logo
AI is about enabling pros to do more with their time: Nvidia's Kerris

AI is about enabling pros to do more with their time: Nvidia's Kerris

Time of India01-05-2025
Streaming platforms are exploring generative AI capabilities to not only translate language content but also enhance video features such as lip synching, realism, emotion and nuance into characters in real-time, said Richard Kerris, Vice President - Media & Entertainment, Nvidia.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
A Chinese shadow falls on Pahalgam terror attack case probe
How India can use water to pressure Pakistan
Buzzkill: How India can dissolve the Pakistan problem, not just swat it
He said that filmmakers and production houses are already seeing cost benefits in complex tasks like creating smoke, fire, or explosions, once requiring entire teams, can now be done more quickly using AI-powered tools. "What once required extensive computing resources, time, and human input can now be done on devices as simple as a smartphone, connecting to cloud-based computing systems. The cost is much lower now, and the speed is much faster," he said.
"AI, while already present in Hollywood for tasks like rotoscoping and de-aging, is now causing a paradigm shift with generative capabilities."
Discover the stories of your interest
Blockchain
5 Stories
Cyber-safety
7 Stories
Fintech
9 Stories
E-comm
9 Stories
ML
8 Stories
Edtech
6 Stories
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Targets Corporate America to Achieve Economic and Foreign Policy Goals
Trump Targets Corporate America to Achieve Economic and Foreign Policy Goals

Mint

time7 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump Targets Corporate America to Achieve Economic and Foreign Policy Goals

(Bloomberg) -- He didn't campaign on it. It wasn't even broached during his first administration. He criticized his predecessor for it. But this month President Donald Trump made clear that he's willing to use the full force of the US government to directly intervene in corporate matters to achieve his economic and foreign policy goals. Trump, backed by his team of Wall Street financiers, took the unprecedented step of seeking to collect a portion of money generated from sales of AI chips to China by Nvidia Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. And in a move that could see the US government become Intel Corp.'s largest shareholder, the administration is said to be in talks for taking a 10% stake in the beleaguered chipmaker. Last month, the Pentagon also decided to take a $400 million preferred equity stake in a little-known rare earth mining company. It's a series of moves that has surprised Wall Street and Washington policy veterans, who privately and publicly acknowledged they've never seen anything like it in their decades-long careers. The actions, if successful, could leave private investors and average 401(k) savings holders enriched while catapulting US national security further ahead of China. But they're also risky bets that could end with taxpayer losses and distort markets in ways investors can't predict. 'I'm very concerned that we're going to have these rolling sectors where the president starts saying 'you have to pay us just to sell internationally,'' Lee Munson, the chief investment officer at Portfolio Wealth Advisors, with $390 million in assets under management, said. 'Where does this end? I don't even know how to buy companies right now that have exposure to China that have high-tech IP.' The Trump administration's direct involvement in corporate matters is becoming a marker of the president's second term. Trump, a self-described dealmaker, has a mixed track record of success yet has vowed to bring more of a business approach to governing in Washington. In addition to the Nvidia and AMD revenue promise and potential Intel investment stake, his administration secured the 'Golden Share' from Nippon Steel Corp., a Japanese steelmaker that gives Trump personal power to make decisions on United States Steel Corp. corporate decisions. In these cases, the administration is picking winners and losers, and risks undermining the free flow of capital. 'The Trump administration's focus on industries like steel, semiconductors, and critical minerals is not arbitrary – these sectors are critical to our national and economic security,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in an emailed statement. 'Cooled inflation, trillions in new investments, historic trade deals, and hundreds of billions in tariff revenue prove how President Trump's hands-on leadership is paving the way towards a new Golden Age for America.' Trump surprised markets earlier this month when he announced Nvidia and AMD agreed to pay the US government 15% of their revenue from AI chip sales to China. The move rankled investors, trade experts, lawmakers and others who feared a much broader slippery slope in which the federal government could begin forcing pay-for-play scenarios in everything from trade negotiations to defense contracts. Word that the White House is contemplating using Chips Act money to take a direct stake in chip-maker Intel added to the uncertainty around changing norms between private sector companies and the US government. The move could provide a much-needed boost to Intel's ambitious plan for a sparkling new chips facility in Ohio, which is vital to rebuilding domestic chip production in the US but which has been delayed amid shrinking sales and mounting losses at the company. SoftBank Group Corp. agreed this week to buy $2 billion of Intel stock in a surprise deal. In America's free market economy, the government typically doesn't buy stakes in companies. There are exceptions, of course, such as during the financial crisis of 2008-2009, when it stepped in to support major names like Citigroup Inc., American International Group Inc. and General Motors Co. While Intel has performance issues to grapple with, it isn't facing the imminent threat of collapse. That's in part why investors, lawmakers, national security experts and others interviewed repeatedly referred to 'uncertainty' and 'uncharted territory' when asked to contemplate the risks associated with Trump's new policies. 'It's state direction that we haven't had in the US, it's very much the Chinese model making its way into US government,' Gary Hufbauer, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said. The Trump administration's approach to public companies in the first year of his second term is in some ways an evolution of the economic statecraft tools he deployed in his first four years as president. Back then he deployed trade levers that hadn't been used in years or decades, from Section 301 tariffs on entire countries, like China, to Section 232 tariffs on sectors like steel and automobiles. The policies weren't popular and they rattled markets, but supporters argued that the tariffs tamped down Chinese and other foreign products that flooded the US market and drove some American companies out of business. Trump has continued to push the boundaries of using novel tools in his second administration. 'What we see here is when it comes to big economic questions like tariffs and fees for exports and also the MP Materials deal, he is willing to push legal boundaries on big economic issues in a way that he wasn't in the first term,' said Peter Harrell, a nonresident scholar for the American Statecraft Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Caitlin Legacki, a former Commerce Department official in the Biden administration, said an argument in favor of 'national champions' is understandable, however a 'lack of transparency' around the deals in concerning. 'Instead of making this a cause for national security or technological independence that people from both parties can rally around, it feels more like a shakedown,' she said. --With assistance from Josh Wingrove and Ryan Gould. More stories like this are available on

Sam Altman admits Chinese AI pushed OpenAI to release its own open-weight models
Sam Altman admits Chinese AI pushed OpenAI to release its own open-weight models

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Sam Altman admits Chinese AI pushed OpenAI to release its own open-weight models

OpenAI made a big move earlier this month. Ahead of ChatGPT 5's release on August 7, the company released two open-eight models. This was the first time the AI startup had launched open-weight models since GPT 2 in 2019. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has now accepted that Chinese rivals played a key role in this two open-weight models launched were gpt-oss-120b and gpt-oss-20b. The former is a large model meant to work with data systems and high-end laptops. On the other hand, gpt-oss-20b can work on most laptops, desktops, and even on phones with relatively modest hardware, per OpenAI. These models which can be run locally and customised by researchers, developers, and this year, DeepSeek shook the AI space with its R1 model. Not only did R1 match the likes of ChatGPT and Gemini, it was also open-source. This allowed users to get much more freedom compared to closed AI models like ChatGPT. This sparked fears within OpenAI. Sam Altman claimed that releasing open-weight models became a necessity to avoid Chinese dominance. He told CNBC, 'It was clear that if we didn't do it, the world was gonna head to be mostly built on Chinese open-source models.'Altman accepted that this was a serious reason behind the release. However, he clarified that it was not the only open-weight model really meansAn open-weight model like gpt-oss is not the same as an open-source model like DeepSeek R1. In an open-weight model, users are given access to 'weights.' Weights refer to the characteristics or elements that are you used to train a Large Language Model (LLM).For certain queries, the AI gives more weight to certain words or sequences. An open-weight model gives access of these weights to users. Developers can then see these weights and how they're used in the creation of AI the way the AI was trained or the information used to train the model remain restricted. Thus, the code or the information used to train gpt-oss is not available to the ChatGPT's open-weight models can be crucial. Developers can not only understand the weights of the models, but use them locally or add them to pre-existing programs. This will help negate the dependence on Chinese open-source models, strengthening US' move comes at a time when the US government is concerned about China's rise in the AI race. The Trump administration has even put stricter restrictions on advanced chip sales to Beijing.- Ends

Scientists in China building world's first robot that ‘could give birth to human baby'
Scientists in China building world's first robot that ‘could give birth to human baby'

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Scientists in China building world's first robot that ‘could give birth to human baby'

Scientists in China are developing a humanoid robot designed to mimic pregnancy and give birth to a live baby, according to The Telegraph. Dr Zhang Qifeng, founder of the Guangzhou-based company Kaiwa Technology, said the project is already at a 'mature stage'. The plan is for the robot to carry a foetus inside an artificial womb from conception through to delivery. Dr Zhang, who earned his PhD at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, told The Telegraph: 'Now it needs to be implanted in the robot's abdomen so that a real person and the robot can interact to achieve pregnancy, allowing the foetus to grow inside.' The prototype humanoid is expected to go on sale next year for about £10,000 (Rs 11.75 lakh). Reports in Chinese media say the machine has been designed to replicate the full process of pregnancy, although details about fertilisation and implantation remain unclear. During gestation, the developing baby would remain inside the robot's body in artificial amniotic fluid, creating a womb-like environment. Dr Zhang noted that the idea builds on earlier research, including experiments in which premature lambs were kept alive for weeks in an artificial 'biobag'. The development has already raised legal and ethical questions. Dr Zhang said he has been in talks with Guangdong provincial authorities to prepare policy and legislation to regulate the technology. Some researchers believe the approach could help address rising infertility rates in China, which increased from 11.9 per cent in 2007 to 18 per cent in 2020. But critics have questioned both the ethics and feasibility. According to The Telegraph, some Chinese medical experts argue that human pregnancy involves complex biological processes, such as maternal hormone secretion, that cannot be replicated by technology. Others have voiced concerns about the social impact. Feminist writer Andrea Dworkin previously warned that artificial wombs could lead to 'the end of women'. Researchers at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia wrote in 2022 that such technologies risk 'pathologising' pregnancy. Supporters, however, argue that artificial wombs could free women from the health risks of pregnancy and childbirth.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store