Revised £7.5m Leicester Market revamp plans submitted
Plans to transform the historic Leicester Market into a joint events and retail space have been submitted.Leicester City Council has put forward the first of two applications for approval, which details seating, planting, lighting and security measures for the city centre site.The second application, which is expected in the coming months, will set out the details for a new covered market structure.The authority submitted new proposals for a shared space after a backlash from traders over fears they would not be allowed to return to the 700-year-old marketplace.
Last year, work on the planned £7.5m revamp, which was announced in 2022, was paused following demolition work.The council said at the time the area opened up by the work could instead be used as a space for events.However, a consultation to return the market to its original location and create a new event space received "overwhelming" backing.The latest plans will see a smaller 48-stall market built adjacent to the existing food hall.Automated shutters would secure the market when it was not in use and it could be fully dismantled if the entire site was being used for an event.However, the council said the new covered market stalls would likely be for food vendors only, meaning other traders may need to find a new location.
According to planning documents, the authority hopes to use the square to create an "open and heritage-focused public realm at the heart of the city".The scheme will see views of the historic Corn Exchange building opened up, with new planting and lighting aimed at "enhancing" and focusing on heritage features."Bespoke perch seating" will also be installed throughout the site, documents stated.New security measures will be introduced, including retractable bollards to be installed at the edge of the market square.
The documents state: "Leicester's covered market has long been a defining feature of the city's civic and commercial life. "Located at the heart of the historic Market Place, it has for centuries served as a hub for trade, social gathering, and local commerce."However, in recent decades, the market has faced increasing challenges. "Trading conditions and the overall visitor experience declined, falling short of expectations for a modern, accessible city centre destination."The application said added: "The aim for the site is to create a more inclusive, resilient, and engaging city centre space, where heritage, community events, and public life can be enjoyed."A public consultation on the plans will run until 29 July, with a decision due to be made on 25 September.The regeneration of the market is expected to be completed by the end of 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Salford thrashed but hope for brighter days as financial situation improves
The start of a brighter future, or merely another false dawn? Only in the weeks to come will we know just what the latest developments off the field surrounding Salford Red Devils mean but on it these remain troubling and frustrating times. The irony cannot have been lost on any Salford fan who was inside the Totally Wicked Stadium on Sunday afternoon. Four months ago, they began their season at the same venue amid huge controversy, after the Red Devils chose to field their academy side and lost 82-0 in protest against the salary-cap restrictions placed upon them by the Rugby Football League. At the time there was debate about the merits of those restrictions but months later they remain in place – and with good reason. Since that day in February, Salford have been taken over but their financial troubles have continued, with debts mounting up, significant player sales and salaries being paid late. It is to the immense credit of the players and staff that they have turned up every week and performed with all of this hanging over their heads. Unsurprisingly, with star players sold and the club borrowing players from other clubs, they have been by some distance the weakest team in Super League in 2025, with just one win. Danny Richardson, the latest debutant here after arriving on loan from Hull KR, was the 54th player the head coach, Paul Rowley, has fielded in league and cup. Few would expect anything other than heavy defeat week after week, and that theme continued here as the Saints ran in 11 unanswered tries to win 58-0. This week, though, there was a chink of light off the field. It was entirely possible that Salford could have ceased to exist by Sunday had a winding-up petition filed against the club by HMRC for debts approaching £700,000 gone through. Instead, it was adjourned until September. Why? Salford have secured a bridging loan to the tune of £3m that will enable them to clear their debts to HMRC and the Rugby Football League, hopefully remove the salary-cap measures and open the door for what club sources insist is a multi-million-pound sum in a hedge fund that will be unlocked by the club's new owners once debts are settled. It is not an end to the problems, but respite if nothing else. It is a bizarre situation but given how there were fears Salford could have ceased to exist by Sunday, let alone this year, it is something to cling to. The pressure now falls on the ownership group, led by Sire Kailahi and Curtis Brown, to deliver after months of false promises. The Guardian understands that if those funds are released, the club will be handed over to someone to run it day-to-day and keep it sustainable. That man could be the former Red Devils chief executive, Paul King, who returned from gardening leave to help steward the club through this crisis – and who used his own money to pay the wages last month. Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion Salford's problems, though, are also Super League's. Having a team under special financial measures being heavily beaten every week is not a good look. This felt more like a training session for St Helens, but that is not the fault of the Red Devils' players or staff, who have acquitted themselves commendably throughout this crisis. There is every chance Salford, who were 12th last year in the IMG gradings which determine promotion and relegation, could be removed from the competition in the autumn if their score suffers as a result of the financial problems which have engulfed the club. There are Championship teams waiting to strike in 2026. But the onus must fall on the game to ensure its ownership tests are more stringent, and that players receive adequate welfare and support when financial strife hits. Salford's players, staff and supporters have been grossly failed this year. The sport should be embarrassed – not only by the look it creates for Super League, but for the toll it has taken on human beings who deserve much better. It must be hoped Salford have reached their nadir and they can look ahead with some level of optimism with this financial crisis finally behind them.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Car collection of late McLaren co-owner Ojjeh up for sale
LONDON, June 29 (Reuters) - A unique collection of 20 barely used McLaren road cars that belonged to the Formula One team's late co-owner Mansour Ojjeh is being put up for sale, with hopes one very wealthy buyer might keep it together. Classic and historic car dealer Tom Hartley Jnr announced on Sunday he had been appointed by Ojjeh's family to handle the sale, which could fetch more than $70 million. Hartley also oversaw the sale earlier this year of former F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone's collection of 69 historic grand prix and Formula One racers to Red Bull heir Mark Mateschitz. Ojjeh's collection includes the very last model of the McLaren F1 to be built, finished in a unique 'Yquem' colour that was subsequently renamed 'Mansour Orange' by McLaren and which has just over 1,800km on the clock. Only 106 of the McLaren F1 sportscars were made between 1992 and 1998 and a 1995 one that had done less than 390km sold for $20.4 million in a 2021 auction at Pebble Beach, California. All the other cars are in the same orange colour and all are the final chassis made of each model. Apart from the F1 and a P1 GTR, the cars are all unused and have been maintained by the manufacturer. Accompanying photographs showed them displayed at the Bahrain F1 circuit. "Mansour was a founding father of McLaren as we know it today," said McLaren Racing chief executive Zak Brown in a statement. "A massively passionate racer and automotive enthusiast and no bigger fan of McLaren. His collection is very special, I'm not aware of anything else that compares with it," added the American, who has his own impressive collection of cars. Ojjeh, a Paris-born Saudi businessman, succeeded his father as CEO of Techniques d'Avant Garde (TAG) and sponsored the Williams F1 team in 1979. He then took an ownership stake in McLaren in 1984, financing the development of TAG-Porsche engines that won two constructors' titles and three drivers' championships. Ojjeh, who died in 2021 at the age of 68, was a key figure in launching McLaren Automotive with Ron Dennis. "Being entrusted with the sale of Mansour Ojjeh's McLaren collection is akin to handling Enzo Ferrari's Ferraris or Ferdinand Porsche's Porsches," said Hartley. "This is the most significant McLaren road car collection ever assembled, and I sincerely hope it is acquired by a single buyer." ($1 = 0.7292 pounds)
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Our neighbour built TWO homes without planning permission... we're going to sit there with popcorn when they got bulldozed
Fuming neighbours are ready to 'buy popcorn' and watch from their windows if bulldozers move in to tear down two huge homes – after it emerged they were built without planning permission. The controversial semi-detached homes sprung up on the site of a former pub car park in Bradford, West Yorks, despite original planning permission having long since lapsed. Now locals are demanding action over the 'cowboy' development, which they claim towers over surrounding heritage cottages and damages the area's character. Residents have also called on council officials to make an example of rogue developers who flout planning laws and later seek retrospective approval. It comes as MailOnline this weekend revealed further cases in Bradford where developments were constructed without proper permissions. Helen Naylor, 50, said: 'People in Bradford build exactly what they like, when they like, how they like. And to hell with all rules and regulations. 'The council needs to get its act together because in Bradford, nobody seems to care. 'Cowboys come along, whack something up and just expect that the council will eventually sign it off. 'I think everyone around here has just had enough of it.' The homes appeared in just under a year on the site of the long-disused pub car park in the Heaton area of the city, with one listed for sale online as a five-bedroom, three-storey property. Although permission was granted in 2015 for a modest development, residents say that lapsed long before building began. Now, both homes face potential demolition if Bradford Council refuses to approve the scheme in hindsight. Neighbour Jane Loe, 68, said: 'It's quite funny in a way, but also horrible for those who live here. 'My neighbour and I said we're buying popcorn if and when they make them pull it down. 'We're going to sit out here and laugh.' Ms Loe, who lives opposite the new houses with husband Nick Swift, 76, described the builder's behaviour as 'outrageous'. She explained: 'The original design was unattractive but what they've actually built is even worse. 'We've watched them deviate from the plans in every way for the last year and a half. 'The build quality is terrible – we've seen people working with no helmets, no high-vis, no gloves. 'They even plugged power tools into a neighbour's living room and just ran a cable across the road. 'It's been a bunch of cowboys, basically. It's a monstrosity.' The developer, named in council documents as Amjad Yaqoob, reportedly believed the 2015 approval still applied when he purchased the land. He has claimed to have been unaware that the consent had lapsed. Bradford Council has confirmed that no valid permission was in place when the two homes were built. A decision on the retrospective application is expected in the coming weeks. Neighbours close to the new-build homes say they hope the council will take firm action. Eighty-year-old Janet Megson, who lives nearby with her husband Les, 76, said: 'The whole thing is an absolute disaster. 'I believe they didn't have planning permission but that doesn't seem to mean a thing these days. 'I want to see the council enforce the rules and bring it back to how it was. They should be forced to take the whole thing down. 'I don't know what sort of mentality the council planning department had in the first place to allow anyone to build on this site. 'There are little cottages round the back, it's narrow. There's nowhere to park. It's just out of character. It's out of place, altogether. 'I think anywhere else in the country, with something without permission like this, they'd immediately have to take the whole thing down. 'But I'm afraid round here, it's this sort of 'we'll go back to the planning department, and we'll see if there are amendments or compromises'. 'It's ridiculous.' Mr Yaqoob, who runs a building company in Bradford, declined to comment when approached by MailOnline. However, architects working on his behalf told Bradford Council that there was 'never any malicious intent to build something without approval', and claimed the development was 'very similar' to the previously approved plans. The firm added: 'The materials used are sympathetic to the area, and there are no additional issues of overlooking or overbearing. 'We therefore feel the retrospective application should be approved.' That assessment, however, brought short shrift when MailOnline visited the village. Angry NHS worker Jane Megson, 52, said the idea of letting the build remain was 'disgusting'. She said: 'It doesn't fit in, and the thought of retrospective planning, it's disgusting. 'Why do we bother having rules and regulations if they're just going to do what they like and then get retrospective planning? 'The council needs to make a show of these people and force them to take it down, to be honest. 'It's shocking the way they behave in Bradford, quite frankly. 'The thing that annoys me is that they, on the planning application, said it fits in with the surroundings. 'It does not fit in with the surroundings at all.' 'I really do hope they make an example because it's happening far too often in Bradford. 'People just do what they want and then put in the retrospective planning. Because the council can't be bothered, they just roll over and let them have their way.' Helen Naylor, who lives yards from the unapproved homes, added: 'I think it's absolutely disgraceful, but it doesn't surprise me in the least. 'People in Bradford build exactly what they like, when they like, how they like. And to hell with all rules and regulations. 'The council needs to get its act together because in Bradford, nobody seems to care.' Fran Jones, 60, joked that the houses looked ready to collapse. She said: 'I think they might blow down when the wolf blows on them. I don't think they've got foundations – I think they're built on a concrete slab. 'They stand out a mile and the finish is cheap. I feel sorry for the people in the heritage cottages behind it. It's so awful. 'We saw them building it and we were all shaking our heads going: 'I'll huff, and I'll puff and I'll blow your house down'. 'The fact that it's now come up with no planning permission is no surprise to any of us.' The developer's agents, P.N. Bakes Architectural Consultancy, argue that the homes are 'very similar' to the 2015 plans and say their client believed a 'material start' had already been made. Bradford Council say enforcement action will be 'reviewed' once a decision is made. A spokesman said: 'Our Planning Enforcement Team have investigated reports of these works being carried out without planning permission. 'As a planning application has now been submitted, the matter of enforcement will be reviewed once a decision on planning permission has been made, as is standard practice nationally.'
