandson can't come to a picnic at the White House that all of Congress is allowed to come to, I don't know, it just shows such a pettiness,' he said when asked if the snub makes him less likely to back the bill. 'But they have shown over the last week they don't care about my vote at all,' he added. 'Because I've told them I can and would vote for the bill if the debt ceiling were taken off of it. So conceivably, there might be some situation in which they needed my vote. Instead they have decided to try to attack my character.' 'They're afraid of what I'm saying so they think they're going to punish me, I can't go to the picnic, as if that's somehow going to make me more conciliatory,' he added. 'So it's silly in a way, but it's also just really sad that this is what it's come to. But petty vindictiveness like this, I don't know, it makes you wonder about the quality of people you're dealing with.' Paul also offered criticism of White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who earlier this week had attacked Paul over his criticism of the bill. Paul speculated the rescinded invitation could have come from a White House staffer, rather than Trump himself. 'It could be from lower level staff members, but these are people that shouldn't be working over there. But I mean, you have people that are basically going around casually talking about getting rid of habeas corpus,' he said, presumably referring to Miller's proposal earlier this year. 'And the same people that are directing this campaign are the same people that casually would throw out parts of the Constitution and suspend habeas corpus. So I think what it tells that they don't like hearing me say stuff like that, and so they want to quiet me down. And it hasn't worked, and so they're going to try to attack me. They're going to try to destroy me in other ways, and then do petty little things like social occasions or whatever.'
