France Renews Unchangeable Position on Western Sahara
Rabat — France reaffirmed today its unwavering support for Morocco's territorial integrity and sovereignty over its southern provinces in Western Sahara.
The Qaui d'Orsay issued a statement today following a meeting between Foreign Affairs Minister Nasser Bourita and his counterpart Jean-Noel Barrot, reaffirming the European country's 'unchangeable' position regarding the Sahara dispute.
In the statement, France reiterated its position, recalling the letter Emmanuel Macron sent to King Mohammed VI in July last year. He said that for France, 'the present and future of Western Sahara fall within the framework of Moroccan sovereignty.'
The statement from the French government also stressed its commitment to act in accordance with this position both nationally and internationally, reaffirming the clear and consistent support for Morocco's Autonomy Plan as the only framework within which this issue must be resolved.
Barrot said that the autonomy initiative constitutes the 'sole basis' for reaching a political solution, noting the growing international consensus in support of the Moroccan initiative.
The foreign minister also said that France intends to fully play its part in this regard, with France supporting Morocco's significant efforts for the economic and social development in the country's southern provinces.
France's newfound position on Western Sahara has unlocked a fresh chapter of strong bilateral ties between the two countries.
Macron and French officials have been constantly recalling France's unwavering support in favor of Morocco's position at the local and international level.
During his historic visit to Morocco in October last year, Macron promised that his country would convey its support and defend Morocco's position at all international forums.
'Our operators and businesses will support the development of these territories through investments, sustainable initiatives, and solidarity for the benefit of local populations,' he said in a speech at the Moroccan parliament in October 2024.
Macron also responded to the criticism and Morocco-bashing campaigns from Polisario supporters, including Algeria's regime, which recalled its ambassador to Paris as soon as France announced its decision to recognize Morocco's sovereignty over its southern provinces in Western Sahara.
France's newfound position on the Sahara is 'not hostile to anyone,' he argued, adding that it is rooted in history and respectful of realities. Tags: Algeria and the Western SaharaAlgeria France tension
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
2 hours ago
- Morocco World
At the Edge of the Fabric of Moroccan Identity: The Limits and Promise of Tamaghrabit
In the global tapestry of nations, the Kingdom of Morocco occupies a remarkable position—not as the result of historical disjunction, but as a global culture formed by deep and layered encounters. Positioned on the Atlantic, linked to the interior of Africa, and historically enmeshed with the Mediterranean and Islamic worlds, Morocco has long crafted its identity from a mosaic of plural traditions. At the heart of this national distinctiveness lies a concept both vernacular and cultural: Tamaghrabit (or Tamghribīt ), a term that conveys the affective texture and ethical grammar of 'Moroccanness.' In recent years, Tamaghrabit has gained renewed prominence in Moroccan public discourse. From state institutions to civil society, and from intellectuals to policymakers, the term is increasingly embraced as a homegrown civic ethos—a way of being Moroccan that affirms pluralism, historical continuity, and strategic autonomy in a region often marked by fragmentation and ideological disarray (Bennis 2012; Boussouf 2023; Hashas 2024). Rooted in Morocco's deep historical entanglements—Arab, Amazigh, Andalusian, African, Islamic, Jewish, and Mediterranean— Tamaghrabit is invoked both as a cultural inheritance and as a forward-looking identity project. But is it? Beneath this confident narrative lies a set of unresolved questions. Is Tamaghrabit a genuine civic ethos grounded in lived diversity, or a normative framework that seeks to defuse dissent without addressing deeper structural inequalities and historical omissions? Can a discourse founded on pluralism and exceptionalism avoid the pitfalls of ideological reification? To what extent does invoking Tamaghrabit as a 'civilization' risk lapsing into essentialism? And might Tamaghrabit instead evolve as a generative, critical, and open-ended space of identity-making, rather than a finalized narrative of cultural uniqueness? More than a casual signifier of national identity, Tamaghrabit is framed as a 'civilizational' ethos—a cultivated mode of cultural and political being. It represents an orientation to the world shaped by centuries of entanglement among Amazigh, Arab, African, Andalusian, Islamic, Jewish, and Mediterranean influences. This complex identity found legal and symbolic expression in Morocco's 2011 Constitution, which articulates the nation as forged through the convergence of Arab-Islamic, Amazigh, and Saharan-Hassania roots, nourished by African, Andalusian, Hebraic, and Mediterranean tributaries. At the center of this national tapestry is Islam, whose Moroccan iteration emphasizes openness, moderation, and dialogue—a spiritual and ethical compass that informs both private piety and public life. Yet Tamaghrabit is more than constitutional text; it is a lived practice and cultural grammar, expressed through architecture, cuisine, music, ritual, and the multilingualism of Moroccan society. Arabic and Tamazight share official status, while French, Hebrew, Spanish, Hassania, and Moroccan Arabic ( dārija ) course through everyday life, governance, and intellectual production. This polyphony is not a problem to be solved but a defining feature of Morocco's civilizational grammar—a historical strategy of managing cultural difference not through homogenization, but through what Moroccan thinkers term 'unity in diversity.' This ethos is deeply rooted in Morocco's long-standing state tradition. Since the establishment of the Idrissid dynasty in the late 8th century, Morocco has maintained political autonomy from the great caliphal centers of the Islamic world—the Umayyads in Damascus, the Abbasids in Baghdad, and later the Ottomans. This autonomy gave rise to a distinct model of statecraft, centered on the figure of the Amīr al-Muʾminīn (Commander of the Faithful), which tied political authority to sacred lineage and communal legitimacy. Across successive dynasties—from the Almoravids and Marinids to the Saadians and ʿAlawites—this sovereignty became a cornerstone of Moroccan identity. The process of civilizational fusion matured significantly during the Marinid period (13th–15th centuries), when Moroccan territorial, linguistic, and legal boundaries began to crystallize. Scholars such as Mohammed al-Manouni have shown how institutions of language, law, creed, and scholarship were consolidated during this era, laying the groundwork for what would become the Moroccan personality. Crucially, this identity never rested on exclusionary ethnic foundations. As contemporary scholars affirm, the Arab and Amazigh elements of Moroccan identity are not oppositional but mutually constitutive. Arabness is primarily understood as cultural and linguistic, not ethnic, while Amazighness refers to the indigenous historical and cultural stratum of North Africa, which continues to flourish through cultural revitalization and official recognition (Hashas 2024). The modern articulation of Amazigh identity—evident in the 2011 constitutional recognition of Tamazight and the adoption of the neo-Tifinagh script in 2003—has not undermined national cohesion but rather enriched Morocco's pluralistic ethos. Scholars such as Mohamed Chafik and Hassan Aourid argue that Arabs and Amazighs are not discrete or antagonistic communities, but co-founders of the Moroccan nation and its Islamic civilizational path. This marks a significant epistemic shift from colonial binaries that sought to fragment Moroccan society, toward a postcolonial paradigm that affirms pluralism as foundational. Still, while Tamaghrabit is often celebrated as a framework of cultural pluralism and historical depth, it risks being reified as a coherent and finalized construct. This conceptual closure—reinforced by state narratives and nationalist historiography—can obscure the tensions, hierarchies, and contestations that animate Moroccan plurality. Rather than treating Moroccanness as a stable essence, it is more productive to view it as a site of ongoing negotiation—a dynamic space where cultural, linguistic, political, and epistemic forces interact and reshape one another. This perspective aligns with Lawrence Rosen's Two Arabs, a Berber, and a Jew (2015), which argues that identity in the Moroccan context is not inherited but negotiated—shaped by social adjudication, situational belonging, and interpretive practice. Rosen reveals that Moroccan life is marked by enduring tensions—between Arab and Amazigh identities, Islamic and Jewish legacies, modern and traditional authorities. These are not peripheral but foundational. Despite Morocco's proud motto of 'unity in diversity,' linguistic and religious hierarchies persist. Tamazight still struggles for full institutional parity; Jewish heritage is symbolically acknowledged but politically marginal; and Christian and non-Sunni communities remain largely invisible. Moroccanness , then, is not seamless—it is marked by dissonance between symbolic pluralism and structural inequalities. The late Moroccan sociologist Paul Pascon's concept of the 'composite society' ( société composite ) offers a powerful analytic for these contradictions. Pascon rejected binary models—tribe versus state, tradition versus modernity—that flatten Morocco's complexity. He saw Moroccan society as an overlapping set of social orders—tribal, colonial, capitalist, Islamic—each shaped by historical forces and coexisting in tension. These entanglements produce not harmony but uneven development and contested spaces. Pascon's insights complement Rosen's: identity in Morocco is not fixed but enacted through a continual process of negotiation. It draws on multiple, often conflicting sources—Islamic law, tribal custom, colonial bureaucracy, revolutionary ideologies. The result is not a finished pluralism but a dynamic and fragmented field of becoming, where Moroccanness is continually reshaped and reimagined. These frameworks resonate with Hashas's (2024) tripartite typology of contemporary Moroccan thought— the near , the far , and the other —tracing how Moroccan thinkers engage local traditions, regional connections, and universal values. Rosen's interlocutors live this complexity daily. Their identities draw from Islamic jurisprudence, tribal affiliations, and postcolonial modernity, always negotiated and never settled. In this context, Pascon's société composite provides the structural lens through which these lived negotiations unfold. This ethos of critical dynamism underpins the intellectual tradition of the so-called Rabat School of Thought—a constellation of thinkers who emerged during the French Protectorate and rose to prominence in post-independence Morocco. They articulated a pluralist, reformist, and autonomous epistemology. Positioned at the intellectual 'edge' of Arab, African, Islamic, and Mediterranean civilizations, these thinkers reject both cultural mimicry and ideological rigidity. Their edge is not marginality but vantage—a site of synthesis, critique, and possibility. From this perspective, Moroccan intellectuals confront colonial legacies, critique Arab nationalism, and craft alternatives rooted in the country's cultural ecology. Allal al-Fassi, for example, envisioned Morocco's Atlantic character as both a geopolitical fact and a moral orientation. The Atlantic was not merely geography—it was a horizon of freedom, dialogue, and ethical reform. Morocco, in this view, becomes a nation of the middle way : Sufism animates spiritual life, legal reform coexists with tradition, and intellectual independence is a lived ideal (Hashas 2024). Tamaghrabit , then, might best be understood as 'Moroccan humanism'—an ethos of coexistence, reflection, and civilizational confidence. It is not utopian or parochial, but emergent: forged at the intersection of geography and memory, spirit and aspiration. Yet to realize its potential, we must resist the urge to canonize it. Moroccanness is not a finished identity—it is a palimpsest, a site of becoming, where plural pasts meet uncertain futures. Edward Said's warning against essentialist thinking is instructive here. In 'The Clash of Ignorance' (2001), Said critiques Huntington's thesis of 'civilizational clashes,' rejecting the idea of cultures as fixed, self-contained entities. Civilizations, he argues, are dynamic, porous, and internally contested. Applied to Tamaghrabit , Said's insight reminds us that cultural identity must remain open to negotiation. When framed as essence, Tamaghrabit risks becoming an ideological tool—masking dissent and presenting pluralism as a fait accompli. Morocco's history offers rich resources for reimagining identity today: the migrations of Andalusian refugees and expellees; deep Jewish-Muslim ties; trans-Saharan caravans; Sufi cosmopolitanism; centuries of encounter with Ottoman, European, and American actors. These crossings shaped a Moroccan identity forged in connection, not isolation. If Tamaghrabit is to retain meaning, it must embrace these complexities. Tamaghrabit should not be reduced to a national brand. It should be seen as an ethical compass—a way of being that values pluralism, embraces contradiction, and cultivates reflection. Its power lies not in resolving complexity, but in naming it. To acknowledge the cracks in our society is not to weaken Tamaghrabit —it is to humanize and strengthen it. To speak of Tamaghrabit in the spirit of Edward Said is to reject cultural essentialism. Identity is not timeless essence; it is struggle, memory, and practice. Moroccan pluralism is not a completed project—it is an ongoing labor. Sustaining it requires dialogue, critique, and imagination. The stories of Estevanico of Azemmour—the African explorer who crossed continents and cultures—and Ibn Battuta of Tangier—the indefatigable traveler—remind us that identity is not a destination but a journey. To honor them is not to claim national heroes, but to embrace the labor of border-crossing, tension-holding, and narrative-making. In this light, Tamaghrabit is best seen as a living formation—an evolving bundle of meanings and practices shaped by history, memory, and everyday negotiation. It is not a static identity, but a dynamic process: open-ended, contested, and generative. Its strength lies in its capacity for openness—to hold contradiction, resist closure, and invite continual reinterpretation. As such, Tamaghrabit offers Moroccans a framework for navigating pluralism, questioning orthodoxies, and imagining more inclusive futures. Tags: Arabic and FrenchTamazight
Morocco World
2 hours ago
- Morocco World
Cote d'Ivoire's President Ouattara Bans Opposition to Consolidate Power
Rabat – Cote d'Ivoire's young democratic journey is backsliding as the incumbent president looks to tighten his grip on a presidency he is no longer supposed to run for. In a move aimed at strengthening his position of power in the Ivorian political makeup, President Alassane Ouattara has banned the most influential presidential candidates from the 2025 election. President Ouattara originally came to power in 2010 after an election against then incumbent president Laurent Gbagbo turned into a civil war, which killed 3000 people. Ouattara changed the constitution in 2016 to allow himself to run for a third term in 2020, and Ivorians fear he will stand again for reelection in 2025. He has also been accused of gradually becoming increasingly autocratic throughout his presidency. A popular opposition figure, particularly among young voters, Tidjane Thiam of the Democratic and Peace Party had been rising quickly in the polls. In addition to being the nephew of the country's first President Houphouet-Boigny, Thiam is widely perceived as experienced and competent to run a country that often prides itself as the economic leader in Francophone West Africa. Disqualifying popular candidates Despite Thiam receiving overwhelming support within his party and his popularity among younger Ivorians, a court blocked his bid to become presidential candidate in April 2025. The court notably cast doubt on Thiam's Ivorian nationality, arguing that his holding of French citizenship made him unreliable as the future leader of a sovereign nation. Thiam has contested what he sees as a political trial, noting that he had renounced his French citizenship long before launching his bid to become president of Cote d'Ivoire. And this week, in a decision that has polarized the West African nation and sent it into crisis, the Independent Electoral Commission announced banning Tidjane Thiam from the electoral list. Even more controversially, the ban applies to three other candidates whose popularity and political influence could prove a headache for President Ouattara's camp in any election: former president Laurent Gbagbo, former youth leader and political organizer Charles Blé Goudé, and former Ouattara acolyte Guillaume Soro. A very dependent electoral commission In a telling sign of political intervention from the presidential camp, the Commission contentiously stated that this list is definitive and would not be revised under any circumstances prior to the October elections. Both independent observers and supporters of the banned presidential hopefuls have accused Ouattara of illegally disqualifying his most formidable opponents to centralize power. Once hailed in the West as the savior of Ivorian democracy, President Ouattara is now roundly denounced by his opponents and some of his former advocates in the Western press as a power-hungry agent of democratic backsliding in the West African nation. Thiam has called on the UN to oppose Ouattara's dictatorial project, arguing that the past few years have seen Cote d'Ivoire 'slide towards a total lack of democracy.' Other candidates are qualified to participate in the coming elections, however. These include former First Lady Simone Ehivet Gbagbo and former Minister of Commerce Jean-Louis Billon. But neither of these candidates have the same popular support as Thiam and the other banned contenders. While it is not clear whether the media protestations of the banned candidates will bear any meaningful fruit on the actual political scene, one thing is for certain: this decision means that the October elections will be deeply divisive. Tags: Cote d'Ivoireivory coastOuattarapolitics
Ya Biladi
4 hours ago
- Ya Biladi
Sahara : Moroccan army drone strikes Algerian truck near Bir Lahlou
A Royal Armed Forces (FAR) drone strike on Wednesday, June 4, destroyed an Algerian-registered truck east of the Sand Wall near Bir Lahlou, killing all three occupants on board. The truck, which was returning from Mauritania, had entered the region from southern Algeria. It remains unclear why the vehicle entered this active conflict zone or what it was carrying. In response, Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune convened a meeting of the High Security Council, as briefly noted in a statement from the Algerian presidency. However, Algerian media did not report the drone strike or mention Morocco's involvement. This incident is not unprecedented. Moroccan drones have previously targeted Algerian trucks in the area, prompting verbal warnings from the Algerian government, though these threats have not led to concrete action. Since the Polisario Front resumed hostilities on November 13, 2020, the FAR has effectively enforced a no-go zone east of the Sand Wall, significantly limiting movement in the area and forcing the Polisario to retreat from what it had declared «liberated territories». Bir Lahlou, where the strike occurred, was once regarded as the «capital» of the self-proclaimed Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic.
