South Korea's top court clears Samsung chairman Lee in 2015 fraud case
The Supreme Court's verdict permanently removes a long-running legal distraction for Lee as Samsung plays catch-up in a global race to develop cutting-edge AI chips.
The verdict upheld an appeals court's ruling dismissing all the charges in the case involving the merger a decade ago between two Samsung affiliates, Samsung C&T and Cheil Industries, which prosecutors said was designed to cement Lee's control of the tech giant.
A lower court last year had also cleared Lee of the charges.
"The Supreme Court ruling clears a layer of legal uncertainty, which could be a long-term positive for Samsung," said Ryu Young-ho, a senior analyst at NH Investment & Securities.
"It remains to be seen how directly and proactively he will engage going forward, but if the owner takes a more active role, it could allow management to focus more on long-term initiatives rather than short-term results," Ryu added.
Samsung Electronics shares were little changed after the ruling, up 1.7%.
The Supreme Court verdict was widely expected, but comes at a critical moment for Lee, who has faced mounting questions about his ability to lead Samsung Electronics — the world's top memory chip and smartphone maker.
Samsung's lawyers said they were "sincerely grateful" to the court for its decision and added in a statement that the ruling confirmed that the merger was legal.
Business lobby groups welcomed the court's decision, framing it as a stabilizing development for the South Korean economy.
The Korea Enterprises Federation said the ruling removes a major legal burden for Samsung and comes at a time of intensifying global competition in high-tech industries like AI and semiconductors as well as economic pressure from U.S. trade tariffs.
"Samsung's role as a leading South Korean company is more critical than ever," the group said in a statement.
The group said it hoped Samsung, under Lee's leadership, would step up investment and innovation, helping to create jobs and bolster South Korea's economic rebound.
For nearly a decade, Lee has faced legal challenges, including those from the merger that paved the way for his succession after his father, Lee Kun-hee, had a heart attack in 2014 that left him in a coma.
Park Ju-gun, head of corporate analysis firm Leaders Index, said Lee now faces dual challenges of tightening his grip on the conglomerate while steering Samsung back to leadership in key sectors.
"He must both defend Samsung's core businesses and find new growth engines, all while consolidating his control," Park said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
an hour ago
- Nikkei Asia
South Korean stocks plunge nearly 4% following US trade deal
South Korean stocks have been trading at high levels, fueled by optimism toward new President Lee Jae Myung's promises of stock market reforms. © Reuters LISA KIM and JADA NAGUMO TOKYO -- South Korean stocks slid on Friday due to investor concerns about the downsides of the country's trade deal with the U.S. and disappointment over a domestic tax reform plan. The benchmark KOSPI was at one point down 3.7%, hitting its lowest intra-day level since early July and extending losses from the previous day. Big tech names tumbled, led by SK Hynix's 5% drop. Samsung Electronics and LG Energy Solution were also trading lower.
Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
Trump embraces economic coercion with tariffs as his big stick
Back in January, a global survey found that India was the most upbeat of any nation about what a second Donald Trump presidency would mean for their country. They're likely having second thoughts now. Trump just dinged India with a 25% tariff rate — higher than many other Asian nations, though he's leaving the door open for last-minute haggling. He cited New Delhi's own trade barriers, but rebuked Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government over lots of other things too — including its BRICS membership, and close ties with Russia. "They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care,' he posted on social media. Trump is taking punitive tariff threats beyond the realm of trade and into other arenas — ramping up pressure on countries to bend to America's will, on matters from war to energy supplies. Trump road-tested the hardball tactic in his first term. Now he's taken it to new levels. The U.S. spent years accusing its chief superpower rival China of practicing "economic coercion' — a label that precisely describes what Trump is doing now. And from his perspective, it's working — especially with allies that depend on the U.S. for military protection. He's gotten the European Union, Japan and South Korea to meekly accept lopsided tariff terms, and customs revenue is pouring in. Whether all this will deliver a "golden age' for the U.S. economy — which has slowed since Trump took office — remains to be seen. So does the longer-term fallout for America's relationships with partners. India is far from the only case where Trump is wielding trade weapons for unrelated issues. He fired a shot across Mark Carney's bow after the Canadian prime minister said Wednesday that Canada plans to recognize a Palestinian state — in defiance of Israel and its chief backer, the U.S. "Wow!' Trump responded on social media. "That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them.' Trump said Thursday that the U.S. will put a 35% tariff on some imports from Canada after trade negotiations between the two countries broke down. The new rate represents an increase from the 25% tariffs Trump imposed in early March under an emergency law. 'Full power' While they call it leverage rather than coercion, Trump's team hasn't been shy about using America's economic and military might to extract concessions from allies and adversaries alike. "We've never had a president who wields the full power of the United States to negotiate good deals for our country,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday. "This is what maximum leverage looks like.' Stephen Miran, one of Trump's top economic aides, said earlier this month that since the U.S. has the world's biggest consumer market, it can force other countries to accept the cost of tariffs. Trump has backed away from some of his harsher tariff threats, and at other times he's set deadlines only to extend them — like he just did with Mexico — or indicate that bargaining can stretch past the cutoff date. Perhaps his most brazen intervention came during the BRICS summit in Brazil earlier this month. Trump first blasted the 10-member group's "anti-American policies' and threatened additional tariffs on any country aligning themselves with BRICS. Then he singled out the host nation, without so much as the pretense of addressing trade issues. Trump said he'd impose 50% tariffs on Brazil after demanding that it cease a "Witch Hunt' against his ally, former President Jair Bolsonaro, and criticizing steps taken against U.S. social media companies — matters that are the prerogative of Brazil's judiciary, not its government. He backtracked somewhat this week, allowing multiple exemptions and giving Brazil an extra week before the maximum tariff rate kicks in. Trump has given most U.S. partners until Aug. 1 to cough up or suffer additional tariffs, and there's been a flurry of trade agreements — often barely more than frameworks — hashed out ahead of the deadline. Under Trump's pressure, the European Union declined to use its trade heft and signed up to terms that were subsequently denounced by German and French industry. The Europeans were acutely aware that they still depend on the U.S. for weapons and security in the face of Russia's aggression in Ukraine. The pressure was there for British Prime Minister Keir Starmer too, when he traveled to not one but two Trump golf courses in Scotland last weekend to try and pin down the details of the U.K.'s framework deal of a few weeks earlier. He instead got a lecture on how British immigration was too lax, North Sea oil taxes were too high, and the U.K. was misguided to seek clean energy. Popular resistance To be sure, the U.S. has been applying economic pressures to get its diplomatic way since long before Trump entered politics. Successive presidents have piled on thousands of sanctions over the last couple of decades. Still, there's something new in Trump's approach. He's questioned the utility of sanctions — which can cut access to dollar-based finance, but risk a backlash against the greenback's global status, something Trump vows to protect. Instead, his weapon of choice is essentially the U.S. consumer. He's betting that other countries can't get by without selling stuff into the world's biggest economy. So far he can point to some significant successes. His tariffs are bringing in billions for the U.S. Treasury. Despite dire warnings from critics, the U.S. economy hasn't tanked — though there's been a marked slowdown this year — and the stock market, Trump's preferred gauge of sentiment, is setting fresh records. Meanwhile, only China has retaliated to tariffs in hardball style so far. Mexico has also pushed back to an extent, and got a reward on Thursday when Trump postponed tariff hikes for 90 days. There's been some resistance from Brazil and Canada too — and it's proved popular at home in both cases. President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva appears to be reaping the benefit of holding firm. He got a polling boost ahead of elections, while the U.S. exempted key Brazilian goods from the tariffs. Carney enjoys wide support for his opposition to the more egregious of Trump's charges. A broad if provisional conclusion from the upheavals of the past few months might be that Trump-style coercion gets results within the U.S.-led bloc, the jury's still out when it comes to large neutral countries like India and Brazil, and it may be less effective with adversaries. China, for instance, hit back hard with curbs on its sales of rare-earth elements — which are vital to advanced U.S. industries. Trump rapidly dialed back his highest China tariffs, as well as some export restrictions, and the countries have reached a kind of truce with talks ongoing. Equally, Trump's demands for a ceasefire in Ukraine haven't had much impact on Vladimir Putin. Trump's given him a deadline of Aug. 8 to strike a deal or face more economic pressure. There's no sign that this is affecting Moscow's conduct of the war, and the Russian army continues to advance.
NHK
an hour ago
- NHK
Trump signs executive order setting new tariff rates
US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Thursday, increasing tariffs on imports from dozens of countries, including Japan. The administration says the new rates will go into effect from midnight Aug. 7. The measure says the baseline tariff to be imposed on imports from Japan is 15 percent. That is the same rate that Japan and the US agreed on in their tariff negotiations last week. Japanese officials said at the time that US levies on Japanese automobiles would be 15 percent. That number is based on cutting a 25-percent rate in half to 12.5 percent and adding an already-existing 2.5 percent levy. But the latest executive order makes no mention of this. A uniform 10-percent tariff is currently being imposed on imports from Japan and other countries. Under the executive order, tariffs that the Trump administration originally threatened to impose on many countries and regions are adjusted lower.
