What have Zambia's new cyber laws achieved so far? – DW – 07/07/2025
It has been almost three months since Zambia's president, Hakainde Hichilema, signed the Cyber Security and Cyber Crimes Acts of 2025 into law.
His supporters hailed the laws, calling them progressive, and said they would help fight digital crimes and improve national security.
But rights groups maintain the laws, especially the Cyber Crimes Act, are undemocratic, and stifle freedom of expression and speech.
The laws allow for the interception and surveillance of all electronic communications, including calls, emails, messages and streamed content. The Zambia Cyber Security Agency has been moved from an independent state agency and brought under the Office of the President.
Violating the laws also carries significant consequences: the legislation allows for the extradition of Zambians abroad, and stiff penalties, from fines to prison sentences — potentially two to 25 years — depending on the specific offense committed.
Mulambo Haimbe, Zambia's Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, said the legislation is meant to protect citizens online and not stifle fundamental freedoms.
"This conception that the cyber laws are perhaps meant to intrude, to go into your personal details in a willy-nilly fashion is not correct," he told journalists at a press briefing in Lusaka.
"It needs to be put in its proper context, contrary to the assertions that the government's intention is to intercept any of your communication and break into your gadget," he added.
Oliver Shalala Sepiso, a media consultant for the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND), also defended Zambia's new cyber laws — saying they are not about the surveillance of citizens but merely for digital or data protection.
To play this audio please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 audio
Given that the laws are meant to protect Zambians from digital crimes and identity theft while improving national security, their enactment on April 8 received surprisingly little fanfare. There was so little media coverage that most Zambians only learned about the new rules through an alert issued by the United States embassy in Lusaka, warning Zambians abroad about the intrusive nature of the legislation.
"Cyber legislation is needed to combat cybercrimes that are very rampant, like identity theft, and online fraud," Richard Mulonga, CEO of Bloggers of Zambia, told DW.
"There are some provisions that have the potential to restrict free expression, for example, assembly and association, and just broader digital rights."
Lungisani Zulu, President of the Law Association of Zambia, said his association will challenge the new law in court.
"Numerous provisions of the Act, which is now law, infringe upon the rights and freedoms of citizens, hinder a free press, and have the potential to undermine the cherished democracy in our country," Zulu said.
The new laws replace the Cyber Security and Cyber Crimes Act of 2021, which was passed by former president, Edgar Lungu. Under these laws, Zambia police arrested Mbewe Sibajene in April 2024 for circulating satirical memes and videos mocking government officials and institutions. Police said the memes were abusive, defamatory, and aimed at inciting public disorder towards state institutions.
To play this audio please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 audio
Among the contentious provisions are laws that criminalize so-called false information, vague definitions of indecent content, and a lack of protection for journalists reporting on sensitive national issues.
The Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA), a regional media watchdog in eight African countries, says the new law has already impacted journalists negatively.
"Journalists a living in fear because whenever they are doing their stories, they need to now do self-censorship because they don't know what is going to come out from what they are doing," Kennedy Mbulo, vice chairperson of MISA Zambia, told DW, "it has also impacted investigative journalism. You cannot record an individual because one day that could be used as evidence."
Tech savvy young Zambians are divided over the new cyber laws.
Kellys Mushota, a frequent social media user and youth member Zambia's Congress of Trade Unions, has noticed some changes online.
"The enactment of this law has seen some reduction in the number of harassment or even the way of harassment social media users engage in. However, there has also been a reduction of the will by people to speak freely on matters such as governance and politics," he told DW.
Kitwe-based 22-year-old researcher Joshua Seke says young people online are worried about their private conversations being intercepted by authorities.
"If you look at what young people are saying online, does it mean that now I can't laugh with my girl online? Is the government actually going to read everything that we do?" he asked.
Others, like 31-year-old Lusaka resident Mary Ndau, told DW that the laws would discourage online abuse.
"People will be doing the right thing online, they will not express bad behaviors or bully others online because they will be subjected to the law," she said.
As opposition leader, President Hichilema repeatedly criticized cyber laws, describing them as tools of government surveillance. Yet he has enacted arguably even stricter cybersecurity laws.
Kampala-based Edrine Wanyama of CIPESA (Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa), says cyber security legislation is not unique to Zambia, with neighbors South Africa, Zimbabwe, Namibia, and Malawi also enacting cybersecurity laws.
"Countries tend to pick practices from one country, and apply in theirs," the lawyer told DW. "The whole virus keeps biting the rest of the continent, and these laws have been found to be effective for governments in checking on freedoms of expression, access to information, assembly and association in the online spaces."
The West Africa Media Foundation has also reported a rise in restrictive cyber laws infringing on freedom of expression and privacy in countries like Nigeria, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Benin and Niger.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Pakistan: 33 militants killed near Afghan border – DW – 08/08/2025
The Pakistan military, without providing evidence, said the militants had the backing of India. Pakistani security forces killed 33 militants attempting to cross from Afghanistan, the military said Friday. The overnight operation in Balochistan province's Zhob district targeted fighters described as "Khwarij," a term the government uses for the Pakistani Taliban. Security forces continued search operations to locate and eliminate any remaining insurgents, the military said. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif praised the security forces for what he called a successful operation. The military described the militants as "Indian-sponsored" but provided no evidence to support the claim. Pakistan has long accused New Delhi of supporting the Pakistani Taliban and separatist groups in Balochistan. It also accuses Afghanistan's Taliban government of ignoring militant activity near the border. Both India and Afghanistan deny any involvement with militant groups. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Also Friday, the Balochistan government said mobile internet had been suspended in the region until the end of August. Balochistan has faced years of insurgency from separatist groups, including attacks by the Pakistani Taliban and the banned Baloch Liberation Army, which seeks independence from Pakistan. Much of the recent violence has been blamed on the Pakistani Taliban, a group separate from but closely allied with the Afghan Taliban. It operates along Pakistan's northwest border with Afghanistan. While officials say the insurgency is largely under control, violence persists.
DW
6 hours ago
- DW
South African court orders return of Zambian leader's body – DW – 08/08/2025
Former Zambian president Edgar Lungu's burial has been the subject of a two-month dispute between Zambia's government and his family. A South African court on Friday ruled that Zambia may repatriate the remains of former President Edgar Lungu, despite opposition from his family. "A former president's personal wishes or the wishes of his family cannot outweigh the right of the state to honor that individual with a state funeral," the High Court in Pretoria ruled. Lungu, who served as Zambia's head of state from 2015 to 2021, died in South Africa in early June while receiving medical treatment. His family wanted to bury him in South Africa, but the Zambian government insisted on holding a state funeral. At the center of the dispute is the tension between Lungu and his successor, current President Hakainde Hichilema. Hichilema was jailed in 2017 during Lungu's presidency. Last year, Lungu accused Hichilema's government of harassment and travel restrictions, including allegedly blocking his medical trip to South Africa, a claim the government denied. Lungu's family said the former president did not want Hichilema anywhere near his funeral. Zambia's government had planned a state funeral in Lusaka and turned to the courts. On Friday, the South African judge ordered the family "to immediately surrender the body of the late president" to Zambian authorities to allow for its repatriation and burial in Lusaka. The family may still appeal, but officials say the burial will now proceed in Zambia.
DW
7 hours ago
- DW
Is Togo's 'constitutional coup' a blueprint for dictators? – DW – 08/08/2025
Togolese President Faure Gnassingbe has cemented his power by creating a new position. Political observers say Africa's other long-time rulers could replicate the move in a bid to prolong their leadership. In May, President Faure Gnassingbe of Togo stepped down from his post. Since then, Jean-Lucien Savi de Tove has been president. But Gnassingbe has not relinquished power. Instead, he is now president of the Council of Ministers, a new body created following a constitutional amendment. Most of Gnassingbe's previous presidential powers have been transferred to his new position, leaving President de Tove serving as a ceremonial head of state. The opposition and civil rights activists call it a "constitutional coup"—because Gnassingbe's new position is not elected, but appointed by the strongest faction in parliament. Gnassingbe's UNIR party (Union for the Republic) has a comfortable majority there. There are no term limits, and Gnassingbe could rule indefinitely without ever having to stand for direct election again. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "That is really the biggest problem because the recent riot that happened in the country was not just about the arrest of the people, it was simply becausepeople are fed up with this family which is controlling the country for more than 50 years now," Pape Ibrahima Kane, director of the Open Society Initiative for West Africa (OSIWA) in Dakar, told DW. He said the Gnassingbe family wields control over all aspects of Togo's governance structures, including the parliament. The Togolese government has disregarded the African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance, Kane added. The Charter, signed off by the African Union (AU) in 2007, came into effect in 2012. The document says member states should aim, through regular, free and fair elections, to legitimize representative government and democratic transfers of power. However, the charter has so far had no impact on the balance of power in Togo, where the Gnassingbe family has ruled the country for 58 years. Faure Gnassingbe took power in 2005 from his father, Gnassingbe Eyadema, who had ruled for almost four decades. With his latest move, he has further consolidated power. "This is undoubtedly a terrible development for the Togolese people," Fredson Guilenge of the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation in Johannesburg, told DW. Observers fear Gnassingbe might just be the first African leader to use a constitutional amendment to cement their power without having to answer the electorate. "That fact that it will inspire other leaders to change the constitution in order to maintain themselves in power is a worrying truth," Togolese human rights lawyer Esso-Dong Divin Aymard Kongah said. "This is a worrying trend regarding democracy, human rights, and civic space, because all this is leading to a shrinking civic space where people are having less and less power to influence the way public affairs are being done," he told DW. Gnassingbe's political move is nothing new. Several other African leaders have sought to change the constitution to remain in power. President Faustin-Archange Touadera had the constitution amended so he could run for a third term in the Central African Republic's late 2025 election. In January 2026, Uganda's President Yoweri Museveni, 80, will seek to be re-elected for the seventh time, after he pushed for the removal of age limits for presidential candidates in 2017. Cameroon's 92-year-old President Paul Biya is aiming for an eighth term, at the end of which he would be 99 years old. President Denis Sassou-Nguesso has ruled the Republic of Congo for 41 years. Ivory Coast heads to the polls in October 2025, where 83-year-old Alassane Ouattara has announced another election bid, after he too sought a constitutional amendment, which began in 2016. The world's longest-serving head of state is Equatorial Guinea's 83-year-old Teodoro Obiang Nguema. Widely regarded by political analysts, international watchdogs, and rights activists as a dictator, Nguema has been in office since 1979. Systemic repression of the opposition in those countries has allowed their leaders to hold on to power. When younger generations demand political change, protests are violently crushed. In Togo, at least seven people were killed when demonstrators demanded the government's resignation over the constitutional amendment and a disputed local election. Human rights organizations have for years accused the Togolese state of repressing freedom of speech and gatherings. Fredson Guilenge warns that events in Togo may have been inspired by the rise of the junta-led governments of the Sahel countries. Between 2020 and 2023, there were six military coups in West Africa. The military rulers of Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger have chosen to work with Russia over former colonial power France. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video While the junta governments have not ruled out a return to civilian rule and democracy, efforts to establish a transition have not materialized, says Guilenge. For instance, in July, Mali's leader Assimi Goita gave himself a five-year leadership extensionwithout the prospects of an election. Similar moves might be tempting for countries such as Uganda, Rwanda, or Equatorial Guinea, Guilenge told DW. But he says the risk varies across the continent. A further threat to liberal democracy, he adds, is the current global context, which has seen the erosion of democracy and multilateralism. "The world is becoming so divided, which might allow leaders to operate without major pressure when it comes to their undemocratic decisions."
