Governor flexes amendatory veto power; tweaks several bills in final days of legislature
When House Bill 145, aimed at raising nonresident base hunting license fees from $15 to $100, moved through committee hearings, the legislation saw opposition from the Montana Outfitters and Guides Association who thought the increase 'drastic.'
Gov. Greg Gianforte agreed, and on Tuesday sent the bill back to the legislature with a recommended amendment for a more moderate increase — to just $50.
'Like the Montana Outfitters and Guides Association and other conservation groups, I support a modest increase of the nonresident base hunting license fee, but believe the increase from $15 to $100 is too great,' Gianforte wrote in his amendatory veto letter.
The shift from $100 down to $50 still represents a 230% increase from the existing license fee. Forty dollars of each fee goes to fund access programs for hunters, including the Block Management Program, and will generate an additional $2.5 million, according to projections from the governor's budget office.
The House and Senate on Thursday both approved of the governor's amendment.
'This has been a really entertaining bill,' Rep. Gary Parry, R-Colstrip, said on the House floor. 'It started out at 100, you go to committee, they drop it to 50, then it comes back from the Senate up to 100. I'm going 'Yeah, no,' I don't even know in committee which one I'm supposed to defend.
'Anyway, so the governor got it and he said 'No, gonna be 50,' and here we are complaining we got so much money in the budget, I'm trying to give him more money and he's taking it away. So, let's concur.'
Parry said he was concerned that if the House rejected the amendment, the governor would exercise one of the executive branch's check on legislative power and issue an outright veto.
Montana's governor has three versions of veto power over legislation that reaches his desk.
The most basic is the outright veto, when the governor decides, for any reason, that he does not agree with a bill passed by the Legislature. A two-thirds vote by both chambers — conducted as normal business if in session, by a mail poll after adjournment, or during a special session — can override a veto.
Gianforte also holds the power to issue individual line item vetoes in bills that appropriate state funds, while approving the bulk of the bill — a power shared by 44 state governors.
Line item vetos don't often receive much attention, as they often involve ensuring a budget is balanced, but a case in Wisconsin drew national attention in 2023 when Democratic Gov. Tony Evers removed a few words in a 158-page budget bill to increase school funding for 400 years, instead of the intended two.
Montana's governor can also recommend amendments to bills, officially called an 'amendatory veto.' Similar to amendments made in a legislative committee, altered bills must be approved by both chambers and then returned to the governor for final consideration.
If one or both chambers reject the amendments, the bill returns to the governor in its original form, where he could then opt to veto it outright. If only one chamber approves of the recommendations, a conference committee may be convened to hammer out the differences.
On Thursday, the House and Senate approved of the governor's amendments to several bills in addition to House Bill 145.
Changes to Senate Bill 45, which creates a judicial performance evaluation system for sitting judges, removed a section which would have added the evaluation information to the state's voter information pamphlet.
Amendments to a bill revising the Montana Heritage Preservation and Development Commission kept the legislature from reducing the number of members, while Gianforte amended a bill about reporting on the costs of fiscal legislation to be an annual, rather than bi-annual report.
According to a spokesperson for the governor's office, Gianforte has recommended amendments to seven bills this session.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
16 minutes ago
- New York Post
Brooklyn Democratic Party hacks' support of Zohran Mamdani is really about the next council Speaker and patronage
We had to laugh when everyone present tried to spin this week's Brooklyn stop on Zohran Mamdani's 'Five Boroughs Against Trump' tour as a dramatic show of Democratic Party unity, when it was plainly nothing more than an alliance of convenience with the Kings County's most prominent Dems conspicuously absent. Public Advocate Jumaane Williams insisted that the media needed to 'understand what's going on right now, because I don't think this group of people agree about nothing' — yet they still don't. Williams and other radicals (including supposed reformers) were basking in the glow of fellow-traveler Mamdani's primary triumph, but the machine politicians like Assemblywoman Rodneyse Bichotte Hermalyne, the county Democratic boss, were just trying to make sure their bread will still be buttered. Bichotte Hermalyne and her allies had endorsed ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the primary, obviously because he seemed the sure winner, but Andrew's political corpse wasn't even cold when she announced in a NY1 News interview her support for Mamdani in the general election. Beyond other patronage, she and her 'regular' Democrats are likely also hoping to cut some deal that nabs their faction the City Council speakership next year as a reward for jumping so quickly behind Mamdani. Not all pols are that squalid: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and other notable Brooklyn Dems very much did not turn out for the 'unity' farce. Then again, Jeffries and Schumer are actually working ceaselessly to counter Trump, not just posturing about it so they can avoid addressing other issues. The point is that these politicians (like others across town) are 'uniting' behind Mamdani because it serves their factional interests, not because they think he'll be good for the city. The Democrats who truly care about New York are conspicuous by their silence.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats Unveil Map Targeting California GOP House Members
(Bloomberg Government) -- Top Democrats released a draft congressional map Friday that may lead to Republicans losing five US House seats as Democratic leaders in the state push to offset possible GOP gains from redistricting in Texas. The California map released Friday by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee would imperil the 2026 re-election bids of California Republicans including Reps. Doug LaMalfa, Kevin Kiley, David Valadao, Ken Calvert, and Darrell Issa. It would also bolster some swing-district Democrats who won close 2024 elections. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain 'We will not stand by as Republicans attempt to rig the election in their favor and choose their voters,' Julie Merz, executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said in a statement. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said he will ask California voters to approve new congressional districts in a special election on Nov. 4 if Republican lawmakers in Texas go ahead with redrawing congressional maps in that state at President Donald Trump's urging. The governor was joined by other federal and state Democratic officials Thursday at an event to build support for the plan. Kiley, a leading Newsom critic who represents some Sacramento suburbs and Lake Tahoe, would receive Democratic voters in Sacramento now represented by Rep. Doris Matsui (D) and Rep. Ami Bera (D). Kiley said he expects voters will reject the Democratic proposal and will keep his district intact. 'We will defeat Newsom's sham initiative and vindicate the will of California voters,' he said in a post on X. The proposed map would shake up several races ahead of a June 2, 2026, primary election, likely spurring additional candidates to jump into newly competitive races while emboldening Democrats who have already launched campaigns targeting vulnerable Republicans such as Valadao, who represents a Central Valley swing district. The California map would also boost Reps. Adam Gray and Josh Harder, the only California Democrats from districts that favored Trump in 2024. Gray would receive voters in the Stockton area now represented by Harder, whose San Joaquin County-centered district would move westward to take in more Democrats from Contra Costa County. The top two finishers in each primary race, regardless of party, would face off in next November's general election. Democrats hold 43 of California's 52 congressional districts, which were drawn by an independent commission under a process approved by voters in 2010 that was meant to take power over redistricting away from politicians. Newsom is proposing to get around that process by asking voters to approve the new map directly. California lawmakers, who return from summer recess Aug. 18, will have until Aug. 22 to pass legislation with support from supermajorities in the Senate and Assembly to formally call for the election, according to the secretary of state's office. Assembly and Senate committees plan to hold Aug. 19 hearings on the redistricting plan. The map would only take effect if approved by California voters, and if Texas goes ahead with its redistricting plans, Newsom said. The redistricting commission would redraw the districts after the next census in 2030. Greg Giroux in Washington also contributed to this story. To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Oxford in Sacramento at To contact the editors responsible for this story: Bill Swindell at ; Loren Duggan at ; Cheryl Saenz at (Updates with comments from Merz and Kiley, and adds analysis of the changes in some key districts.) Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Twitter's Ex-CEO Is Moving Past His Elon Musk Drama and Starting an AI Company Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
USA Today
42 minutes ago
- USA Today
Notorious Nashville: Megan Barry made history, not all of it good
Megan Barry made history in 2015 as Nashville's first female mayor. Less than three years later, she again made history as the city's first mayor with a mug shot. You could say Megan Barry is a politician of firsts. She made history in 2015 when she was elected as Nashville's first female mayor. And then, less than three years later, she again made history as the city's first mayor with a mug shot. A once rising Democratic star seen as a contender for higher office, Barry's career imploded in a spectacular scandal that made national headlines for its tawdry details about an extramarital affair with her police bodyguard. The pair enjoyed late-night concerts, early-morning cemetery strolls and steamy hot yoga classes. They also racked up thousands of dollars in overtime on the taxpayer dime, and ultimately, felony theft charges. Barry's downfall sent shockwaves through a city that once put her approval rating over 70 percent. And it served as a cautionary tale for other lawmakers who might get carried away using public funds. Ultimately, Barry pleaded guilty to felony theft of property over $10,000 related to her affair with former police Sgt. Rob Forrest. As part of her plea agreement, she resigned as mayor and reimbursed the city $11,000 in restitution connected with her travel expenses with Forrest. Her criminal record was later expunged after completing probation. The pair, who were both married at the time, attended nearly a dozen city-funded trips by themselves, including conferences in Paris and Greece. Forrest, who racked up nearly $200,000 in overtime, also pleaded guilty to felony theft over $10,000 and was given probation. For many politicians, the story would have ended here. But Barry isn't one to give up. While in office, she lost her 22-year-old son, Max, to a drug overdose and was vocal about the heartbreak of the opioid crisis. She later went on to write a USA Today bestselling book called 'It's What You Do Next: The Fall and Rise of Nashville's First Female Mayor,' detailing her personal and professional struggles. In it she writes: 'At some point, all of us will be at our worst, and while some of us will be remembered for it, none of us should be defined by it.' Last November, she ran a well-funded campaign as the Democratic challenger to U.S. Rep. Mark Green, R-Tennessee. Barry ultimately lost to Green. The seat will soon be vacant as Green in June announced his early retirement, but Barry has said she won't run for it again. That doesn't mean it's not possible Tennessee could see more firsts from Megan Barry. The Tennessean is publishing a Notorious Nashville story for each year from 2000-2024. Catch up on the series here.
